653 Religion Week 1
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
University of Houston, Downtown *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
3301
Subject
Religion
Date
Apr 3, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
2
Uploaded by LieutenantProtonGerbil37
Parables can be interpreted in many forms and meaning (Buecher, 1977). “Interpretation describe the process of reading the parables well as that of constructing a “second narrative” or story to make sense of the first narrative of the parable (Steinmetz, p, 1, 2003). The interpreter’s lenses play a major role in the construction of meaning. The story of Joseph is profound. Joseph was destined to be a great leader. He overcame betrayal, exile, torment, and hatred. During these surmountable obstacles, he remained focused on God’s promises and plan for his life. With confidence and strength, he endured. Steinmetz (2003) explicitly discussed the “second narrative” of interpretation and how it functions. Anderson (2003), then, serves as an exemplar of this type of interpretation with his reading of Joseph vis-à-vis Jesus. The beginning narratives from Anderson (2003) focused on various events around Joseph’s, his family, jealousy, plots, and betrayal. Yet, the story does not end with the first narrative. As the dramatic sequence of events continue the second narrative plays out. “The election of Abraham as the father comes at a cost” (Anderson, p. 200, 2003). Elections don’t necessary collaborate with “unending blessing” however, “it means being chosen
to give up one’s all for God” (p. 204). Joseph’s story is of his death and faith the overcome through resurrection. The second narrative focuses on the power and passion of redemption, forgiveness, and love. Trusting God’s word and promises beyond negativity and life trauma is critical.
“The loss of Joseph is a type of death; his return, as ruler of Egypt, a type of resurrection in glory. Like the apostles, Jacob is dumbfounded”
(Anderson, p. 208, 2003). Life from death is a pattern in genesis. Anderson utilizes the hurt, lies, humiliation, betrayal of Joseph’s brothers and later overcoming spirit to uncovered the second narrative. In
contrast, Steinmetz uses mystery to explain the second narrative. “The narrative is crisp, clear, and explains in considerable details what was really occurring while
the larger narrative is unfolding” (Steinmetz, p. 54, 2003). Furthermore
, for Steinmetz, Christ is the detail that helped to reveal the second narrative that underlies the entire biblical drama. I would say Anderson’s account of Joseph’s life events, his belief in God, and willingness
to forgive those who sinned against him is persuasive. The writing presents reason (Elect/Non-
Elect) and examples to support Joseph’s actions. Understanding interpretation consists of construction of meaning in text (Steinmetz, 2003). The interpreter’s lenses play a major role in the construction of meaning. Anderson’s methodology can be considered credible in his accounts
of Joseph’s life and decisions. References
Anderson, G. (2003). Joseph and the passion of our Lord. In E. Davis & R. Hays (Eds.),
The art of reading scripture
(pp. 198-215). Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing.
Buechner, F. (1977).
Telling the truth
(p. 63). New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Steinmetz, D. (2003). Uncovering a second narrative. In E. Davis, & R. Hays (Eds.),
The art of reading scripture
(pp. 54-68)
.
Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help