mod 2 case brief
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Forsyth Technical Community College *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
-140
Subject
Law
Date
Feb 20, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
2
Uploaded by Mackenziegc46
Mackenzie Carroll
LEX140-130A
January 22, 2024
Issue:
The main issue in Caterpillar Inc. v. Lewis was whether the federal court had proper jurisdiction following the removal of the case from state court based on diversity of citizenship, and subsequently, whether the dismissal of the plaintiff's lawsuit against Caterpillar was justified.
Rule:
Diversity at the time judgment is entered, rather than at the time of removal, is the appropriate time to examine whether complete diversity exists, permitting federal court jurisdiction.
Application:
Defendant James David Lewis, a resident of Kentucky, filed a lawsuit in Kentucky state court against Caterpillar Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and Whayne Supply Company (a Kentucky corporation) after sustaining injuries while operating a bulldozer. After entering into a settlement agreement with Whayne, Caterpillar removed the case to the Federal District Court in Kentucky, claiming diversity jurisdiction. Lewis objected to the removal, moving to remand the case to state court.
The Supreme Court emphasized that complete diversity existed when the trial commenced, as Whayne was formally dismissed, establishing federal jurisdiction at that time. The Court reasoned that remanding the case to state court after post-adjudication judgment would impose an exorbitant cost on the court system. The Court held that federal jurisdiction is permissible if the requirements are met at the time the judgment is entered.
Conclusion:
The Supreme Court concluded that the absence of complete diversity at the time of removal to the Federal District Court is not fatal to federal court jurisdiction. Federal jurisdiction is determined by the existence of complete diversity at the time the judgment is entered, and considerations of finality, efficiency, and economy weigh against remanding the case after post-
adjudication judgment. The unanimous decision reversed the Sixth Circuit's ruling, upholding the adjudication in federal court.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help