Lab Report #2 Determining g on an Incline - PCS120

pdf

School

Toronto Metropolitan University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

120

Subject

Physics

Date

Dec 6, 2023

Type

pdf

Pages

7

Uploaded by BailiffFrogMaster879

Report
Lab Report 2 Determining g on an Incline Jewel Benita Ungao Aashwin Mittal PCS120 Section 5 Jian Yuan Filip Bodera
I. Introduction The objective of this experiment is to examine an object's gravitational acceleration (g) and be able to identify the value of g in relation to various inclinations. Furthermore, it aims to establish a connection between different angles and the cart’s acceleration as it rolls down an incline. It also intends to justify the validity of this experiment that seeks to illustrate the value of g which is 9.80 m/s 2 by extrapolating data from a free falling object. II. Theory It is assumed that the cart will go along the tracks while accelerating until it hits a point and then changes its direction, reaching the maximum point on the incline and then follows the same procedure until it comes to rest which will leave the velocity at = 0 m/s. The acceleration of the cart when released from the point is called acceleration due to gravity (g). ∆? = 1 2 𝑎∆? 2 → ∆? = 1 2 𝑔?𝑖?θ · ∆? 2 ∆? Final velocity - initial velocity ∆? Final time - initial time θ Angular position The velocity time graph roughly looks like this and the slope of the gray line on the graph provides the acceleration due to gravity.
III. Procedure 1. Prepared all the apparatus necessary for the experiment; a. Vernier cart b. Aluminum track with feet c. Meter stick d. Retort stand with clamp e. LoggerPro (software) f. LabPro g. Motion Sensor 2. The computer was plugged in and the Lab Pro unit was attached. 3. The position sensor was connected to the dig/sonic port on the Lab Pro. 4. Objects that obstructed the track were removed. 5. The track was leveled in accordance with the intended proportion/angle using a meter stick and clamp was tightened to ensure sturdiness. 6. Attempted multiple mock runs to avoid damages to the equipment and made sure that the experiment was conducted in gentle to moderate conditions. 7. Collect button was pressed as the cart was released. 8. Extended a hand out to catch the rolling cart if it potentially goes off track to prevent unwanted consequences. 9. The y-axis was adjusted and certain regions of the graph with quantitative values and reliable results were selected and recorded. 10. An acceptable amount of runs for each trial were performed with varying track angles that guaranteed a reliable and consistent outcome. 11. Steps 5-10 were repeated for varying angles. 12. Results obtained were examined which included the duration of the collection and the area of detection. 13. All the conditions/control variables that were involved that may have influenced how each run accelerated were taken into account. 14. All the measurements were gathered and saved as CSV (Comma Separated Value).
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
IV. Results and Calculations Runs Height of Incline (cm) Length of Incline (cm) θ Acceleration Average Acceleration ?/? 2 Trial 1 ?/? 2 Trial 2 ?/? 2 Trial 3 ?/? 2 1 17 cm 100 cm 0.17 ° 5.87 6.02 6.09 5.99 ± 0.091 2 25 cm 100 cm 0.25 ° 28 28 28.2 28.06 ± 0.244 3 13 cm 100 cm 0.13 ° 11.41 11.41 11.41 11.41 ± 0.0 4 20 cm 100 cm 0.20 ° 11.60 11.82 12.85 12.09 ± 0.544 Sample calculation (Run #1 Trial #1) To calculate : θ Sin = θ ?????𝑖?𝑒 ℎ????𝑒???𝑒 = ℎ𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ? ?𝑒?𝑔?ℎ Sin = θ 17𝑐? 100 𝑐? = 0. 17° To calculate acceleration: 2 ∆? = 1 2 𝑔?𝑖?θ (∆?) ∆? = 1. 5 − 0. 25 = 1. 25 ∆? = 1. 08 − 0. 3 = 0. 78 0. 78 = 1 2 𝑔 0. 17 (1. 25) 2 = = 5.87 9.18 1.5625 Mean Value: µ = Σ? 𝑁 µ = 5.99 + 11.41 + 12.09 3 = 9. 83 ?/? 2 = 2.73 σ = (5.99 − 9.83) 2 +(11.41 − 9.83) 2 +(12.09 − 9.83) 2 3 ?/? 2 Error = % 𝐴𝑐??𝑎? ?𝑎??𝑒 − 𝑇ℎ𝑒??𝑒?𝑖𝑐𝑎? 𝑉𝑎??𝑒 𝐴𝑐??𝑎? 𝑉𝑎??𝑒 • 100 9.80 ?/? 2 − 9.83?/? 2 9.80?/? 2 · 100 = − 0. 3% | | = 0. 3%
Graphs (Position-Time & Velocity-Time graphs) Run 1 (Trials 1-3) Run 2 (Trials 1-3)
Run 3 (Trials 1-3) Run 4 (Trials 1-3) V. Discussion and Conclusion With this experiment it can be interpreted that a cart, after being let go from an inclined position comes to rest after it hits the point multiple times if no external forces are exerted on it. The data given above allows us to make an educated guess about the value g which comes out to be 9.8m/s². Even with errors, one can also add and subtract the error amount from each point to get various results. Errors were made in gathering a region of the graph that yields inconsistent and unreliable results, hence “run 2” was
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
eliminated from the calculations. By implementing such modification, it suggests that the collected data (9.83m/s²) now conforms to the referenced gravitational force acting on free falling objects on an incline (9.80m/s²). Therefore, the extrapolated value does agree with the actual value. VI. References Randall D Knight. Chapter 2 in Physics for scientists and engineers: A strategic approach with modern physics. Pearson. Professor pre lecture notes. Chapter 2 ,page 14.