Project #1 - Kit Pernitez

pdf

School

California State University, Sacramento *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

004

Subject

Philosophy

Date

Dec 6, 2023

Type

pdf

Pages

2

Uploaded by JudgeGull3759

Report
Assignment Details: Name: Kit Pernitez For this assignment you must answer each of the following on this sheet (Please save this document, complete each of the questions, and save it as a PDF. Then submit using the Essay Assignment #1 submission link in CANVAS Modules: Part 1: (Worth 5 Points Total) What is the Title of the Essay: The Wrong Ruling on Vouchers The total number of premises: 5 The total number of counter example premises is: ___4__ Part 2: (Worth 30 Points Total) List out in numbered order, each of the main premises below. If a premise is a counter example, please indicate that by putting an X on the line next to Counter Example. The conclusion is: The article concludes that Cleveland's school voucher program was a bad decision by the Supreme Court, both constitutionally and in terms of American education. The program, according to the author, does not give participants a genuine option and instead sends public funding to private schools, raising concerns about potential First Amendment violations. Furthermore, because they divert resources and attract parents and high-achieving students, voucher schemes are thought to have the potential to be harmful to public schools. First Main Premise: Counter Example ___X___ The Supreme Court's ruling upholding Cleveland's school voucher program is a bad decision on constitutional grounds and for American education. Second Main Premise: Counter Example ___x___ The Cleveland program's stipends are too small to support most private schools but suitable for parochial schools. Third Main Premise: Counter Example ______ The Cleveland program, despite the technical argument, violates the First Amendment by directing taxpayer dollars to finance religious training. Forth Main Premise: Counter Example __X____ Voucher programs like Cleveland's can harm public schools by siphoning off public funds and the best-performing students and parents.
Fifth Main Premise: Counter Example __X____ The Supreme Court's decision also undermines the teaching of democracy and pluralism that occurs in public schools. Answer Each of the following questions: (Worth 15 Points) How many sub-premises for Premise 1: –––2–––– How many sub-premises for Premise 2: –––3–––– How many sub-premises for Premise 3: –––2–––– How many sub-premises for Premise 4: –––1–––– How many sub-premises for Premise 5: ––––2–––
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help