Peer response (7)

docx

School

Grantham University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

419

Subject

Nursing

Date

Nov 24, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

3

Uploaded by ChancellorBravery96491

Report
Hello, You have provided a comprehensive overview of the components of the psychiatric interview and introduced a valuable assessment tool, the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS). This highlights the importance of the psychiatric interview in diagnosing and treating mental illnesses, and I appreciate the clarity in your explanation. I uphold your emphasis on the patient as the central focus during the psychiatric interview. Understanding their subjective experiences, history, and symptoms is fundamental to formulating an accurate diagnosis and treatment plan (Gazzillo et al., 2021). Your breakdown of the three pillars of a successful psychiatric interview is concise and informative. The integration of the ASRS is vital since it offers a structured approach to assessing ADHD symptoms in adults (Artuch-Garde et al., 2020). Moreover, the explanation of its sections and the criterion for an ADHD diagnosis provides a clear understanding of how this tool can be used effectively in clinical practice. Generally, your post is well-written and informative, contributing to a better comprehension of the components of the psychiatric interview and the use of assessment tools like the ASRS in clinical practice. References Artuch-Garde, R., Aznárez-Sanado, M., Bernacer, J., Gambra, L., Magallón, S., Garcia-Arbizu, I., ... & Arrondo, G. (2020). Validity of the adult ADHD self-report scale (ASRS) expanded scale and its relationship to whole-life self-reported psychopathology. European Psychiatry , 63 . https://web.p.ebscohost.com/abstract? direct=true&profile=ehost&scope=site&authtype=c rawler&jrnl=09249338&AN=160387360&h=hyQM3u7XXnAwTBRXyAvrqgCS8ECyg
Gazzillo, F., Dimaggio, G., & Curtis, J. T. (2021). Case formulation and treatment planning: How to take care of relationship and symptoms together. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration , 31 (2), 115. https://doi.org/10.1037/int0000185 Hi, I concur with your informative post on the essential components of a psychiatric interview and discussion on the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A). It is ideal to emphasize the importance of obtaining a thorough patient history during a psychiatric interview. A patient's medical and psychiatric history can provide critical context for their current condition and aid in tailoring an effective treatment plan (Ingram, 2016). Also, you make a valid point about the limitations in medication choices for patients with comorbid cardiac or liver diseases, underscoring the significance of a comprehensive assessment. The breakdown of the three critical components of the psychiatric interview is well-explored. These components form the foundation of understanding a patient's needs and challenges, and integrating them is essential for a holistic treatment approach (Sellbom & Tellegen, 2019). Regarding the HAM-A scale, your insights about its strengths and limitations are insightful. Standardizing interview questions can indeed improve reliability and consistency in assessing anxiety symptoms. Therefore, your suggestion to use the HAM-A to evaluate treatment progress during the initial assessment and follow-up appointments is a valuable clinical practice. References Ingram, B. L. (2016). Case formulation and treatment planning. In APA Handbook of Clinical Psychology: Applications and Methods, Vol. 3 (pp. 233-249). American Psychological Association. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/14861-012
Sellbom, M., & Tellegen, A. (2019). Factor analysis in psychological assessment research: Common pitfalls and recommendations. Psychological assessment , 31 (12), 1428. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/pas0000623
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help