325587485-Fluids-Lab-Report

pdf

School

Curtin University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

12925

Subject

Mechanical Engineering

Date

Oct 30, 2023

Type

pdf

Pages

19

Uploaded by ChiefFog12162

Report
Curtin University Department of Mechanical Engineering Fluid Mechanics Lab Report Flow Through Pipes By Name: Dhruv Patel Student Id: 18109775 Date Lab Performed: 26 th May 2016 Due Date: 9 th June 2016
Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ....................................................................... 1 2.0 Objective ........................................................................... 1 3.0 Background ....................................................................... 1 3.1 Reynolds Number ..................................................................... 1 3.2 Hydraulic Gradient ................................................................... 3 3.3 Friction factor .......................................................................... 3 3.4 Moody Chart ............................................................................ 4 4.0 Procedure .......................................................................... 4 4.1 Apparatus ................................................................................ 4 4.2 Water manometer readings ...................................................... 5 4.3 Mercury Manometer Readings ................................................... 5 5.0 Experimental results .......................................................... 6 6.0 Analysis ............................................................................. 9 7.0 Discussion ....................................................................... 10 8.0 Conclusion ....................................................................... 11 9.0 Appendix .......................................................................... 12 Appendix I .................................................................................... 12 Appendix II ................................................................................... 14 Appendix III .................................................................................. 15 List of Tables and figure Table 1: Properties of water, mercury and pipe ........................... 6 Table 2: Water Manometers Reading .......................................... 6 Table 3: Mercury Manometer Reading ........................................ 6 Table 4: Results Sheet .............................................................. 7 Table 5: Experimental and Theoretical Friction Factor ................. 9 Y Figure 1: Laminar flow in a Pipe ................................................ 2 Figure 2: Turbulent flow in a pipe .............................................. 2 Figure 3: Transitional flow in a Pipe ........................................... 3 Figure 4: Laboratory equipment for the study of flow through a pipe ......................................................................................... 4 Fig 5: Hydraulic Gradient vs Mean velocity ................................. 8 Fig 6: Friction factor vs Reynolds Number .................................. 8
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
1.0 Introduction The purpose of this laboratory session is to further develop the understanding of flow in pipes where the laminar, turbulent and transitional flows were flows that were dealt with. In this experiment, the pressure gradient in the pipe was measured and the pipe’s friction factor was evaluated for different flow rates. 2.0 Objective The main objectives of this experiment are as follow: To identify the values of Reynolds number for the three laminar, transitional and turbulent flows in a pipe with a circular cross- sectional. To understand the concept of friction applied in pipe flow and to obtain the friction factor for different flow rates and Reynolds number using both the diameter of the pipe and the graphical method. To identify the floe-speed regions for different flow from relationship of the velocity and the hydraulic gradient using the graphical method. To carefully understand the concept of the Darcy friction and know how to calculate for laminar and turbulent flow. 3.0 Background Before performing the experiment there few aspects, which needs to be looked down fully to understand the fluid, flow through pipes. 3.1Reynolds Number The Reynolds number is the dimensionless quantity used to predict the flow patters in the different fluid flow situation. Reynolds number is a measure of the importance of inertia to viscosity effects. Reynolds Number (R e ) Fluid density ( ρ ) X Typical Flowspeed ( Um ) X Typicallength ( D ) Dynamic viscosityof the fluid ( v ) There are three types of flows that can be determined by using the Reynolds Number: 1
1. Laminar flow 2. Transitional flow 3. Turbulent flow There values can be affected by the friction factor within the pipe. For the flow in round pipe, we have: Re < 2100- Laminar flow 2100 < Re < 4000- Transitional flow Re > 4000 - Turbulent flow When the Re<2100, the flow is said to be laminar and therefore it is steady and smooth. As the velocity increases the Re increases and therefore the flow enter a transitional phase where the range of Re is, 2100<Re<4000, in this phase the fluid is not considered to be smooth or chaotic. As the velocity increases further, the fluid enters the turbulent flow where the fluid loses energy and the range of turbulent flow is, Re>4000. The flow is laminar at very low flow rates and dominates viscous effect. In the fully develop region, the viscous forces are in equilibrium with pressure forces so that the velocity profile and pressure gradient remain constant along the pipe. The velocity at the pipe wall is zero hence; the fluid is no slip at wall. The velocity reaches maximum at pipe centreline. Figure 1: Laminar flow in a Pipe In turbulent flow (Re > 4000), the fluid experiences random, chaotic motion, including strong eddy transport on a macro scale, compared with the molecular motion in laminar flow. At high velocity, the fluid continuously undergoes changes in both size and magnitude by which it mixes in an irregular manner and results to a change in the flows behavior constantly. It is however time dependent as it takes time to be created. At the higher flow speeds associated with the turbulent flow the in pipes the effect of viscosity only penetrates a small region close to wall as shown in figure below. 2
Figure 2: Turbulent flow in a pipe Lastly transitional flow, this is when the velocity of the fluid increases at some certain point when the flow is neither laminar nor turbulent. Because the increase in velocity the fluid flow is first broken down then turns to turbulent flow. It is a mixture of laminar and turbulent flow as shown in figure. Figure 3: Transitional flow in a Pipe 3.2 Hydraulic Gradient Hydraulic gradient is the ratio of loss of head to length. It is define as: i = h L L As the fluid flow through the pipe the viscosity of the fluid and surface inside the pipe offers resistance to the flow and in overcoming the same, energy of flowing water is lost. This loss of energy over the weight of water is called loss of head h L and is given by Darcy’s formula: h L = f LV 2 D 2 g Where, D is the diameter of pipe, V is the mean velocity of fluid flow and L is the length across which the loss is measured and f is know as Darcy’s friction coefficient. 3.3 Friction factor The friction factor (f) is the ratio of wall shear stress to internal force of the flow. Its is define as: 3
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
f = ΔP ( D L ) ρV 2 2 Darcy’s Friction Factor This is used to calculate the friction factors for laminar and turbulent flows. For laminar flow; f = 64 From the above equation, it shows that when the Reynolds Number increases the friction factor decreases. For Turbulent flow in smooth pipes and Re < 100,000. f = 0.316 1 4 Dracy’s Friction factor depends on Reynolds number and relative roughness ε D . ε is define as the small diameter of small uniform and grain coated inside the pipe wall that yield the same limiting value for rough condition Furthermore, friction factor can be found using Moody chart (shown in Appendix A). It is a function of relative roughness ε D where ε = pipe roughness and D = pipe diameter. The moody chart shows all three flows, for each flow there is a corresponding value for the friction factor, the relative roughness and the Reynolds Number. 3.4 Moody Chart The Moody chart or Moody diagram is a graph in non-dimensional form that relates the Darcy-Weisbach friction factor f , Reynolds number Re, and relative roughness for fully developed flow in a circular pipe. It is used to find estimate friction factor. 4.0 Procedure 4.1Apparatus A small horizontal pipe of diameter 3mm is utilised to measure the friction loss. The figure below displays the positioning of the lab that outlines the path of water from the supply to the bell-mouth opening to a straight pipe. The water is carried to the straight pipe through a flexible hose. It is 4
through this pipe that the friction loss will be measured. An upstream section is made at a distance of 45-pipe diameter from the entrance of the pipe, where piezometer trappings are located. Similarly, a downstream exists 40 pipe diameters away from the pipe exit. The accuracy of the distance of the streams needs to be maintained so that the results are not being influenced by disturbances near the pipe entrance or exit. The differential pressure is measured when the piezometer tapping is connected to an inverted U-tube manometer. The rate of flow along the pipe is measured using the timing of water collection in a measuring cylinder. Figure 4: Laboratory equipment for the study of flow through a pipe The first step is to make sure that the manometer and the other instruments are all on the one level and stand vertically. The readings are taken in 2 sets. The lower flow rates are measured using the water manometer and the mercury manometer is used for higher flow rates. The readings are taken in 2 sets due to the large range of head differences. In total, 30 reading were recorded in the following manner: 4.2Water manometer readings 1. Open the bench supply valve and adjust until there is a steady flow down the supply tank overflow pipe. 5
2. Made sure the needle valve is closed initially and overflow was allowed to occur before starting the experiment. 3. Turned on the isolating tap to read the manometer. 4. Used the needle valve to regulate the flow rates through the pipe for the 12 readings, started from a low flow rate. 5. Took readings of water manometer h 1 and h 2. 6. Collected a suitable quantity of water in measuring cylinder and recorded the time taken for the collection, hence made sure the exit pipe is above the water and kept the cylinder below the apparatus. 7. 12 results were recorded after repeating steps 4, 5 and 6. 4.3Mercury Manometer Readings 1. The water supply to the pipe is directly from the bench supply instead of the elevated tank, this will allow higher flow rates. 2. Isolate the water manometer by switching the tap to the mercury manometer. 3. Made sure the needle valve was closed initially to make sure that both mercury manometers levels are equal. 4. Used the needle value to regulate water flow by turning it by a quarter and then read the mercury levels of h 1 and h 2. 5. Suitable amount of water was collected in the cylinder and the time was noted down for collecting the amount. 6
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
6. 18 tests were taken by repeating step 4 and 5 for the transitional and turbulent flows. 7. Calculate the flow rates in a similar way as in the 1 st procedure. 5.0 Experimental results Table 1: Properties of water, mercury and pipe Density of water (kg/m 3 ) 1000 Dynamic viscosity of water at 20⁰C (N.s/m 2 ) 0.001002 Diameter of pipe (mm) 3 Length of pipe between piezometer trappings (mm) 524 Roughness height of pipe-wall material, Ԑ (mm) 0.0015 Density of mercury (kg/m 3 ) 13500 Table 2: Water Manometers Reading Tes t No. Qty (ml) Δt (s) Flow rate, Q (m 3 /s) V (m/s) h 1 (mm) h 2 (mm) Hydraulic gradient, i 1 10 19.63 5.09424E-07 0.073 352 338 0.027 2 50 41.42 1.20715E-06 0.171 360 328 0.062 3 50 27.48 1.81951E-06 0.258 364 318 0.088 4 50 19.28 2.59336E-06 0.367 374 308 0.126 5 50 14.8 3.37838E-06 0.478 382 295 0.167 6 50 12.26 4.0783E-06 0.577 391 282 0.209 7 50 20.8 2.40385E-06 0.341 410 260 0.287 8 100 19.25 5.19481E-06 0.735 423 245 0.34 9 150 17.08 8.7822E-06 1.243 438 229 0.399 10 150 25.13 5.96896E-06 0.845 454 208 0.47 11 150 24.36 6.15764E-06 0.872 469 195 0.523 12 150 22.98 6.52742E-06 0.924 489 165 0.619 Table 3: Mercury Manometer Reading Test No. Qty (ml) Δt (s) Flow rate, Q (m 3 /s) V (m/s) h 1 (mm) h 2 (mm) Hydraulic gradient, i 13 100 30.93 3.23311E-06 0.458 143 140 0.072 14 100 18.64 5.36481E-06 0.759 149 135 0.334 7
15 150 21.74 6.89972E-06 0.977 154 130 0.573 16 200 22.16 9.02527E-06 1.277 161 123 0.907 17 250 23.12 1.08131E-05 1.53 170 116 1.289 18 250 20.59 1.21418E-05 1.718 178 109 1.646 19 300 22.43 1.33749E-05 1.893 185 102 1.98 20 300 21.66 1.38504E-05 1.96 193 95 2.338 21 300 20.21 1.48441E-05 2.101 198 92 2.529 22 350 21.27 1.64551E-05 2.328 204 86 2.815 23 350 21.27 1.64551E-05 2.328 210 81 3.078 24 400 22.83 1.75208E-05 2.479 217 75 3.388 25 400 33.1 1.20846E-05 1.71 219 73 3.483 26 400 20.86 1.91755E-05 2.713 223 69 3.674 27 500 25.98 1.92456E-05 2.723 228 64 3.913 28 500 24.93 2.00562E-05 2.838 234 59 4.175 29 500 24.44 2.04583E-05 2.895 239 55 4.39 30 500 23.99 2.0842E-05 2.949 247 48 4.748 Table 4: Results Sheet Hydraulic gradient, i V (m/s) Reynolds number, Re Friction factor, f 0.027 0.073 215.775 L 0.2967 2 0.062 0.171 511.307 L 0.1252 3 0.088 0.258 770.681 L 0.0831 4 0.126 0.367 1098.46 L 0.0583 5 0.167 0.478 1430.967 L 0.0448 6 0.209 0.577 1727.431 L 0.0371 7 0.287 0.341 1018.188 L 0.0629 8 0.34 0.735 2200.344 T 0.0291 9 0.399 1.243 3719.843 T 0.0173 10 0.47 0.845 2528.25 T 0.0254 11 0.523 0.872 2608.166 T 0.0246 12 0.619 0.924 2764.792 T 0.0232 13 0.072 0.458 1369.435 L 0.0468 14 0.334 0.759 2272.351 T 0.0282 15 0.573 0.977 2922.489 T 0.0219 16 0.907 1.277 3822.799 T 0.0168 17 1.289 1.53 4580.083 TU 0.0385 18 1.646 1.718 5142.862 TU 0.0374 19 1.98 1.893 5665.173 TU 0.0365 20 2.338 1.96 5866.566 TU 0.0362 21 2.529 2.101 6287.473 TU 0.0355 22 2.815 2.328 6969.823 TU 0.0346 23 3.078 2.328 6969.823 TU 0.0346 24 3.388 2.479 7421.219 TU 0.0341 25 3.483 1.71 5118.623 TU 0.0374 26 3.674 2.713 8122.072 TU 0.0333 8 Laminar Flow-L Transition Flow-T Turbulent Flow-TU
27 3.913 2.723 8151.772 TU 0.0333 28 4.175 2.838 8495.108 TU 0.033 29 4.39 2.895 8665.427 TU 0.0328 30 4.748 2.949 8827.972 TU 0.0327 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 0 1 2 3 4 5 R² = 0.79 R² = 0 R² = 0 Hydraulic Gradient vs Mean Velocity Laminar Flow Linear (Laminar Flow) Transient Flow Linear (Transient Flow) Turbulent Flow Linear (Turbulent Flow) Mean Velocity V (m/s) Hydraulic Gradient i Fig 5: Hydraulic Gradient vs Mean velocity 0 5000 10000 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04 Experimental Friction Factor and Reynolds Number Laminar Flow Logarithmic (Laminar Flow) Transient Flow Linear (Transient Flow) Turbulent Flow Linear (Turbulent Flow) Reynolds Number, Re Friction Factor, f Fig 6: Friction factor vs Reynolds Number 9
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
6.0 Analysis The theoretical values of friction were obtained by plotting the values of Reynolds number on the Moody chart. For the turbulent flow, the value of friction was predicted by plotting the range of Reynolds numbers on the moody chart using the equivalent roughness ε/D. Where ε is the roughness height of the pipe wall material and D is the Diameter of the Pipe. To choose the curve from the Moody graph we use equivalent roughness and plot the range of Reynolds numbers on the curve to obtain corresponding friction factor value. ε D = 0.0015 3 = 0.0005 mm The obtained theoretical values from Moody chart are as follow: Table 5: Experimental and Theoretical Friction Factor Test No. Reynolds number, Re Friction factor, f (EXPERIMENTAL) Friction factor, f (THEORETICAL) 1 215.775 0.2967 L 0.095 2 511.307 0.1252 L 0.07 3 770.681 0.0831 L 0.06 4 1098.46 0.0583 L 0.059 5 1430.967 0.0448 L 0.048 6 1727.431 0.0371 L 0.0375 7 1018.188 0.0629 L 0.05 8 2200.344 0.0291 T 0.028 9 3719.843 0.0173 T 0.017 10 2528.25 0.0254 T 0.028 11 2608.166 0.0246 T 0.0245 12 2764.792 0.0232 T 0.0235 13 1369.435 0.0468 L 0.052 14 2272.351 0.0282 T 0.028 15 2922.489 0.0219 T 0.023 16 3822.799 0.0168 T 0.017 17 4580.083 0.0385 TU 0.038 18 5142.862 0.0374 TU 0.0362 19 5665.173 0.0365 TU 0.036 20 5866.566 0.0362 TU 0.036 21 6287.473 0.0355 TU 0.0345 22 6969.823 0.0346 TU 0.034 23 6969.823 0.0346 TU 0.034 24 7421.219 0.0341 TU 0.0338 25 5118.623 0.0374 TU 0.036 26 8122.072 0.0333 TU 0.032 10
27 8151.772 0.0333 TU 0.032 28 8495.108 0.033 TU 0.032 29 8665.427 0.0328 TU 0.0321 30 8827.972 0.0327 TU 0.031 Due to the transparency of the chart the obtained values are not accurate. From the fig5 it is observed that the range of transition zone is 2200.343114 <R e <3822.798281. The flow-speed regions of laminar and turbulent flow are shown in fig5. 7.0 Discussion In this experiment it is clearly shown that there is a relationship between the Hydraulic Gradient (i) and the friction factor f and also a relationship between the Reynolds Number (Re) and the flow rate. In order to get the accurate results through out the experiment the density of water and mercury, diameter and volume of pipe were kept constant. The first 12 readings show a laminar regime and a transitional regime as shown in the table2 above. It is noticeable that there is a linear relationship between the hydraulic gradient and the velocity of the fluid for the first twelve tests. However there were a few errors in the experiment as the graph is not 100% linear. These errors can include systematic or human error, as the values may have not been read properly. If the Moody chart is carefully studied it can be seen that the experimental values were close to the theoretical values. The theoretical values of the Reynolds number for the laminar regime was Re<2100 and the highest experimental value found in this experiment was 1727.431, which is only off by 1.02% of the theoretical value. Figure 5 shows that at low velocity the turbulent flow moves to transitional regime and back to laminar regime as the velocity of the flow increases. However as soon as there in an increase to the velocity (1m/s) the flow turns to the transitional regime and that is when the actual transition happens. To have more accurate results, increase the number of tests and add 50ml every time instead of 100ml, this will not give the exact values but it can reduce the number of errors and give a better accurate average value. In figure 6 the turbulent regime can clearly be seen and compared to the Moody chart the turbulent flow is more chaotic and less linear. The experimental turbulent regime starts at Re=4580.083 and the theoretical Re> 4000. There is an error and therefore to improve the test results more tests should be done for every test, at least 3 people should record the time taken to fill the cylinder and have an average of all 3. The inconsistencies can be accounted for by the amount of friction loss occurred through the pipe. The dynamic viscosity of water and mercury affects the Reynolds number and these 2 factors are altered by temperature. Errors have occurred whilst discovering the hydraulic gradient. One proposed reason for the errors is the discharged collection timings. For example, a higher flow of mater results in a difference in height, which lowers the hydraulic gradient. 11
The friction factors are calculated using the data obtained in the experiment. Compared to Moody chart, the line 0.0005 matches in context to roughness. The values for the friction factors are seen in table 5, and the Moody chart is found in the appendix. This can allow for a visual representation between the similarity of the theoretical friction factors and the Moody chart. Compared to the Moody chart, the starting friction factor value is 0.2976, which is a bit too high in the laminar region. The end value of the experimental friction factor is 0.0371 and the Reynolds Number is 1727.431 as compared to this Moody chart, the end value is 0.0375. The experimental value was only by around 0.006, which is very low considering that the starting friction factor was too high. For the transitional region, the theoretical value for the friction factor is about 0.038 and the experimental value is 0.0385, a difference of 0.005, which is quite low. For the turbulent flow, the nature of it is that it decreases the friction factor and that it has been justified in the experiment as seen in table 3. It can also be justified in the Moody chart. The friction factor remains constant as the Reynolds Number increases. Relative roughness constant k s D was used for comparing the values. Equipment error and human error are the 2 main sources of error. It is more likely to be human error due to inaccuracy of value as the values were taken with the assumption of the human eye. Temperature and the layout of the apparatus can give a difference in theoretical and practical results. Friction factor and Reynolds number are inversely proportional, as observed from the experimental results. This complies with the theory. For example, a high Reynolds number with laminar flow will have a higher friction factor whilst with turbulent flow, the vice versa will occur. A large friction factor will create a viscous effect. The loss of velocity profile will only occur when the inertial pressure inside the pipe is too large the effect of friction is no longer relevant. 8.0 Conclusion The results obtained prove that operation was successful as all the objectives were achieved. The Reynolds number and the friction were calculated as well as identifying the types of flows. This experiment helps to understand the concept of fluid flow through pipes with a relative roughness and teaches how to calculate the friction factors for the different regimes. Furthermore, it also helps in understanding the relationship between the hydraulic gradient and the friction factor. A background research was carried out and as expected the laminar flow was linear, the transitional regime had both laminar and turbulent 12
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
characteristics and lastly the turbulent flow had a chaotic nature and was not linear. This experiment contains errors such as human errors that do not make it 100% accurate, but the level of accuracy is relatively high. This can be improved by increasing the number of tests and getting an average time for the water to fill up the cylinder, moreover, having the cylinders high at an eye level will improve the accuracy. However this will be time consuming. 9.0 Appendix Appendix I Calculations: 1. Flow rate, Q ( m 3 / s ) : Flow rate, Q = Volome ,V ( m 3 ) Time ( s ) 1 ml = 1 × 10 6 m 3 Test 5: Qty (ml) = 50, Time (s) = 14.8 Therefore, Flow rate, Q = Volome ,V ( m 3 ) Time ( s ) = ( 50 × 10 6 ) 14.8 = 3.38 × 10 6 m 3 / s 2. Mean velocity calculation, V ( m / s ) : Mean velocity, V = Flow rate ,Q ( m 3 / s ) Area ( m 2 ) and Area = π ( D 2 ) 4 13
Test 5: Q =3.38 × 10 6 m 3 / s , Area = 7.07 × 10 6 m 2 Therefore, V = Flowrate ,Q ( m 3 / s ) Area ( m 2 ) = ( 4.01 × 10 6 ) 7.07 × 10 6 = 0.478 ( m / s ) 3. Hydraulic gradient, i : L = 524 mm = 0.524 m For water manometer: i = ( h 1 h 2 ) L For mercury manometer: i = ( h 1 h 2 )( 12.5 ) L 4. Reynolds number, Re: ℜ= ŪD v Where v = μ ρ 5. Friction Factor calculation: For laminar flow: f = λ = 64 For turbulent flow: f = λ = 0.316 1 4 14
Appendix II Moody Chart attached. 15
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Appendix III Lab Sheet 1 and 2 attached. 16

Browse Popular Homework Q&A

Q: (a) If a hash table uses a hash function that does not satisfy the simple uniform hashing…
Q: True or false…Young people who are in emerging adulthood have the highest rates of loneliness of any…
Q: 1. A gold-colored ring has a mass of 18.9 grams and a volume of 1.12 mL. Is the ring pure gold? Pure…
Q: Is it possible to use the fundamental theorem of calc to find the area between the graph of f(x) = |…
Q: Molecule NH3 H₂S NI3 CS₂ CC14 10 OF 2 SO₂ Part II Answer Table and Questions Name of Molecular Shape…
Q: Explain Various key components of XML.
Q: Check here for instructional material to complete this problem. Evaluate E=z E= 0² 0²/2 + n₁ n₂ *…
Q: Explain the write cycle waveform for memory.
Q: Within the tutorial casino craps game pseudocode, where should you place the pseudocode that…
Q: If you lift the front wheel of a poorly maintained bicycle off the ground and then start it spinning…
Q: WHAT IS THE ADVANTAGE OF USING ADM?
Q: Calculate the definite integral by referring to the figure with the indicated areas. fox)dx Area A =…
Q: A factor that promotes school attendance and academic motivation a. teachers who are supportive and…
Q: Input the minimum and maximum ranges from the user (these are the values the dice will randomly…
Q: Can you also answer part D please. :) Thank you!
Q: Explain in full detail the rise of choirs in early 18th Century America?
Q: 2. Which gender is taller, males or females? A sample of 14-year-olds from the United Kingdom was…
Q: A car tire is 60.0 cm in diameter. The car is traveling at a speed of 24.0 m/s. Part A: What is the…
Q: Lite Number 8.645712
Q: WHAT IS THE ADVANTAGE OF USING ADM?
Q: Find the length of segment UV if segment VW=% inches U Show your work. V W
Q: A data set includes wait times​ (minutes) for the Tower of Terror ride at Walt Disney​ World's…