case study (1)

docx

School

Raunaq-e-Islam Govt. College for Women, Karachi *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

200

Subject

Management

Date

Nov 24, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

Uploaded by JudgeAtom9890

Unilever's case study Introduction This report analyses Unilever's case study. The company adopted USLP's financial approach. It will help companies operate and operate sustainably. USLP drives Unilever's revolutionary approach. The Unilever case study demonstrates how this method has yielded outstanding outcomes. It's been helpful. The case study explains Unilever's strategic vision. Before USLP, they had no clear goals, but now they have competitiveness. Detailing the core issues and strategies. It is through the use of leadership theory such as Porter's model and generic strategies that it is sufficient to interpret the behavior of a company about the competition within a particular sector. These designs are considered to be significant components of systems thinking. The word "generic strategy" refers to a wide range of applications and opportunities to gain a competitive edge, regardless of the type of organization, the field in which they operate, or the size of the business. For a corporate plan to be successful, philosophy must always be included. A corporation can discover its place in the market and have a better understanding of its clientele by employing an efficient competitive strategy. According to Porter, firms can achieve a competitive advantage through the use of tactics. The basis on which this benefit can be gained is cost leadership, differentiation, and focus. These are what Porter refers to as competitive strategies (Tony, G, 2006). Q NO: 1 The Application of Porter's Generic Framework Across all of its business, Unilever manages its productivity using a large variety of programs and practices that encompass vision, budgeting, delivery, and talent management. The managing of risks is incorporated into every phase. The Unilever firm is a massive company that operates its headquarters out of London, in the United Kingdom. Its trademark has achieved widespread recognition in a wide range of business segments across the globe. As per Gautam, it operates in the meals, care products, and housewares markets in addition to the residential market Hwy-Chang, M, et al, 2014). Uniliver can describe its strategic competitive plans by referring to Michael Porter's business model. Porter's generic competitive strategy is a

framework for identifying the strategic direction of the organization and attaining competitiveness over its business rivals. The strategy is named after Porter, who developed the approach. Michael Porter presents a company with 4 possible courses of action that can select one. He thinks that a business should establish a well-defined strategy to surpass its rivals. Unilever may employ any mixture of these strategies to lessen the impact of the market or help control it (Islami, Xhavit., et al, 2020). Unilever’s strategies Unilever's strategy and the realization of Unilever's long-term goals are inextricably intertwined with risk management. Opportunity recognition and utilization are critical to our company's long-term success. By doing so, we adopt an embedded strategy for risk management, which positions risk and opportunity assessment at the very top of the Board's to-do list. What motivates Unilever to take risks is:  Unilever’s expansion must be steady, aggressive, profitable, and ethical.  It is imperative that our responses to pressing problems, such as trash emissions to the environment, match the magnitude of the situation and are not hampered by the lack of confidence around those problems' possible consequences.  Each of us is responsible for ensuring that our actions are consistent with the values outlined in our Corp Business Principles and Code Policies.  Unilever strives to increase performance and productivity in all areas of our business.  In the long run, we'd like to keep our creditworthiness at the A+/A2 level. Unilever's strategy to credit risk is built around the idea of providing adequate assurance that the receivables are secure, that the risks facing the business are being evaluated and dealt with, and that any knowledge that may be legally bound to be revealed has been mentioned to the company's top brass. A sustainable and meaningful business produces a response to great profitability, according to Unilever's Compass (Justin, Y, 2016). This statement seems to be more important than ever. Covid-19 focused attention and energy on the international medical condition, but it also informed us of the instability of the environment we inhabit, with climate change and inequality growing increasingly serious. By focusing on

answers to these concerns, we engage closer personally with the billions of individuals we represent. They expect firms and organizations to tackle history's biggest serious issues of sustainability, not merely paying due attention. Last year's main efforts highlighted the power and relevance of the Unilever Compass. Clean Future pledges to eliminate petroleum carbon in cleaning and laundry products by 2030. Future Foods aims to transform the global food system, eliminate wasted food, and promote flower meat and animal product substitutes. These consumer-driven efforts are manufacturing. Earlier, Uniliver outlined how we want to leverage our scale and influence to build a more equal and open society. This involves paying everyone in our product network a proper salary by 2030 and educating our people for the future of work including training and adaptable job opportunities. The following table gives us a clear clue to understanding Unilivre’s strategies for working and financial management. Bellow’s illustration clarifies the vision of Unilever.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

Analysis of Unilever’s generic strategy: Unilever's generic approach (based on Michael Porter's concept) focuses on meeting clients' requirements and wants. Porter's model uses general tactics to promote workforce productivity, expansion, and durability. Unilever's competitive advantage is based on research- driven mass production. The business grows by combining aggressive approaches. Unilever's ambitious expansion strategy depends on the household products sector. Combining porter's generic and terms of the increase ensures Unilever's leading position. Unilever maintains a competitive advantage in the global consumer products business by employing Porter's methodology. Such a core competency allows Unilever to employ aggressive growth methods to grow the economy. Unilever focuses on relative costs. Servicing a narrow audience at the cheapest price is the limited focus method. The best value focus strategy emphasizes flavor, size, and style to meet client needs. By focusing on product attributes, Unilever revises its branding strategy and modifies industrial design and marketing to fulfill clients' higher test scores and optimize value. QNO: 2 How well a firm is positioned relative to its competitors is the most important factor in determining whether or not its revenue is above average for its industry. This metric is used to assess whether or not the company's profitability is above average in its sector. Long-term professional success depends on a company's power to keep onto its competitiveness. The fundamental business tactics utilized by Unilever include cost leadership, differentiation, focus differentiation, and focus cost.

The four strategies are called:  Cost Leadership Strategy  Differentiation Strategy  Cost Focus Strategy  Differentiation Focus Strategy Cost Leadership Strategy When a company implements the Cost Leadership Strategy, the primary objective is to cut the amount of money it takes to provide a commodity or offer a service. This makes the company more financially viable, which enables it to either increase shareholder value or invest in other components of the business approach. Review the following items as part of your investigation into the Cost Leadership Strategy:  Associated costs with your present providers  Tools and methods that can streamline your operations  How quickly and effectively a procedure can complete a task  The value of your personnel and how they develop If executed properly, the Cost Leadership Strategy provides businesses with several opportunities, including but not limited to the following.  Making more money while keeping expenses the same.  The refusal to raise prices when rivals have no choice  We're dropping prices to attract. Earnings can be reinvested to increase product variety, efficiency, and investment returns ((Daniela Ortiz, A & Kühne, S, 2008).

Differentiation strategy The goal of the differentiation strategy is to set a company's goods and services apart from those of its rivals. This narrow approach covers a broad range, from offering a large variety of products to offering specialized options for an existing core offering. Checking out the Ansoff Matrix and the 4Ps of Innovation will complement your investigation into the Differentiation Strategy. When analyzing the Differentiation Strategy, it is important to gain insight into the following:  What you have to offer now in terms of goods and services  The portfolios of similar businesses to yours  Patterns in user reviews  Innovating using the existing set of tools and tools  Quantifying the Price of a Commodity  Every merger and activity you've seen in the industry, and whether or not it presents an opportunity for you  Compare your present 4Ps strategy with the ideal one. If executed properly, the Differentiation Strategy provides businesses with several opportunities:  Expand the network to increase sales stability.  Increase the size of your current earnings through upselling or new deal closures.  Expansion of current income sources through increased pricing  Introducing service or product options to the industry  Getting your core audience excited about your brand-new qualities  Consumers are more likely to stick with a company if they are consistently satisfied (Wind, Yoram, and S. Robertson, T, 1983). Cost Focus Strategy This economic approach has two parts, as the title says. The "Focus" is achieved when a business hones down on a specific sector or region by becoming the go-to provider for that marketplace. Like the Cost Leadership Strategy we mentioned before, "Price" relates to the group's ability to produce the good or service at a low cost to the economy. All the advantages of Cost Leadership are present, and more, with this approach.  Has become the go-to expert in your field  Establishing strategic alliances with competing businesses  Adding authority to your industry's narrative as a whole.  Gain consumer devotion by being the market leader and only option . Differentiation Strategy Developed from the Differentiation Strategy, the Differentiation Focus Strategy emphasizes key areas of variation. Like the Cost-Focused approach, this one has two facets: one emphasizes the

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

method's emphasis on differentiating itself from the competition, while another emphasizes the company is operating in a high system that focuses. In addition to all the advantages of Differentiation, this tactic additionally offers these advantages:  Marketing to existing clients in other segments of a business  Altering the Marketplace by Substituting Alternative Goods  Developing new solutions to market as ancillary items Limitations of strategies Limitations arise when analyzing a company's structure via the lens of more abstract concepts. Companies that adopt the same generic strategy often have similar structures and cultures. To maintain their cheap prices, big players often cut back on promotional activities. Although often the case, not all cost leaders operate in this manner. Walmart, which also employs a competitive pricing strategy, invests a disproportionately large amount of money in print and television advertising compared to competitors like Waffle Restaurant. This means that a company might not exhibit all the traits associated with its generic approach. Specific to the needs of the market in which a certain company operates, it may be crucial to make minor adjustments to an otherwise effective generic business plan. Strategic planning at the corporate level considers the dynamics of competition within a certain market. Managers decide if their firm's competitiveness stems from low prices or unique selling propositions, or if the company's activities will serve a wide or niche customer base, all of which inform the company's strategic direction (Kong University of Hong, 2015). Conclusion Unilever's capacity to select the ideal configuration of planned generic and aggressive expansion methods, taking into account the existing increasing competition circumstances, is a significant contributor to the company's remarkable level of business potential. In general, the findings of the study indicate that the risks and costs associated with each intensive development plan are distinct from one another, and the selection of one growth strategy over another by a company is connected to generic business expansion. Management can appropriate advertising its core objectives, which are to maintain profits, earn a profit, and develop its pricing power when it applies Porter's competitive strategy. These aims are to stay in business, make a profit, and grow its market share. These objectives are essential to the continued operation of every organization. This study presents a significant commitment to the scientific value about the effect of Porter's generic strategies on firm value in Uniliver, in the surrounding area, or beyond (Daniela Ortiz, A & Kühne, S, 2008).

References Islami, Xhavit, et al. (2020). “Linking Porter’s Generic Strategies to Firm Performance - Future Business Journal.” Retrieved from https://fbj.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s43093-020- 0009-1 . Kong, university of Hong. (2015). “Limitations of Generic Strategies | Open Textbooks for Hong Kong.” Open Textbooks for Hong Kong. Retrieved from https://www.opentextbooks.org.hk/ditatopic/17222 Justin, Y. (2016). “Unilever’s Generic Strategy & Intensive Growth Strategies. Retrieved from https://panmore.com/unilever-generic-strategy-intensive-growth-strategies Hwy-Chang, M, et al. (2014). Extending Porter's generic strategies: from three to eight. European J. of International Management. 8. 205 - 225. 10.1504/EJIM.2014.059583 Tony, G. (2006). "Rethinking and reinventing Michael Porter's five forces model." Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jsc.764 Daniela Ortiz, A & Kühne, S. (2008). "Implementing responsible business behavior from a strategic management perspective: Developing a framework for Austrian SMEs." Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-008-9897-7 Wind, Yoram, and S. Robertson, T. (1983). "Marketing strategy: new directions for theory and research." Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/002224298304700203

case study (1)

Related Documents