The Impact of Affirmative Action Policies on Diversity in Educational Institutions.edited

docx

School

University of Notre Dame *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

405

Subject

Sociology

Date

Nov 24, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

Uploaded by nkimanzi89

Running Head: THE IMPACT OF AFFIRMATIVE ACTION POLICIES ON DIVERSITY IN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS 1 The Impact of Affirmative Action Policies on Diversity in Educational Institutions Author Affiliation Course Instructor Date

The Impact of Affirmative Action Policies on Diversity in Educational Institutions 2 Abstract This essay explores the divisive discussion surrounding educational institutions' affirmative action practices. Using case studies and empirical data, it thoroughly analyzes the reasons for and against these policies. The possibilities of affirmative action programs to advance inclusion, diversity, and equal opportunity are carefully considered, along with their consequences and constraints. The study argues in favor of affirmative action by highlighting how the laws may be used to correct past injustices, promote diverse classrooms, and prepare students for a world that is becoming more and more interconnected. It also recognizes that further assessment and improvement are necessary to address any adverse effects, including stigmatization and reverse discrimination. Because it influences education and society, this argument is crucial. It makes people think critically about the quest for equal opportunity, social justice, and fairness. This study promotes a balanced approach that acknowledges the significance of affirmative action programs while being aware of their intricacies and changing social requirements as we traverse this challenging terrain.

The Impact of Affirmative Action Policies on Diversity in Educational Institutions 3 Introduction The assignment examines how affirmative action affects higher education diversity. It emphasizes the issue's intricacy and ramifications. The research examines how affirmative action rules affect schools from several viewpoints and statistics. Akhtari, Bau, and Laliberté (2020) analyze pre-college human capital and affirmative action, whereas Aygün and Bó (2021) study Brazilian affirmative action. Audits can assess US partiality, according to Anderson (2021). Dong, Liang, and Wanyin (2023) study board diversity's influence on corporate performance in varied organizational cultures, whereas Bowman and Weaver (2023) investigate undergraduate student results. Centralized admissions and low-income student access contribute to educational inequity, according to Mello (2022). The paper promotes a balanced approach that recognizes affirmative action's role in addressing past injustices but asks for continuing evaluation and revision to build inclusive educational environments for all stakeholders. Literature Review Affirmative action policies in education have been the subject of much research, discussion, and empirical data in the literature. This section attempts to give a thorough analysis, considering the arguments for and against affirmative action in educational settings and providing pertinent data from earlier research projects. Arguments For Affirmative Action : Affirmative action rules have been implemented to promote diversity in higher education and right past wrongs. This viewpoint is furthered by Akhtari, Bau, and Laliberté (2020), who emphasize the importance of pre-college human capital in the context of affirmative action. Their findings highlight the possibility that these measures might give those who may have been

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

The Impact of Affirmative Action Policies on Diversity in Educational Institutions 4 historically disadvantaged chances. Additionally, Aygün and Bó (2021) highlight the significance of addressing privilege gaps in college admissions by illuminating the multifaceted nature of advantage. Their analysis of the Brazilian affirmative action case sheds light on the efficacy of laws that consider privilege in various contexts. Arguments Against Affirmative Action : There is no one side in the affirmative action discussion. Opponents contend that there are better ways to achieve diversity than these regulations or that they might have unforeseen repercussions. Anderson (2021) talks about how discrimination audits might be used to examine the possible adverse effects of affirmative action. This method critically analyzes the potential problems and difficulties related to such policies. Relevant Scientific Evidence : Referring to prior research is essential for conducting an empirical assessment of the effects of affirmative action legislation. Mello (2022) explores the connection between affirmative action, centralized admissions, and low-income students' access. This study offers insightful information on how these regulations may affect impoverished people's ability to obtain higher education. Bowman and Weaver (2023) add to the body of knowledge by investigating how diverse experiences affect the results of undergraduate students. Their findings provide subtlety to the current discussion and offer empirical evidence of the advantages of various learning contexts. Furthermore, Dong, Liang, and Wanyin (2023) provide an alternative viewpoint by investigating the effect of board diversity on company performance. This study highlights the broader consequences of diversity in various organizational situations, even if it is not immediately tied to educational institutions.

The Impact of Affirmative Action Policies on Diversity in Educational Institutions 5 Nkomo et al. (2019) offer fresh theories within the larger framework of diversity that advance our comprehension of variety as a multifaceted phenomenon. This theoretical paradigm adds valuable insights to the debate over affirmative action laws. Affirmative action policies in education have been the subject of much research, with both pro and con arguments. The references included give various viewpoints and factual data to contribute to the current discussion on how these policies affect educational establishments. We must consider this abundance of research as we move forward in this article to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the topic. Argumentation in Favor of Affirmative Action Examining affirmative action policies' beneficial effects on diversity and inclusion in educational institutions is crucial to arguing in their favor. This section will provide strong opinions backed by examples from earlier research and scientific proof. Promotion of Equal Opportunity : Affirmative action programs' promotion of equal educational opportunities is one of its primary justifications. Akhtari, Bau, and Laliberté (2020) stress the significance of these regulations in ensuring fairness for those who might have had disadvantages in the past. These rules try to give underrepresented groups a fair shot by considering variables other than test results or grades. Enhancement of Campus Diversity : Policies about affirmative action play a significant role in enhancing campus diversity. The Brazilian affirmative action case studied by Aygün and Bó (2021) provides an example of how multidimensional privilege considerations in college admissions might lead to a more

The Impact of Affirmative Action Policies on Diversity in Educational Institutions 6 diverse student body. A varied student body fosters an atmosphere where students are exposed to a wide range of ideas and experiences, which enhances the learning process. Improved Learning Outcomes : Undergraduate student achievements are positively impacted by multicultural experiences, according to research by Bowman and Weaver (2023). Interactions between students from different origins help them develop critical thinking abilities, cultural competency, and insightful perspectives. These encounters result in improved learning outcomes, such as improved problem-solving skills and heightened global awareness. Addressing Systemic Disparities : Affirmative action measures are essential to overcome the structural gaps that continue to exist in educational institutions. Mello (2022) investigates the connection between low-income students' access and centralized admissions. In the end, these policies can help create a more equitable society by assisting in removing obstacles that keep underprivileged populations from obtaining higher education. Preparation for a Diverse Workforce : Future workers will comprise a more diversified workforce. The study conducted by Dong, Liang, and Wanyin (2023) emphasizes the importance of diversity in organizational settings about board diversity and company performance. Policies about affirmative action equip students with the skills necessary to collaborate with people from different backgrounds in the real world. Promotion of Inclusivity :

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

The Impact of Affirmative Action Policies on Diversity in Educational Institutions 7 A fundamental tenet of affirmative action programs is inclusivity. New ideas are presented by Nkomo et al. (2019) to help comprehend variety as a multifaceted phenomenon. These ideas stress the importance of establishing inclusive settings where everyone is respected and encouraged to share their distinct viewpoints. Policies based on affirmative action are one way to accomplish this inclusion. Ensuring Fairness and Social Justice : Fairness and social justice are values that are consistent with affirmative action. It aims to address systematic inequality and historical injustices. According to Yu and Cheung (2022), affirmative action is consistent with fairness since it strives to establish a more equitable society where opportunities are dispersed more equally across all facets of society. Scientific data provides a strong justification for affirmative action measures. Equal opportunity, campus diversity, learning outcomes, structural inequities, preparation for a diverse workforce, inclusion, fairness, and social justice are promoted. Ultimately, these regulations help create a more varied and equal educational environment, which is advantageous to both people and society at large. Argumentation Against Affirmative Action Counterarguments against affirmative action measures must critically assess potential adverse effects and critiques and be backed up by case studies and scientific data. The main counterarguments will be discussed in this section to present a fair analysis. Reverse Discrimination : Affirmative action is sometimes criticized for creating the possibility of reverse discrimination, in which applicants who do not belong to historically underrepresented groups may be mistreated during the admissions process. In addressing this issue, Anderson (2021)

The Impact of Affirmative Action Policies on Diversity in Educational Institutions 8 emphasizes that auditing discrimination might uncover situations where these regulations negatively impact people. Merit-Based Admissions : Affirmative action critics contend that it might jeopardize merit-based admissions by allowing students who meet fewer academic or otherwise requirements to be admitted. This is especially important to consider in highly competitive educational settings. It is critical to consider how these rules could affect general academic standards. Stigmatization and Stereotyping : Affirmative action laws may unintentionally promote stigmatization and stereotyping. These regulations may cause students to be seen as less capable or receiving exceptional care, hurting their interactions with other students and their sense of self in the classroom. Potential Mismatch : According to research by Bowen and Weaver (2023), there may be a mismatch between the academic standards of institutions and students accepted under affirmative action laws. Admitting students to universities where they find it challenging to fulfill the prerequisites might result in less-than-ideal better learning environments and outcomes. Alternative Approaches : Critics contend that different strategies, such as selective assistance for poor students or admissions decisions based on socioeconomic status, would be more successful in resolving inequalities in educational access. The effectiveness of affirmative action as a strategy for attaining fairness is called into doubt by Mello's (2022) research on centralized admissions and access for low-income students.

The Impact of Affirmative Action Policies on Diversity in Educational Institutions 9 Legal Challenges : The implementation and efficacy of affirmative action measures have been further complicated by legal challenges that they have encountered in some jurisdictions. Court cases have the potential to take resources and focus away from the main objective of advancing inclusion and diversity. Complexity of Implementation : The administration and implementation of affirmative action laws can take time and effort. As Aygün and Bó (2021) point out, privilege has several dimensions, complicating the evaluation of applicants. It might not be easy to guarantee that these regulations are applied fairly and consistently. Unintended Consequences : Affirmative action critics contend that unintended repercussions of the policy might include recipients developing a sense of entitlement or reliance. This may compromise the overarching objective of promoting empowerment and self-reliance. Affirmative action laws have supporters and have been instrumental in advancing inclusion and diversity, but they are not without their detractors and difficulties. To eliminate educational inequality, it is crucial to have a thoughtful conversation that considers any potential downsides and looks into alternate strategies. Their efficacy should be continuously assessed to ensure that these policies accomplish their intended aims while limiting unfavorable effects. Discussion The justifications that support affirmative action laws highlight how they might advance inclusion, diversity, and equal opportunity in educational settings. These laws have been crucial

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

The Impact of Affirmative Action Policies on Diversity in Educational Institutions 10 in correcting past injustices and giving previously underprivileged populations chances. However, it is essential to consider the limits of the available data and recognize the ramifications of these arguments. Implications : The effects of affirmative action laws on academic institutions and society can be profound. They help create inclusive and varied learning environments where students from different backgrounds can engage and share knowledge. This diversity helps children think critically, comprehend people from other cultures, and prepare them for a future where everything is interrelated. Furthermore, affirmative action is consistent with social justice and fairness values by addressing structural prejudice and past injustices. It can result in more equal access to education and assist in removing obstacles preventing underrepresented groups from moving further. Limitations of Existing Evidence : Despite the strength of the evidence supporting affirmative action, it is essential to recognize its limits. The effects of these policies differ significantly based on specific circumstances, such as the institution, the area, or the demographics. The multifaceted nature of privilege, as examined by Aygün and Bó (2021), complicates policy application. It can be difficult to fairly and thoroughly evaluate benefits, and the results of these evaluations can differ widely. In addition, some detractors express worries about unforeseen outcomes that can occur, such as stigmatization or reverse discrimination, which current studies might not adequately address. These possible downsides are still being researched. Therefore, it has to be looked at more. Affirmative action measures are essential in remedying historical injustices and promoting

The Impact of Affirmative Action Policies on Diversity in Educational Institutions 11 diversity and inclusion in educational institutions. However, their applicability and consequences vary depending on the situation and are intricate. Even if the data now available indicates that these policies have a beneficial influence, further study is required to address their shortcomings and improve their application to accomplish the intended objectives of equity and equal opportunity. Conclusion This essay has examined the complex discussion around affirmative action practices in higher education. Considering their ramifications and limits, we argued for and against these measures. Affirmative action measures are crucial to rectify past injustices, foster inclusion, diversity, and equal opportunity, and prepare students for a varied society. Our stance acknowledges the necessity for continual review and improvement while supporting the application of affirmative action laws. Redressing past injustices and promoting an inclusive learning environment depends heavily on these measures. Nonetheless, its application must be mindful of possible adverse effects, such as reverse discrimination, and constantly modified to meet changing societal demands. Its influence on education and society makes this argument important. It compels us to consider justice, fairness, and the most effective ways to attain equal opportunity. Affirmative action policy study and discussion are essential as we negotiate this rugged terrain to guarantee that our educational institutions keep improving toward greater justice and inclusion.

The Impact of Affirmative Action Policies on Diversity in Educational Institutions 12 References Akhtari, M., Bau, N., & Laliberté, J. W. P. (2020). Affirmative action and pre-college human capital (No. w27779). National Bureau of Economic Research. Anderson, J. (2021). Studying Discrimination Using Audits. Available at SSRN 3828620 . Aygün, O., & Bó, I. (2021). College admission with multidimensional privileges: The Brazilian affirmative action case. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics , 13 (3), 1-28. Bowman, N. A., & Weaver, K. E. (2023). 21. The impact of diversity experiences on undergraduate student outcomes. Research Handbook on the Student Experience in Higher Education , p. 296. Dong, Y., Liang, C., & Wanyin, Z. (2023). Board diversity and firm performance: Impact of ESG activities in China. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja , 36 (1), 1592-1609. Mello, U. (2022). Centralized admissions, affirmative action, and low-income students' access to higher education. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy , 14 (3), 166–197. Nkomo, S. M., Bell, M. P., Roberts, L. M., Joshi, A., & Thatcher, S. M. (2019). Diversity at a critical juncture: New theories for a complex phenomenon. Academy of Management Review , 44 (3), 498–517. Rose, E. K. (2023). A constructivist perspective on empirical discrimination research. Journal of Economic Literature , 61 (3), 906–923. Williams, J., Alexander, K., Wilson, T., Newton, B., McNeil, C., & Jung, C. (2021). A Better Future: Transforming jobs and skills for young people post-pandemic. Institute for Employment Studies, Report , p. 568 .

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

The Impact of Affirmative Action Policies on Diversity in Educational Institutions 13 Yu, C. H., & Cheung, K. T. (2022). Rethinking the Dworkinian Forward-Looking Approach: Is Affirmative Action Compatible with Fairness? Humanities Today: Proceedings , 1 (1), 1- 15.

The Impact of Affirmative Action Policies on Diversity in Educational Institutions.edited

Related Documents