ABA 628 Week 1 SAFMEDS

docx

School

National University College *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

628

Subject

Statistics

Date

Feb 20, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

Uploaded by cdf10arr10

Week 1 SAFMEDS Figure 1.1 ABC Acquisition Standard Celebration Chart Chart 1.2 ABC Acquisition Raw Data

Figure 2.1 Acquisition Application Deck Report Chart 2.2 Acquisition Application Deck Report Timeline

Figure 3.1 Fluency Application Deck Report Chart 3.2 Fluency Application Deck Report Timeline Data Analysis Figure 1.1 shows the data collected for the week of January 8 th -14 th of me studying Deck 1 on SAFMEDS for ABA (Applied Behavior Analysis) 628. The Acquisition accel data for this week shows medium level, an upwards trend with no variability. Variability is hypothesized to remain the same in an upwards trend. The accel data point for this week shows I got close to meeting the AIM for deck 1 of week 1. Acquisition decel has low levels, no variability and no trend line from January 8 th -14 th . No change is necessary. Figure 3.1 shows the fluency data collected for the week of January 8 th -14 th . Fluency accel has medium level, an increasing trend with no variability. It is hypothesized that fluency accel will remain the same in an upwards trend continuing into the following week. Figure 3.1 also shows my fluency decel, has low

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

levels, no variability, and no trend line. It is hypothesized to maintain that trend as well. No necessary change is needed at this time. Study Approach and Adjustments: Antecedent : My goal for the week for my accel data was to reach 8-9 accel and 0 decel. As well as keep my SAFMEDS during the week (Monday- Friday). The reinforcer that I set for myself was having time to spend with my family on the weekend and going out with them. My study method since the beginning of my previous courses, was running my timings when I’m not over worked, and I am using a breathing video I use on my clients to relax myself before starting. I also must get my kids distracted before I begin any schoolwork, so I give them their tablet or have them coloring while I am doing schoolwork. I was able to run my timings this week during the week, and they also bounced from different times of the day since my schedule is not a set schedule. I was able to get close to my AIM this week, i did achieve my goal. I used my study deck to study for 5-10 min this week for my frequency deck. I needed a refresher. I would run the study mode from 15-20 minutes for the acquisition deck, I increase the studying time since this new deck, then run my timings. Behavior: At the beginning of week 1 I started off by running my frequency deck for 30 seconds and ran it 3 times a day for 5 days straight. I like to run the fluency deck first because those are the terms I already know and have had more time to learn those, so it was easier to do that deck first for the five days straight. Then after running the frequency deck, I would run my acquisition deck study mode first then run it for 30seconds, 5 times a day for 5 days straight on trial mode. For this deck I ran study mode for 15-20 minutes. After running my acquisition deck each day, I would go to precision X and enter my best of the day timing on the graph for the given day and time. (question this is what I usually write can I still use the above statement, or do I have to write the one from the checklist?) On day 1 of a run day, I run one 30-second timing and enter that data point in Precision X. On days 2 through 5, I run five 30-second timings, shuffle between each timing, and enter the best data point into Precision X. For my fluency deck, I run three 30-second timings and enter the last data point into Precision X. This is done for a minimum of 5 days. Consequence : Following my last timing, oi entered my best timing for my acquisition data onto Precision X immediately. I am looking at the data across the week and the deck to evaluate if the AIM will be met by and/or if there is variability in the data. According to my data I am on track to meeting the AIM by the end of week 2. My goal for week 1 was to get close to my AIM so around 8-9 cards by the end of the week. I was also able to keep my decel cards at a no trend. And I kept my SAFMEDS during the week this week, meaning I will have access to my reinforcer this weekend which is spending time with my

kids. No adjustments will be made for my acquisition deck nor my study method as I believe I found my rhythm. Adjustments: No adjustments necessary for my accel or decel for acquisition or frequency deck for week 1. The reason why I don’t need adjustments is because I found the rhythm of the way I have been studying. So, since my accel and decel have no variability, I don’t need to adjust at the moment. I try to keep my it low or no variability, to avoid having to adjust because the way I am studying helps me stay within the range that I wouldn’t have to make adjustments to the way that I study.