BKulzer.Module3.HCA320

docx

School

Aspen University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

320

Subject

Medicine

Date

Dec 6, 2023

Type

docx

Pages

8

Uploaded by CorporalButterfly1372

Report
1 Physician Nurse Partnership Brooke Kulzer Aspen University HCA 320 Dr. Terri Crowder, DNP, RN, CNS, ACNS-BC, CCRN October 17 th 2022
2 Physician Nurse Partnership The past of healthcare remains very evident in our country as evidenced by the changing healthcare system, values and outcomes. From the identity of the male physician to the evolution to primary care and preventative care, the health care system is looking to change towards outcomes, not dollars and cents. This article will discuss the past of medicine in America, where we stand at present, and a glance into the future. The distinction between the fee for services healthcare to the value-based care system and all that entails. With nurses being the catalyst holding the keys to filling the void between the physician and the bedside. All while impacting care for patients ensuring the healthcare system stands accountable for the changing medical industry in America. Current Policy The healthcare system in America serves to stand as a product of many different policies throughout the history of our country. At present, the latest overhaul of our modern medicine system remains following the introduction of the Affordable Care Act in 2010. While this large piece of legislation served many goals and purposes, it also changed health care policy and remains the large great change in recent past (Salmond & Echevarria, 2017). And the streamline attempt to maximize value and coordination of quality, there remains an element missing. Many believe this change over the past decade trying to find the place for the Affordable Care Act and management of Medicaid and Medicare to maximize outcomes for patients leaves nurses on the edge of a transformation as a collaborative member of the health care team (Fraher et al., 2015). Physicians care has also shifted in the past decade from fee-based patient centered care to more of focus on skills, preventative care, and collaboration with the health care team (Salmond & Echevarria, 2017). This is a vast shift from the past of healthcare with the male physician
3 directing the traditionally female task completers in health care. Those nurses and tasked with patient care were to only follow the orders, and never free think or make suggestions regarding patient care or plan of care. As the shift focuses on outcomes versus individualized care, the team becomes more important then ever to achieve an outcome with the patient. And while the physician structure as the order originator has evolved to the leader and primary collaborator of the team. And as a change occurs in medicine, the ideals around health care promotion need to change as well (Fraher et al., 2015). Health care promotion and preventative care remained a lacking health care measure prior to the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in 2010 (Seiler et al., 2014). This extension of the ACA strived to overcome public health issues around preventative care in America. It attempted to shift the thinking from problem solving to problem avoiding. But the shortage of primary care physicians created a backlog of patients wanting to see their medical team and left the emergency room and like services overwhelmed at times. It left patients confused on where to go for care, and when to present for care. Access while improved, showed the need for nurses to fill in the education gap for those customers to understand the importance of preventative and primary care to avoid costly and resource depleting other visits (Fraher et al., 2015) Distinction Between Fee for Service and Value Based Care The distinction between fee for service and value-based care can be seen with a simple definition of each term. Fee for service healthcare model is the current model in place in American medicine (Nickitas et al., 2018). Value based care system is defined by the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services (2022) as a program that rewards health care providers with incentive payments for the quality of care the patients receive with Medicare. But broken down
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
4 further, the value-based care healthcare model is truly a biproduct of the outcome-based care and cost attentive care initiatives as further defined by Nickitas (2018). Value based programs have good attributes but struggle with measuring the outcomes. In order to ensure reimbursement, there needs to be an outcome that is being measured. And in the industry of healthcare, many variable plays into effect with the outcome. The changing world of reimbursement is directly tied to cost and quality of care (Nickitas et al., 2018). Going hand in hand with the change in American healthcare from fee-based services to value-based system is the identified need to keep the individual well through primary preventative care as a means to drive down overall costs for providers, patients, and consumers. While value-based care systems and focus on outcomes have proven some improvements and cost cutting measures have proven effective, there remains a long way to go on the improvement spectrum (Gondi et al., 2022). With our country still have private and public insurance, there is not the same measure outcome metrics to hold private insurance companies to the same standards as government-based care. Many rural institutions remain limited by staff and lack thereof to institute meaningful change to the healthcare model. The ACA remains a means to institute change, but the extensions and expansion acts need to have buy in from the individual states and make the outcomes worthy of the change to the healthcare systems. Shared Power and Collaboration Starting as a new graduate nurse in 2007, what I did not realize is that I was entering the healthcare industry during a time of shift and change. Beginning with the change of physician’s role and gender equality in the profession, to the introduction of advanced practice registered nurses, to the change in the nurse’s role in the healthcare team. Equality became a common
5 thread between all of these changes. And while the nurse’s foundation and education remain unchanged, the potential of this team member looked different depending on where I was within my health care organization. This led to a specialty change to Emergency Medicine in 2010. I loved the fast pace free thinking. And what attracted me the most was the continual learning and autonomy to start care for our patients. Working in a busy metro Emergency room left patients waiting to be seen by the providers. We had a strong midlevel presence at one point, but many left and were not timely replaced. This again left long waits for providers. But as a nursing team, we identified orders that could be done as standing orders based on chief complaints. This expedited care for the patient and made it easier for the physician team to catch up when the work was being done before they met the patient. There were struggles, and there will continue to be with ordering tests and labs before the physician sees the patient. But often, the blood work is in the lab for additional tests without needing to draw more blood. What lacks is the ability to order pain medications before the provider has assessed the patient. The nurses are able to offer Tylenol and ibuprofen, rest, ice heat and elevation. But often, the patient correlates the narcotics or medication with patient satisfaction. The nurses have learned what the expected plan of care should entail and can hold their physician counterpart accountable for ensure a proper scope of care is ordered. It is not a perfect system but allows nursing to advocate for the work up and timeliness of care that the patient deserves. Personally, I love the free thinking and processing teamed with assessing the patient. They eagerly tell me their story, and I am equipped to be the medical translator and explain why I would expect this work up and why. I fill the void between the medical jargon and what the patient is experiencing. And this leads to greater patient satisfaction. It also holds the
6 medical team accountable to ensuring timely results and work up. This impacts the patient positively in terms of waiting times and turnaround. However, it does not ensure there is not wasteful test ordering and waste not occurring. It does show the importance of collaboration between the interdisciplinary teams, especially the nurse physician relationship with the best outcome for the patient as the most important outcome. And there remains room for impact for the patient. With the projected shortcomings of providers and shortage of workers, what does the best expediated care for the patient entail? With the introduction of virtual healthcare during the Covid pandemic, there is a new access to the healthcare provider. And the nurses future role remains undefined and educationally based to make an impact with preventative care, health care education, and bedside care for those choosing to enter the hospital for care. Conclusion The Affordable Care Act served to be a major game changer in modern American healthcare. With a change from fee-based systems to value based preventative care, the importance of proactive care versus problem solving allowed bedside nurses to use their education to maximize the physician presence. There is a long way to go with the incorporation of advanced practice providers along side of physicians. But having collaborative care to maximize time, resources, and dollars will ensure the patient outcome benefits from the collaboration of all the members of the team.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
7
8 References Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2022. Data | CMS . [online] Cms.gov.https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment- Instruments/Value-Based-Programs/Value-Based-Programs Fraher, E., Spetz, J., & Naylor, M. (2015). Nursing in a Transformed Health Care System: New Roles, New Rules. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Interdisciplinary Nursing Quality Research Initiative. Gondi, S., Li Y., Drzayich AD, Boudreau E., Shrank WH., Powers BW. (2022) Analysis of Value-Based Payment and Acute Care Use Among Medicare Advantage Beneficiaries. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(3 ):e222916. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.2916 Nickitas, D. M., Middaugh, D. J., & Feeg, V. (2018). Policy and politics for nurses and other health professionals (3rd ed.). Jones and Bartlett. Salmond, S. W., & Echevarria, M. (2017). Healthcare Transformation and Changing Roles for Nursing. Orthopedic nursing, 36(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.1097/NOR.0000000000000308 Seiler, N., Malcarney, M., Horton, K., & Dafflitto, S. (2014). Coverage of Clinical Preventive Services under the Affordable Care Act: From Law to Access. Public Health Reports, 129(6), 526-532. https://doi.org/10.1177/003335491412900611