Reflection and Discussion Forum Week 4

docx

School

Trine University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

AUDITING

Subject

Management

Date

Nov 24, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

4

Uploaded by MasterScience9621

Report
I found Chapter 8: Decision Making and Problem Solving very interesting to discuss. Decision making and problem solving are two crucial elements in our daily lives. They are essential skills that involve gathering relevant information, evaluating alternatives, and making choices. Making decisions involves choosing a course of action among various alternatives, while problem solving is a systematic process of finding a solution to a specific issue or challenge. The decision-making process starts by identifying the problem or the situation that requires a decision (Herrera-Viedma et al., 2020). Then, we collect relevant information and analyze it to understand the situation better. The next step is to review and evaluate possible solutions or options. Finally, a decision is made based on the best available choice. Problem solving, on the other hand, involves identifying the root cause of an issue and devising a solution to address it. It requires critical thinking skills, creativity, and a logical approach. The process involves defining the problem, gathering information, brainstorming possible solutions, evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of each option, and choosing the best solution. Effective decision-making and problem-solving skills are essential in personal, professional, and academic contexts. They help individuals overcome challenges, make informed choices, and achieve their goals. Furthermore, these skills can be improved by continuously practicing and gaining experience. With the right approach and mindset, decision making and problem solving can become powerful tools for success and growth. Graduate-level response
Select a personal decision that you are currently making or that you will need to make soon. It might be picking a major, buying a car, renting an apartment, choosing a job, or something else. Now apply the rational decision-making process to it by identifying criteria and goals, assigning weights to the criteria, generating and evaluating alternatives, ranking the alternatives, and making a decision. Next, compare the outcome of this decision with the outcome you would have reached by following a more intuitive or emotional process. Are the outcomes different? Which process do you feel led you to the best decision? Why? The personal decision that I am currently making is choosing a job offer. I recently graduated from college and have been fortunate enough to receive multiple job offers in my field. However, with each offer comes its own set of factors to consider and it has been a challenging decision to make. To apply the rational decision-making process, the first step is to clearly identify my criteria and goals (Mukhametzyanov, 2021). Some of the criteria that are important to me are salary, benefits, location, job responsibilities, and growth opportunities. My main goals for this decision are to have job stability and growth potential while also being able to maintain a good work-life balance. After identifying the criteria and goals, I assigned weights to each of them based on their importance to me. Salary and location were given a higher weightage because I want to live comfortably in a big city. Benefits and growth opportunities were also given a considerable weightage because I want a job that would not only provide immediate financial stability but also long-term career growth.
Next, I generated and evaluated the alternatives based on these criteria. I researched about the companies, their values, and their financial stability. I also reached out to employees in each of the companies to gather information about the work culture and growth opportunities. After evaluating each of the alternatives, I ranked them based on how well they align with my criteria and goals. The outcome of this decision-making process was that I chose the job offer that provided the highest salary, good benefits, located in a big city, and offered opportunities for growth. This option ticked all the boxes of my criteria and goals and seemed like the best decision based on a rational approach. On the other hand, following an intuitive or emotional process may have led me to a different outcome. In this process, I would have primarily focused on how the job offer made me feel. I may have been swayed by factors such as the company's reputation, my connection with the interviewer, or the excitement of a new adventure. The outcomes of the two processes would have been different. While the intuitive process may have seemed initially appealing, it may not have aligned with my long-term goals and priorities. The rational process, on the other hand, considered all the factors and led me to a decision that promises financial stability, growth, and balance. Ultimately, I believe that the rational decision-making process led me to the best decision. It allowed me to objectively consider all the factors and make a well-informed decision that aligns with my criteria and goals. It also ensures that I am not swayed by emotions and impulses in the heat of the moment. The outcome of this decision is one that I am confident in and I believe will lead me towards a successful and fulfilling career path.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
References Herrera-Viedma, E., Palomares, I., Li, C. C., Cabrerizo, F. J., Dong, Y., Chiclana, F., & Herrera, F. (2020). Revisiting fuzzy and linguistic decision making: Scenarios and challenges for making wiser decisions in a better way. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems , 51 (1), 191-208. Mukhametzyanov, I. (2021). Specific character of objective methods for determining weights of criteria in MCDM problems: Entropy, CRITIC and SD. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering , 4 (2), 76-105.