PROJECT TOPIC SELECTION
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Moi University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
605
Subject
Philosophy
Date
Nov 24, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
3
Uploaded by EarlWorldApe6
1
Ethics and Contemporary Issues: Project Topic Selection
First Name, middle initial(s), last name
Department, University/College
Course Number: Course Name
Instructor’s Name
Due Date
2
Ethics and Contemporary Issues: Project Topic Selection
Introduction:
My chosen topic for this project is "The merits of building of walls immigration
policy." I have opted to look into the ethical rationale and considerations of the building of
walls as an immigration policy. The issue of immigration has been a contentious and
polarizing one in recent times; and the proposed and actual building of walls to border
countries has become a popular means of attempting to control the flow of immigrants. This
topic is relevant to the discussion of ethics in contemporary issues, as it raises numerous
ethical questions and dilemmas.
Ethical Dilemmas:
The building of walls as an immigration policy raises a number of ethical dilemmas,
especially to the governments, the citizens and the affected immigrants. Some questions
raised by this policy include the implications of the building of walls for human rights, the
moral explanations of preventing people from entering a country, the ramifications for global
economic disparities, and the impact of the building of walls on relations between various
nations. Additionally, using walls to control immigration raises questions regarding the
effectiveness of such a policy, and whether or not it is a humane and ethical way to manage
immigration.
Theoretical Basis:
Aristotle, for instance, might have argued that erecting walls as an immigration policy
are necessary to preserve the stability of a society. He would likely cite the need for
individuals to be part of a political community in order to lead a good life, and the need for
borders to protect the community from external threats. On the other hand, Aquinas might
have argued that walls are a form of injustice, as they deny people the opportunity to pursue
3
their own good. He may also have argued that walls lead to further injustice, as they force
people to live in poverty due to their limited access to resources and opportunities. Locke,
meanwhile, may have argued that walls are an unjust restriction of people's natural rights to
move freely and pursue their own happiness.
Quality Source:
Source:
Hidalgo, J. S. (2018).
Unjust borders: Individuals and the ethics of immigration
.
Routledge.
This source focuses on the ethical implications of immigration policy and the
construction of walls to restrict immigration. Specifically,
Hidalgo
(2018)
argues that
building walls is ethically wrong because it often violates basic human rights, particularly the
right to migrate and seek refuge in other countries. He also examines the economic and
political implications of immigration policy and argues that walls often lead to economic
inequality, political instability, and human suffering.
This source is particularly relevant to my project paper entitled "The Merits of
Building Walls Immigration Policy" because it provides a comprehensive ethical analysis of
the issue.
Hidalgo
's (2018) argument is grounded in an ethical framework that emphasizes
respect for human rights and the importance of economic and political stability. He provides a
detailed examination of the potential consequences of immigration policy and makes a strong
case against the construction of walls to restrict immigration. This article provides an
important ethical consideration that should be taken into account when discussing the merits
of immigration policy.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help