EAP105-12_1

.pdf

School

Muranga University College *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

1326494

Subject

Marketing

Date

Nov 24, 2024

Type

pdf

Pages

Uploaded by johnphilo

SMWC Canvas (CLASS M.N) (NO REPOSITORY) M.N CLASS EAP105-12_1.docx . . Document Details Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2721856189 Submission Date Oct 19, 2023, 12:40 PM EDT Download Date Oct 19, 2023, 12:41 PM EDT File Name EAP105-12_1.docx File Size 22.4 KB 9 Pages 1,507 Words 10,070 Characters Page 1 of 11 - Cover Page Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2721856189 Page 1 of 11 - Cover Page Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2721856189

How much of this submission has been generated by AI? 0% of qualifying text in this submission has been determined to be generated by AI. Caution: Percentage may not indicate academic misconduct. Review required. It is essential to understand the limitations of AI detection before making decisions about a student's work. We encourage you to learn more about Turnitin's AI detection capabilities before using the tool. Frequently Asked Questions What does the percentage mean? The percentage shown in the AI writing detection indicator and in the AI writing report is the amount of qualifying text within the submission that Turnitin's AI writing detection model determines was generated by AI. Our testing has found that there is a higher incidence of false positives when the percentage is less than 20. In order to reduce the likelihood of misinterpretation, the AI indicator will display an asterisk for percentages less than 20 to call attention to the fact that the score is less reliable. However, the final decision on whether any misconduct has occurred rests with the reviewer/instructor. They should use the percentage as a means to start a formative conversation with their student and/or use it to examine the submitted assignment in greater detail according to their school's policies. How does Turnitin's indicator address false positives? Our model only processes qualifying text in the form of long-form writing. Long-form writing means individual sentences contained in paragraphs that make up a longer piece of written work, such as an essay, a dissertation, or an article, etc. Qualifying text that has been determined to be AI-generated will be highlighted blue on the submission text. Non-qualifying text, such as bullet points, annotated bibliographies, etc., will not be processed and can create disparity between the submission highlights and the percentage shown. What does 'qualifying text' mean? Sometimes false positives (incorrectly flagging human-written text as AI-generated), can include lists without a lot of structural variation, text that literally repeats itself, or text that has been paraphrased without developing new ideas. If our indicator shows a higher amount of AI writing in such text, we advise you to take that into consideration when looking at the percentage indicated. In a longer document with a mix of authentic writing and AI generated text, it can be difficult to exactly determine where the AI writing begins and original writing ends, but our model should give you a reliable guide to start conversations with the submitting student. Disclaimer Our AI writing assessment is designed to help educators identify text that might be prepared by a generative AI tool. Our AI writing assessment may not always be accurate (it may misidentify both human and AI-generated text) so it should not be used as the sole basis for adverse actions against a student. It takes further scrutiny and human judgment in conjunction with an organization's application of its specific academic policies to determine whether any academic misconduct has occurred. Page 2 of 11 - AI Writing Overview Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2721856189 Page 2 of 11 - AI Writing Overview Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2721856189

1 Smart Sustainable Packaging Solution Student's Name Institutional Affiliation Course Name and Number Instructor's Name Date Page 3 of 11 - AI Writing Submission Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2721856189 Page 3 of 11 - AI Writing Submission Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2721856189

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

2 1. Introduction Packaging development in the modern world is inextricably tied to the growth of industrialization and consumption. Since its initial utilitarian duty of preserving and safeguarding commodities, packaging has developed into a strategic tool for marketing and brand distinction (Mittal, 2018) . But this advancement has also resulted in severe environmental problems, as the overuse of non-biodegradable materials harms ecosystems. The food and beverage sector has found that the Smart Sustainable Packaging Solution (SSPS) idea is a viable solution to this urgent problem. By fusing cutting-edge technology with environmentally friendly materials, the SSPS seeks to transform traditional packaging methods while maintaining product integrity. This assessment study examines the SSPS in detail, applying the SWOT analysis model to evaluate the product's possible advantages, disadvantages, opportunities, and threats in the context of the market as it exists today. This research aims to highlight the vital role that the SSPS can play in tackling today's environmental issues and satisfying the rising demand from consumers for environmentally friendly packaging options. 2.0 Business Proposition The Smart Sustainable Packaging Solution (SSPS) is a revolutionary development in the packaging field that redefines the industry's traditional assumptions. Modern technology, eco- friendly materials, and a solid commitment to environmental sustainability are the multimodal approaches that set this creative solution apart. To put it briefly, the SSPS uses state-of-the-art, environmentally friendly, and biodegradable materials to lessen the negative environmental consequences of traditional packaging (Fofana, 2023). Using these sustainable materials helps the SSPS reduce its carbon footprint and promotes a circular economy, both of which are aims of the global sustainability agenda. The SSPS also integrates cutting-edge technological Page 4 of 11 - AI Writing Submission Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2721856189 Page 4 of 11 - AI Writing Submission Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2721856189

3 components, such as sophisticated sensors and surveillance systems, to ensure product quality and freshness throughout the supply chain. The seamless integration of technology enhances the functionality of the packaging and increases consumer confidence in the product's dependability and safety. Packaging's environmental effects may be openly disclosed through QR codes and monitoring systems, enabling consumers to make sustainable selections. It is impossible to overstate the significance of the SSPS in the current environmentally conscious market. Growing consumer knowledge and demand for eco-friendly products have pressured firms to adopt sustainable practices. The SSPS is a powerful differentiator for companies trying to portray themselves as ecologically conscientious stewards of the environment and satisfying evolving customer demands. Using the SSPS, businesses may effectively position themselves as leaders in sustainable packaging, improving customer image and brand loyalty. Consequently, by implementing the SSPS, which has redefined packaging regulations and set new norms for environmental responsibility and product sustainability, the food and beverage industry has made a revolutionary step forward. 3.0 Evaluation of Proposition The SWOT analysis model provides a comprehensive framework for assessing the The Smart Sustainable Packaging Solution (SSPS) proposition, scrutinizing its internal and external factors to understand its potential for success. Table 1.0 Strengths Weaknesses Page 5 of 11 - AI Writing Submission Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2721856189 Page 5 of 11 - AI Writing Submission Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2721856189

4 - Reduces plastic waste, aligning with sustainability goals. - High initial investment costs for implementation. - Enhances product safety and freshness. - Complexity in the implementation process. - Promotes brand sustainability and differentiation. - Potential operational disruptions. Table 1.1 Opportunities Threats - Growing consumer preference for sustainable products. - Intense market competition in the packaging industry. - Alignment with government initiatives for eco-friendly solutions. - Fluctuating prices of raw materials, affecting cost-effectiveness. Page 6 of 11 - AI Writing Submission Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2721856189 Page 6 of 11 - AI Writing Submission Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2721856189

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

5 - Potential market expansion in the environmentally conscious consumer segment. - Compliance challenges due to evolving regulatory policies. 3.1 Strengths With many advantages, The Smart Sustainable Packaging Solution (SSPS) is a leader in environmentally friendly packaging. Its main advantages are its noteworthy contribution to the reduction of plastic waste, its resolution of a pressing environmental issue, and its alignment with international sustainability goals (Kumar et al. , 2021) . The SSPS promotes a more sustainable ecosystem by reducing the ecological effect usually associated with conventional non- biodegradable packaging using biodegradable materials. Furthermore, by incorporating cutting- edge monitoring technologies that guarantee the maintenance of product freshness and quality across the supply chain, the SSPS improves product safety. This characteristic not only preserves the packed goods' integrity but also fosters customer confidence and trust. Businesses may also successfully differentiate themselves in a competitive market and appeal to the growing environmentally conscious consumer base by implementing the SSPS and showcasing their commitment to brand sustainability. 3.2 Weaknesses The Smart Sustainable Packaging Solution (SSPS) has drawbacks despite its advantages. One significant disadvantage is the upfront investment expenses associated with switching to the SSPS. Using eco-friendly materials and cutting-edge technologies frequently requires substantial upfront costs, which may be expensive for small enterprises. Furthermore, the intricacy of the Page 7 of 11 - AI Writing Submission Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2721856189 Page 7 of 11 - AI Writing Submission Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2721856189

6 implementation procedure might pose difficulties, necessitating specific knowledge and resources that certain businesses could want assistance obtaining. Companies looking to implement the SSPS may face additional financial hardship due to delays and operational interruptions brought on by this complexity. 3.3 Opportunities Given the industry's present state, the Smart Sustainable Packaging Solution (SSPS) is in a solid position to take advantage of several opportunities. The growing inclination of customers towards sustainable products is an opportunity for SSPS to capitalize on a swiftly growing market niche and meet the changing needs of eco-aware consumers (Lotfi, Yousefi and Jafari, 2018) . Additionally, the SSPS may benefit from possible incentives and subsidies by supporting government programs promoting eco-friendly packaging solutions. It would lower the financial barriers to adoption and create a favorable regulatory framework for sustainable packaging practices. 3.4 Threats Smart Sustainable Packaging Solution (SSPS) has a lot of potential; there are many outside dangers that might prevent it from being successfully adopted. The fierce rivalry between current packaging industry companies for market share and customer attention poses a threat. The competitive environment makes it difficult for the SSPS to be widely accepted and integrated, necessitating strong value propositions and marketing campaigns to set it apart from traditional packaging options (Boz, Korhonen and Sand, 2020) . Furthermore, the SSPS's total cost- effectiveness may be impacted by the rising and falling prices of raw materials, particularly those related to environmentally friendly components, which influence the product's competitiveness and viability in the market. Furthermore, firms may need help complying with the changing Page 8 of 11 - AI Writing Submission Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2721856189 Page 8 of 11 - AI Writing Submission Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2721856189

7 regulatory rules regarding sustainable packaging requirements, which will require constant adaptation and adherence to strict environmental criteria. 4.0 Recommendations To reduce possible dangers and correct identified vulnerabilities, it is crucial to implement an effective strategy related to the Smart Sustainable Packaging Solution (SSPS). First, businesses could look into government financing sources or collaborations with sustainable investment firms to lessen the financial burden of initial implementation expenses. At the same time, operational interruptions may be minimized by streamlining the implementation process with thorough training courses and readily available technical assistance (Prasad, 2022) . By stressing the SSPS's long-term cost-saving advantages, companies may be persuaded to see the initial expenditure as a strategic opportunity instead of a financial loss. Additionally, establishing partnerships with industry participants, such as vendors and merchants, helps optimize the supply chain and lessen reliance on variable raw material costs, improving the SSPS's economic viability. Furthermore, extensive awareness efforts must be launched to improve the SSPS's acceptance among companies and customers. The primary goal of these efforts should be consumer education on the adverse effects of traditional packaging on the environment and the advantages of transitioning to sustainable alternatives. Working with influencers and environmental organizations may help these awareness campaigns reach a wider audience and have a more significant impact, ultimately leading to consumer demand for the SSPS. Furthermore, promoting regulatory support and incentives via advocacy and conversation with politicians and industry leaders can foster a favorable climate for the widespread implementation of the SSPS in the food and beverage sector. 5.0 Conclusion Page 9 of 11 - AI Writing Submission Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2721856189 Page 9 of 11 - AI Writing Submission Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2721856189

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

8 The assessment study highlights the Smart Sustainable Packaging Solution (SSPS) 's critical role in advancing sustainable practices in the food and beverage sector. The SWOT model was used to conduct a thorough study of the SSPS, highlighting its potential to reduce environmental impacts and satisfy the rising demand from consumers for eco-friendly packaging options. Stressing how important it is for companies to use eco-friendly packaging supports global sustainability objectives and establishes them as accountable stewards of the environment. A revolutionary step towards a more sustainable and environmentally friendly future for the food and beverage sector and the world at large is the adoption of the SSPS. Page 10 of 11 - AI Writing Submission Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2721856189 Page 10 of 11 - AI Writing Submission Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2721856189

9 6.0 References Mittal, M. (2018) 'The evolution of packaging - Digital Packaging Experiences - medium,' Medium , 12 June. https://medium.com/digital-packaging-experiences/the-evolution-of-packaging- 57259054792d . Fofana, O. (2023) 'Unpacking the environmental footprint of food packaging materials,' Packaging Gateway , 31 August. https://www.packaging-gateway.com/features/environmental-footprint- food- packaging/#:~:text=Biodegradable%20packaging%20materials%20are%20designed,ecological% 20impacts%20of%20plastic%20pollution . Kumar, Rakesh et al. (2021) 'Impacts of plastic pollution on ecosystem services, sustainable development goals, and need to focus on circular economy and policy interventions,' Sustainability , 13(17), p. 9963. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179963 . Lotfi, M., Yousefi, A. and Jafari, S. (2018) 'The effect of emerging Green Market on green entrepreneurship and sustainable Development in Knowledge-Based Companies,' Sustainability , 10(7), p. 2308. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072308 . Boz, Z., Korhonen, V. and Sand, C.K. (2020) 'Consumer Considerations for the Implementation of Sustainable Packaging: A review,' Sustainability , 12(6), p. 2192. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062192 . Prasad, A. (2022) 'Mobilizing private climate financing in emerging market and developing economies,' IMF eLibrary [Preprint]. https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400216428.066.A001 . Page 11 of 11 - AI Writing Submission Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2721856189 Page 11 of 11 - AI Writing Submission Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2721856189

Recommended textbooks for you

Principles Of Marketing

Marketing

ISBN:9780134492513

Author:Kotler, Philip, Armstrong, Gary (gary M.)

Publisher:Pearson Higher Education,

Marketing

ISBN:9781259924040

Author:Roger A. Kerin, Steven W. Hartley

Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education

Foundations of Business (MindTap Course List)

Marketing

ISBN:9781337386920

Author:William M. Pride, Robert J. Hughes, Jack R. Kapoor

Publisher:Cengage Learning

Marketing: An Introduction (13th Edition)

Marketing

ISBN:9780134149530

Author:Gary Armstrong, Philip Kotler

Publisher:PEARSON

MKTG 12:STUDENT ED.-TEXT

Marketing

ISBN:9781337407595

Author:Lamb

Publisher:Cengage

Contemporary Marketing

Marketing

ISBN:9780357033777

Author:Louis E. Boone, David L. Kurtz

Publisher:Cengage Learning

SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS

Recommended textbooks for you

Principles Of Marketing
Marketing
ISBN:9780134492513
Author:Kotler, Philip, Armstrong, Gary (gary M.)
Publisher:Pearson Higher Education,
Marketing
Marketing
ISBN:9781259924040
Author:Roger A. Kerin, Steven W. Hartley
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Foundations of Business (MindTap Course List)
Marketing
ISBN:9781337386920
Author:William M. Pride, Robert J. Hughes, Jack R. Kapoor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Marketing: An Introduction (13th Edition)
Marketing
ISBN:9780134149530
Author:Gary Armstrong, Philip Kotler
Publisher:PEARSON
MKTG 12:STUDENT ED.-TEXT
Marketing
ISBN:9781337407595
Author:Lamb
Publisher:Cengage
Contemporary Marketing
Marketing
ISBN:9780357033777
Author:Louis E. Boone, David L. Kurtz
Publisher:Cengage Learning