PSY 831 Topic 8 Discussions

docx

School

Walden University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

831

Subject

Psychology

Date

Nov 24, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

5

Uploaded by UltraProton10071

Report
PSY 831 Topic 8 Discussions Topic 8 Q1 The interactional approach to understanding personality development and its influence on performance success recognizes the dynamic interplay between individual traits and the environmental context. Social and cultural norms are crucial in determining how personality traits manifest and are perceived in the context of gender differences. Conventional gender roles frequently impose particular standards on behavior, impacting the value or stigma attached to particular traits according to one's gender (Subotnik et al., 2019). Men may be socially accepted and even encouraged to be assertive and competitive, for instance, while women may be expected to display nurturing or empathic qualities. These gendered expectations affect how personality traits are expressed as well as how they are assessed in relation to performance, which may have an impact on opportunities and recognition (Rumsey, 2020). In this particular context, the interactional framework requires a sophisticated comprehension of the ways in which cultural norms interact with unique personality traits, acknowledging the intricacies that surface in evaluating the influence on performance success for both genders. Furthermore, it is critical to take into account the particular difficulties and demands that people of different genders encounter when examining the interactional dynamics of personality and situational factors. Men and women may experience different situational factors in the societal context that interact differently with their personality traits. For example, gender stereotypes about leadership abilities, work-life balance expectations, and gender biases may affect women's experiences in performance settings. To understand how gender-specific norms influence the interactions between personality and situational determinants of success, it is necessary to analyze this relationship within the larger framework of society (Anaya & Pérez-
Edgar, 2019). A thorough comprehension of these relationships is necessary to promote a fair and inclusive atmosphere that honors and values the various contributions made by people of all genders in the area of performance and accomplishment. Traditional gender stereotypes can have an impact on how particular personality traits manifest in a variety of cultures. Men may be more socially accepted or even expected to be aggressive and competitive, for instance, while women may be encouraged to display qualities like nurturing and teamwork (Anaya & Pérez-Edgar, 2019). These cultural expectations may affect how people behave and react in different performance settings. Furthermore, gender biases may impact opportunities, recognition, and advancement by influencing how personality traits are perceived and evaluated in relation to performance success (Rumsey, 2020). Therefore, a nuanced investigation of the intersections between individual traits and societal norms within particular performance contexts is necessary to understand the differential impact of situational factors and personality on success for men and women. In addition, because of societal roles and expectations, the nature of situational factors itself may be different for men and women. For example, women may face particular difficulties with work-life balance, childcare obligations, or preconceived notions about their capacity for leadership. Different interactions may occur between their personality traits and these external pressures than when men are subjected to different social expectations (Subotnik et al., 2019). Researchers need to take into account both the innate qualities and the social context that shapes the expression and assessment of these traits in both men and women in order to fully understand the interaction between personality, situational factors, and performance success (Rumsey, 2020). Developing interventions and tactics that promote a fair and encouraging environment for both genders in a variety of performance domains requires this nuanced understanding.
References Anaya, B., & Pérez-Edgar, K. (2019). Personality development in the context of individual traits and parenting dynamics. New Ideas in Psychology , 53 , 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2018.03.002 Rumsey M. G. (2020). Personality and interests for selection: Theoretical perspectives. Military Psychology , 32 (1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2019.1652478 Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2019). Environmental factors and personal characteristics interact to yield high performance in domains. Frontiers in Psychology , 10 , 2804. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02804 Topic 8 Q2 Alignment of Dissertation Components The term "alignment of dissertation components" refers to the harmonious and cohesive connection between the various elements that constitute a research study. Every section of a well-aligned dissertation makes sure that the research questions or objectives are addressed in a cohesive manner. This includes the introduction, methodology, literature review, theoretical framework, data analysis, and conclusion (Wright et al., 2018). A logical and structured progression is what is meant by alignment, where each section flows into the next in a logical manner to form a seamless narrative that leads the reader through the research process (Paradis et al., 2018). It is important to consider how each section supports and reinforces the study's overall purpose and objectives in addition to its internal consistency. A meticulously planned and carried out dissertation is characterized by effective alignment, which strengthens the coherence and appeal of the research argument. Alignment of Theoretical Framework, Problem Statement, and Purpose Statement
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Theoretical framework, problem statement, and purpose statement form the foundational pillars of a dissertation, and their alignment is crucial for the overall coherence and effectiveness of the study. The conceptual basis for the selection of variables and the development of hypotheses is provided by the theoretical framework (Hamilton & Finley, 2019). The problem statement, which outlines the particular problem or knowledge gap that the research attempts to fill, must be in perfect alignment with the theoretical framework (Wright et al., 2018). This alignment guarantees that the identified problem or gap directly corresponds to the theoretical lens through which the study is conceptualized. In addition, the problem statement and the theoretical framework should be in line with the purpose statement, which outlines the main objective of the study (Paradis et al., 2018). The purpose statement makes it clear why the research is being done and how it adds to the body of knowledge already in existence, guaranteeing that the theoretical framework directly supports the goals of the study. The importance of this alignment lies in the clarity and coherence it provides to the research endeavor. The entire study is supported by a strong theoretical framework, problem statement, and purpose statement that all work together to guide decisions about research design, data collection strategies, and data analysis techniques. This alignment makes sure that all of the dissertation's parts function together harmoniously, improving the overall validity and rigor of the study (Paradis et al., 2018). Conversely, a lack of alignment may compromise the dissertation's impact and legitimacy by causing misunderstanding, contradictions, and a weaker research case. For the research study to be successful and effective, these essential elements must line up. References
Hamilton, A. B., & Finley, E. P. (2019). Qualitative methods in implementation research: An introduction. Psychiatry Research , 280 , 112516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112516 Paradis, E., O'Brien, B., Nimmon, L., Bandiera, G., & Martimianakis, M. A. (2018). Design: Selection of data collection methods. Journal of Graduate Medical Education , 8 (2), 263– 264. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-16-00098.1 Wright, S., O'Brien, B. C., Nimmon, L., Law, M., & Mylopoulos, M. (2018). Research design considerations. Journal of Graduate Medical Education , 8 (1), 97–98. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-15-00566.1