ICT702 Introduction to Database Design T3 2023
pdf
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Federation University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
ITECH 5500
Subject
Information Systems
Date
Nov 24, 2024
Type
Pages
19
Uploaded by mariyammasadaf
KING’S OWN INSTITUTE*
Success in Higher Education
ICT702 INTRODUCTION TO DATABASE DESIGN
T323 12-10-23
PAGE 1 OF 19
*AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT PTY LTD ©
ABN: 72 132 629 979
CRICOS 03171A
ICT702
INTRODUCTION
TO
DATABASE
DESIGN
T323
All information in the Subject Outline is correct at the time of approval. KOI reserves the right to make changes to the Subject
Outline if they become necessary. Any changes require the approval of the KOI Academic Board and will be formally advised to
those students who may be affected by email and via Moodle.
Information contained within this Subject Outline applies to students enrolled in the trimester as indicated
1. General Information
1.1 Administrative Details
Associated HE Award(s)
Duration
Level
Subject Coordinator
Master of Information Systems (MIS)
Graduate Diploma of Information
Systems (GDIS)
Graduate Certificate of Information
Systems (GCIS)
1 trimester
Level 8
Graduate
Certificate
Name: Dr Mohamad Naji
Email:mohamad.naji@koi.edu.
au
P: 92833583 (Ext.156)
L: Level 1, 545 Kent St.
Consultation: via Moodle or by
appointment
1.2 Core / Elective
This subject is a core subject for the Graduate Certificate of Information Systems (GCIS).
1.3 Subject Weighting
Indicated below is the weighting of this subject and the total course points.
Subject Credit Points
Total Course Credit Points
4
MIS (64 Credit Points); GDIS (32 Credit Points);
GCIS
(16 Credit Points)
1.4 Student Workload
Indicated below is the expected student workload per week for this subject
No. timetabled hours/week*
No. personal study
hours/week**
Total workload
hours/week***
3 hours/week plus supplementary
online material
7 hours/week
10 hours/week
*
Total time spent per week at lectures and tutorials
**
Total time students are expected to spend per week in studying, completing assignments, etc.
***
Combination of timetable hours and personal study.
1.4
Mode of Delivery
Classes will be face-to-face or hybrid. Certain classes will be online (e.g., special
arrangements).
1.6 Pre-requisites
There are no pre-requisites for this subject.
1.7 General Study and Resource Requirements
o
Students are expected to attend classes with the required textbook and to read specific chapters prior to the
tutorials.
Students should read this material before coming to class to improve their ability to participate in the
weekly activities.
o
Students will require access to the internet and their KOI email and should have basic skills in word processing
KING’S OWN INSTITUTE*
Success in Higher Education
ICT702 INTRODUCTION TO DATABASE DESIGN
T323 12-10-23
PAGE 2 OF 19
*AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT PTY LTD ©
ABN: 72 132 629 979
CRICOS 03171A
software such as MS Word, spreadsheet software such as MS Excel and visual presentation software such as
MS PowerPoint.
o
Computers and WIFI facilities are extensively available for student use throughout KOI. Students are
encouraged to make use of the campus Library for reference materials.
Software resource requirements specific to this subject:
Office 365, MS Imagine, SQL Server 2017
1.8 Academic Advising
Academic advising is available to students throughout teaching periods including the exam weeks.
As well as requesting help during scheduled class times, students have the following options:
o
Consultation times: A list of consultation hours is provided on the homepage of Moodle where
appointments can be booked.
o
Subject coordinator: Subject coordinators are available for contact via email. The email address of the
subject coordinator is provided at the top of this subject outline.
o
Academic staff: Lecturers and Tutors provide their contact details in Moodle for the specific subject. In
most cases, this will be via email. Some subjects may also provide a discussion forum where questions
can be raised.
o
Head of Program: The Head of Program is available to all students in the program if they need advice
about their studies and KOI procedures.
o
Vice President (Academic): The Vice President (Academic) will assist students to resolve complex issues
(but may refer students to the relevant lecturers for detailed academic advice).
2. Academic Details
2.1 Overview of the Subject
Database management, design and development serve as the foundation of the modern business world and
information society. Information that is collected from the customers, the sales revenues that are gathered from
the business competitors, the profit and loss that are generated and many more forms of data are required to be
stored in a secured, efficient and accessible place, this is called a database. A well-designed database will
fundamentally change the decision-making process, data communication process and front-end user experience.
Therefore, the design of the database is crucial to conquer the concerns of data collection, data storage and data
analysis.
This subject provides an overall understanding of database design terminology, database design strategy,
database structure and relationships, and level of the data integrity for each database. By completing this subject,
students will be able to design a basic relationship database, refine the database structure, integrate the business
needs with the database design objectives and implement the database by using a database management system
and structured queried language (SQL) Server environments.
2.2 Graduate Attributes for Undergraduate Courses
Graduates of Postgraduate courses from King’s Own In
stitute will achieve the graduate attributes expected from
successful completion of a Master’s degree under the Australian Qualifications Framework (2
nd
edition, January
2013). Graduates at this level will be able to apply an advanced body of knowledge from their major area of study
in a range of contexts for professional practice or scholarship and as a pathway for further learning.
King’s Own Institute’s generic graduate attributes for a master’s level degree are summarised below:
KOI Master’s Degree
Graduate Attributes
Detailed Description
Knowledge
Current, comprehensive and coherent knowledge, including
recent developments and applied research methods
KING’S OWN INSTITUTE*
Success in Higher Education
ICT702 INTRODUCTION TO DATABASE DESIGN
T323 12-10-23
PAGE 3 OF 19
*AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT PTY LTD ©
ABN: 72 132 629 979
CRICOS 03171A
Critical Thinking
Critical thinking skills to identify and analyse current theories and
developments and emerging trends in professional practice
Communication
Communication and technical skills to analyse and theorise,
contribute to professional practice or scholarship and present
ideas to a variety of audiences.
Research and Information
Literacy
Cognitive and technical skills to access and evaluate information
resources, justify research approaches and interpret theoretical
propositions
Creative Problem Solving
Skills
Cognitive, technical and creative skills to investigate, analyse and
synthesise complex information, concepts and theories, solve
complex problems and apply established theories to situations
faced in professional practice.
Ethical and Cultural
Sensitivity
Appreciation and accountability for ethical principles, cultural
sensitivity and social responsibility, both personally and
professionally
Leadership and Strategy
Initiative, leadership skills and ability to work professionally and
collaboratively to achieve team objectives across a range of team
roles.
Expertise in strategic thinking, developing and implementing
business plans and decision making under uncertainty
Professional Skills
High level personal autonomy, judgement decision-making and
accountability required to begin professional practice.
Across the course, these skills are developed progressively at three levels:
o
Level 1 Foundation
–
Students learn the skills, theories and techniques of the subject and apply them in
stand-alone contexts.
o
Level 2 Intermediate
–
Students further develop skills, theories and techniques of the subject and apply them
in more complex contexts, beginning to integrate the application with other subjects.
o
Level 3 Advanced
–
Students have a demonstrated ability to plan, research and apply the skills, theories and
techniques of the subject in complex situations, integrating the subject content with a range of other subject
disciplines within the context of the course
2.3 Subject Learning Outcomes
Listed below, are key knowledge and skills students are expected to attain by successfully completing this
subject:
Subject Learning Outcomes
Contribution to Course
Graduate Attributes
a)
Define database types, models and design terminology
b)
Perform reviews of existing databases and relational tables
c)
Create a database by using a database management system and
generate query results by using SQL based on a given scenario
d)
Analyse the functions of a database and present it to the specific
business stakeholders
e)
Evaluate the functionality of a database and make performance
enhancements as part of a collaborative team
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
KING’S OWN INSTITUTE*
Success in Higher Education
ICT702 INTRODUCTION TO DATABASE DESIGN
T323 12-10-23
PAGE 4 OF 19
*AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT PTY LTD ©
ABN: 72 132 629 979
CRICOS 03171A
2.4 Subject Content and Structure
Below are details of the subject content and how it is structured, including specific topics covered in lectures
and tutorials. Reading refers to the text unless otherwise indicated.
Weekly Planner:
Week
(beginning)
Topic Covered in Each Week’s Lecture
Reading(s)
Expected Work
1
30 Oct
Introduction to the relational database
●
Types of databases
●
Database models
●
The relational database models
●
Relational
database
management
systems
Chapter 1
Critically review the
concepts and principles of
databases and database
management systems
including relational data
model for handling
structured data
Formative not graded
2
06 Nov
Introduction to entity relationship model
●
Understand entity, attribute,
cardinality, primary key and foreign
key
●
Understand associate entity and the
complex ER diagram terminology
Materials
provided on
Moodle
Design database using ER
Modelling 1
Graded
3
13 Nov
Introduction to entity relationship model
●
Draw ER diagram
●
Create tables and ER diagram on the
database management system
Materials
provided on
Moodle
Design database using ER
Modelling 2
Graded
4
20 Nov
Terminology used in classic database
examples
●
Value-related terms
●
Structure-related terms
●
Relationship-related term
Chapter 3
Review questions on the
main concepts of database
terminology
Graded
Assessment 2: due
Draft proposal of
A4
5
27 Nov
Database Design
Chapter 2
&
Chapter 11
Design database using ER
Modelling and
Normalization Techniques
Graded
6
04 Dec
Database Design (2)
Chapter 2
&
Chapter 11
Design database using ER
Modelling and
Normalization Techniques
Graded
Assessment 3: due
practical exam
Table relationships
●
Types of relationships
Chapter 8 &
Chapter 10
Review questions on types
of relationships, reducing
KING’S OWN INSTITUTE*
Success in Higher Education
ICT702 INTRODUCTION TO DATABASE DESIGN
T323 12-10-23
PAGE 5 OF 19
*AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT PTY LTD ©
ABN: 72 132 629 979
CRICOS 03171A
7
11 Dec
●
Identifying existing relationships
●
Refining all foreign keys
●
Establishing relationship
characteristics
●
Relationship-level integrity
the unnecessary
relationships &
Review questions on table
relationship and relation-
level integrity
Graded
8
02 Jan
(Tue)
Analysing the current database
●
Conducting the analysis
●
Looking at how data is collected
●
Looking at how information is
presented
●
Conducting interviews
●
Interview users
●
Interview management
●
Interview questions
Chapter 4
Case studies on how data
is collected, presented and
transit from business needs
to database 1
Graded
9
08 Jan
SQL for database structure creations
Materials
provided on
Moodle
Use SQL to create, query
and manipulate database 1
Graded
Assessment 4: Due
Database design
(individual assessment)
10
15 Jan
Perform logic information with SQL
Materials
provided on
Moodle
Use SQL to create, query
and manipulate database 2
Graded
11
22 Jan
Review data integrity
●
Why you should review data integrity
●
Review and refine data integrity
Assembling the database documentation
Chapter 13
Revie questions on data
integrity, case studies on
evaluating data integrity
Graded
12
29 Jan
Introduction to Big Data
XML and DTD
•
Semistructured Data
•
XML
•
DTD
Revision
Materials
provided on
Moodle
Review questions on the
table creations on XML,
DTD declarations.
Emerging trends eg.
blockchain.
Formative not graded
Assessment 5: Database
implementation and
performance
improvement (Group
assessment)
13
05 Feb
Study review week and Final Exam Week
14
12 Feb
Examinations
Continuing students - enrolments for T124 open
Please see exam timetable for
exam date, time and location
15
19 Feb
Student Vacation begins
New students - enrolments for T124 open
KING’S OWN INSTITUTE*
Success in Higher Education
ICT702 INTRODUCTION TO DATABASE DESIGN
T323 12-10-23
PAGE 6 OF 19
*AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT PTY LTD ©
ABN: 72 132 629 979
CRICOS 03171A
16
26 Feb
Results Released
Review of Grade Day for T323
–
see Sections 2.6 and 3.2 below for relevant
information.
Certification of Grades
NOTE: More information about the dates will be provided at a later date through Moodle/KOI
email.
T124 4 Mar 2024
1
04 Mar
Week 1 of classes for T124
2.5 Public Holiday Amendments
Please note: KOI is closed on all scheduled NSW Public Holidays
T323 has two (2) public holidays that occur during this trimester. Classes scheduled for these public holidays
(Calendar Class Dates) will be rescheduled as per the table below.
This applies to ALL subjects taught in T323.
Please see the table below and adjust your class timing as required. Please make sure you have arrangements
in place to attend the rescheduled classes if applicable to your T323 enrolment.
Classes will be conducted at the same time and in the same location as your normally scheduled class except
these classes will be held on the date shown below.
Calendar Class Date
Rescheduled Class Date
Monday 01 January 2024 (Week 8)
Friday 26 January 2024 (Week 11)
Monday 05 Feb 2024
Tuesday 06 Feb 2024
2.6 Review of Grade, Deferred Exams & Supplementary Exams/Assessments
Review of Grade:
There may be instances when you believe that your final grade in a subject does not accurately reflect your
performance against the marking criteria. Section 8 of the
Assessment and Assessment Appeals Policy
(
www.koi.edu.au
) describes the grounds on which you may apply for a Review of Grade.
If you have a concern about your marks and you are unable to resolve it with the Academic staff concerned,
then you can apply for a formal Review of Grade as explained in section 3.2(e) Appeals Process below. Please
note the time limits for requesting a review. Please ensure you read the Review of Grade information before
submitting an application.
Review of Grade Day:
Final exam scripts will not normally be returned to students. Students can obtain feedback on their exam
performance and their results for the whole subject at the Review of Grade Day. KOI will hold the Review of
Grade Day for all subjects studied in T323.
The ROG day will be in week 16, the date will be announced
at a later date and the students will be notified through Moodle/KOI email.
Only final exams and whole subject results will be discussed as all other assessments should have been
reviewed during the trimester. Further information about Review of Grade Day will be available through Moodle.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
KING’S OWN INSTITUTE*
Success in Higher Education
ICT702 INTRODUCTION TO DATABASE DESIGN
T323 12-10-23
PAGE 7 OF 19
*AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT PTY LTD ©
ABN: 72 132 629 979
CRICOS 03171A
If you fail one or more subjects and you wish to consider applying for a Review of Grade you are
STRONGLY
ADVISED to
attend the Review of Grade Day. You will have the chance to discuss your final exam and subject
result with your lecturer, and will be advised if you have valid reasons for applying for a Review of Grade (see
Section 3.2 below and the
Assessment and Assessment Appeals Policy
).
A formal request for a review of grade may not be considered unless you first contact the subject coordinator
to discuss the result.
Deferred Exams:
If you wish to apply for a deferred exam because you are unable to attend the scheduled exam, you should
submit the Assignment Extension / Exam Deferment Form available by clicking the following link
Assignment
Extension / Exam Deferment Form
as soon as possible
, but no later than three (3) working days
of the
assessment due date
.
If you miss your mid-trimester or final exam there is no guarantee you will be offered a deferred exam.
You must apply within the stated timeframe and satisfy the conditions for approval to be offered a deferred
exam (see Section 8.1 of the
Assessment and Assessment Appeals Policy and the Application for
Assignment Extension or Deferred Exam Forms
). In assessing your request for a deferred exam, KOI will
take into account the information you provide, the severity of the event or circumstance, your performance on
other items of assessment in the subject, class attendance and your history of previous applications for
special consideration.
Deferred mid-trimester exams will be held before the end of week 9. Deferred final exams will be held on two
days during week 1 or 2 in the next trimester. You will not normally be granted a deferred exam on the
grounds that you mistook the time, date or place of an examination, or that you have made arrangements to
be elsewhere at that time; for example, have booked plane tickets.
If you are offered a deferred exam, but do not attend
you will be awarded 0 marks for the exam
. This may
mean it becomes difficult for you to pass the subject. If you apply for a deferred exam within the required
time frame and satisfy the conditions you will be advised by email (to your KOI student email address) of the
time and date for the deferred exam. Please ensure that you are available to take the exam at this time.
Marks awarded for the deferred exam will be the marks awarded for that item of assessment towards your
final mark in the subject.
Supplementary Assessments (Exams and Assessments):
A supplementary assessment may be offered to students to provide a final opportunity to demonstrate
successful achievement of the learning outcomes of a subject.
Supplementary assessments are only offered
at the discretion of the Board of Examiners.
In considering whether or not to offer a supplementary assessment,
KOI will take into account your performance on all the major assessment items in the subject, your attendance,
participation and your history of any previous special considerations.
If you are offered a supplementary assessment, you will be
advised by email to your
KOI student email address
of the time and due date for the supplementary assessment
–
supplementary exams will normally be held at
the same time as deferred final exams during week 1 or week 2 of the next trimester.
You must pass the supplementary assessment to pass the subject. The maximum grade you can achieve in a
subject based on a supplementary assessment is a PASS grade.
If you:
o
are offered a supplementary assessment, but fail it;
o
are offered a supplementary exam, but do not attend; or
o
are offered a supplementary assessment but do not submit by the due date;
you will receive a FAIL grade for the subject.
Students are also eligible for a supplementary assessment for their final subject in a course where they fail the
subject but have successfully completed all other subjects in the course. You must have completed all major
KING’S OWN INSTITUTE*
Success in Higher Education
ICT702 INTRODUCTION TO DATABASE DESIGN
T323 12-10-23
PAGE 8 OF 19
*AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT PTY LTD ©
ABN: 72 132 629 979
CRICOS 03171A
assessment tasks for the subject and obtained a passing mark on at least one of the major assessment tasks
to be eligible for a supplementary assessment.
If you believe you meet the criteria for a supplementary assessment for the final subject in your course, but
have not received an offer, complete the
Complaint, Grievance, Appeal Form
and send your form to
reception@koi.edu.au
. The deadline for applying for supplementary assessment is the Friday of the first week
of classes in the next trimester.
2.7 Teaching Methods/Strategies
Briefly described below are the teaching methods/strategies used in this subject:
o
Sessions
(3 hours/week) are conducted in seminar style and address the subject content,
provide motivation and context and draw on the students’ experience and preparatory reading.
Sessions include class discussion of case studies and research papers, practice sets and
problem-solving and syndicate work on group projects. Sessions often include group exercises
and so contribute to the development of teamwork skills and cultural understanding. Session
participation is an essential component of the subject and contributes to the development of
many of the graduate attributes (see section 2.2 above). Session participation contributes
towards the assessment in many subjects (see details in Section 3.1 for this subject).
Supplementary session material such as case studies, recommended readings, review
questions etc. will be made available each week in Moodle.
o
Online
teaching resources include class materials, readings, model answers to assignments
and exercises and discussion boards. All online materials for this subject as provided by KOI
will be found in the Moodle page for this subject. Students should access Moodle regularly as
material may be updated at any time during the trimester
o
Other contact
- academic staff may also contact students either via Moodle messaging, or via
email to the email address provided to KOI on enrolment.
2.8 Student Assessment
Assessment is designed to encourage effective student learning and enable students to develop
and demonstrate the skills and knowledge identified in the subject learning outcomes.
Assessment tasks during the first half of the study period are usually intended to maximise the
developmental function of assessment (formative assessment). These assessment tasks
include weekly tutorial exercises (as indicated in the weekly planner) and low stakes graded
assessments (as shown in the graded assessment table). The major assessment tasks where
students demonstrate their knowledge and skills (summative assessment) generally occur later
in the study period. These are the major graded assessment items shown in the graded
assessment table.
Final grades are awarded by the Board of Examiners in accordance with KOI's Assessment and
Assessment Appeals Policy. The definitions and guidelines for the awarding of final grades are:
o
HD High distinction (85-100%): an outstanding level of achievement in relation to the
assessment process.
o
D Distinction (75-84%): a high level of achievement in relation to the assessment process.
o
C Credit (65-74%): a better than satisfactory level of achievement in relation to the assessment
process.
o
P Pass (50-64%): a satisfactory level of achievement in relation to the assessment process.
o
F Fail (0-49%): an unsatisfactory level of achievement in relation to the assessment process.
o
FW: This grade will be assigned when a student did not submit any of the compulsory
assessment items.
KING’S OWN INSTITUTE*
Success in Higher Education
ICT702 INTRODUCTION TO DATABASE DESIGN
T323 12-10-23
PAGE 9 OF 19
*AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT PTY LTD ©
ABN: 72 132 629 979
CRICOS 03171A
Provided below is a schedule of formal assessment tasks and major examinations for the subject.
Assessment Type
When assessed
Weighting
Learning Outcomes
Assessed
Assessment 1: Tutorial exercises
(Participation and discussion)
Weeks 2-11
10%
a, b, c, d, e
Assessment 2: Draft of A4
Week 4
10%
a, b
Assessment 3: Practical exam in class
Week 6
10%
c
Assessment 4:
Database design (individual assessment)
Implementation Report
–
1500 word
Weeks 9
40%
b, c
Assessment 5: Database Implementation
and performance improvement (group
assessment) Implementation report;
Group
–
1000 words Individual
–
500
words
Week 12
30% (group
–
20%,
individual
–
10%)
d, e
Requirements to Pass the Subject:
To gain a pass or better in this subject, students must gain a minimum of 50% of the total available subject
marks.
2.9 Prescribed and Recommended Readings
Provided below, in formal reference format, is a list of the prescribed and recommended readings.
Prescribed Text:
Coronel, C. and Morris, S. (2022)
Database systems: Design, implementation, & management
. 14th
ed. Boston, MA, USA: Cengage Learning.
Recommended Readings:
Fathima Nifra, N., & Razeeth, S. (2022). Database backup and recovery: a review with test
implementation for MYSQL and NOSQL databases.
Sicari, S., Rizzardi, A., & Coen-Porisini, A. (2022). Security & privacy issues and challenges in NoSQL
databases.
Computer Networks
,
206
, 108828.
Khan, W., Kumar, T., Zhang, C., Raj, K., Roy, A. M., & Luo, B. (2023). SQL and NoSQL Database
Software Architecture Performance Analysis and Assessments
—
A Systematic Literature Review.
Big
Data and Cognitive Computing
,
7
(2), 97.
Suggested Periodicals:
1.
Journal of Database Management:
https://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=13581&tip=sid
2.
Database System Journal:
https://www.dbjournal.ro/
Useful Websites
The following websites are useful sources covering a range of information useful for this subject.
However, most are not considered to be sources of Academic Peer Reviewed theory and research. If
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
KING’S OWN INSTITUTE*
Success in Higher Education
ICT702 INTRODUCTION TO DATABASE DESIGN
T323 12-10-23
PAGE 10 OF 19
*AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT PTY LTD ©
ABN: 72 132 629 979
CRICOS 03171A
your assessments require
academic peer reviewed journal articles
as sources, you need to access
such sources using the Library database, Ebscohost, or Google Scholar. Please ask in the Library if
you are unsure how to access Ebscohost. Instructions can also be found in Moodle.
3. Assessment Details
3.1 Details of Each Assessment Item
The assessments for this subject are described below. The description includes the type of assessment, its
purpose, weighting, due date and submission requirements, the topic of the assessment, details of the task
and detailed marking criteria, including a marking rubric for essays, reports and presentations.
Supplementary assessment information and assistance can be found in Moodle.
KOI expects students to submit their own work in both assignments and exams, or the work of their group in
the case of group assignments. Material in assignments which comes from the work of others must be
appropriately acknowledged.
Assessment 1
Assessment type
Assessment type: Tutorial exercises - individual assessment
Purpose
To answer the weekly tutorial questions on the topics covered in lecturers. This
assessment contributes to learning outcomes a, b, c, d and e.
Value
10%
Due date
Week 2 to week 11, on tutorials
Submission
Submit the completed program on Moodle
Task details
The details of tutorial exercises will be provided on Moodle. This task contains
several practical exercises on database design, development and testing.
Marking Rubric for Assessment:
1
;
Value:
10
%
Criteria
Fail
(0
–
49%)
Pass
(50
–
64%)
Credit
(65
–
74%)
Distinction
(75
–
84%)
High Distinction
(85
–
100%)
Tutorial Exercises
10 marks
Less than 50%of
the tutorial
exercises
completed or
many major errors
or omissions
Most tutorial
exercises
completed, but
with some major
errors or
omissions
Most tutorial
exercises
completed, but
with some minor
errors and
omissions
Nearly all tutorial
exercises
completed, but
with some minor
errors and
omissions
All tutorial
exercises
complete and
accurate or with
few very minor
errors
Assessment 2
Assessment type
Report
Purpose
This assessment will allow students to review the database design case study of
assessment four and understand the information required to be included in the
database to meet business requirements.
Value
10%
Due Date
Week 4
Assessment Topic
Draft of Assessment 4
KING’S OWN INSTITUTE*
Success in Higher Education
ICT702 INTRODUCTION TO DATABASE DESIGN
T323 12-10-23
PAGE 11 OF 19
*AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT PTY LTD ©
ABN: 72 132 629 979
CRICOS 03171A
Task details
In this assignment, students must read, review and analyse the database design case study provided for
assessment 4. The student must understand the business requirements for the given case study and identify
the information required for database design.
The main objective of this draft is to identify entities, attributes, keys, and relationships within the case study.
The students must create a detailed list of all entities and their corresponding attributes. They should also
identify the primary and foreign keys for each entity. The list should be presented in a tabular format with
separate columns for entity names, attribute names, and key types, as shown in the table below.
Entity Name
Attribute
Key Type
Customers
CustomerID
Primary
FirstName
LastName
Orders
OrderID
Primary
CustomerID
Foreign
OrderDate
In addition to the entity and attribute identification, the students are required to identify relationships between
the entities. They should describe the type of relationship between each entity, such as one-to-one, one-to-
many, or many-to-many. They should also describe the cardinality of each relationship, such as whether it is
mandatory or optional.
Entity 1
Relationship Type
Entity2
Cardinality
Customers
One - to - Many
Orders
Mandatory
The information should be organised in a clear and concise manner. The final assessment will be based on the
proposal draft's completeness, accuracy, clarity, and organisation.
Submission requirements details:
A draft report should be submitted on Moodle.
KING’S OWN INSTITUTE*
Success in Higher Education
ICT702 INTRODUCTION TO DATABASE DESIGN
T323 12-10-23
PAGE 12 OF 19
*AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT PTY LTD ©
ABN: 72 132 629 979
CRICOS 03171A
Marking Rubric for Assessment:
2
;
Value:
10
%
Criteria
Fail
(0
–
49%)
Pass
(50
–
64%)
Credit
(65
–
74%)
Distinction
(75
–
84%)
High Distinction
(85
–
100%)
Identify
business issues
2 marks
No issues
analysed and
discussed
Some basic
issues are
identified, most of
the issues are
relevant to the
given case
Some critical
issues are
identified but not
all questions are
covered
Critical issues are
identified,
provides
supportive
arguments
All important
issues are
identified and well
justified by using
supportive
arguments
Proposed
Solution I
(Identification of
entities and
attributes)
3 marks
Student has not
proposed a
solution that
includes the
relevant entities
and attributes
Student has
proposed a
solution that
includes the
identification of
only few relevant
entities and
attributes
Student has
proposed a
solution that
includes the
identification of
some relevant
entities and
attributes
Student has
proposed a
solution that
includes the
identification of
most relevant
entities and
attributes
Student has
proposed a
solution that
includes the
identification of all
relevant entities
and attributes
Proposed
Solution II
(Identification of
relationships
and cardinality)
3 marks
Student has not
identified relevant
relationships and
cardinalities
Student has
identified only few
relationships and
cardinalities
Student has
identified some
relationships and
cardinalities
Student has
identified most
relevant
relationships and
cardinalities
Student has
identified all
relevant
relationships and
cardinalities
Structure and
Format
2 marks
Very difficult to
read, unclear
structure and
most of the
required sections
are missing.
Some difficulty in
reading, not very
clear structure but
important sections
are included. The
information is not
presented in the
tabular format
Clear and
readable, and all
required sections
are included. The
information is
provided in the
tabular format
Well written and
very clear, and all
required sections
with completed
discussion are
included. The
information is
clear and
provided in the
tabular format
Well written and
very clear, all
required sections
with completed
discussion are
included and
information is
presented in a
clear, concise
manner using a
tabular format
Assessment 3
Assessment Type
Practical exam in class
Purpose
This assessment will allow students to demonstrate their understanding of the
concepts covered in weeks 1 to 5. This assessment contributes to learning
outcome c.
Value
10%
Due Date
Week 6
Topic
Quiz
Submission
This quiz will be conducted in the tutorial class of Week 6. Therefore, students
need to attend their enrolled tutorial class to do the quiz in the presence of
their tutor.
Task Details
A short case study will be given to the students consisting of entities and attributes.
Students need to draw the ERD with relationships and cardinalities. The students
also need to show their understanding of primary keys, foreign keys, strong entities
and weak entities. The quiz will cover the topics from Week 1 to Week 5.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
KING’S OWN INSTITUTE*
Success in Higher Education
ICT702 INTRODUCTION TO DATABASE DESIGN
T323 12-10-23
PAGE 13 OF 19
*AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT PTY LTD ©
ABN: 72 132 629 979
CRICOS 03171A
Marking Rubric for Assessment:
3
;
Value:
10
%
Criteria
Fail
(0
–
49%)
Pass
(50
–
64%)
Credit
(65
–
74%)
Distinction
(75
–
84%)
High Distinction
(85
–
100%)
Knowledge and
Concepts
10 marks
Student didn’t show
any or minimal
understanding of the
knowledge and
concepts discussed
in the lecture
Less than 50%
correct answers
Student show
some
understanding of
the knowledge and
concepts
discussed in the
lecture
50% or more
correct answers
but less than 65%
Students show a
good understanding
of knowledge and
concepts discussed
in the lecture with few
inaccuracies.
65% or more correct
answers but less than
75%
Students shows
complete
understanding of
the concepts
discussed in the
lecture with no
inaccuracies.
75% or more
correct answers
but less than 85%
Students shows
an excellent
understanding of
all the concepts
discussed in
lecture and their
practical
implementation.
85% or more
correct answers
Assessment 4
Assessment Type
Database design
–
Individual Assessment
Purpose
This assessment will help students to design and develop a database based on
a given scenario. The students will identify the tables and their relationships and
write SQL queries to implement the database. Students are expected to improve
the database performance, including the structure, database relationship,
integrity and other aspects to make the database more secure, efficient and
presentable to business stakeholders. This assessment
contributes to learning outcomes b and c.
Value
40%
Due Date
Week 9
Topic
The details of the topic will be provided during the sessions
Submission
Submit the report, including database design and implementation SQL queries on
Moodle.
Task Details
The individual assessment will provide a real-world scenario for the students to
develop a database structure for a new website/mobile application to solve
business issues. Students are also required to create general samples of basic
queries. The queries also serve as a foundation for solving business issues and
helping management to make specific business decisions.
KING’S OWN INSTITUTE*
Success in Higher Education
ICT702 INTRODUCTION TO DATABASE DESIGN
T323 12-10-23
PAGE 14 OF 19
*AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT PTY LTD ©
ABN: 72 132 629 979
CRICOS 03171A
Marking Rubric for Assessment:
4
;
Value:
40
%
Criteria
Fail
(0
–
49%)
Pass
(50
–
64%)
Credit
(65
–
74%)
Distinction
(75
–
84%)
High Distinction
(85
–
100%)
Understanding
of Business
Requirements
5 marks
Student has not
demonstrated any
understanding of
the business
requirements for
the given case
study
Student has
demonstrated a
basic
understanding of
the business
requirements for
the given case
study and has
identified only a
few of the relevant
information
required for
database design.
Student has
demonstrated
some
understanding of
the business
requirements for
the given case
study and has
identified some of
the relevant
information
required for
database design.
Student has
demonstrated a
good
understanding of
the business
requirements for
the given case
study and has
identified most of
the relevant
information
required for
database design.
Student has
demonstrated a
deep
understanding of
the business
requirements for
the given case
study and has
identified all
relevant
information
required for
database design.
Identification
of Entities,
Attributes, and
Keys
5 marks
Student has not
identified any
entities or their
corresponding
attributes, or has
not identified the
primary and
foreign keys for
any entities, or
has not presented
the information in
a clear and
concise tabular
format.
Student has only
identified a few
entities and their
corresponding
attributes, and has
not identified the
primary and
foreign keys for
most entities, or
has not presented
the information in
a clear and
concise tabular
format.
Student has
identified some
entities and their
corresponding
attributes, but has
not identified the
primary and
foreign keys for all
entities, or has not
presented the
information in a
clear and concise
tabular format.
Student has
identified most
entities and their
corresponding
attributes, and has
identified the
primary and
foreign keys for
most entities in a
mostly clear and
concise tabular
format.
Student has
accurately
identified all
entities and their
corresponding
attributes, and has
identified the
primary and
foreign keys for
each entity in a
clear and concise
tabular format.
Identification
of
relationships
and cardinality
5 marks
Student has not
identified relevant
relationships and
cardinalities
Student has
identified only few
relationships and
cardinalities
Student has
identified some
relationships and
cardinalities
Student has
identified most
relevant
relationships and
cardinalities
Student has
identified all
relevant
relationships and
cardinalities
ER design
10 marks
Design an ERD
that is completely
inaccurate
Design a very
basic ERD
Designs an ERD
that is somewhat
clear, accurate
Designs an ERD
that is generally
clear, accurate
Designs an ERD
that is clear,
accurate
Queries
10 marks
No queries can be
generated by
using the
database
A few queries can
be generated to
provide the
answers to the
business issues
but not accurate
The available
queries are
designed to
partially answer
the business
issues
The available
queries are
designed to
answer most of
the business
issues
All queries are
specifically
designed to
answer the
questions of the
given case, the
answers are
insightful and
accurate
Structure and
Format
5 marks
Very difficult to
read, unclear
structure and
most of the
required sections
are missing
Some difficulty in
reading, not very
clear structure but
important sections
are included
Clear and
readable, and all
required sections
are included.
Well written and
very clear, and all
required sections
with completed
discussion are
included.
Well written and
very clear, all
required sections
with completed
discussion are
included and
additional sections
have been added
for clarity.
Assessment 5
Assessment Type
Database Implementation and performance - Group Assessment
Purpose
The case study of database evaluation and improvement will be provided on
KING’S OWN INSTITUTE*
Success in Higher Education
ICT702 INTRODUCTION TO DATABASE DESIGN
T323 12-10-23
PAGE 15 OF 19
*AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT PTY LTD ©
ABN: 72 132 629 979
CRICOS 03171A
Moodle. The students are required to conduct a review on the existing database
based on the business needs that are collected from the given narratives. Each
group of 3-4 students, they are required to create a database using SQL,
enhance the structure of the database using normalization and other data
analytics techniques to improve the performance of the database, generate and
execute queries to solve the current business issues through SQL. This
assessment contributes to learning outcomes d and e.
Value
30%
Due Date
Week 12
Topic
The details of the topic will be provided during the sessions
Submission
Submit the MDB and report on Moodle
Task Details
Student groups are required to create a database for the given case study
and enhance the structure by normalizing the data form, using SQL to
generate queries and implement the SQL server environment to execute the
queries.
Marking Rubric for Assessment:
5
;
Value:
20
%
Group
Criteria
Fail
(0
–
49%)
Pass
(50
–
64%)
Credit
(65
–
74%)
Distinction
(75
–
84%)
High Distinction
(85
–
100%)
ER
Normalisation
5 marks
Demonstrates
poor database
design skills by
failing to
normalize the
data form case
study or create
an efficient
database
Demonstrates
basic database
design skills but
may not
accurately
normalize the
data form case
study or create
an accurate ER d
Demonstrates
adequate
database design
skills by partially
normalizing the
data form case
study and
creating a mostly
accurate ER d
Demonstrates
strong database
design skills by
effectively
normalizing the
data form case
study and
creating an
accurate ER
Demonstrates
exceptional database
design skills by
normalizing the data form
case study and creating
an accurate and well-
organized ER
SQL
10 marks
No SQL solutions
are provided
clear
explanations.
Some SQL
solutions are
provided to
answer the
business issues
but with errors
Most SQL
solutions are
provided to
answer the
business issues
but with errors
All SQL solutions
are provided to
answer the
business issues
but with errors
All SQL solutions are
provided to answer the
business issues but
without any errors
Queries
5 marks
No queries can
be generated by
using the
database
A few queries
can be generated
to provide the
answers to the
business issues
but not accurate
The available
queries are
designed to
partially answer
the business
issues
The available
queries are
designed to
answer most of
the business
issues
All queries are
specifically designed to
answer the questions of
the given case, the
answers are insightful
and accurate
Total mark
out of 20
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
KING’S OWN INSTITUTE*
Success in Higher Education
ICT702 INTRODUCTION TO DATABASE DESIGN
T323 12-10-23
PAGE 16 OF 19
*AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT PTY LTD ©
ABN: 72 132 629 979
CRICOS 03171A
Marking Rubric for Assessment:
5
;
Value:
10 %
Individual
Criteria
Fail
(0
–
49%)
Pass
(50
–
64%)
Credit
(65
–
74%)
Distinction
(75
–
84%)
High Distinction
(85
–
100%)
Attendance at
weekly
meetings
1.5 marks
Attended less than
50% of the
meetings
Attended less than
65% of the
meetings
Attended less than
75% of the
meetings
Attended less than
85% of the
meetings
Attended 85% or
more of the
meetings
Weekly activity
log
1.5 marks
Provided less than
50% of the weekly
logs and/or
provided scant
details
Provided less than
65% of the weekly
logs and/or
provided
incomplete details
Provided less than
75% of the weekly
logs and/or
provided only basic
details
Provided less than
75% of the weekly
logs and/or
provided most
required details
Provided less than
75% of the weekly logs
and/or provided
comprehensive
details
Time
management
1.5 marks
Assigned tasks
typically late or not
completed
Most assigned
tasks completed
by the deadline
All assigned tasks
completed by the
deadline
Most assigned
tasks completed
well in advance of
deadline allowing
time for revision
and refinement
All assigned tasks
completed well in
advance of
deadline allowing
time for revision
and refinement
Tasks
1.5 marks
Did not complete
the tasks assigned
Completed most
assigned tasks but
not thorough and
lacking details
Completed most
assigned tasks in
detail
Completed all
assigned tasks in
detail
Completed all
tasks assigned at a
professional level
Actual
contribution to
group project
2 marks
Made little or no
contribution to the
project/report
Made a cursory
contribution to the
project/report
Made a fair
contribution to the
project/report
Made a
significant
contribution to the
project/report
Made a vital
contribution to the
project/report
Reflection
2 marks
Has not been able to
provide any of the
following:
•
Discuss your
experience of
working in a
group.
•
Mention any
challenges/
difficulties that
you have faced in
accomplishing the
group project.
•
Comment on any
limitations/
strength of your
design.
•
Comment on
whether your
database meets
all the system
requirements as
specified.
•
Mention any
assumptions
made.
Has been able to
provide just one of the
following:
•
Discuss your
experience of
working in a
group.
•
Mention any
challenges/
difficulties that
you have faced in
accomplishing the
group project.
•
Comment on any
limitations/
strength of your
design.
•
Comment on
whether your
database meets
all the system
requirements as
specified.
•
Mention any
assumptions
made.
Has been able to
provide just any two of
the following:
•
Discuss your
experience of
working in a
group.
•
Mention any
challenges/
difficulties that
you have faced in
accomplishing the
group project.
•
Comment on any
limitations/
strength of your
design.
•
Comment on
whether your
database meets
all the system
requirements as
specified.
•
Mention any
assumptions
made.
Has been able to
provide only any three
of the following:
•
Discuss your
experience of
working in a
group.
•
Mention any
challenges/
difficulties that
you have faced in
accomplishing the
group project.
•
Comment on any
limitations/
strength of your
design.
•
Comment on
whether your
database meets
all the system
requirements as
specified.
•
Mention any
assumptions
made.
Has been able to
provide all the
following:
•
Discuss your
experience of
working in a
group.
•
Mention any
challenges/
difficulties that
you have faced in
accomplishing the
group project.
•
Comment on any
limitations/
strength of your
design.
•
Comment on
whether your
database meets
all the system
requirements as
specified.
•
Mention any
assumptions
made.
Total Mark
out of 10
10%
COMMENTS:
KING’S OWN INSTITUTE*
Success in Higher Education
ICT702 INTRODUCTION TO DATABASE DESIGN
T323 12-10-23
PAGE 17 OF 19
*AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT PTY LTD ©
ABN: 72 132 629 979
CRICOS 03171A
3.2 General information about assessment
a) Late Penalties and Extensions
An important part of business life and key to achieving KOI’s graduate outcome of Professional Skills is the
ability to manage workloads and meet deadlines. Completing assessment tasks on time is a good way to
master these habits.
Students who miss mid-trimester tests and final exams without a valid and accepted reason may not be granted
a deferred exam and will be awarded 0 marks for the assessment item. Assessment items which are missed
or submitted after the due date/time will attract a penalty unless there is a compelling reason (see below).
These penalties are designed to encourage students to develop good time management practices, and to
create equity for all students.
Any penalties applied will only be up to the maximum marks available for the specific piece of assessment
attracting the penalty.
Late penalties, granting of extensions and deferred exams are based on the following:
In Class Tests and Quizzes (excluding Mid-Trimester Tests)
o
Generally, extensions are not permitted. A make-up test may only be permitted under very special
circumstances where acceptable supporting evidence of illness, hardship or unavoidable problems preventing
completion of the assessment is provided (see section (b) below). The procedures and timing to apply for a
make-up test (only if available) are as shown in the section
Applying for an Extension
(see below).
o
Missing a class test will result in 0 marks for that assessment item unless the above applies.
Written Assessments and Video Assessments
o
There is a late penalty of
5% of the total available marks
per calendar day unless an extension is approved
(see
Applying for an Extension
section
below).
Presentations
o
Generally, extensions are not permitted. Missing a presentation will result in 0 marks for that assessment
item. The rules for make-up presentations are the same as for missing in-class tests (described above).
For group presentations, if serious circumstances prevent some members of the group from participating, the
members of the group who are present should make their contributions as agreed. If a make-up presentation
is approved, the other members of the group will be able to make their individual presentation later and will be
marked according to the marking rubric. A video presentation may be used to facilitate the process.
Mid-Trimester Tests and Final Exams
If students are unable to attend mid-trimester tests or final exams due to illness, hardship or some other
unavoidable problem (acceptable to KOI), they must:
o
Complete the Assignment Extension / Exam Deferment Form available by clicking the following link
Assignment Extension / Exam Deferment Form
as soon as possible
, but no later than three (3) working days
after the exam date.
o
Provide acceptable documentary evidence (see section (b) below).
o
Agree to attend the deferred exam as set by KOI if a deferred exam is approved.
Deferred exam
o
There will only be one deferred exam offered.
o
Marks obtained for the deferred exam will be the marks awarded for that assessment item.
o
If you miss the deferred exam you will be awarded 0 marks for the assessment item. This may mean you
are unable to pass the subject.
b) Applying for an Extension
If students are unable to submit or attend an assessment when due, they must
KING’S OWN INSTITUTE*
Success in Higher Education
ICT702 INTRODUCTION TO DATABASE DESIGN
T323 12-10-23
PAGE 18 OF 19
*AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT PTY LTD ©
ABN: 72 132 629 979
CRICOS 03171A
o
Complete the Assignment Extension / Exam Deferment Form available by clicking the following link
Assignment Extension / Exam Deferment Form
as soon as possible
, but no later than three (3) working days
of the assessment due date
.
o
Provide acceptable documentary evidence in the form of a medical certificate, police report or some other
appropriate evidence of illness or hardship, or a
technician’s report on problems with computer or
communications technology, or a signed and witnessed statutory declaration explaining the circumstances.
o
Students and lecturers / tutors will be advised of the outcome of the extension request as soon as
practicable.
Please remember there is no guarantee of an extension being granted, and poor organisation is not a
satisfactory reason to be granted an extension.
c) Referencing and Plagiarism
Please remember that all sources used in assessment tasks must be suitably referenced.
Failure to acknowledge sources is plagiarism, and as such is a very serious academic issue. Students
plagiarising run the risk of severe penalties ranging from a reduction in marks through to 0 marks for a first
offence for a single assessment task, to exclusion from KOI in the most serious repeat cases. Exclusion has
serious visa implications. The easiest way to avoid plagiarising is to reference all sources.
Harvard referencing is the required method
–
in-
text referencing using Author’
s Surname (family name) and
year of publication. A Referencing Guide, “Harvard Referencing”, and a Referencing Tutorial can be found on
the right-hand menu strip in Moodle on all subject pages.
An effective way to reference correctly is to use
Microsoft
Word’s
referencing function (please note that other
versions and programs are likely to be different). To use the referencing function, click on the References Tab
in the menu ribbon
–
students should choose
Harvard.
Authorship
is also an issue under plagiarism
–
KOI expects students to submit their own original work in both
assessment and exams, or the original work of their group in the case of a group project. All students agree to
a statement of authorship when submitting assessments online via Moodle, stating that the work submitted is
their own original work.
The following are examples of academic misconduct and can attract severe penalties:
o
Handing in work created by someone else (without acknowledgement), whether copied from another
student, written by someone else, or from any published or electronic source, is fraud, and falls under the
general Plagiarism guidelines.
o
Copying / cheating in tests and exams is academic misconduct.
Such incidents will be treated just as
seriously as other forms of plagiarism.
o
Students who willingly allow another student to copy their work in any assessment may be considered to
assisting in copying/cheating, and similar penalties may be applied.
Where a subject coordinator considers that a student might have engaged in academic misconduct, KOI may
require the student to undertake an additional oral exam as a part of the assessment for the subject, as a way
of testing the student’s understanding of their work.
Further information can be found on the KOI website.
d) Reasonable Adjustment
The Commonwealth Disability Discrimination Act (1992) makes it unlawful to treat people with a disability less
fairly than people without a disability. In the context of this subject, the principle of Reasonable Adjustment is
applied to ensure that participants with a disability have equitable access to all aspects of the learning for the
subject. For assessment, this means that barriers to their demonstrating competence are removed wherever
it is reasonably practical to do so.
Examples of reasonable adjustment in assessment may include:
o
provision of an oral assessment, rather than a written assessment
o
provision of extra time
o
use of adaptive technology.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
KING’S OWN INSTITUTE*
Success in Higher Education
ICT702 INTRODUCTION TO DATABASE DESIGN
T323 12-10-23
PAGE 19 OF 19
*AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT PTY LTD ©
ABN: 72 132 629 979
CRICOS 03171A
The focus of the adjusted assessment should be on enabling the student to demonstrate achievement of the
learning outcomes for the subject, rather than on the method of assessment.
e) Appeals Process
Full details of the KOI
Assessment and Assessment Appeals Policy
may be obtained in hard copy from the
Library, and on the KOI website
www.koi.edu.au
under
Policies and Forms
.
Assessments and Mid-Trimester Exams:
Where students are not satisfied with the results of an assessment, including mid-trimester exams, they have
the right to appeal. The process is as follows:
o
Discuss the assessment with their tutor or lecturer
–
students should identify where they feel more marks
should have been awarded
–
students should provide valid reasons based on the marking guide provided for
the assessment. Reasons such as
“I worked really hard
” are not considered valid.
o
If still not satisfied, students should complete an Application for Review of Assessment Marks form, clearly
explaining the reasons for seeking a review. This form is available from the KOI website under
Policies and
Forms
and is also available at KOI Rece
ption (Kent St, Market St and O’Connell St). The completed Application
for Review of Assessment Marks form should be submitted as explained on the form with supporting evidence
attached to
academic@koi.edu.au
.
o
The form must be submitted within
ten (10) working days
of the return of the marked assessment, or within
five (5) working days
after the return of the assessment if the assessment is returned after the end of the
trimester.
Review of Grade
–
whole of subject and final exams:
Where students are not satisfied with the results of the whole subject or with their final exam results, they have
the right to request a Review of Grade
–
see the
Assessment and Assessment Appeals Policy
for more
information.
An
Application for Review of Grade/Assessment Form
(available from the KOI Website under
Policies and
Forms
and from KOI Reception at Kent St, Market St and O’Connell St) should be completed clearly explaining
the grounds for the application. The completed application should be submitted as explained on the form, with
supporting evidence attached to
academic@koi.edu.au
.