Lesson 5
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Concordia University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
204
Subject
Philosophy
Date
Jan 9, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
3
Uploaded by AdmiralLightningFerret4
Lesson 5: A Framework for Ethical Deliberations
What is Ethics:
Ethics is the activity of knowing and doing good behaviours, is it knowing what
constitutes good acts and doing them in the concrete situations of our lives.
Ethical Theories: Authority, Tradition & Law
In response to the
question,
“What should I do?”
,
we look to an
authority, tradition or
law to provide an
answer.
What does God
command?
What does the law
say?
What did my
parents tell me?
What are my
teachers telling me?
So, doing the good
means being obedient or
faithful to an authority, to
a tradition, to the law.
Here, the good is what
tradition, the authority
and the law commands.
Some examples across cultures and time are the Ten Commandments in the Jewish faith,
the Beatitudes in the Christian faith, and the Quran in Muslim faith.
Rules or Principles known by Reason
For this source, rules or principles are derived through reason not authority.
What is the criterion for knowing we are being reasonable?
The Categorical imperative is the basis upon which rules are determined.
What is the categorical imperative?
Always act according to a maxim that you would desire would be a universal law.
Never act in such a way as to treat humanity, whether in ourselves or in others, as a
means
only
but always as an end in itself.
In response to the question,
“What should I do?”
we consider the problem in light of the prior,
fixed (rational) criteria. Is this something that everyone should be allowed to do in every case?
Here, the good is what can be universally applied.
There are 4 principles: Autonomy, beneficence (act of charity, mercy and kindness), non-
maleficence (do no harm), and justice.
Consequences
If the consequence of an action is the source I draw on to make a decision at an individual level,
my criterion is happiness. If the end result promotes my happiness, then it is good. The ethical
act is what brings about my happiness.
Ethics has to do with personal preference.
The ethical theory known as Utilitarianism is an expression of this. Individual action is right if it
increases happiness more than unhappiness. Another way to think about it is though cost-
benefit analysis.
What will it cost? What is the benefit?
Does the benefit outweigh the cost?
Measured empirically, if applied to society as a whole, the action that brings the greatest
happiness to the greatest number of people is what is good. There are no prescriptions, acts are
viewed only in terms of effectiveness in bringing about a goal.
In
response
to the question,
“What should I do?”
, one would ask the following
questions:
What is wanted?
What most satisfies
one’s desire?
How efficiently can I
get it?
So, the good is what
maximizes the
satisfaction of
personal desire or
social goals.
An example would be who lives or dies in receiving treatments for an illness, like a
kidney or renal disease, the lifesaving treatment is dialysis, then you proceed to the
question of the greater good.
Virtue
Acting ethically has to do with how virtuous a person is. It requires training and direction
(education).
Drawing on Aristotle, virtues are the
following:
courage
temperance
justice
truthfulness
prudence
fortitude
In this context, ethics refers to the
character
of the person acting.
The virtuous person is the responsible person. What is good refers to one’s own capacity for
responsible choice – which grows in direct proportion as one grows in virtue.
The virtuous person acts virtuously.
In response to the question,
“What should I do?”
one would refer to one’s character and what
promotes the development of virtue throughout a person’s life.
So, in this context, the good is
virtue or virtuous acts
.
All in all, what should a virtuous or honest person do?
Intention
Ethics is determined by uncovering the intention of the person acting. Ethics has to do
with motive. Intentions change the ethical nature of the person’s action.
In response to the question,
“What should I do?”
one needs to consider motives, reasons
or intentions that propels one to act.
In this context, the good is the intention or the motive. It is not the consequences of
actions that make them right or wrong but the motives of the person who carries out
the action.
Immanuel Kant argues:
“There is nothing it is possible to think of anywhere in the
world, or indeed anything at all outside it, that can be held to be good without
limitation, excepting only a
good will
.”
An example, is a baby’s quality of life, which follows the result and rationale behind it
Living with Other People
The guiding concern through all the chapters in Melchin’s book,
Living with Other People
, is
the quest for self-knowledge. What this means is that Melchin’s book is as much about
discovering something about us, how we engage in ethical deliberation, as it is about
Christian ethics.
In relation to this, Melchin’s goal is to help us (his readers) grasp how we use skills of
moral understanding in our everyday lives in order to apply them to more complex
situations.
This is a distinctly different approach to ethics. It promotes a deepening of our
understanding of ethics because we ask questions about:
What is going on in the human person (you and me) as we engage in ethics?
What is the basic structure of the process of ethical deliberation?
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help