Case Study
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Western Sydney University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
102102
Subject
Philosophy
Date
Jan 9, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
5
Uploaded by DukeFlower6029
Introduction
The aim of this paper is to examine ethical dilemmas present in the case
study ‘Domestic Violence and protecting the community’. I will be
seeking solutions informed by theories studied this semester, specifically
act utilitarianism theory and the divine command theory. Scarre (1998)
discusses that the act utilitarianism theory causes one to take actions to
achieve the greater good in a given situation. He notes that the
utilitarianism act is a highly influential moral theory which assesses a
right or wrong action based on its outcome. On the other hand, Rahimi
(2012) discusses that the divine command theory view God as the one
who determines what is morally right. It centres on obeying Go
d’s
commands, with the right and wrongs varying according to the diverse religious
beliefs people hold.
Section 1
As a police officer new to my role, I receive a call on my night shift about
an incident of disturbance from a neighbour claiming to hear screams
and objects being broken. I attend to the disturbance with my partner
who I hold in high regard due to her high standards of work. Upon arrival
I realise the house to be that of the station’s sergeant. We both perceive
the smell of alcohol from her and notice another woman with bruises who
is emotionally unstable. The woman does not want to press charges and
insist that it is just a silly fight. I get into the patrol car with my partner
only for her to disclose to me the sergeant is in a same sex relationship
unknown to her colleagues at work. My partner wants to handle the
situation informally due to her respect for the sergeant. She claims the
sergeant is a high-ranking woman who faced challenges to attain her
position and is a big support to other women at the station. Due to this
she also does not find the situation to be domestic violence since it exists
between two women. I feel uncomfortable about the situation, and I am
in a dilemma unsure whether it should be reported or not. I grapple with
this decision because I have vowed to protect the community but then I
am new to the station and to my role.
According to Diemer et al. (2017)
safeguarding victims of domestic violence from future harm depends on
the initial actions police officers take when they encounter domestic
violence cases. As outlined in the Code of Practice for the NSW Police
Force Response to Domestic and Family Violence (2018), the NSW police
force is dedicated to enforcing victim support to protect victims from
further harm. This commitment involves seeking Apprehended domestic
violence orders (ADVO) to ensure the victim is safe from further violence.
Miles-Johnson & Ball (2022) highlights the need for improved police
responses to domestic violence cases, especially in the context of same-
sex relationships, advocating for more serious approach to addressing
these issues.
When it comes to domestic violence cases, the police play five key roles:
investigating incidents, providing support and safety, bringing offenders
to court, preventing occurring of incidents and working with local
services to reduce risks (Code of Practice for the NSW Police Force
Response to Domestic and Family Violence 2018).
Also, according to
Meyer & Reeves (2021), each Australian state has its own jurisdiction
and procedures for handling incidents of domestic violence. While it is
rare, some police officers themselves are involved with domestic violence
but there are hardly any relevant statistics of Australian police officers
due to the closed nature of how such cases are heard in court. (Douglas
& Goodmark 2015). A study done in the United States shows that police
officers in service are four times more likely to engage in domestic
violence (Douglas & Goodmark 2015). This is concerning because just
like the partner of the sergeant in the case study, partners of police
officers may hesitate to report incidents of abuse. This highlights the
importance of police action in domestic violence cases. It must be taken
seriously and handled with care.
Section 2
Divine command theory
The ethical dilemma in this case study revolves around whether I should
report the ongoing domestic violence at the sergeant’s house.
Implementing the divine command theory as discussed by Mahrik (2018)
offers a valuable approach for me to address ethical challenges in our
evolving society. The divine command theory, rooted in obeying the
commands of God dictates that reporting the sergeant is the morally
right action for me to take to ensure the victim is safe. Despite probable
variations in moral codes among religions, following the divine command
theory aligns with my personal principles of honest living and serving
humanity. Reporting the case of domestic violence becomes my fulfilment
of God’s command and the right thing to do. However, a setback is the
theory’s religious variability, with not all religions having the same moral
standards. For example, not all religions follow the doctrine of having one
wife as in Christianity. Additionally, people who are not religious may face
challenges in applying the principles of God in such situations.
Implementing the divine command theory, nevertheless, promises
positive outcomes: ensuring the safety of the victim, potential charges
against the sergeant, and my fulfilment of doing what is ethically right.
Basically, the divine command theory provides a solution to the ethical
dilemma by guiding actions based on the commands of God.
Act Utilitarianism Theory
The utilitarian act theory, which highlights the morality of actions based
on outcomes is important in ethical considerations (Eggleston 2020).
Applying this theory increases doing good for the majority. From the case
study it is evident that I am not comfortable with the sergeants abuse
against her partner and so by applying the utilitarian theory it maximizes
the good for both parties. This means that reporting the incident would
protect the sergeant’s partner from further incidence of domestic
violence, aligning with the theory and fulfilling my duty to the community
(Eggleston 2020). The sergeant could either be charged for domestic
violence or an ADVO order can be held against them to prevent future
abuse. The theory’s flexibility allows for varied situations, but the
challenges arise in determining moral rightness without explicit
guidelines (Eggleston 2020). Despite its complexities, I would, as a police
officer, choose to report the incident, aligning with the act utilitarianism
to secure positive outcomes for the sergeant’s partner and uphold moral
responsibility.
Conclusion
In essence, it's necessary for the me to report the domestic violence
incident involving the sergeant. The ethical ruling could align with either
the divine command theory, obeying God's commands, or the act
utilitarianism theory, prioritizing the greater good. Both approaches lead
to the same goal: reporting the incident to protect the community,
especially considering the victim's potential hesitancy due to the
sergeant's position. Applying these theories offers efficient ways to
address the ethical dilemma, ensuring the pursuit of ultimate good,
whether guided by divine commands or achieving greater good for all
involved. The optimal solution remains reporting the domestic violence
incident at the police station.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Reference List
Diemer, K, Ross, S, Humphreys, C, Healey, L 2017, ‘A 'double edged
sword': discretion and compulsion in policing domestic violence’, Police
practice & research, Vol.18, no.4, p.339-351, viewed 22 October 2023,
WSU Library Database, DOI: 10.1080/15614263.2016.1230853.
Douglas, H & Goodmark, L (2015) “Police perpetrators of domestic
violence: what do we know and what can be done”, 2 November 2015,
The
Conversation,
viewed
22
October
2023
<
https://theconversation.com/police-perpetrators-of-domestic-violence-
what-do-weknow-and-what-can-be-done-49441
>
Eggleston, B 2020, ‘Consequentialism and Respect: Two Strategies for
Justifying Act Utilitarianism’, Utilitas, Vol.32, no.1, p.1-18, Viewed 22
October
2023,
WSU
Library
Database,
DOI:
10.1017/S0953820819000086.
Mahrik, T 2018, ‘DIVINE COMMAND THEORY – A CRITICAL
REFLECTIONS’, Idei (Sofiâ.), 2018, Vol.1, no. (1(11)), p.10-15, viewed 22
October 2023, WSU Library Database, DOI: 10.34017/1313-9703-2018-
1(11)-10-15
Meyer, S, Reeves, E, ‘Policies, procedures and risk aversity: police
decision-making in domestic violence matters in an Australian
jurisdiction’, Policing & society, Vol.31, no.10, p.1168-1182, viewed 22
October
2023,
WSU
Library
Database,
DOI:
10.1080/10439463.2020.1869234
Miles-Johnson, T., Ball, M. “Police prosecutors and LGBTIQ intimate
partner violence, victims, and perpetrators: an empirical study”, SN Soc
Sci 2(84), viewed 22 October 2023, WSU Library Database,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-022-00382-z.
NSW Police Force 2018, Code of Practice for the NSW Police Force
Response to Domestic and Family Violence, viewed 22 October 2023,
https://www.police.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0016/165202/Code_o
f_Practice_for_the_NSW
PF_response_to_Domestic_and_Family_Violence.pdf
Rahimi, S 2012, ‘Divine Command Theory and Theistic Activism’,
Heythrop journal, Vol.53, no.4, p.551-559, viewed 22 October 2023, WSU
Library Database, DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2265.2012.00752.x.
Scarre, G 1998, ‘Is Act-Utilitarianism the 'Ethics of Fantasy'?’, Journal of
applied philosophy, Vol.15, no.3, p.259-270, viewed 22 October 2023,
WSU Library Database, DOI: 10.1111/1468-5930.00096.