Education 696 _ Expert Educator Interview and Summary Grading Rubric

pdf

School

Liberty University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

696

Subject

Mechanical Engineering

Date

Feb 20, 2024

Type

pdf

Pages

3

Uploaded by hkuwalik

Report
Criteria Ratings Points Biographical Information about the Expert / Interviewee 10 to >9 pts Advanced A 6 to 7 sentence paragraph is provided that describes the interviewee, his or her position, and why he/she is a credible resource to recruit for the interview. 9 to >8 pts Proficient A 4 to 5 sentence paragraph is provided that describes the interviewee, his or her position, and why he/she is a credible resource to recruit for the interview. 8 to >0 pts Developing Not enough biographical information is provided to highlight why the educator is a credible resource to recruit for the interview. 0 pts Not Present No biographical information about the interviewee is provided. 10 pts Number of Interview Questions 10 to >9 pts Advanced 8 to 10 questions are composed. 9 to >8 pts Proficient 6-7 questions are composed. 8 to >0 pts Developing 1-5 questions are composed. 0 pts Not Present No questions were composed. 10 pts Type of Questions 10 to >9 pts Advanced The questions are creative and open ended and lead to good discussion. 9 to >8 pts Proficient The questions are open ended. 8 to >0 pts Developing Most of the questions are convergent and do not promote discussion. 0 pts Not Present All questions were convergent. 10 pts Relevance of Questions 10 to >9 pts Advanced All questions are clearly related to the project topic. 9 to >8 pts Proficient Most all questions are clearly related to the project topic. 8 to >0 pts Developing Few questions are relevant to the project topic. 0 pts Not Present No questions are relevant to the project topic. 10 pts Responses 10 to >9 pts Advanced All responses clearly represent the words of the interviewee. 9 to >8 pts Proficient Responses appear to represent the words of the interviewee. 8 to >0 pts Developing Few responses appear to represent the words of the interviewee. 0 pts Not Present Responses do not clearly represent the words of the interviewee. 10 pts Expert Educator Interview and Summary Grading Rubric | EDUC696_B01_202420
Criteria Ratings Points Project Question and Response 10 to >9 pts Advanced A question and response addressed the project. The interviewee’s response included the positive aspects of the project AND what could be done to enhance the project. 9 to >8 pts Proficient A question and response addressed the project. The interviewee’s response included the positive aspects of the project OR what could be done to enhance the project. 8 to >0 pts Developing A question and response addressed the project. More clarity should be provided on how the project could be enhanced. 0 pts Not Present No question was provided about the project. 10 pts Personal Analysis 10 to >9 pts Advanced The candidate provided rich description (a complete paragraph or more) about what he/she learned as a result of conducting the interview. 9 to >8 pts Proficient The candidate provided minimal but adequate description about what he/she learned as a result of conducting the interview. 8 to >0 pts Developing The candidate did not provide enough detail to show evidence that he/she learned any new information as a result of conducting the interview. 0 pts Not Present No analysis was provided. 10 pts Format 10 to >9 pts Advanced The directions were followed: the questions and responses were in the form of a transcript with the question in bold text and the responses in plan, “unbolded” text. 9 to >8 pts Proficient The questions and responses were in the form of a transcript. 8 to >0 pts Developing The questions and responses were not in the form of a transcript (but they were comprehendible). 0 pts Not Present The questions and responses were not in the form of a transcript (and they were not comprehendible). 10 pts Mechanical errors in grammar or punctuation or spelling or capitalization 10 to >9 pts Advanced The assignment exhibits no mechanical errors. 9 to >8 pts Proficient The assignment exhibits 2 or 3 mechanical errors. 8 to >0 pts Developing The assignment exhibits 4 to 7 mechanical errors. 0 pts Not Present 8 or more mechanical errors evident. 10 pts Expert Educator Interview and Summary Grading Rubric | EDUC696_B01_202420
Criteria Ratings Points Sentence Structure in the Description of the Interviewee and the Personal Analysis. 10 to >9 pts Advanced Sentence structure uses a variation of simple, compound, complex, and compound complex. Narrative is flowing and competent and represents the writing of a graduate student. 9 to >8 pts Proficient Sentence structure mostly uses a variation of simple, compound, complex, and compound complex. Narrative is competent and represents the writing of a graduate student. 8 to >0 pts Developing Sentence structure is overly simple. Concepts and ideas in the narrative are unclear. The writing rambles and does not represent the writing of a graduate student. 0 pts Not Present The narrative is not comprehendible. 10 pts Total Points: 100 Expert Educator Interview and Summary Grading Rubric | EDUC696_B01_202420
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help