Personality trait

docx

School

Minnesota State University, Mankato *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

RESEARCH P

Subject

Psychology

Date

Nov 24, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

5

Uploaded by alexgkarasinga

Report
Personality traits, self-discovery, and insights Results of my personality test on the big five project personality test
The results accuracy I believe the results are very accurate and reliable. Comparing the results with my self- perception and feedback from people who know me well, I am certain they align with them. This is because I keenly answered the questions and heeded the instructions to ensure I received very reliable results. It is important to note that the accuracy of the Big Five personality test results varies depending on the quality of the test and how honestly and accurately the individual responds to the questions (Outofservice, 2023). I came to this conclusion because the conclusions drawn from the test results are based on established psychological research on the Big Five personality traits. The OCEAN model is widely recognized and extensively studied, so the results have a solid foundation. I, therefore, acknowledge that various factors, such as mood, self-perception, and social desirability bias, can influence the self-report personality tests. Still, I am certain the provided results are correct. Something that surprised me I was quite surprised by my agreeableness score. I scored 50% on agreeableness, meaning I fell in the middle range of the trait. Notably, I recognize that People who score high in agreeableness tend to be good-natured, sympathetic, forgiving, and courteous. On the other hand, individuals who score low in agreeableness tend to be more critical, rude, harsh, and callous (Riggs, 2015). Being in the middle range indicates that I possess a balanced approach to agreeableness; I neither exhibit extreme forgiveness nor extreme irritability. This suggests that I can be understanding and empathetic towards others while also being able to express my opinions and assert myself when necessary. Previously I thought I exhibited agreeable qualities, but the results have shown me otherwise, which is not a bad trait at all anyway.
Examples of how my traits play out I scored highly on open-mindedness. This suggests that I will likely be open to new experiences, curious, and creative. This manifests as a willingness to explore different ideas, perspectives, and activities in my daily life. I also enjoy seeking new information, engaging in creative pursuits, and being receptive to alternative viewpoints. My open-mindedness also contributes to my ability to think outside the box, solve problems creatively, and adapt to change more easily. I equally scored relatively high in Conscientiousness. This gave the impression that I would likely be reliable, well-organized, and self-disciplined. In my daily life, this translates to punctuality, meeting deadlines consistently, and maintaining a structured approach to tasks and responsibilities. Therefore, I have a strong work ethic, pay attention to details, and always strive for excellence in my endeavors. My Conscientiousness also contributes to my ability to plan and prioritize effectively, leading to greater productivity and success in my personal and professional pursuits. Article on open Mindedness Kwong's (2019) piece is titled Cultivating Open Mindedness. It considers open- mindedness as both an epistemological and a moral virtue. Historically, open-mindedness has been regarded as advantageous for learning truth, information, and understanding. It also fosters social solidarity, respect, and consideration for others. However, this favorable outlook on open- mindedness has been criticized. The paper recognizes that an indiscriminate position of openness can harm our epistemic and moral well-being, especially in a world with fake news, attacks on truth, and deliberate lies. The symposium's authors, Howard Curzer, Jessica Gottlieb, and Matt Ferkany, investigate the potential dangers of over-open-mindedness and recommend solutions to
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
alleviate those dangers. According to the information in the article, the essay digs into the difficulties of open-mindedness and emphasizes the necessity for judgment. While open- mindedness can be beneficial in some contexts, it can also lead to accepting erroneous information or destructive views. This article has two consequences for my experiences. For starters, it emphasizes the necessity of critical thinking and analyzing information from credible sources, particularly in today's information-saturated environment. It reminds people to be skeptical and not believe everything they encounter (Riggs, 2015). Second, the text proposes that open-mindedness be balanced with logic and understanding potential dangers. Individuals can create a more informed and discriminating approach to open-mindedness by critically examining ideas and being aware of biases and underhanded methods. The knowledge in this article can be used to improve one's capacity to negotiate the difficulties of open-mindedness in the future. It promotes critical thinking abilities, fact-checking habits, and a grasp of cognitive biases. People can maintain a healthy level of open-mindedness while shielding themselves against disinformation and manipulation.
References Kwong, J. M. C. (2019). Cultivating Open‐Mindedness . https://philpapers.org/rec/KWOCO Outofservice, (2023). The Big Five Project Personality Test. https://www.outofservice.com/bigfive/results/? o=81,63,81&c=69,63,56&e=50,81,63&a=81,63,44&n=75,44,50&y=1990&g=m Riggs, W. D. (2015). Open-mindedness, insight, and understanding. In Intellectual virtues and education (pp. 18–37). Routledge. https://books.google.co.ke/books? hl=en&lr=&id=f2JACwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA18&dq=open+mindedness&ots=xqeOxv 4e0i&sig=__1S-JvqweucOnPIyQsQzqtCwKA&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=open mindedness&f=false