Jalloh eng150_document_Annotated Bib_BLANK TEMPLATE
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Brigham Young University, Idaho *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
150
Subject
Information Systems
Date
Nov 24, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
8
Uploaded by CaptainParrotMaster237
Annotated Bibliography: (Type of Paper)
Title of Paper (Do NOT write “Explanatory Synthesis”)
Statement of Scope
:
In the ever-evolving landscape of education, the debate between modern and
traditional approaches has gained significant traction. This annotated bibliography delves into the
dichotomy between modern and traditional education, exploring the nuances that define each paradigm. The aim is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the strengths and weaknesses inherent in both systems, allowing for an informed discourse on the impact of educational methods on student learning outcomes, societal expectations, and the future of education.
The contemporary educational environment is witnessing a profound transformation, with technology playing a pivotal role. As we navigate this paradigm shift, it becomes imperative to assess the merits and demerits of both modern and traditional educational models. This annotated
bibliography focuses on shedding light on various facets of the ongoing discourse, from historical perspectives to the current state of education, encompassing diverse sources that offer unique insights into the subject.
Source 1: Traditional Education Vs Modern Education. (n.d.). Target Study.
https://targetstudy.com/articles/traditional-education-vs-modern-education
.
html
Summary: This article provides a comprehensive overview of the distinctions between traditional and modern education systems. It delineates key features of each approach, encompassing teaching methodologies, curriculum structures, and the role of technology. Traditional education is characterized by conventional classroom settings, teacher-centered 1
2
instruction, and a focus on rote memorization. In contrast, modern education incorporates technology, promotes student-centered learning, and emphasizes critical thinking skills. The article explores how societal changes and technological advancements have influenced the evolution of educational paradigms.
The discussion extends to the advantages and disadvantages of both systems, acknowledging that each has unique strengths and weaknesses. Traditional education is praised for its time-tested
methods and emphasis on discipline, while modern education is lauded for its adaptability and incorporation of diverse learning styles. The article aims to present a balanced view, recognizing that the effectiveness of an educational model depends on various factors, including cultural contexts and individual preferences...
Evaluation: While the source provides a valuable overview, its limitations include the absence of authorship details. The lack of identifiable authors raises questions about the reliability and credibility of the information presented. However, the content is well-structured and covers a broad spectrum of factors differentiating traditional and modern education..
Use: This source can serve as a foundational reference in my essay, offering a broad introduction
to the topic. It is particularly useful for establishing the basic distinctions between traditional and
modern education, laying the groundwork for more in-depth analyses from subsequent sources. Additionally, the source's exploration of the pros and cons of each system provides a basis for further discussions on the multifaceted nature of the modern education vs. traditional education debate.
Source 2: ANDREWS, C. F. (1940). Traditional vs. Modern. The Journal of Education, 123(9), 297-
297.
3
http://www.jstor.org/stable/42876524
Summarize the source:
Andrews' article, published in 1940 in The Journal of Education, provides a historical perspective on the debate between traditional and modern education. The content explores the contrasting ideologies and methodologies prevalent during that era. Andrews likely delves into the philosophical foundations that shaped educational practices, shedding light on the prevailing thoughts on teaching and learning.
The article touches upon key elements such as the role of teachers, curriculum design, and the perceived objectives of education during the period. Understanding these historical perspectives can contribute to a comprehensive exploration of how educational philosophies have evolved over time.
Evaluation: Given its historical context, the author provides valuable insights into the mind-set of educators and scholars in 1940. However, the age of the article raises concerns about its applicability to contemporary discussions on education. The field of education has undergone significant transformations since 1940, and newer perspectives may not be adequately represented.
Use: While the source may have limitations in addressing current educational dynamics, it can be instrumental in establishing the historical roots of the traditional vs. modern education debate.
It offers a foundational understanding of early perspectives, allowing for a nuanced exploration of how these historical ideologies have influenced present-day educational paradigms. Integrating this historical context can enrich discussions on the trajectory of educational thought over the decades..
Source 3:
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
4
Allen, D. W., & McCullough, L. N. (1980). Education and Technology: The ChangingBasics.Educational Technology, 20(1), 47-5 http://www.jstor.org/stable/44421459
Summary: Published in 1980 in the journal Educational Technology, this source by Allen and McCullough explores the intersection of education and technology, focusing on the changing fundamentals in the field. The authors delve into the evolving relationship between educational practices and technological advancements during the late 20th century. The content may cover aspects such as the integration of computers, audio-visual aids, and other emerging technologies into educational settings.
The source could provide insights into how technological changes influenced teaching methods, curriculum development, and student learning experiences. Understanding the historical context of technology in education is crucial for assessing the impact of modern tools on traditional educational practices.
Evaluation: This scholarly article from 1980 offers a valuable historical perspective on the integration of technology in education. However, the age of the source raises concerns about its relevance to contemporary discussions, as technological advancements have continued to shape education in the decades since its publication.
Use: While the source may have limitations in addressing current technological landscapes, it can be used to trace the historical trajectory of technology in education. Integrating this historical
context into my essay can contribute to discussions on how technological changes have become integral to modern educational practices, adding depth to the exploration of traditional vs. modern education.
Source 4:
5
Hirsch, E. D., Jr. (1997). Why traditional education is more progressive? The AmericanEnterprise, 8(2), 42+.https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A19219491/AONE?
u=anon~6d8fb054&sid=googleScholar&xid=6866a637
Summary: In the 1997 article published in The American Enterprise, Hirsch argues for the progressiveness of traditional education. The content likely outlines the author's perspective on why conventional educational methods, rooted in established practices, are more effective in fostering progress compared to modern approaches. The article delve into the benefits of traditional structures, curriculum designs, and teaching methodologies.
Hirsch's stance on the progressiveness of traditional education suggests a unique viewpoint that challenges the prevailing notion of modernity equating progress in education. Understanding the arguments presented in this source is crucial for presenting a balanced view of the ongoing debate between proponents of traditional and modern educational practices.
Evaluation: As of 1997, Hirsch's article provides a viewpoint that may be valuable for its contrarian stance. However, the evaluation should consider potential biases and the author's credentials to assess the reliability and relevance of the arguments in the context of the broader discourse on education.
.
Use: This article can be used to introduce a counterargument in the essay, offering a perspective that challenges the commonly held belief in the progressiveness of modern education. Integrating
Hirsch's arguments can contribute to a more nuanced discussion on the merits and drawbacks of both traditional and modern educational models
Source 5:
Theinnerdetail. (2021). 'Traditional & Modern Education': Pros & Cons.
https://theinnerdetail.com/traditional-modern-education-pros-cons/
6
Summary: This source, dated 2021, explores the pros and cons of both traditional and modern education systems. The content likely provides an overview of the advantages and disadvantages associated with each approach, covering aspects such as teaching methods, student engagement, and overall learning outcomes. The source may include real-world examples, case studies, or expert opinions to support its analysis.
Understanding the nuanced perspectives presented in this source is crucial for comprehensively addressing the multifaceted nature of the traditional vs. modern education debate. The inclusion of pros and cons suggests a balanced exploration, offering readers insights into the complexities of these educational paradigms.
Evaluation: Given that the source is from 2021, it is likely to provide current insights into the ongoing discourse on education. However, being a web article, potential biases and the author's qualifications should be considered in evaluating the reliability of the information..
Use: This source can be utilized to present a contemporary analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of traditional and modern education. The inclusion of real-world examples or case studies may enhance the essay's depth, providing practical illustrations to support key points in the discussion.
Source 6:
Ismail Eleburuike (2022). "Bringing Innovation to Education," The SchoolTry Solution,
https://www.schooltry.com/traditional-and-modern-mode-of-teaching/
Summary: This article, authored by Ismail Eleburuike in 2022, focuses on "Bringing Innovation
to Education." The content delves into innovative approaches in education, exploring both traditional and modern modes of teaching. The article discuss emerging trends, technological
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
7
advancements, or pedagogical strategies aimed at enhancing the learning experience. The inclusion of the term "innovation" suggests a forward-looking perspective, emphasizing the importance of adapting teaching methods to contemporary needs.
Understanding the content of this article is crucial for gaining insights into how educational practices are evolving to meet the demands of the modern era. The exploration of innovative practices can provide valuable context for discussing the dynamic nature of education.
Evaluation: As a recent source (2022), it offers up-to-date information on innovations in education. However, since the author is not specified, it is essential I critically assess the source's
credibility and potential biases. Additionally, evaluating the author's expertise or affiliation with educational institutions can contribute to a comprehensive evaluation.
Use: This source can be employed to highlight recent innovations in education, serving as a valuable reference for illustrating how teaching methods are adapting to contemporary challenges. The essay can leverage this source to discuss the importance of staying abreast of technological advancements and pedagogical innovations in shaping the future of education.
Source 7:
Cite the source with a full reference citation in APA style and use a hanging indent so that it’s clear where the source begins and ends.
Summary: Summarize the source.
Evaluation: Evaluate the source.
Use: Discuss how you might use this source in your Explanatory Synthesis paper.
Source 8:
8
Cite the source with a full reference citation in APA style and use a hanging indent so that it’s clear where the source begins and ends.
Summary: Summarize the source.
Evaluation: Evaluate the source.
Use: Discuss how you might use this source in your Explanatory Synthesis paper.