Article Critique_ Part 2 QUESTIONS 3-6

pdf

School

Ball State University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

630

Subject

Sociology

Date

Jun 18, 2024

Type

pdf

Pages

4

Uploaded by PurpleTurtle48

Report
Article Critique: Part 2 QUESTIONS 3-6 Question 4 3 / 3 pts What are the independent variables? It is ok to list the independent variables. An explanation is not needed for this question Your Answer: The independent variables include the following: Conditions/Phases Baseline Pairwise Functional Analysis (FA) conditions (control, tangible test) Initial FCT evaluation Prompting procedures (e.g. prompt delays, fading) Question 5
5 / 5 pts Are the independent variables clearly defined? Consider the procedural details, procedural fidelity, and measures of social validity. Explain your rationale using citations from the textbook. Your Answer: The study defines the independent variables, which include the distinct treatment conditions/phases and prompting processes. The offered procedural details are sufficient. In addition, the assessment includes indicators of procedural fidelity and social validity. Procedural Details: Detailed descriptions are provided for each condition, such as the baseline, pairwise FA, NCR alone, NCR + FCT, NCR + FCT with contingent delivery, etc. For example, for the NCR + FCT condition. Cooper et al. (2020) underscore the significance of such comprehensive procedural particulars in facilitating replication and establishing the independent variable's independence. Procedural Fidelity: Remote coaching was provided to caregivers from an adjacent room to verify that they appropriately implemented the protocols. This suggests that measures were likely made to guarantee that the procedures were followed accurately, although no precise data on fidelity were recorded. Social Validity: The participant's primary caregiver was provided with a social validity questionnaire that was modified from the one used by Elliott and Treuting (1991). Data on acceptability were collected using both qualitative and quantitative methods, including the Likert scale.According to Cooper et al. (2020), evaluating the social validity of goals, processes, and impacts is a crucial step in assessing if the benefits of executing the procedures outweigh the associated costs. To summarize, the independent variables are properly stated and accompanied by procedural explanations. In accordance with the guidelines set forth by Cooper et al.
(2020), this study incorporates assessments of procedural fidelity (remote coaching) and social validity (caregiver questionnaire). Question 6 4 / 4 pts Based on the information provided, can you implement this study in your practice? What additional information is needed? Explain your rationale using citations from the textbook. Your Answer: Given the comprehensive information presented in this article, I am certain that I can apply most of the fundamental methods outlined in this study. However, additional clarification/information would be beneficial to do such. Below, I will list the necessary details. Information Provided That Allows Implementation: 1. Clear operational definitions of all dependent variables (Cooper et al., 2020) 2. Detailed descriptions of procedures for each condition/phase (Cooper et al., 2020) 3. Prompting procedures and schedules described (Cooper et al., 2020) 4. Remote coaching procedures explained (Cooper et al., 2020) Additional Information Needed:
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
1. Provide explicit instructions and materials for collecting data, such as data sheets and recording processes that go beyond merely the measurement instrument. This will ensure an established structure for future interventions. 2. Enhancing the caregiver training procedures by providing additional information on the initial training for implementing the program would facilitate replication. 3. The study by Cooper et al. (2020) does not provide any information regarding the specific data obtained on procedural fidelity, despite remote coaching suggesting the use of fidelity measures. All things considered, the degree of procedural information offered would enable me to carry out the essential treatment elements. However, some of the finer implementation details required for complete procedural reliability are missing. Cooper et al. (2020) stress the importance of providing a thorough account of techniques in order to facilitate replication and show a cause-and-effect relationship between the independent and dependent variables. By obtaining further clarification, I would be able to more accurately reproduce this study in real-world scenarios. Quiz Score: 22 out of 20