Analyzing Jury Decision-Making in On Trial

docx

School

University of California, Irvine *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

SOCIAL PSY

Subject

Psychology

Date

Nov 24, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

Uploaded by ChefFlag8680

Introduction "On Trial: Lee Harvey Oswald" jurors' reasoning is illuminating. Juries, their deliberations, the logic behind their verdicts, juror ethics, and trial outcomes will be closely examined. Discussing jury system issues and remedies. Factors Influencing the Jurors  Prejudice: Given the case's notoriety and the historical background of Lee Harvey Oswald and John F. Kennedy's killing, the jurors' preexisting beliefs may have influenced their conclusion. Their preconceptions, political views, and past opinions on Oswald's guilt or innocence likely influenced their decision.  Emotional reactions: The assassination and subsequent events may have affected jurors' impartiality. They may have been irrational due to despair, fury, and terror.  Evidence Analysis Court evidence dominates the documentary. The jury's ability to understand and weigh complex evidence like forensic research and witness testimony influenced the verdicts.  Jurors were influenced by witnesses' credibility. Witness credibility, inconsistencies, and biases may have affected the case's outcome.  Media coverage of Oswald and the assassination may have influenced public opinion and jurors. Perhaps media bias influenced the jury's judgment.  Group Dynamics: Leadership, communication, and consensus may have influenced the jury's verdict. Conformity may have influenced opinions. Deliberation Process The documentary shows heated debate. Some jurors were receptive to many ideas, while others stayed resolute. Emotional outbursts and conflicts between opposing jurors hampered dialogue. Some jurors struggled to set aside emotions and biases, making consensus difficult. The documentary shows the emotional deliberation process. Some jurors were open to different viewpoints and objectively weighed the evidence, but others were not. The jury's opposing views sparked lengthy disputes. Emotional outbursts and disagreements inhibited juror communication. As jurors strongly defended their positions, the group struggled to have rational talks. Emotional responses from the case's severity and historical significance hindered discussion. The documentary showed consensus problems. Some jurors had trouble putting aside their emotions and preconceptions to objectively evaluate the evidence. As deliberations progressed, some jurors were reluctant to change their minds, causing stalemates and divides. Group dynamics also shaped debate. Strong personalities or leaders may have steered talks, swaying the group. Some jurors who first disagree may have succumbed to collective pressure to conform.

Jurors felt emotional strain from deciding the fate of a person accused of such a serious crime. Deliberation was complicated by the duty to uphold justice and public scrutiny of the case. Despite these limitations, the discussion process was crucial to hearing all opinions and thoroughly examining the facts. The procedure allowed jurors to examine the facts and witnesses more thoroughly. The documentary implies that some jurors became more open to different ideas as discussions progressed. Verdict Justification The jurors defended their verdict with evidence, witness testimony, and personal views. Some jurors may have overlooked key evidence while focusing on others, resulting in reasoning gaps or inconsistencies. Their conclusion may have been affected by media coverage and public opinion. The jury' verdict was a careful mix of evidence, witness testimony, and personal views. Some jurors carefully considered all the facts and testimonies to reach a fair verdict, but others may have been influenced by their preconceived views or emotions. This selective evaluation of evidence may have left gaps in their thinking, compromising the verdict. Media and public opinion influence jurors. High-profile cases like Lee Harvey Oswald's can influence juries' opinions of the accused and the evidence. Media bias or sensationalism may have swayed jurors. Trials must be secluded and managed to avoid media bias. Balanced fair trials and public information maintain jury decision-making. Ethical Considerations The documentary discusses juror bias and media impact ethics. Jurors must remain impartial despite outside influences. High-profile cases can make fair trials and unbiased verdicts difficult due to the media's influence. This raises issues about the deliberation process since jurors may accidentally or purposely encounter information that could impact their decision-making outside of the evidence and testimonies. To remedy this issue, courts must actively educate jurors about avoiding external influences and rigidly enforce juror misbehavior laws. Jurors should also report any potential exposure to external information, allowing for appropriate remedies like sequestration or replacement. The justice system can retain credibility and ensure that decisions are based entirely on trial evidence by ensuring juror neutrality and preventing other influences (Larson, 2021) . Comparison with Real-Life Trial Outcomes Real-life juries are influenced by public opinion and media coverage. Media covered Lee Harvey Oswald's trial. Media bias affects public opinion and juries. This may gently influence the jury's evidence evaluation. The documentary uses different evidentiary and procedural standards than real trials. Judiciary evaluates evidence. Objection, experienced attorney cross-examination, and judge inspection make evidence evaluation more methodical and transparent. Despite media and public attention, real-

life trials are decided by the evidence and the prosecution and defense's arguments. Judges and lawyers would deliberate to get a fair judgement. Conclusion Personal biases, emotional responses, evidence interpretation, witness credibility, media influence, and group dynamics all affect a jury's decision-making. High-profile events make decisions difficult. Bias awareness training, media restrictions, and better deliberation may improve juries. Evaluating and improving the jury system regularly ensures fairness. Sources Bystranowski, P., Janik, B., Próchnicki, M., & Skórska, P. (2021). Anchoring effect in legal decision- making: A meta-analysis. Law and Human Behavior , 45 (1), 1. Larson, J. E. (2021). Veracious Verdicts: An Expansion of Cognitive-Experiential Self-Theory in Jury Decision-Making Using Attribution Theory . South Dakota State University.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

Related Documents

1.PNG

PSYC1504_DF_Unit1-A - Copy (23).docx

Psychology Assignment (5).docx

Thematic Approa.docx

DB525reply.docx

Screenshot_20231124-153737.jpg

Hello professor and classmates,.docx

Topic 1 DQ 2.docx

Educ 5420 discussion unit 4 doc4.docx

Unit -17 Question 6 - S3.docx

Order_3717147.docx

Case SOAP NOTE.docx

Recommended textbooks for you

Ciccarelli: Psychology_5 (5th Edition)

Psychology

ISBN:9780134477961

Author:Saundra K. Ciccarelli, J. Noland White

Publisher:PEARSON

Cognitive Psychology

Psychology

ISBN:9781337408271

Author:Goldstein, E. Bruce.

Publisher:Cengage Learning,

Introduction to Psychology: Gateways to Mind and ...

Psychology

ISBN:9781337565691

Author:Dennis Coon, John O. Mitterer, Tanya S. Martini

Publisher:Cengage Learning

Psychology in Your Life (Second Edition)

Psychology

ISBN:9780393265156

Author:Sarah Grison, Michael Gazzaniga

Publisher:W. W. Norton & Company

Cognitive Psychology: Connecting Mind, Research a...

Psychology

ISBN:9781285763880

Author:E. Bruce Goldstein

Publisher:Cengage Learning

Theories of Personality (MindTap Course List)

Psychology

ISBN:9781305652958

Author:Duane P. Schultz, Sydney Ellen Schultz

Publisher:Cengage Learning

SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS

Recommended textbooks for you

Ciccarelli: Psychology_5 (5th Edition)
Psychology
ISBN:9780134477961
Author:Saundra K. Ciccarelli, J. Noland White
Publisher:PEARSON
Cognitive Psychology
Psychology
ISBN:9781337408271
Author:Goldstein, E. Bruce.
Publisher:Cengage Learning,
Introduction to Psychology: Gateways to Mind and ...
Psychology
ISBN:9781337565691
Author:Dennis Coon, John O. Mitterer, Tanya S. Martini
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Psychology in Your Life (Second Edition)
Psychology
ISBN:9780393265156
Author:Sarah Grison, Michael Gazzaniga
Publisher:W. W. Norton & Company
Cognitive Psychology: Connecting Mind, Research a...
Psychology
ISBN:9781285763880
Author:E. Bruce Goldstein
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Theories of Personality (MindTap Course List)
Psychology
ISBN:9781305652958
Author:Duane P. Schultz, Sydney Ellen Schultz
Publisher:Cengage Learning