Graph given values 1.3. Percentage of material retained between consecutive sieves.2. Report percentages to the nearest whole number, except if the percentage passing the75-um (No. 200) sieve is less than 10 %, it shall be reported to the nearest 0.1 %.3. Report the fineness modulus, when required, to the nearest 0.01.CUMULATIVECUMULATIVESIEVEAMOUNTAMOUNTPERCENT RETAINED,PERCENT PASSING(d)=100 - (c)93,84 2086,01 %8 3,40 %(c) (b)*100/TOTAL4.16 20SIZERETAINED, g (a)RETAINED,g (b)3333427513.99 ro10148914, 40 23016425347.20%52.80 2.39, 18 %o40. 822,90.4940733241001594859,5/ 2o2のの2050594.22 25.78 %PAN3/536100,00 %0,の 2。ТОTAL536[7] GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION GRAPH - AGGREGATE GRADATION CHART:. DATE1. PROJECTSIEVE ANALY SI S - US STANDARD SIEVE SIZE SBIZE es3EVE NUMBERHYCROVETER ANALYIE1/21418140212112:4102040100200100102070604070202010601001006020100.2D.1202D.010.0023.001GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERSEXCAVATION NUMBERBAMPLE NUVEERDn'DFOL DE ICRIFTICN-REMARCLASEIFCATION IUICSI2. TECHNICIAN 3 t4 PLOTTEC BY natue,6 CHECKED BY Srar.DD FORM 1207. DEC 1999FREVIOUS COIICN S 05SCLETEResetVIICHARTS AND GRAPHS

Sieve size Size in mm Amount retained Cummulative amount retained percent fineness 4 4.76 33 33…

1.3. Percentage of material retained between consecutive sieves. 2. Report percentages to the nearest whole number, except if the percentage passing the 75-um (No. 200) sieve is less than 10 %, it shall be reported to the nearest 0.1 %. 3. Report the fineness modulus, when required, to the nearest 0.01. CUMULATIVE CUMULATIVE SIEVE AMOUNT AMOUNT PERCENT RETAINED, PERCENT PASSING (d)=100 - (c) 93, 84 0 86,01 % 83,40 % RETAINED,g (b) (c)=(b)*100/TOTAL 4.16 0 SIZE RETAINED, g (a) 33 33 13.99 ro こカ 14 7ム 10 89 14. 40 2 164 47.20 % 52.80 % 39, 18 % 9.51 2 30 253 40 73 40.822 100 159 485 90.49 2 2のの 20 505 94.22 2 5.78% PAN 3/ 536 100,00 ro 0,00 % ТОTAL 536

1.3. Percentage of material retained between consecutive sieves. 2. Report percentages to the nearest whole number, except if the percentage passing the 75-um (No. 200) sieve is less than 10 %, it shall be reported to the nearest 0.1 %. 3. Report the fineness modulus, when required, to the nearest 0.01. CUMULATIVE CUMULATIVE SIEVE AMOUNT AMOUNT PERCENT RETAINED, PERCENT PASSING (d)=100 - (c) 93, 84 0 86,01 % 83,40 % RETAINED,g (b) (c)=(b)*100/TOTAL 4.16 0 SIZE RETAINED, g (a) 33 33 13.99 ro こカ 14 7ム 10 89 14. 40 2 164 47.20 % 52.80 % 39, 18 % 9.51 2 30 253 40 73 40.822 100 159 485 90.49 2 2のの 20 505 94.22 2 5.78% PAN 3/ 536 100,00 ro 0,00 % ТОTAL 536

Solid Waste Engineering

3rd Edition

ISBN:9781305635203

Author:Worrell, William A.

Publisher:Worrell, William A.

Chapter4: Mechanical Processes

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 4.11P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Two materials, A and B, are to be separated using two unit operations, 1 and 2. The feed has 10 tons/h A and 4 tons/h B. The split (fraction of material rejected by each operation) is given in Table P5-14. a. Which sequence of operations, (l?2) or (2?1), will yield the greatest recovery of material A? b. What will be the purity of material A using that sequence? c. What will be the efficiency of separation for the entire process train with regard to material A using the Worrell-Stesed equation?
In concrete work, Fuller and Thompson (1907) suggested that a dense packing of grains can be achieved if the percent finer (p) and grain size (D) are related by the following equation, where n is a constant varying in the range of 0.3-0.6. Dmax is the size of the largest grain within the soil. p=(DDmax)n100 This equation is sometimes used in roadwork for selecting the aggregates. a. For n = 0.5, show that the soil is well graded. b. If n = 0.5 and Dmax = 19.0 mm, find the percentages of gravel, sand, and fines within the soil. Use the Unified Soil Classification System.
According to Figure 5-20, is ii possible to completely separate one of the four materials from the other three? Explain your answer.
Given four different types of aggregates to be used to produce a blended aggregate for use in the manufacture of asphaltic concrete, determine the bulk specific gravity of the aggregate mix.
The results of a tensile test are shown in Table 1.5.2. The test was performed on a metal specimen with a circular cross section. The diameter was 3 8 inch and the gage length (The length over which the elongation is measured) was 2 inches. a. Use the data in Table 1.5.2 to produce a table of stress and strain values. b. Plot the stress-strain data and draw a best-fit curve. c. Compute the, modulus of elasticity from the initial slope of the curve. d. Estimate the yield stress.
A tensile test was performed on a metal specimen having a circular cross section with a diameter of 1 2 inch. The gage length (the length over which the elongation is measured) is 2 inches. For a load 13.5 kips, the elongation was 4.6610 3 inches. If the load is assumed to be within the linear elastic rang: of the material, determine the modulus of elasticity.
A tensile test was performed on a metal specimen with a diameter of 1 2 inch and a gage length (the length over which the elongation is measured) of 4 inches. The dam were plotted on a load-displacement graph. P vs. L. A best-fit line was drawn through the points, and the slope of the straight-line portion was calculated to be P/L =1392 kips/in. What is the modulus of elasticity?
A tensile test was performed on a metal specimen having a circular cross section with a diameter 0. 510 inch. For each increment of load applied, the strain was directly determined by means of a strain gage attached to the specimen. The results are, shown in Table: 1.5.1. a. Prepare a table of stress and strain. b. Plot these data to obtain a stress-strain curve. Do not connect the data points; draw a best-fit straight line through them. c. Determine the modulus of elasticity as the slope of the best-fit line.
What is the most common form of chemical degradation?
The data in Table 1.5.3 were obtained from a tensile test of a metal specimen with a rectangular cross section of 0.2011in.2 in area and a gage length (the length over which the elongation is measured) of 2.000 inches. The specimen was not loaded to failure. a. Generate a table of stress and strain values. b. Plot these values and draw a best-fit line to obtain a stress-strain curve. c. Determine the modulus of elasticity from the slope of the linear portion of the curve. d. Estimate the value of the proportional limit. e. Use the 0.2 offset method to determine the yield stress.
Three groups of students from the Geotechnical Engineering class collected soil-aggregate samples for laboratory testing from a recycled aggregate processing plant in Palm Beach County, Florida. Three samples, denoted by Soil A, Soil B, and Soil C, were collected from three locations of the aggregate stockpile, and sieve analyses were conducted (see Figure 2.35). (a) (b) Figure 2.35 (a) Soil-aggregate stockpile; (b) sieve analysis (Courtesy of Khaled Sobhan, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida) a. Determine the coefficient of uniformity and the coefficient of gradation for Soils A, B, and C. b. Which one is coarser: Soil A or Soil C? Justify your answer. c. Although the soils are obtained from the same stockpile, why are the curves so different? (Hint: Comment on particle segregation and representative field sampling.) d. Determine the percentages of gravel, sand and fines according to Unified Soil Classification System.