Language Development

docx

School

University of British Columbia *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

315

Subject

Linguistics

Date

Jan 9, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

7

Uploaded by MegaWillpower8504

Report
Language Development What is language? Human language Species specific & species universal Only humans have it the way humans have it -unique to humans Three critical parts: Symbols Arbitrary pairings between the words we speak and the things we refer to** Consensus - sounds that map out (represent) objects in the world System of symbols Generativity Where you get structure in grammar Allow you to combine words you’ve never heard together before, and make sense of it We have a structure that allows us to take words that we know, and combine them in unique ways to express ideas Recursion Meaning is not lost from change in utterance Our grammar allows us to retain meaning even if the order in which we express words changes Parts of Language Phonemes Smallest units of sound recognizable as speech rather than random noise Helps us distinguish words from one another Consonants and vowels Not all languages use all phonemes Subset that gets used by different languages Morphemes Smallest meaningful units of language Syntax The rules governing how words are combined to form meaningful phrases and sentences Syntactical rules differ across languages Principles and parameters -**** - Chomsky Principles that govern
Pragmatics Are part of language that do not consist of sounds or words, but can nonetheless change meaning Can include elements such as: Context Intonation Facial configuration Body language No evidence of pragmatics in non-human animals When do children learn language? Pragmatic Development Children develop an understanding of pragmatics from early infancy (E.g., response to pointing), And continues throughout lifespan Joint attention (Vygotsky) Phonological Development Before birth to adolescence Discriminate different phonemes Learn to differentiate (perceive) sounds of native language Learn to produce sounds of native language Much perceptual phonological development complete by 10 months Semantic Development Birth throughout lifespan Very high rates of acquisition after 10 months through early school age Requires segmenting of speech Mostly nouns Syntactic Development "Telegraphic speech" - often two-word utterances "More milk", "eat cookie" Abbreviated speech - signals more Grammatically correct expression/statement Pronouns in the third year (24-36 months) Development slows by 5-6 years of age Sarah - typically developed Ruth - born deaf (same trajectory, but off set,) Nim - chimp - never gets past point of producing more than one utterance
Evidence for critical period Comparing adult second language learners to child second language learners Evidence from ASL learnings Comparing those who learned in adulthood vs childhood (20-50) ASL instruction most beneficial as soon as child identified as being deaf Quinean Reference Problem All labelling inherently ambiguous Hearing a label doesn't immediately tell you what it is - doesn't tell you if it's the name of the object, a feature of the object, etc.. What gets us to figure out what words refer to (when they learn language?) Kids have a bias that help funnel what could be the meaning - word learning constraints (biases) that limits what is possible to be referring to Whole-object bias : Bias - When we hear a novel word, we assume it's referring to entire object Mutual Exclusivity - each label applies to one and only one object; each object has one and only one label Each label has only one reference When children hear a novel word (in both contexts of familiar and unfamiliar object), they will think it will refer to the object they don't know Basic Level bias Superordinate: (Mammal) Basic: (Rabbit) Subordinate: (Arctic Hare) When we hear a novel word, we do not think of it to be a superordinate or subordinate level - we think of it in a basic level Linguistic Context
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Grammatical/syntactical cues: Looking at grammatical cues to infer meaning - type of word "This is gavagai" "He is gavagaying" Pragmatic Cues Pointing - orienting children toward what is being referenced 4 Hypotheses for Language Development Behaviourist Account (i.e., Watson, consistent with Constructivism) All about reinforcement - kids learn language through reinforcement Caregivers support language learning through reinforcement Parents correct children when they make mistakes Parents reward children when they are correct Nativist Account (Chomsky - Modularity hypothesis -specific part of the brain to learn language) A dedicated language module has evolved in humans (modularity hypothesis) Specific brain areas are used for language Universal grammar All (typically developing) children acquire language Evidence from Nicaraguan Sign Language - reinforces idea of universal grammar - kids who made up their own grammatical structures without being exposed to another system/language Connectionist Account: We have. The ability to process information like computer - on multiple levels Opposite of nativism Children learn language the same way that they learn everything (general- purpose associative learning mechanisms) Computer simulations show that some features of language can be learned with repetitive input Parallel processing allows for a lot of information to be processed at once (e.g, processing word form, meaning and grammar) Statistical Learning Account Children sensitive to the statistical probabilities of the input Not language specific (i.e., not evolved specifically for language learning), but used in service of learning language (conditional probabilities Can learn rules as well as sound (phoneme patterns) Don't think learning language is reason why we have this ability - but (same as connectionist and behaviouralist)
Other Key concepts On word learning Fast mapping: How much input we need to learn the meaning of a word - expose a child to a word once, or twice and they learn it - very fast learning Syntactic bootstrapping: Using syntax to figure out meaning - using syntactical cues On conversations: Collective monologues: Seen in early childhood - engage in turn taking conversation, but no shared meaning. Children are talking to each other, taking turns, but each about their own individual topic Vygotsky: Kids might be talking to themselves, even when no one else is around - helps them organize themselves Key Concepts Phonological development Semantic development Syntactic development Quanian Reference Problem Biases Theories of language development Which theory thought x Key points highlighted on slides Quiz Questions When does phonological development begin? Before birth Provide an example of generativity Provide an example of Recursion Show that you understand the concept of symbols Chomsky best supports which view of Language Development? Nativist Accout Describe one way in which behaviourist and connectionist accounts of language development differ Connectionist - rewards don't matter behaviourist - all anout reinforcement There is developmental change with respect to how noun labels lead to the whole object bias between 5-7 years of age T/ F Developmental differences in language learning were not seen in class
What is the QRP? Provide example to demonstrate why that's the case Provide 3 examples of how we solve the QRP (name the bias) Name the bias - given a situation Draw a graph illustrating the development of explicit race bias as discussed in your reading Baron & Banaji 6-10 show race bias Adults don't Broad patterns What was the primary research question explored by Gelman & Heyman? And, what was the main conclusion from their study When you hear noun labels, you are more likely to essentialize Rhodes: how using action oriented or identity oriented language leads to *** What was the primary research question explored by Gonzalez? What were the main findings of the study reported by Gonzalez, et al.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help