SHELL UK

docx

School

KASB Institute of Technology, Karachi (Main Campus) *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

214

Subject

Management

Date

Nov 24, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

Uploaded by IQRAY5

Student Name: Student ID: Assignment: Integrated Management (SHELL UK)

Table of Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction: .................................................................................................................................... 3 Company Background ..................................................................................................................... 4 Shell UK & The Paradox of Sustainable Management: .................................................................. 4 Corporate Function: The strategic role of the supply chain: ........................................................... 5 Ways to Enhance Shell UK's Logistics Management: ..................................................................... 5 First controversy: The Brent Spar incident at Shell UK .................................................................. 5 Second Controversy: The Shell UK Nigeria Issue .......................................................................... 7 Shell UK's actions: ........................................................................................................................... 8 Corporate Function: Supply Chain Management ............................................................................ 9 Examining the Internal factors: ....................................................................................................... 9 Recommendations For Shell UK: .................................................................................................. 10 Conclusion: .................................................................................................................................... 12 References ...................................................................................................................................... 12

Executive Summary This inquiry, which uncovers a comprehensive restructuring procedure, is examining the intricate obstacles underlying Shell UK's problem and apprehensions over leadership responsibility. The Nigeria incident may have contributed to a greater recognition of Brent Spar's resilience, adherence to environmentally friendly sustainability, and smart responses to issues. The article delves into the internal operations of the company, specifically focusing on the oversight of the supply chain. It highlights the significance of these departments in the development of ecologically and ethically sound practises. Shell UK carefully balances its corporate objectives and societal obligations by continuously assessing its recruitment practises, decision-making approaches, and environmental impacts. The concepts priorities the importance of ethical practises, promoting innovation, and enhancing transparency in order to propel Shell UK forward a more enduring and environmentally-friendly future.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

Introduction: An important participant in the oil business, Shell UK has persevered through lawsuits that almost halted its expansion. While dealing with the Brent Spar & Nigerian crises, the company had to show its determination and dedication to meticulous management. The conflicts at Shell UK, a prominent player in the global energy market, demonstrate the interconnectedness of public desires and corporate ambitions. This study provides insight into the company's journey to more environmentally friendly practises by describing the events and obstacles it encountered. This research delves at Shell UK's problem-solving methodology while examining the changing ethical standards of the energy industry (Shell, 2021). Company Background For many years, Shell UK has served as an influential force in the energy sector, and the world has taken notice of and adopted the company's groundbreaking innovations. The many responsibilities carried out by Royal Dutch Shell extend well beyond the extraction, processing, and distribution of oil and gas. With its extensive network, Shell UK dominates the UK's energy market. Few firms can compete with Shell UK's extensive operational network and stellar reputation for technical innovation when it comes to addressing the complex energy demands of contemporary society (Shell, 2021). Shell UK's Present Situation: Adjusting to Change: Shell UK now has a leading position in the energy transition. In response to changing market conditions and the worldwide emphasis on sustainability, the firm is proactively adjusting its range of products and services. Shell UK is actively adopting clean energy sources and cutting- edge technology to navigate the transition towards a zero-carbon future. The company's dedication to environmental stewardship, along with continuous endeavors to expand its energy portfolio, demonstrates its proactive approach in addressing the demands of the current dynamic energy market. During this period of change, Shell UK continues to be a strong and flexible participant in influencing the next phase of energy (Greenpeace, 2021) .

Shell UK & The Paradox of Sustainable Management: In its pursuit of a balance between business goals and public expectations, Shell UK encounters the challenges of responsible governance. Ethical and environmental considerations have been challenging to include into the company's operations. Discussions about Nigeria & Brent Spar show how difficult it is to strike a balance between making a profit and acting ethically as a company. In light of this challenging scenario and the energy industry's moment of significant transformation, Shell UK must take urgent action to rethink the way it operates as an ethical organization. Critical evaluation of the development of responsible management in the energy industry is necessitated by the problems brought about by these events (Shell, 2021) Corporate Function: The strategic role of the supply chain: An important part of Shell UK's approach to responsible management is the supplier chain. The interconnected nature of sourcing, distribution, and logistics determines the extent to which a business harms people and the planet. Major events including the recent Brent Spar issue and the recent Nigeria debate highlight the importance of the supply network function in decision- making. Shell UK's dedication to ethical sourcing, community involvement, and ecologically and socially sensitive business practices has set an example across the supply chain. This proves that the supply chain is crucial for handling the complexities of the energy industry and making sure that corporations are responsible (Times., 2022). Ways to Enhance Shell UK's Logistics Management: Social and environmental repercussions are significantly affected by Shell UK's management of supply chains strategies. Since it takes into account the whole process, including sourcing, transportation, logistics, and more, the supply chain is a crucial component of responsible management practices. Incorporating environmental awareness and volunteerism into the company's supply chain operations demonstrates its dedication to ethical sourcing and transparency. Shell UK has established the strategic aims of increasing transparency, decreasing environmental impact, and fostering moral supply chain use since ethical energy operations are critical to the performance and long-term sustainability of the organization.

First controversy: The Brent Spar incident at Shell UK Occurrence: On June 20, 1995, Shell UK was involved in a big controversy over the relocation of the company's subsidiary Brent Spar, which is a facility for storing and loading North Sea crude oil. The first plan by Shell to sink the building in the water caused public outcry and protests. What caused the event to occur: The rationale for submerging Brent Spar was that it would be both economical and environmentally friendly. But the lack of transparency and the inadequate evaluation of environmental impacts led to the dispute's emergence. Many people were against the disposal method because of the damage it was believed to do to the environment. When and where: The Brent Spar incident took place in the northwestern Sea, quite close to the coordinates 61°18’N, 01°45’E. In June 1995, the controversy was at its peak. Concerns over emissions of carbon: Concerns about the carbon emissions associated with Shell's offshore operations were a major source of anxiety throughout the debate. Corporate commitment to the environment and its impact on carbon emissions were investigated after the Brent Spar accident (Times, 1995). Consequences: Following the Brent Spar tragedy, public trust in Shell UK plummeted, leading to scrutiny of the company's environmental policy. This event has caused a sea shift in how the oil and gas industry view environmental preservation. Strategy for the project's implementation by Shell UK : Because of what had transpired, Shell UK was far more transparent and participatory when making decisions. To make ensuring it stood in line with the values that the public anticipated and valued, the business launched talks with concerned parties, notably those in the sustainability

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

area. The incident caused Shell to reconsider its environmental policies and take a more responsible stance, according to The Times (1995). Actions Performed by Shell: An Analysis of the Termination Protocols: After the Brent Spar incident, Shell's decommissioning processes were thoroughly reviewed. In response to calls for a greener method of decommissioning offshore facilities, the company has promised to look at other options. Involvement of stakeholders: In light of the public's concerns, Shell implemented a new policy that makes decision-making more transparent and inclusive. A number of interested parties, including local associations and environmental organizations, were contacted by the company. We aimed to reestablish trust in the method of decision-making by introducing multiple points views into the discussion process.The relocation of Shell UK's Brent Spar business, which receives and processes crude oil via the North Sea, caused a huge controversy on June 20, 1995. When Shell first intended to sink the structure, it caused a public outcry and protests. Allocation of resources towards research and innovation. Shell allocated resources towards research and innovation in order to discover ecologically sustainable solutions for disposing of offshore constructions. The Brent Spar event acted as a drive for the energy sector to investigate novel technology and strategies that may reduce the environmental consequences throughout the decommissioning process. Execution of Environmental Management Exercises: Shell adopted rigorous environmental management follows to decrease the effect of its activities. The group developed and implemented standards for evaluating and managing environmental hazards linked to offshore operations, demonstrating a dedication to conscientious environmental management (Times, 1995) . Second Controversy: The Shell UK Nigeria Issue Occurrence:

Shell was accused of violating human rights and causing environmental harm in the Niger Delta, which sparked the Nigeria issue in the early 2000s. The corporation faced allegations of exacerbating oil spills, causing detrimental effects on local populations, and colluding against the Nigerian government to repress opposition. Why the incident happened: The event in Nigeria was caused by a multifaceted mix of circumstances, including insufficient upkeep of oil infrastructures regulatory difficulties, and socio-political tensions. The company's alleged involvement in human rights violations in Nigeria stems from its tight relationships to the country's administration (Watch, 2019). The time and place: Much of the violence in the Niger Delta's Ogoniland area has its roots in the civil war in Nigeria. The long-running dispute finally burst into flames just before the new century. Concerns pertaining to releases of carbon: Concerns regarding carbon emissions are magnified by the oil production and extraction processes, as the Nigerian debate highlighted. Concerns about the environmental impacts of Shell's energy activities in the delta of the Niger, such as gas consumption and oil spills, have cast doubt on the company's commitment to mitigating climate change. Impact: The oil spill in Nigeria has severely damaged Shell's reputation globally. There were a lot of protests, litigation, and unfavorable comments made against the company. Watch (2019) notes that the tragedy also triggered a more comprehensive review of Shell's operations in other domains. The plan for Shell UK to execute change: Shell UK wanted to reiterate its commitment to environmental and human rights protection in view of current developments in Nigeria. The company spent money on cutting-edge electronics and upgraded infrastructure to make oil spills less likely. They went above and above by taking

part in community development projects and by pushing for honest and accountable communication across neighborhood associations. Shell UK's actions: Initiatives for Growth and Involvement of the Community: After the Nigerian conflict brought attention to the need of community welfare, Shell launched extensive community engagement initiatives and development plans in the Niger Delta. These programs were developed to address the social and economic needs of the surrounding communities that were affected by the company's operations. Shell has shown its commitment to improving the quality of life in the region by forming partnerships and investing in community development. Enhanced Protocols for the Protection of the Environment: After realizing its operations had negative effects on the environment, Shell took decisive steps to improve environmental protections across all of its Nigerian operations. In order to lessen the impact of their activities on the environment and prevent oil spills, the corporation invested heavily in cutting-edge machinery and systems. Shell exhibited its commitment to environmentally responsible and moral conduct by aligning the company's activities with global ecological norms. According to Hoffman (2017), the acknowledgement highlights the critical need to conserve the vulnerable ecosystem throughout the Nigerian delta region that are impacted by Shell's operations. Corporate Function: Supply Chain Management Both issues revolved on the supply chain. Everyone in the supply chain was looking at costs and logistics throughout the Brent Spar tragedy to figure out the best way to dispose of the debris. Several tasks pertaining to the supply chain were engaged in the Nigerian problem. These included, among other things, compliance and servicing regulations, petroleum extraction, and the administration of extraction operations. In both cases, Shell UK sought to improve environmental sustainability and community connections via supply chain adjustments.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

Examining the Internal factors: Approaches to Environmental Protection: To comprehend Shell UK's response to crises like the Brent Spar and Nigeria, one must examine the company's internal environmental stewardship policies thoroughly. To better understand the company's commitment to reducing carbon emissions, it is helpful to look at how they have integrated sustainable practices, invested in technology, and developed eco-friendly solutions (Levy, 2003). Logistics and operations management: The scandals highlight how important Shell UK's supply chain is to putting responsible management practises into effect. The internal study should primarily examine how a supply chain operation effectively tackles difficulties pertaining to emissions of carbon dioxide, ethical purchasing, and community participation. Evaluating the efficacy of supply chain efforts offers insight into the company's dedication to business practises that are ethical. Corporate Governance and the Process of Making Decisions: Investigating the internal workings of making decisions and corporate governance is essential. An analysis of the company's handling of disputes, strategic decision-making, and integration of stakeholder input reveals its dedication to responsible management. This investigation reveals the underlying processes that impact ethical and environmental decision-making (Nations., 2013) . Advancement and Assimilation of Technology: An internal investigation should thoroughly examine Shell UK's strategy for innovation and the integration of new technology in tackling carbon emission concerns. Examining internal efforts, research and development spending, and technical breakthroughs offers a holistic perspective on the company's dedication to being at the cutting-edge of sustainable methods. Corporate Environment and Employment Policies: The investigation of labor rights abuses necessitates an internal review of Shell UK's labour policies and working culture. An assessment of the organization's internal rules, employee

feedback systems, and labor-related actions reveals how deeply committed the corporation is to treating its employees fairly and ethically. This research facilitates comprehension of Shell UK's approach to identifying and resolving internal difficulties pertaining to responsible management (Times, 1995) . Recommendations For Shell UK: Improve the level of transparency in the supply chain: Shell UK should make improvements to the openness of its supply chain and make sure that its transportation, logistics, and purchasing procedures are in line with the concepts of responsible management. Consistently providing updates on the environmental and social consequences along the whole supply chain will enhance the confidence of stakeholders and showcase a dedication to doing right by customers. Incorporate environmentally friendly methods into the process of making decisions. For the company to address the problems associated with carbon emissions, Shell UK should methodically include sustainability factors into its decision-making procedures. This entails evaluating the ecological consequences of significant choices, spanning from development to decommissioning, and giving priority to alternatives that are in line with the organization's commitment to decreasing its carbon emissions (Hoffman, 2017) . Encourage Innovation to Reduce Carbon Emissions: Allocate resources towards research and development in order to promote the creation of inventive methods for reducing carbon emissions. Shell UK has the ability to use technology in order to improve operating efficiency, decrease emissions, and investigate alternate energy sources. Adopting innovative solutions would not only support environmental objectives but also establish the group as an expert in green energy practises. Enhance Workplace Ethical Standards: Shell UK must improve its internal worker welfare policies and procedures in order to address labor rights issues. Implementing regular audits, cultivating an open and courteous working

culture, and swiftly resolving any reported infractions can enhance a honest and accountable approach to managing labor. Incorporate responsible management into the corporate culture: Make sure Shell UK's business culture incorporates responsible management practises. This entails providing comprehensive training to staff across all hierarchical levels on the significance of environmental sustainability responsible conduct, and community involvement. The corporation can strengthen its dedication to social and environmental duties by promoting a culture that encourages responsible business techniques (Shell, 2021) . Conclusion: Shell UK's experience with the Brent Spar catastrophe and Nigeria scandal demonstrates the intricate relationship between corporate objectives and competent management. These disputes acted as catalysts, compelling the corporation to reassess its ecological influence, supply chain methodologies, and overarching commitment to sustainability. Shell UK's strategic initiatives, which include embracing stakeholder involvement and investing in creative solutions, demonstrate an increasing recognition of the need to achieve a balance between profitability and ethical and environmental concerns. According to the in-house studies, we must immediately begin to be more transparent in our supplier chains, include sustainability into our decision- making procedures to a greater extent, and uphold our dedication to ethical working techniques. The recommendations show that Shell UK has to fix its issue with responsible management. To ensure a future that is both environmentally and ethically sound, it is essential to enhance openness, encourage innovation, and incorporate ethical practises into business culture. Shell UK may better position itself as a global leader in ethically energy policy and mitigate the effects of past disagreements by following these suggestions. This will help create a more equitable and sustainable future while also satisfying the global need for social responsibility among businesses.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

References Greenpeace, 2021. Shell's Nigeria Oil Spill Clean Up 'Inadequate' - Amnesty. s.l.:s.n. Hoffman, A. J. &. B. M. H., 2017. Changing Environmental Practices by Changing the Practice of Environmental Management. Organizational Dynamics, 46(2), 104–112.. s.l.:s.n. Levy, D. L. &. E. D., 2003. A Neo-Gramscian Approach to Corporate Political Strategy: Conflict and Accommodation in the Climate Change Negotiations. Journal of Management Studies, 40(4), 803–829.. s.l.:s.n. Nations., U., 2013. Human Rights and the Environment: Final Report of the Special Rapporteur.. s.l.:s.n. Shell, 2021. Sustainability Report.. s.l.:s.n. Times., F., 2022. Shell Faces Investor Pressure Over Carbon Emission Targets. s.l.:s.n. Times, T. N. Y., 1995. Shell's Decision on Brent Spar Buoy.. s.l.:s.n. Watch., C., 2018. Shell: A History of Controversy.. s.l.:s.n. Watch, H. R., 2019. Nigeria: Oil Spill Investigations a Mockery.. s.l.:s.n.

SHELL UK

Related Documents