Unit 5 - Individual Assignment
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
University of New Haven *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
1109
Subject
Information Systems
Date
Feb 20, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
3
Uploaded by MegaNewt126
UNIT 5 - INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT BY – KARAN V PAREKH
Question 1 (taken from Unit 3) – If you were the project manager, what expertise would you like from
the sponsor, stakeholders, or core team members to create a milestone schedule with acceptance
criteria?
1. Sponsor: The sponsor is essential in providing both financial resources and strategic direction. I would
anticipate the sponsor to be knowledgeable about real estate development, market trends, and financial
viability. Their advice would be helpful in establishing achievable milestones and ensuring that the
project is in line with the larger corporate goals.
2. Stakeholders: Stakeholders offer the project a variety of viewpoints and interests. Participants like
representatives of the local government, the community, and future tenants or buyers would be asked
for their opinions. Their knowledge would be useful in comprehending zoning laws, neighborhood
needs, and market demands. By including them in the milestone scheduling process, we can make sure
their needs are considered and addressed.
3. Core Team Members: The core team members have specialized knowledge and are directly involved
in project execution. Professionals like architects, engineers, construction managers, and legal counsel
are the types of people I would look to for knowledge. Their assistance would be essential in formulating
realistic timetables, estimating resources, and establishing acceptability standards based on accepted
practices and norms in the business.
4. Subject Matter Experts (SMEs): SMEs in fields like sustainable design, energy efficiency, landscaping,
or interior design may be important contributors, depending on the Casa De Paz project's specific needs.
Their knowledge would aid in incorporating cutting-edge and eco-friendly elements into the project and
achieving sustainability goals.
It is crucial to consult people with subject expertise and experience in order to develop a milestone
calendar with approval criteria. A thorough and educated approach will be ensured by collaboration
between the project manager, sponsor, stakeholders, core team members, and SMEs, leading to the
formulation of a realistic and doable project plan.
Question 2 (taken from Unit 5) - What would you want to see in a team charter (i.e., rules of
engagement) for this development project? Is this different (Agile environment) than other
(Traditional – Suburban Homes) environments? If so, how is it different?
The team charter should incorporate the fundamental Agile concepts and principles, such as:
1. Iterative and incremental development: The team charter should reflect the knowledge that the
project will develop via regular feedback loops and iterations, enabling continual improvement and
adaptability.
2. Cross-functional collaboration: The team charter ought to place a strong emphasis on the value of
interdisciplinary cooperation, enticing team members to cooperate and share information across various
fields of specialization. This strategy encourages group accountability and self-organization.
3. Empowered decision-making: The team charter should specify the members' authority and
responsibility for making decisions, giving them the freedom to do so. As a result, the team develops a
sense of autonomy and ownership.
4. Transparent communication: The team charter should stress the need for open and transparent
communication among team members, stakeholders, and sponsors. Regular meetings, daily stand-ups,
and other Agile ceremonies should be established to facilitate effective communication channels.
While the principles of a team charter remain similar in traditional and Agile environments, Agile
emphasizes adaptability, flexibility, and self-organization. Agile teams are expected to be more
autonomous and responsive to change, whereas traditional teams may follow a more hierarchical
structure with centralized decision-making.
Question 3 (taken from Unit 5) - List types of decisions that would need to be made and the
appropriate person, group, or method for each, for example, individual team member, the collective
team, scrum master, and/or product owner.
1. Individual team member: Individual team members often make daily decisions on task execution,
resource allocation, and technological implementation. They are accountable for their specialized areas
and have autonomy within the constraints of the team charter.
2. Collective team: The collective team would be involved in decisions that affected the overall project
direction, sprint planning, and retrospective improvements. To make sure that everyone's opinions are
considered, consensus-building, brainstorming, and group decision-making methods like the Fist of Five
or Roman voting might be employed.
3. Scrum Master: The Scrum Master helps the team overcome difficulties and ensures that the Agile
methodology is followed to the letter. They don't make choices on the team's behalf, but they do offer
direction and assistance to help the team make good judgments.
4. Product Owner: The Product Owner oversees deciding which features to deploy, prioritizing the
product backlog, and expressing the interests of stakeholders. They collaborate closely with the team to
establish acceptance standards and offer direction for the product.
5. Stakeholders: External stakeholders, such as community members, local authorities, or potential
buyers, may provide input or approval on decisions that have larger ramifications or affect stakeholders
outside the development team. Their knowledge and input are crucial for the project's development.
Depending on the situation, a different decision-making approach may be applicable. Scrum and other
agile frameworks encourage group decision-making by utilizing tools like participatory workshops,
retrospectives, and feedback loops. The decision-making process should be adjusted to the unique
requirements and dynamics of the Casa De Paz Development Project, considering the complexity,
timing, and stakeholder environment of the project.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help