COM 362 Rough Draft
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Grand Canyon University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
362
Subject
Philosophy
Date
Jan 9, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
5
Uploaded by KidArmadilloMaster552
Title: The Argument Against Men Competing in Women's Sports - A Syllogistic Analysis
Introduction:
Men participating in women's sports has become a more controversial topic of discussion,
which concerns those who are against the practice. Those opposed contend that permitting men to participate in women's sports compromises the values of impartial competition and endangers the wellbeing of female athletes. Men and women differ in terms of bone density and muscle mass, among other physical characteristics, which critics claim creates an unfair playing field. These issues challenge the delicate balance between inclusivity and preserving the integrity of women's sports, adding to the complexity of the argument.
The following premises become apparent when applying a syllogistic style to evaluate and summarize the case against men participating in women's sports: First of all, there is a biological difference between men and women that impacts how well they function physically. Secondly, the addition of male athletes may upset the equilibrium necessary for competitive sports, which depend on level playing fields. Therefore, opponents claim that keeping sports segregated based on biological sex maintains fair competition and protects the fundamental qualities of women's sports. As the discussion progresses, analyzing these premises in the context of a syllogistic framework becomes essential for a thorough comprehension of the complex arguments at hand.
Summary of the Argument:
Major Premise:
Men, on average, possess physical advantages such as greater muscle mass and bone density compared to women.
Minor Premise: Physical advantages contribute to performance differentials in sports, therefore creating an uneven playing field.
Conclusion: Allowing men to compete in women's sports will compromise the integrity of fair competition and hinder opportunities for women athletes.
Body paragraphs:
Examining the presumptions behind the argument against men playing women's sports exposes a dependence on the idea that differences in biology affect physical ability. The argument claims that fair competition requires recognition and respect for these physiological variances. In order to provide an equal playing field, it is assumed that physical equality should be given priority in a competitive sporting setting. However, possible inconsistencies become apparent when examined through the prism of a Christian worldview. The Christian viewpoint frequently places a strong emphasis on ideas of compassion, empathy, and inclusivity. Although it is legitimate to acknowledge and value biological differences, an absolutist approach can run counter to Christian values of tolerance and diversity. Furthermore, the Christian Worldview emphasizes the value of showing love and respect to others, which begs the question of whether it is discriminatory to forbid men from taking part in women's sports.
This inconsistency paves the way for a different line of reasoning that aims for a more complex approach, taking into account both the inclusionary Christian values and biological reality. A perspective that values justice without sacrificing compassion is fostered by striking a
balance between accepting physical differences and creating an atmosphere of understanding. This is more in line with the holistic ideals of the Christian Worldview. Even though the Christian worldview does hold that we are to show love and respect to others and invite them to join and include everyone no matter what, the Holy Bible also tells us that men and women are different. Theological and scriptural viewpoints form the basis of the Christian Worldview's understanding of gender distinctions. A complementary perspective on gender is given by the Bible, which emphasizes that although men and women are made in God's
image, they have different functions and traits. Conventional Christian teachings recognize the inherent diversity in each gender's features and emphasize the distinctive qualities and roles allotted to each. For example, the Bible may make references to roles that emphasize care for women and leadership for males. This view emphasizes respect and collaboration between men and women within the context of Christian ideals, and it promotes the idea that acknowledging and appreciating these differences leads to a peaceful and meaningful cohabitation.
Valid Argument + Syllogism:
I claim that because of innate biological differences that are essential to preserving fair competition, men shouldn't participate in women's sports.
1.
Fairness in competitive sports depends on level playing fields.
2.
The competitive landscape is uneven because of biological variations between men and women, such as inequalities in bone density and muscle mass.
3.
One of the main priorities in sports governance is maintaining fair competition.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Conclusion: In light of this, it is appropriate to keep men out of women's sports in order to preserve the integrity of fair competition.
This argument states that maintaining the values of fair competition in sports requires acknowledging and appreciating biological differences. It is consistent with the idea that sports integrity is based on fair play. It offers a nuanced viewpoint that is consistent with the values of sportsmanship and athletic equality, while also appreciating the significance of diversity and compassion. It also maintains that guaranteeing fair competition is a priority.
Conclusion:
I've made a persuasive case in this essay against men participating in women's sports, highlighting the innate biological distinctions that have an impact on fair play. I have argued, using a syllogistic framework, that it is essential to acknowledge these distinctions in order to preserve sports' integrity and keep them consistent with Christian principles. The following are the key points, fair competition and alignment with the Christian Worldview. Fair competition means that the level playing fields are necessary for competitive sports, and recognizing biological differences guarantees fairness. Alignment with the Christian Worldview Is that the argument is consistent with the Christian Worldview in that it emphasizes the value of compassion and inclusivity while also emphasizing justice and valuing individual diversity.
This essay urges a balance between justice and inclusivity and stresses the need for critical thinking when handling complicated situations. The argument highlights the importance of appreciating and comprehending biological variations while cultivating a compassionate atmosphere by conforming to Christian values. The call to action is to have open discussions
while advocating for a comprehensive strategy that takes into account all viewpoints and looks for just solutions in the framework of Christian values and sports.
Still need:
Title page
Page numbers
5 peer reviewed sources
References page