express summary comparison kd

docx

School

Walden University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

2001

Subject

Sociology

Date

Jan 9, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

Uploaded by ColonelIce3453

Dimanche 1 Kassandra Dimanche Article Summary Comparison Fall, 2023 - EXPRESS TERM II 10/23/2023 – 12/15/2023 HUSV 4157 (20) Health and Wellness Syllabus (Learning Contract) Dr. Hines 11/25/23 Article Summaries Comparison Words: 2,153

Dimanche 2 Articles Summary Comparison 1. Britton, L., & Pilnik, L. (2018). Preventing homelessness for system-involved youth. Juvenile and family court journal, 69(1), 19-33. 2. Davies, B. R., & Allen, N. B. (2017). Trauma and homelessness in youth: Psychopathology and intervention. Clinical psychology review, 54, 17-28. Article Summary Comparison of Article 1 and Article 2-There are many similarities and differ- ences between Article 1 and 2. Article 1 of my references proposes 3 strategies in going for a resolution towards preventing and eventual lying ending homelessness among the youth in the system. Article 2 is a journal article review, as well as Article 1, but Article 2 demonstrates more of mechanisms of psychopathology of runway youth when it comes to homelessness. In Article 2, the authors also conducted a systematic reviews of the state of the current literature on trauma-informed interventions for runaway homeless youth, which marks the main difference from Article 1. Moreover, Article 2 shows a demographic statistic and showed the prevalence of homelessness in that article wasn’t present in Article 1. Article 1 used a different research method that Article 2. Article 1 researched the efforts of the Coalition for Juvenile Justice and The American Bar Associated’s Homeless Youth Legal Network to determine their 3 strategies for resolutions to homelessness. Lastly, Article 2 sug- gests that the young people who are homeless are affected by anxiety disorders, substance abuse, bipolar and depressions and that these traumatic effects drives homelessness. Article 1 and Arti- cle 2 do not demonstrate any leading biases in their research that affects their results and find- ings. Both articles are reliable and give insight to the readers on how to cope with homelessness regardless of locale and environment.

Dimanche 3 3. Heerde, J. A., Bailey, J. A., Toumbourou, J. W., Rowland, B., & Catalano, R. F. (2020). Longitudinal associations between early-mid adolescent risk and protective factors and young adult homelessness in Australia and the United States. Prevention science, 21(4), 557-567. 4. Herbers, J. E., Cutuli, J. J., Fugo, P. B., Nordeen, E. R., & Hartman, M. J. (2020). Promoting parent-infant responsiveness in families experiencing homelessness. Infant mental health jour- nal, 41(6), 811-820. Article Summary Comparison of Article 3 and 4- There are many similarities and differences between Article 3 and 4. Article 3 and 4 provide insight on how to deal with the homelessness experience between family members and relatives. Article 3 uses many statistical methods to point out significant predictors of homelessness. As a result, there conducted a longitudinal study across 2 countries, Australia and United States. Article 4 doesn’t perform a study nor in- clude adolescent teens in their article. In article 3, there were cohorts (teen subjects) that were recruited at 7th graders and young adults in their early twenties. Article 3 is a powerful article because the methods and participants are very similar which means that the results of the study are reliable and trustworthy. Another major difference is that this article performed a study that spans over 12 years long. This article will automatically have accurate and reliable results be- cause it has long-term follow up and it has the most complete data in both countries at the same time points. Article 4 presents more of an opinion-based information and actually uses a frame- work process in that article. Article 4 provides a framework for observing different contexts and different influences that have an effect on young individuals, their development and adaptation to different life circumstances. Article 4 also gives a real perspective on the mental health of a child and the lack of parent-infants responsiveness and protection leaves them to be more vulner- able on the streets and are exposed to different stressors before even being full homeless. The author in Article 4 just used randomized controlled design across 3 family shelters in an inter-

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

Dimanche 4 vention to evaluate its effectiveness. Studies like this only provide results in a closed section of society and doesn’t represent a large difference. 5. Iwundu, C. N., Chen, T., Edereka-Great, K., Businelle, M. S., Kendzor, D. E., & Reitzel, L. R. (2020). Mental illness and youth-onset homelessness: A retrospective study among adults experiencing homelessness. International journal of environmental research and public health , 17(22), 8295. 6. Morton, M. H. (2020). The complex predictors of youth homelessness. Journal of adolescent health , 66(4), 381-382. Article Summary Comparison of Article 5 and Article 6- Both Article 5 and 6 are strictly jour- nals, however, they going about displaying their information differently. Article 6 is more of an editorial journal where he is giving his option on research data and then giving his assertions. Article 6, is less reliable and very one-sided. It provides all the complex predictors of youth homelessness in an a specific area in the United States. It doesn’t offer a more global or panoramic perspective on the topic just only on the what the complex predictors are in their per- spective. Article 6 shows tremendous bias and a limited amount of information. The complex predictors in Article 6 are poor relationships among the youth, early victimization and violence among youth, and early immersion into street culture which predisposes them to behavioral, emotional and social challenges. Article 5 has a very different approach. Article 5 demonstrates a retrospective study. A retrospective study denotes a study that usually interviews a group of people that have been exposed to something and then asking them about the events surround their circumstance and their history. In this article, the adults that are experiencing homelessness were asked about the initial timing of their homelessness. The two independent studies were in Dallas and Oklahoma. Article 5 concluded that 29.5% of homelessness reported mental illness as a reason for current homelessness. Overall, Article 5 offers a better understanding of these re-

Dimanche 5 lationships and serve a template on how to combat homelessness and better prepare agencies that serve youth and adults to address the risk factors and precursors to youth homelessness. 7. Oudshoorn, A., Dej, E., Parsons, C., & Gaetz, S. (2020). Evolving an evidence-based model for homelessness prevention. Health & Social care in the community, 28(5), 1754-1763. 8. Russell, M., Soong, W., Nicholls, C., Griffiths, J., Curtis, K., Follett, D., . .. Waters, F. (2020). Homelessness youth and mental health service utilization: A long-term follow-up study. Early intervention in psychiatry, 15(3), 563-568. Article Summary Comparison of Article 7 and Article 8- Both articles provide ample informa- tion on homelessness. Both articles are reliable and convey their message thoroughly and trans- parently. These are two very strong articles because in Article 7, many people like to operate through frameworks and educational models to figure out intervention and prevention models. Others like to figure out intervention and prevention matters through studies and literature re- views. In Article 7, the evidence based model gives the readers more tools and a more effective approach for homeless prevention. Article 7 produces more facts and also the authors have used different aged populations using the same model. The findings are somewhat similar in both ar- ticles. The readers and might enjoy because it just facts and/or information. Article 7 presents a step by step process that can be replicated. In Article 8, there less room for bias because it is a long-tern study. There is a big similarity between Article 8 and Article 3 from the beginning of this paper. Long-term studies or longitudinal studies are one in the same in that the author or re- search applies continuous or repeated measures follow particular individuals over prolonging pe- riods of time. Article 8 will have more vital information and a perhaps a repeat of the similar re- sults over a period of time which is beneficial in the long-term. The method of retrieving infor- mation was very different in Article 8 in that it was a retrospective, longitudinal study 60 partici- pants (30 homeless and 30 non-homeless). The results found that homeless had more frequent presentations and admission in to the ER for mental health reasons. Moreover, they were 11

Dimanche 6 times morel likely to be re-admitted to mental patient inpatient ward. Its more advantages to a long-term study with retrospective analysis because you can make practical statements based on statistical and reliable results. 9. Slesnick, N., Zhang, J., & Walsh, L. (2020). Youth experiencing homelessness with suicidal ideation: Understanding risk associated with peer and family social networks. Community mental health journal, 57(1), 128-135. 10. Giano, Z., Williams, A., Hankey, C., Merrill, R., Lisnic, R., & Herring, A. (2020). Forty years of research on predictors of homelessness. Community Mental Health Journal, 56(4), 692- 709. Article Summary Comparison of Article 9 and Article 10- Article 9 is a very interesting article. Article 9 and 10 are very different articles in that Article 9 is looking for a specific solution for youth experiencing homelessness that end up taking their own lives eventually or youth are ob- sessed with suicidal ideation. In Article 9, the study examined the relationship of social network characteristics, interpersonal risks and perceive social network among a small sample off 150 homeless youth who have reported suicidal ideation. The findings showed that having a per- ceived social network can be a protective against suicide but the results are conclusive enough. The sample size the study in Article 9 is too small and there are too many complex factors that need to be accounted for to create full-proof intervention targets to prevent future suicide at- tempts among this hight-risk group. Article 10 is basically an informational summary of 40 years of research on the predictors of homelessness. The predictors are runaway youths, youths from sheltered homes and youth from female headed families. Crime, unemployment, mental ill- ness are some of the results to these predictors. The main goal of Article 10 is to demonstrate the facts that can be used for evidence-based practices, be used for laws and policy and for further research. 11. Heerde, J. A., Bailey, J. A., Kelly, A. B., McMorris, B. J., Patton, G. C., & Toumbourou, J. W. (2021). Life-course predictors of homelessness from adolescence into adulthood: A

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

Dimanche 7 population-based cohort study. Journal of adolescence, 91, 15-24. 12. Muentner, L., Holde.r, N., Burnson, C., Runion, H., Weymouth, L., & Poehlmann-Tynan, J. (2019). Jailed parents and their young children: Residential instability, homelessness, and behav- ior problems . Journal of child and family studies, 28(2), 370-386. Article Summary Comparison of Article 11 and Article 12- Article 11 and Article 12 are similar in that both articles uses surveys, questionnaire, key observations for recording data. Both of these articles are not as biased as the articles in this paper. Article 11 is a population-based co- hort study. The conclusions of Article 11 showed that family conflict increases vulnerability of the youth and strengthens the case for primary, secondary and tertiary preventions programs in early adolescence. Article l2 used a smaller study of 165 jailed fathers and mothers with young children (2-6 ages) who had housing instability during the 12 months prior to incarceration and the child behavior problems. The more housing instability among the jailed parents, the more behavioral the children were. Its sad because the more recidivism between parents, its a large predictor and high risk for the children to have behavioral problems. Both articles have the same amount of opinion, which doesn’t affect the overall narrative. I believe that both Article 11 and 12 are reliable, and can be repeated and similar results and conclusions can be shown again con- sistently. 13. Wiewel, B., & Hernandez, L. (2021). Traumatic Stress and Homelessness: A Review of the Literature for Practitioners. Clinical Social Work Journal , 1-13. 14. Williams, A., Giano, Z., & Merten, M. (2019). Running away during adolescence and future homelessness: The amplifying role of mental health. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 89(2), 268. Article Summary Comparison of Article 13 and Article 14- The big similarities between Article 13 and Article 14 is that they have large samples. Article 13 is a journal article review for clini- cians and providers that treat homelessness in ER, CPEP centers. Article 13 has more opinions

Dimanche 8 than Article 14, which compromises the narratives. Article 13 asked for the providers to think trauma first when a possible homeless person comes to the ER/CPEP. That judgment call can be different among providers if there isn’t one set of data or system. Article 14 is more reliable be- cause it is large national study that represents a sample size of 8,560 you that are all identified as running away at least once in their lifetime. The youths age were between 13 and 17. With stud- ies like this, the results and conclusions are reliable and the whole narrative is more than likely true. Two conclusions that came out of Article 14 is that every single youth that runaway at least once in their life tripled their odds of become homeless by young adulthood. Moreover, the same single runaway youth with high mental health disease is 6 times more likely to experience homelessness!

express summary comparison kd

Related Documents