Lesson 2 - Christian Ethics
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Concordia University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
204
Subject
Philosophy
Date
Jan 9, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
5
Uploaded by AdmiralLightningFerret4
The First 400 Years
Faith vs Reason
The relation between “faith” and “reason” shaped the history of the Christian tradition’s
reflection on moral life.
What is Faith
Confidence, reliance, trust (in the ability, goodness, etc., of a person; in the efficacy or
worth of a thing; or in the truth of a statement or doctrine
Belief proceeding from reliance on testimony or authority
Belief in the truths of religion; belief in the authenticity of divine revelation (whether
viewed as contained in Holy Scripture or in the teaching of the Church), and acceptance
of the revealed doctrines.
That kind of faith (distinctively called
saving faith
or
justifying faith
) which, in the
teaching of the New Testament, justifies a sinner in the sight of God. Theologians
variously define this, but there is general agreement in regarding it as a conviction
practically operative on the character and will, and thus opposed to the mere
intellectual assent to religious truth.
The spiritual apprehension of divine truths, or of realities beyond the reach of sensible
experience or logical proof.
What is Christian Faith?
The New Testament was written in Greek and the Greek noun “pistis” is translated
“faith” in many translations of the Bible.
In the New Testament, the word “faith” meant “to trust someone”, it is a word that
connotes relationship, one’s relationship to God. Faith is to trust in God. Faith in the New
Testament did not mean “firm belief in that for which there is no proof”. That is a
modern understanding of the term “faith”.
What is Reason?
The intellectual power, the capacity for rational through, and related senses. The power
of the mind to think and form valid judgements by a process of logic; the mental faculty
which is used in adapting thought or action to some end; the guiding principle of the
mind in the process of thinking.
A cause, ground or motive. A fact or circumstance forming, or alleged as forming, a
motive sufficient to lead a person to adopt or reject some course of action or belief.
Christian Influences
The earliest Christian writers depended heavily upon Hebrew scriptures. These
scriptures are the sacred texts of the Jewish religion. Many Christian denominations
refer to these sacred texts as the “Old Testament”. Hebrew scriptures are used by both
contemporary Judaism and Christianity, but these texts are interpreted in different ways.
Early Christian writers were also influenced by ancient philosophical traditions. We will
consider four important Greek philosophical sources.
Four Important Greek Philosophers
Plato:
Platonism: The Greek philosophy of Plato (429-347 BCE)
Truth is universal and eternal
The world of things is fleeting and corruptible – an imperfect imitation of pure ideas
Confidence in the capacity of the human mind to discover truth through reason
Moral life is patterning one’s behaviour in accordance with universal ideals
Aristotle
Aristotle parted ways from his mentor Plato. Plato believed that Form over Matter
equalled life, and, that Form was superior to Matter. Aristotle disagreed and asserted
that Form (soul) and Matter were one substance. Plato is considered a Dualist, whereas
Aristotle is a Realist. Aristotle (384-322 BCE) was Plato’s pupil.
He was the reversal of Plato; ideas reflect things.
For Aristotle, the good consists in the realization of the end’s potential in one’s nature.
Zeno
Zeno of Cititum founded the school of Stoicism where he taught from approx. 300 BCE.
His philosophy valued peace of mind which he believed was a result of living reasonably,
virtuously and in harmony with nature.
Stoicism:
this focuses on how God is rational, humans reflect this same rationality, to be
true to one’s humanity is to center oneself on reason.
Epicurus
Epicurious was influenced by Democritus, his predecessor, who has a material list, and
who is regarded as the first to identify the atom at the building blocks of materiality. He
lives by a form of controlled Hedonism (pleasure is the greatest good).
Epicureanism:
this focusses on how life has no enduring meaning, and therefore must
maximize pleasure and minimize pain. Furthermore, to avoid social relationships and
political responsibility.
New Testament Ethics
The last of the New Testament writings are dated from early in the 2nd century and it is
from these writings that we see diversity rather than unity in the scriptures. The Bible
does not have a single ethical perspective, but instead has a variety of ethical
perspectives. Biblical morality is very much of a contextual character rather than stating
universal rules.
However, there were certain distinctive features about the approach of the people of
the Bible to morality:
The Bible regards people's behaviour as the direct and immediate response to God's
revealed will.
In the New Testament, God is revealed through Christ. When proposing a way of life that
is Christian, the New Testament writers constantly draw attention to the pattern of Jesus'
earthly life as well as to the demands the resurrected Christ makes on those who believe
in him.
Christ formed a new covenant that built on the old covenant, so there is a basic unity
between the Hebrew Bible and the New Testament, at the same time there is a shift
away from following the "letter of the law" to following the "spirit" of the law.
Central Theme of Jesus
The central theme of Jesus' (New Testament) message is "the kingdom of God is at
hand." (Mark 1:14) Jesus' proclamation of the kingdom of God is central. The "kingdom"
is present in and with his own person.
The phrase 'the kingdom of God' does not refer to territory or to a state of "kingship".
Rather, it refers to a person's acceptance of the God who graciously approached and to
that person's consequent adherence to a certain way of life.
Jesus demonstrated what this acceptance meant and what this way of life was. This was
the central point of his mission as he understood it. His teaching on morality, with regard
to both content and motivation, was based on it.
The main concern of Jesus was to live out God's kingdom and its demands. Jesus' life
was a pattern of behaviour in accord with the nature of the kingdom. It was a pattern
others could follow. There is not fully worked out moral system in the New Testament.
For Jesus, perfection meant acceptance of the kingdom and its demands. It means
"repentance" and obedience to the divine will (discipleship).
Characteristics of New Testament Ethics
Jesus rejected the formal authority of the Scriptures as absolutely binding. He did not
hesitate to interpret the Scriptures for his contemporaries not as a scribe who spells out
their every implication, but as one who can oppose one passage to another and show
how they correspond with God's kingdom in the present.
Jesus condemns ritual law. For Jesus, it is the human heart that is important, as the
prophets had previously insisted, and ritual prescriptions cannot determine a person's
total acceptance or rejection of God. (Mark 7).
Jesus' basic request is 'follow me', that is, imitate the selfless pattern of his life. He
emphasized this rather than spelling out a detailed moral code.
So we see in John - Jesus' moral teaching is chiefly seen in his command to love. It is
spelled out mainly in the concrete acts of forgiveness, practical caring and unlimited self-
sacrifice. Rather than laws and commands, Jesus uses parables or stories to teach ethical
behaviour.
Christian Concerns
The implications of the Gospel proclamation on the behaviour of the early Christians
continued to be an important concern as the first Christian disciples exited the scene
and second and third generation Christians wrestled with what being a Christian meant
in terms of moral living.
Again, this ethical concern did not result in any comprehensive moral systems, let alone
any single, universally accepted system. Rather, the writing of the period was
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
characterized by a desire to respond to the concrete needs of the community in a way
that is still authentic to the core of the Christian faith.
This dialectic of faith (in the teachings of Christ) and experience (the concrete situation
at that moment) was differently handled by various early Christian theologians. We will
look at five of these key figures who spanned the 2nd to the 5th century c.e.
Clement of Alexandria
He combined Christianity with the Platonism that was common in Alexandria.
Clement of Alexandria (Greek Theologian) (c.150-c.211) in creative dialogue with
the prevailing thought patterns of his culture. The central theme in Clement's
teachings is the true knowledge of Jesus Christ. He gives place to the primacy of
love against stoic self-sufficiency. A key theme in his teachings was that the human
person is created in the image and likeness of God. Therefore, the moral life is
responding to this vocation. Clement had an optimistic vision of life; he saw the
world as good. He wanted to integrate the Gospel with insights from the pagan
world. Clement argued against Gnosticism and Manichaeism.
Origen
Origen was a student of Clement's who saw Christ as the centre of history. He was
also against Gnosticism - strongly defending freedom of the will. Origen was more
negative having a pessimistic view of human life. He was much more inclined to
dichotomize the life of Christian faith and the life of the world.
Origen lived through a turbulent period of the Christian Church, when persecution
was widespread and little or no doctrinal consensus existed among the various
regional churches. In this environment, Gnosticism flourished, and Origen was the
first truly philosophical thinker to turn his hand not only to a refutation of
Gnosticism, but to offer an alternative Christian system that was more rigorous and
philosophically respectable than the mythological speculations of the various
Gnostic sects.
He is unique among Platonists of his era for introducing history into his
cosmological and metaphysical speculations, and his insistence on the absolute
freedom of each and every person, thereby denying the fatalism that so often
found its way into the more esoteric teachings of the various philosophical and
mystery schools of his day. Primary consideration was given at this time to divine
laws or to what were regarded as the eternal laws of the universe, over which man
had no control. But subordinate to these divine and eternal laws was the law of
nature.
That the theory of natural law was given an important place in early Christian
thought may be gathered from the writings of Origen, St. Ambrose, and St. Jerome.
Referring to a passage of St. Paul (Rom. ii, 12-14) they spoke of natural law as
equivalent to the law of God and as universal in contrast with the written laws
made by human beings.
Augustine of Hippo
Augustine of Hippo (354-430) was Ambrose’s discipline and is, to some, considered
Attributed to human beings the ability by themselves to choose the good and so
He used Paul's metaphor in Romans 5 - humanity had fallen in Adam and Eve's
a
between
materialis
m and the
life of the
Spirit
The tension is between valuing this material world, our life on earth
and all it means to us versus the life of the Spirit, which points us to
something more than this world. So, Jesus says to the rich young
man: “If you want to be perfect, go, sell your possessions and give
to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow
me.” (Matthew 19:21)
b
between
universali
sm and
group
identity
Here the tension is between belonging to a group (the Christians)
and being outside the group. One of the questions the early
Christians asked themselves had to do with their relationship with
those who believed in Christ and those who did not. Has Christ come
to save all human beings or only a few select ones?
c
between
grace and
law
Grace is a theological concept. It refers to God’s relation to human
being. It is a relation that is utterly gratuitous and does not depend
on any effort of the human person to warrant God’s love. So, God’s
love is generous, free, totally unexpected and undeserved.
The law refers to God’s law, for example, the Ten Commandments
but it also refers to the laws of human beings, for example, what our
law (in Canada or in the country in which we live) tells us about what
we can and cannot do. The early Christians debated about their
responsibility to the law. Some felt they were no longer obliged to
follow the law because they had been saved through Christ. Christ
freed them from the law. Others argued that just as Christ followed
the law when he lived on earth, so Christians should follow the law.
d
between
revelation
and
reason
Revelation is knowledge given to persons of faith. It is a knowledge
that is gained through an experience of God’s self-revelation to the
world. It is a knowledge that is initiated from God. It comes from God
and human beings receive this knowledge but do not initiate it.
Reason is the capacity to understand (or gain knowledge) through
reflection on one’s experience. It is a knowledge that one comes to
through one’s own effort, by reflecting on one’s experiencing and
judging the correctness of one’s understanding.