3D

.docx

School

National Institute of Tech-Cross Ln *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

201

Subject

Medicine

Date

Nov 24, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

Uploaded by HighnessRiver6647

1 Problem Analysis Paper Student’s Name Institution Class Date

2 Problem Analysis Paper Introduction My topic of choice is the effects of 3D prints on healthcare care. Many industries have been revolutionized by 3D printing, and healthcare has been significantly impacted. Prosthetics and other tools utilized in the medical field can be produced using 3D printing technology (Mardis, 2018). The possibility of creating customized models of organs, bones, and tissues has also been opened up to better comprehend medical conditions and assist with diagnosis and treatments. 3D printing in healthcare should be embraced as it has numerous potential benefits that can help improve patient care and outcomes. Background 3D printing in the healthcare industry has been growing in the past several decades. This technology has been around since the 1980s when Mary Gehl first identified it as a potential tool for healthcare. Medical implants and other tools used in the medical sector have been developed using 3D printing technology since then (Dodziuk, 2016). The possibility of creating customized models of organs, bones, and tissues has also been opened up to better understand medical conditions and aid in diagnosis and treatment. The issue that 3D printing in healthcare attempts to solve is increased efficiency and accuracy need, and reducing expenses in the healthcare sector. Traditional medical implants and prosthetics manufacturing methods are expensive and time-consuming and can often result in inaccuracies compared to 3D printing technology. The lack of access to 3D printing technology and the technology cost itself are the primary causes of inefficient and costly clinical device production. Due to the expense, numerous hospitals and clinics are not able to invest in the relatively contemporary and costly 3D printing technology. The gradual rate of adoption is due to the dearth of training and experience in

3 technology use (Algahtani, 2021). The cause for the problem persistence is the technology's high cost and lack of accessibility, in addition to numerous medical experts who are still not familiar with the technology and are afraid to invest in it. Besides, the supervisory framework encompassing 3D printing in medical care is still evolving, and there is a consensus absence on how 3D-printed medical devices should be governed. Consequently, the healthcare industry has not completely adopted the technology, and the issue of inefficient and costly medical device production persists. Side A 3D printing technology adoption in medical care is of fundamental significance as it has the possibility to revolutionize the healthcare sector. On the condition that the issue of inefficient and costly medical device production is not addressed, it could have an adverse effect on the medical care sector. Without 3D printing technology access, medical equipment will continue to be costly and time-consuming, resulting in higher patient expenses, diminished medical care services, and gradual clinical exploration and development. In addition, without 3D printing technology access, healthcare experts cannot develop tailored healthcare devices individualized to their patient's requirements. Lack of 3D printing can significantly affect patients' care quality because they may be unable to get the medical care they require. Furthermore, without 3D printing technology access, healthcare experts cannot develop tailored organ, bone, and tissue models to better comprehend clinical conditions and assist with diagnosis and treatments (Dodziuk, 2016). This could decrease the accuracy of diagnoses and treatments, resulting in poorer patient outcomes.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

4 Side B While 3D printing technology can transform the medical sector, there are potential drawbacks to consider. Firstly, 3D printing technology is costly, and the technology and materials can be expensive to afford for many hospitals and clinics. In addition, the technology is still current, and there is an absence of training and experience. Moreover, the supervisory framework encompassing 3D printing in medical care is still evolving, and there is a consensus absence on how 3D-printed clinical gadgets should be governed. This can result in suspicions and misunderstandings surrounding the safety and 3D-printed clinical devices' effectiveness. Furthermore, evil-minded actors also can use 3D printing technology to develop fraudulent medical devices and 3D-printed organs and tissues that could be utilized in deceiving patients and medical care experts (Shahrubudin et al., 2020). The aforementioned downsides must be addressed before the full potential of 3D printing technology can be adopted in the medical care sector. Possible solutions To increase 3D printing technology adoption in the medical care sector, a comprehensive strategy must be put in place. Firstly, governments should give financial assistance to medical care organizations to acquire 3D printing technology and materials and provide educational and certification initiatives to guarantee that medical care experts are sufficiently equipped to use the printing technology. To ensure the safety and effectiveness of 3D-printed medical devices, government agencies should also establish a supervisory framework (Beg et al., 2020). Besides, governments should put resources into research and development to examine the possibilities of 3D printing technology, incorporating the potential to generate organs and tissues for medical use.

5 The potential upsides of the solution include guaranteeing that medical care organizations have the resources and technology they require to make the most out of 3D printing technology. The solution would also ensure that healthcare professionals are adequately trained and certified in 3D printing technology. In addition, a supervisory framework would be established to ensure the safety and effectiveness of medical devices printed using 3D technology. Moreover, it could create a setting that advances research and innovation in 3D printing, which could result in novel treatment and therapy development. The possible downsides of this approach incorporate the expense of executing such a strategy and the delay possibilities in the supervisory process. Furthermore, there is the possibility for hostile actors to exploit the technology and develop fake medical devices (Shahrubudin et al., 2020). Nevertheless, the potential upsides of this approach greatly exceed the possible downsides making it is a worthwhile solution. Conclusion Transforming the medical industry, the use of 3D printing technology in healthcare is a groundbreaking development. It can potentially reduce costs, increase accuracy, and speed up medical device creation. Moreover, it holds the capability of producing personalized medical equipment that suits the individual requirements of patients and generating individualized replicas of body organs, bones, and tissues to enhance the comprehension of medical ailments and assist in diagnosis and treatment. Although this technology has possible downsides, the advantages far outweigh them, and it is a solution worth looking into. Consequently, 3D printing in medical care should be employed as it has many potential gains that can improve patient care and results.

6 References Algahtani, M. S. (2021). Assessment of pharmacist’s knowledge and perception toward 3D printing technology as a dispensing method for personalized medicine and the readiness for implementation. Pharmacy, 9 (1), 68. Beg, S., Almalki, W. H., Malik, A., Farhan, M., Aatif, M., Rahman, Z., ... & Rahman, M. (2020). 3D printing for drug delivery and biomedical applications. Drug Discovery Today, 25 (9), 1668-1681. Dodziuk, H. (2016). Applications of 3D printing in healthcare. Kardiochirurgia i Torakochirurgia Polska/Polish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 13 (3), 283-293. Mardis, N. J. (2018). Emerging technology and applications of 3D printing in the medical field. Missouri medicine, 115(4), 368. Shahrubudin, N., Koshy, P., Alipal, J., Kadir, M. H. A., & Lee, T. C. (2020). Challenges of 3D printing technology for manufacturing biomedical products: A case study of Malaysian manufacturing firms. Heliyon, 6 (4), e03734.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help