BB2_ Annotated Bibliography- Margot Munson
.pdf
keyboard_arrow_up
School
San Diego State University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
462
Subject
Philosophy
Date
Jun 6, 2024
Type
Pages
2
Uploaded by MajorHeatWildcat22
Constructivism and Pragmatism.
"What are the key similarities and differences between Constructivism and Pragmatism,
and how do these philosophical frameworks influence modern educational practices?"
Hickman, Larry A., et al.
John Dewey between Pragmatism and Constructivism
. 1st ed., Fordham
University Press, 2009.
John Dewey between Pragmatism and Constructivism presents a collaborative effort about the Center for
Dewey Studies at Southern Illinois University Carbondale and the Dewey Center at the University of
Cologne, showcasing the international dimension of pragmatist studies within the context of constructivist
concerns. The book embraces the intersections between classical pragmatism and contemporary
pragmatism, exploring various themes such as interaction, communication, learning, community, theory,
and inquiry. Through its exploration of these varied themes, the book sheds light on the dynamic
relationship between Dewey's philosophical framework and modern constructivist perspectives, offering
valuable insights into the evolving landscape of educational theory and practice.
Butt, Trevor. “PRAGMATISM, CONSTRUCTIVISM, AND ETHICS.”
Journal of Constructivist
Psychology
, vol. 13, no. 2, 2000, pp. 85–101, https://doi.org/10.1080/107205300265892.
Butt (2000) questions Stojnov's idea that personal construct psychology gives us a clear set of ethics.
Stojnov suggests that it offers universal rules for how we understand things. Butt disagrees, saying
that while personal construct psychology does provide some ethical guidance, it's not as
straightforward as Stojnov suggests. Instead, Butt thinks that the flexible nature of constructivism
actually helps us make better moral decisions. He argues that sticking too firmly to absolute rules can
lead to moralizing instead of genuine moral action. So, he sees the open-ended nature of
constructivism as a helpful way to navigate ethical dilemmas without falling into rigid moral
thinking.
McWilliams, Spencer A. “Cultivating Constructivism: Inspiring Intuition and Promoting Process and
Pragmatism.”
Journal of Constructivist Psychology
, vol. 29, no. 1, 2016, pp. 1–29,
https://doi.org/10.1080/10720537.2014.980871.
In this journal McWilliams (2016) wonders why constructivism is not more popular in psychology
despite its strong theory and practical use. He says it's because constructivism says we make
knowledge within ourselves in different situations, while many people believe nature gives us fixed
truths. He suggests that people who like certainty might prefer the fixed truths idea. To make
constructivism more popular, McWilliams suggests two things: first, focusing on the idea that
everything is always changing rather than being fixed, and second, reminding people that American
pragmatist philosophy, which is linked to constructivism, is still relevant today. He also thinks
psychology, since it's about how we learn things, should be more important in all subjects.
Garrison, Jim. “Deweyan Pragmatism and the Epistemology of Contemporary Social
Constructivism.”
American Educational Research Journal
, vol. 32, no. 4, 1995, pp. 716–40,
https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032004716.
Garrison points out that many educational theorists have overlooked the ideas of John Dewey, a big
name in education history. He thinks this might be because Dewey also talked about social
behaviorism, which some people are not fully embracing. The article suggests that we should pay
more attention to Dewey's views, especially his ideas about how we learn socially. It argues that we
could benefit from looking at behaviorism to understand how social constructivism works. So
basically, it's saying we should give Dewey's ideas another look and consider how behaviorism fits
into modern education theories.
Fosnot, Catherine Twomey.
Constructivism : Theory, Perspectives, and Practice
. Teachers College
Press, 1996.
"Constructivism: Theory, Perspectives, and Practice" provides an in-depth exploration of
constructivism as a prominent educational theory, its origin is from the foundational contributions of
Piaget and Vygotsky in psychology. The book jumps into the principles of constructivism and its
implications for teaching and learning in curriculum development. By examining the theoretical
foundation and practical applications of constructivism, the work offers educators insights into how
students actively construct their understanding of the world through interaction with their
environment. It serves as a comprehensive resource for educators seeking to integrate constructivist
principles into their teaching practices, emphasizing the importance of fostering active engagement
and critical thinking skills in students.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help