Anotated Page For Negative Traits CH
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Liberty University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
700
Subject
Philosophy
Date
Feb 20, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
7
Uploaded by CaptainWolverinePerson1009
Li, X., Dang, J., Liu, L., Liang, Y., Wei, C., & Gu, Z. (2023). Are greedy individuals more corrupt?: Research and Reviews. Current Psychology, 42(1), 165-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01415-1
The authors of this publication, who are primarily psychologists who used their knowledge gained through the neuroscience labs at Normal University in Beijing, China, examine it through a psychological lens. This article found in the EBSCO database, examines two studies that explore the impact of greed on corruption and specifically focus on the role of descriptive corruption regulations. The author's goal was to prove that greed is the driving force behind unethical practices. As found in the Bible, “The Lord detests dishonest scales, but accurate weights find favor with him. When pride comes, then comes disgrace, but with humility comes wisdom. The integrity of the upright guides them, but the unfaithful are destroyed by their duplicity” (
New International Version Bible 1978/2011, Proverbs 11:1-3). The outcomes of the first study demonstrated that greed is a significant factor in the development of corrupt behavior. According to the findings of the second study, which offered efficient descriptive corruption norms, greed was an effective indicator of corrupt intent. The correlation between greed and corrupt behavior suggests that individuals who prioritize personal gain
over ethical principles are more likely to engage in deceitful actions. In general, the findings of the study dispel the idea that greed is the root cause of corruption and provide potential strategies to reduce the adverse consequences of this behavior. This article provides a clear connection with my research paper, as it offers a theory that is based on research and illustrates the variables that led to the collapse of King Solomon and his kingdom. By examining the correlation between greed and corrupt behavior, this article supports the notion that personal gain can significantly influence an individual's ethical decision-making. This understanding of corrupt intent can be valuable in analyzing
historical events, such as the downfall of King Solomon, and drawing parallels to contemporary instances of corruption. Bao, R., Sun, X., Liu, Z., Fu, Z., & Xue, G. (2022). Dispositional greed inhibits prosocial behaviors: an emotive - social cognitive dual-process model: Research and Reviews. Current Psychology, 41(6), 3928-3936. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00928-5
In this study, researchers utilized quantitative data to examine 314 individuals to see whether or not there was a connection between inherent greed and the act of contributing to the welfare of others. To obtain the author's published works, I accessed the EBSCO database. This research, authored by a group of psychologists from Beijing, China, aims to investigate if persons with a tendency for greed are more likely to engage in corrupt behavior. The study found that there was indeed a significant correlation between inherent greed and a lower tendency to contribute to the welfare of others. In addition, in order to guarantee the reliability of their findings, the researchers took into consideration a wide range of demographic aspects, including age, gender, and socioeconomic level. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between greed and corruption by manipulating conditions of greed on purpose. This was accomplished through the utilization of surface-level information and a game in which players were given the opportunity to reach various degrees of success through the usage of prize money. As the Bible warns, “For the love of money is the root of all kinds of evil. Some people, eager for money, have wandered from the faith and pierced themselves with many griefs” (
New
International Version Bible 1978/2011, Timothy, 6:10). The study hypothesized that the participants who were placed in a greed-based condition would show a greater likelihood of participating in unethical conduct. The correlation between the peer-reviewed article and my research paper is an examination of the moral ramifications of greed and how it
can fundamentally alter the principles of an individual who is otherwise considered to be fortunate. “For I know the plans I have for you, declares the Lord, plans for welfare and not for evil, to give you a future and a hope.” (
New International Version Bible
1978/2011, Jeremiah, 29:11)
Clark,Thomas S., I.,II, & Bocarnea, M. C. (2023). The Effect of Moral Development and Moral Identity on Integrity. Revista De Management Comparat International, 24(4), 513-538. https://doi.org/10.24818/RMCI.2023.4.513
This article, sourced in the ProQuest database, investigates the influence of moral growth and moral identity on moral integrity, with the goal of enhancing organizational performance by promoting integrity and fostering honesty in emerging leaders. The study
utilizes a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews, to gather comprehensive data on moral growth and moral identity. The findings suggest that individuals with higher levels of moral growth and a strong moral identity are more likely to exhibit moral integrity in their decision-making and actions within an organization. The study looks at how these factors relate to one another and suggests ways to support moral identity and development in order to encourage moral behavior in organizations. The authors, who are business leadership students at The Citadel Military College and Regents University, contend that individuals who possess elevated degrees of moral growth and a robust moral identity are more inclined to demonstrate moral integrity in their conduct and decision-making. As a result, they supported the research assumptions, demonstrating that a leader's moral development and
moral identity had a favorable impact on their moral integrity. The reason I chose this peer-reviewed work was to establish a correlation between King Ahab's inability to lead
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
as a result of his lack of moral integrity and his moral compromises. The Bible depicts King Ahab's rule as a clear contrast between moral integrity and compromise. As it states in Proverbs 29:2, “when the righteous thrive, the people rejoice; when the wicked rule, the people groan” (
New International Version Bible
1978/2011). Ahab's story serves as a
warning about the negative impact of moral compromises on a leader's ability to lead effectively and make ethical decisions. Moral development and identity are crucial for leaders to maintain integrity and make ethical decisions. His self-centered and immoral behavior caused heavenly displeasure and left a lasting legacy of instability and condemnation.
Ylä-Anttila, T. (2023). Comparative moral principles: justifications, values, and foundations. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications,
10(1), 199. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01684-0
Tuukka Ylä-Anttila, a postdoctoral social science researcher from Helsinki, Finland, examines and compares three different theories of morality: justification theory, theory of
fundamental human values, and theory of moral foundations. In order to compare and contrast the different theories, the author provides a comparison table that breaks them down into categories. The justification theory emphasizes rational reasoning for moral judgments, while the fundamental human values theory emphasizes universal values for moral decision-making across cultures. Lastly, the moral foundations theory suggests morality is rooted in innate psychological factors like care, fairness, loyalty, authority, sanctity, and liberty. The comparative tables analyze theories and moral implications using the Comparative Moral Principles (CMP) framework, which includes eight principles: liberty, inspiration, safety, community, care, equality, deservingness, and competition. The inability of Ahab to fulfill his role as king, as portrayed in the Bible, is
sometimes linked to moral failings and misdirected reasons. In particular, Kings 16:30 states that Ahab "did more evil in the eyes of the Lord than any of those who came before
him" (New International Version Bible, 1978/2011). It is believed that his unethical behavior, which included idolatry and disobedience to the rules of God, was a significant contributor to his fall from power as a king. Ahab's judgments were driven by self-
interest and moral deviation, leading to unfavorable outcomes for himself and his people. His disregard for others' well-being created a toxic environment, causing suffering and discontent among those under his rule. His relentless pursuit of his desires ultimately led to his downfall.
Theodosiadis, M., & Vavouras, E. (2023). Religion as a means of political conformity and obedience: From Critias to Thomas Hobbes. Religions
, 14(9), 1180. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14091180
This text, which was written by two Greek historians who have strong backgrounds in political philosophy, investigates the issues that Thomas Hobbes and Critias have in common with regard to religion and social harmony. These two philosophers, despite their different social environments, shared a common concern that wickedness and conflict are the norm and violence and aggression pose threats to the state of nature without an organized commonwealth or civil society. Additionally, they believed that religion could only maintain stability if the government supported a king and prevented individuals from holding diverse religious ideas by preventing them from reading the Bible in a variety of ways. The philosophers believed that this was a substantial cause of conflict. The text, which was sourced from the Credo Database, was crucial to my research work since it emphasized the issues associated with Rehoboam's disobedience.
Rehoboam, being a weak leader, allowed the expansion of idolatry and other immoral behaviors, resulting in a deterioration of the nation's morality. As the Bible states in Exodus 20:3-5 “You shall have no other gods before me. You shall not make for yourself
an idol in the form of anything in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the waters below. You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God.” (New International Version Bible 1978/2011). The philosophers argued that a strong government with religious control was necessary to maintain social order and prevent such moral decay. This deterioration led to internal conflicts and, ultimately, the downfall of the kingdom. Wonicki, R. (2023). KANT AND REVOLUTION. Diametros, 75, 17-36. https://doi.org/10.33392/diam.1759
Assistant Professor Rafał Wonicki specializes in publications that explore a range of subjects, such as state theory, political rationality, modern political philosophy, and the ethical aspects of international relations. Examines the correlation between a ruler's authority, autonomy, legal framework, and ethical principles, drawing on the political perspectives of philosopher Immanuel Kant. According to the publication, a legitimate political authority guarantees the protection of external freedom; nevertheless, authorities
are not required to abide by the law, endangering citizens' freedom. In addition, this publication highlights how this conflict has the potential to result in a breakdown of trust between the citizens and the political authority. As stated in Romans 13:1 "Let everyone be subject to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God." (New International Version Bible 1978/2011). This theory has a direct connection to the social
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
unrest that occurred as a result of the unfair taxation that was imposed on the citizens of the kingdom while Rehoboam was in charge. This taxation ultimately resulted in political
unrest, which in turn led to the eventual division of the kingdom. The citizens felt oppressed and burdened by the heavy taxes imposed by Rehoboam, leading to widespread dissatisfaction and resentment. As a consequence, factions began to form within the kingdom, fueling tensions and ultimately causing the kingdom to split into two
separate kingdoms. Kant, on the other hand, contends that in order to protect citizens' freedom, a ruler's power should be limited by the law. However, he acknowledges that there may be instances where the law itself is unjust and restricts individual freedom. In such instances, Kant argues that individuals have a moral obligation to oppose unjust laws and try to build a society that is more equitable. The relationship between power, freedom, law, and morality is complex and requires a careful balance that protects both individual freedoms and the nation's wellbeing.