Exam 1 Review (Ethics) (1)
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Florida State University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
2021
Subject
Philosophy
Date
Dec 6, 2023
Type
docx
Pages
5
Uploaded by PresidentArmadillo3756
Exam 1
(Practice)
Name:___
Cat Muravsky
_____________
Section 1
:
Use the list of authors to fill in the chart below.
(22 points total / 2 per)
Authors:
Sparrow, Huemer x2, Marnaffe, LaFollette,
van den Haag, Nathanson,
(1)
Topic
For
Against
Gun Laws – We should have
stricter gun control laws
LaFollette
Huemer
Death Penalty – It is
justified?
Van den Haag
Nathanson
Automation – killer robots
ever permissible?
Sparrow
Drug Legalization – It is
justified?
Huemer
Marnaffe
Section 2:
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.
(22 points total / 2 per)
(2) Two aims of moral theories are (i) specifying which features make certain acts right (or wrong) and (ii)
offering practical guidance for how we might arrive at correct (or justified) moral judgments about what acts
are right/wrong/bad/good
True / False
(3) Principles of right action
(value)
give an account of what is extrinsically valuable (
intrinsically)
True /
False
(4) According to Consequentialism, an action is right just in case its consequences would be at least as good
as the consequences of any alternative action that agent might instead perform
True / False
(5) According to utilitarianism, the person near the switch should activate it and save the 5 while sacrificing
the 1 in the original trolley example.
True / False
(6) According to Kantianism, the person near the man on the bridge should not push (and kill him) in order to
save the other five individuals in the “Bridge” trolley example.
True / False
(7) According to Kantianism, it is always wrong to treat someone as a
mere
means.
True / False
Section 3:
Indicate the best possible answer among the multiple choices.
(12 points total / 2 per)
(8) Consequentialist theories are…
(a) Value-based
(b) Comparative
(c) Maximizing
(d) All of the above
(9) According to the hedonist theory of value, ____________ is intrinsically valuable
(a) Pleasure
(b) Achievement
(c) Virtue
(d) Friendship
(10) According to Kantianism, the following things are examples of treating someone as a mere means.
(a) Using threats of violence or physical force to make someone to do something
(b) Lying to someone to get them to act in a way that you want
(c) Asking for consent before treating them in a certain way
(d) A and B
Section 4:
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.
(10 points total / 2 per)
(11) According to Nyholm, drivers of self-driving cars are at least partly responsible for crashes, since the
drivers occupy a position of authority.
True / False
(12) Sparrow claims that using automated robots will result in an unjust war, and so we should avoid using
them.
True / False
(13) van den Haag focuses primarily on the deterrence function of punishment as justifying the death penalty.
True / False
(14) Huemer claims that prohibitionists are inconsistent in banning some harmful activities, but not others.
True / False
(15) LaFollette argues that the right to own a gun
is
(not)
a fundamental right because not everyone is
interested in them.
True /
False
Section 5:
Indicate the best possible answer among the multiple choices.
(24 points total / 2 per)
(16) A crucial difference between some forms of consequentialism and Kantianism with respect to self-
driving cars is that consequentialism might allow a car to ____________ if doing so would promote better
outcomes.
(a) Communicate with other cars.
(b) Deceive its driver
(c) Save a person
(d) A and B
(17) Why does Nyholm think that drivers are at least partly responsible for car crashes involving automated
vehicles?
(a) The driver decides where the car goes
(b) The driver can make adjustments if they do not enjoy the service
(c) The driver holds a position of authority over the cars
(d) All of the above
(18) Which of the following options are premises Sparrow uses to conclude that the use of autonomous
weapons is impermissible.
(a) Only just wars are morally permissible
(b) A war is just only if someone (or some group) can be held responsible for the deaths caused by the
war
(c) No one can be held responsible for (some) deaths caused by war if autonomous weapons are used
in those killings
(d) All of the above
(19) According to Nathanson’s presentation of the
lex talionis
principle, requires that the punisher:
(a) kidnap kidnappers
(b) murder murderers
(c) prostitute themselves to prostitutes
(d) All of the above
(20) Why does LaFollette think that the right to own a gun is not a fundamental right?
(a) It is not fundamental because of the consequences produced by individuals exercising the right.
(b)
It is not fundamental because not everyone is interested in them
(c) It is not fundamental because it is not a positive right
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
(d) All of the above
(21) According to Huemer, the right to own a gun is a right that is…
(a) Absolute
(b) Prima Facie
(c) Exceptionless
(d) All of the above
(22) According to Huemer, a gun ban would be impermissible if…
(a) There is a prima facie right to own a gun
(b) A gun ban would be a serious rights violation
(c) The harms caused by individuals exercising their right to own firearms are
not
many times greater
than the benefits.
(d) All of the above
Section 6:
Indicate the best possible answer among the multiple choices.
(10 points total / 2.5 per)
Sparrow:
“It
is
a
minimal
expression
of
respect
due
to
our
enemy
—
if
war
is
going
to
be governed by
morality at all — that someone should accept responsibility, or be capable of being held responsible, for the
decision to take their life. If we fail in this, we treat our
enemy
like
vermin,
as
though
they
may
be
exterminated
without
moral
regard
at all. The least we owe our enemies is allowing that their lives are of
sufficient worth that someone
should
accept
responsibility
for
their
deaths. Similarly,
their
grieving
relatives are entitled to an answer as to why they died, which includes both knowing who is responsible and
what their reasons were.”
(23) In this passage, what is primary point of this paragraph?
(a) Presenting a premise of the author’s argument.
(b) Presenting a conclusion of the author’s argument.
(c) Presenting a premise of an argument that the author does not accept.
(d) Presenting a conclusion of an argument that the author does not accept.
(24) In this passage, the author’s overall aim is to…
(a) Provide the author’s argument (or some part of it at least) in favor of his (or her) position.
(b) Provide an argument (or some part of it at least) offered by an opponent of the author’s position.
(c) Provide an objection to the author’s argument.
(d) Provide a counterexample to an opponent’s argument.
Extra Q’s from Class
-
Marneffe’s position on drugs is
PROHIBITION-DECRIMINALIZATION
-
Haag’s premises include
that if death penalty deters murderers from murdering it is
morally justified (A maybe)
Midterm survey extra credit on canvas