Critical_Capabilitie_748700_ndx

pdf

School

Queensland University of Technology *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

623

Subject

Information Systems

Date

Nov 24, 2024

Type

pdf

Pages

34

Uploaded by JudgeZebraMaster583

Report
Gartner, Inc. | G00748700 Page 1 of 28 Critical Capabilities for Enterprise Conversational AI Platforms Published 21 March 2022 - ID G00748700 - 33 min read By Analyst(s): Magnus Revang, Anthony Mullen, Bern Elliot Initiatives: Artificial Intelligence; Customer Service and Support Technology The capabilities of enterprise conversational AI platforms are evolving quickly. Application leaders in charge of conversational AI need to evaluate vendors beyond natural language understanding and dialogue management, and this research helps evaluate 21 platforms across 14 critical capabilities. This Critical Capabilities is related to other research: Magic Quadrant for Enterprise Conversational AI Platforms View All Magic Quadrants and Critical Capabilities Overview Key Findings Recommendations Application leaders responsible for enterprise conversational AI initiatives: Equally important to core capabilities in language understanding and dialogue management is the ability to operationalize usage of these capabilities in no-code tooling within business units. Predefined language models with intents and entities, together with templated dialogue and prebuilt integrations for industry and domain use cases, greatly accelerate development times. Platforms are still emerging and subject to highly varied evaluation criteria. Different clients will thus have more varied and different shortlists, based on the best fit for their unique criteria. This research note is restricted to the personal use of p.bruza@qut.edu.au.
Gartner, Inc. | G00748700 Page 2 of 28 What You Need to Know This document was republished on 11 April 2022. The document you are viewing is the corrected version. For more information, see the Corrections page on gartner.com. Application leaders supporting conversational AI, be it a chatbot initiative or the desire to have virtual assistants replacing existing workforce, and everything in between, need to be able to navigate a very complex vendor landscape with a wide variety of capabilities. With potentially thousands of vendors worldwide that are able to give you basic chatbot capabilities, capabilities outside of just language understanding and responding to users are becoming increasingly important. The category of enterprise conversational AI platform, specifically on platforms capable of multiple use cases, in a variety of enterprise architectures, has no-code tooling to develop, operationalize and scale the implementation into the business units themselves. The market is a trade-off, where no-code operationalization may limit the ability to have high control in code. The ability to do text-based chat very well does not automatically translate into handling a voice conversation on telephone well, and vice versa. Complex dialogue might need integration from a cloud deployment to a legacy on-premises back- end system. Although we have taken great care in crafting five use cases with weightings reflecting what we see in aggregate with clients, application leaders need to set their own weighting for these 14 capabilities to reflect their organization’s unique needs. Evaluate a platform’s potential to achieve your business goals, including how much effort, competence and time it will take to achieve that potential — and what features the vendor has in place to improve deployment time. Evaluate predefined intents, entities and dialogue flow offered by the platform for suitability to your use case, as these will have the largest impact on effort required. Ensure that platforms being evaluated are flexible enough to fit in your existing architecture and will be usable not only for current, but also future use cases. This research note is restricted to the personal use of p.bruza@qut.edu.au.
Gartner, Inc. | G00748700 Page 3 of 28 Different use cases within an organization do indeed need different platform vendor capabilities, often with subtly different approaches. In fact, different use cases and levels of sophistication not only need different kinds of dialogue, but will run into different requirements when it comes to deployment environment, privacy compliance, security measures and integration ability with existing systems. This Critical Capabilities report identifies the major functional capabilities that enterprise conversational AI platforms include, weighted for what Gartner sees as the five most common use cases. Each vendor is rated on those capabilities in order to enable a comparison between them. This research note is restricted to the personal use of p.bruza@qut.edu.au.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Gartner, Inc. | G00748700 Page 4 of 28 Analysis Critical Capabilities Use-Case Graphics Vendors’ Product Scores for Customer Service Use Case Source: Gartner (March 2022) This research note is restricted to the personal use of p.bruza@qut.edu.au.
Gartner, Inc. | G00748700 Page 5 of 28 Vendors’ Product Scores for IT Service Desk Use Case Source: Gartner (March 2022) This research note is restricted to the personal use of p.bruza@qut.edu.au.
Gartner, Inc. | G00748700 Page 6 of 28 Vendors’ Product Scores for Human Resources Use Case Source: Gartner (March 2022) This research note is restricted to the personal use of p.bruza@qut.edu.au.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Gartner, Inc. | G00748700 Page 7 of 28 Vendors’ Product Scores for Voice Bot in Call Center Use Case Source: Gartner (March 2022) This research note is restricted to the personal use of p.bruza@qut.edu.au.
Gartner, Inc. | G00748700 Page 8 of 28 Vendors’ Product Scores for Orchestration of Multiple Employee-Facing Bots Use Case Source: Gartner (March 2022) This research note is restricted to the personal use of p.bruza@qut.edu.au.
Gartner, Inc. | G00748700 Page 9 of 28 Vendors [24]7.ai The [24]7.ai Engagement Cloud is a fully featured and mature contact center solution. It integrates and automates chat, messaging and voice channels with virtual and live agents. The company also offers complementary components to assist with specific types of interactions, as well as its Agent Services for business process outsourcing. The [24]7 Answers component is a knowledge base with multilingual support for FAQ. The [24]7 Assist AI component is an agent recommendation solution. Some of the stronger features in the [24]7.ai Engagement Cloud are related to customer service, where the company has a well-established base of large deployments. Notable capabilities include its experience with telephony deployments, experience with back-end integrations, its agent escalation and live integration options, as well as its analytics. The company also has an experienced professional services organization. [24]7.ai scored in the first quartile in both the customer service and the voice bot in call center use cases. Customer service has been a historical focus and strength for the company. The company has not focused as much on non-contact-center employee-facing chatbot applications, such as for IT service desk and HR. It scored in the third quartile in those use cases. The company scored in the second quartile in the orchestration of multiple employee-facing bots use case. Aisera Aisera Conversational AI is a fully featured platform that can be integrated with both Aisera Conversational Robotic Process Automation (RPA) and Aisera Ticket AI for full automation of service desks. The company also offers AI Service Desk (for IT and HR), AI Customer Service and AI Customer Engagement, which build on the core platform. Aisera is particularly suited for support and for service desks catering to support. The platform integrates easily with most ticketing systems and offers several time- and effort- saving features in automating creation and resolution of tickets. Particularly for domains like IT service and HR, Aisera has prebuilt intents and dialogue flows that accelerate deployment. This research note is restricted to the personal use of p.bruza@qut.edu.au.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Gartner, Inc. | G00748700 Page 10 of 28 The company scored in the second quartile for IT service desk and HR use cases. IT service desk has been its focus and strength, and this translates well into HR as a use case. Within its own ecosystem, Aisera can orchestrate multiple bots, and scored in the third quartile for this use case. While the company scored in the fourth quartile for customer service and voice bot in call center use cases, it may still be a good choice if your customer service is primarily focused on customer support. Aivo Aivo AgentBot is a SaaS-based conversational AI platform that delivers a hosted, affordable and fast-to-set-up solution primarily focused on customer service. Aivo’s Live solution adds human chat and agent assist while Aivo’s voice solution adds voice capabilities to the platform. Aivo is particularly suited for customer service for organizations that need an easy-to-set- up and affordable solution. Its main strength is its collection of predefined industry and domain language models that each include intents, entities and dialogue. Potential customers should evaluate whether they can accelerate their deployment by using content from the marketplace. With a strong presence and large number of implementations in Latin America, Aivo’s capabilities with Latin-derived languages and dialects are strong. This is bolstered by a SaaS model that allows for progressive updates over time. Aivo focuses on ease of implementation for common use cases at an affordable price point. This requires a focus on features that require little or no customization, and makes the platform less feature-rich. As a result, Aivo scored in the fourth quartile for all use cases. Amazon Web Services Amazon Web Services (AWS) is a market leader in cloud computing and offers a broad array of services. The Amazon Lex conversational platform is one of several AI natural language products the company offers. These include Amazon Connect, Amazon Kendra, Amazon Polly, Amazon Translate and Amazon Comprehend. AWS has strong brand recognition with clients globally. And the use of Amazon Lex increases when delivered with an Amazon Connect contact center as a service (CCaaS) deployment. Organizations with existing AWS master purchase agreements and existing investments in AWS are more likely to include Amazon Lex in their shortlist of enterprise conversational AI platform vendors. This research note is restricted to the personal use of p.bruza@qut.edu.au.
Gartner, Inc. | G00748700 Page 11 of 28 AWS leverages partners and enterprises with AWS developer experience for conversational application development. While this is possible for larger customer service use cases, other use cases, such as IT service desk and human resources, will prefer strong prebuilt suites. As a result, Amazon Lex did not score highly in the use-case scores as a stand- alone chatbot solution. Amelia Amelia is both the name of the company and the platform. It’s a comprehensive conversational AI platform primarily sold as a SaaS/subscription offering integrating and automating chat, messaging and voice channels with virtual and live agents. The company also offers AIOps, which is a complementary IT management solution. This IT management solution is fully integrated with Amelia, for engineers to use Amelia as a conversational interface for doing tasks within AIOps. This includes other relevant solutions, like opening requests for change (RFCs) in ServiceNow, as well as supporting end users with tickets and requests that are automated through AIOps. Third parties are used to support voice and translation services. As a leader in this group, the company scored in the first quartile for all five key use cases. A major strength for Amelia is in IT service management (ITSM) and operations, where it provides a suite of tools designed to handle tickets and support use cases in bulk with powerful design and administrator controls. Within customer service, where voice is increasingly key, Amelia provides one of the most naturalistic experiences among vendors in this research, and can integrate with a wide array of interactive voice response (IVR) services. A further differentiator for Amelia is the ability to use virtual assistants to design virtual assistants — a unique feature in this group. Avaamo The Avaamo Conversational AI platform is a SaaS-based enterprise solution enabling users to build and automate conversations with employees, customers and partners. Avaamo provides a complementary solution, Cognitive Search, to allow users to ask natural language questions of content sources without the need to formally build bots. In addition, the platform has its own native voice solutions covering speech to text and custom voice development. This research note is restricted to the personal use of p.bruza@qut.edu.au.
Gartner, Inc. | G00748700 Page 12 of 28 The platform takes an unsupervised learning-first approach and presents lightweight no- code interfaces for users to create virtual assistant experiences. A differentiator for Avaamo is the simplicity of the development experience achieved by generative and sparse data methods, where it has patents. Avaamo also tightly integrates voice and text in the design experience, with differentiating features for localization of entities with speech hints. The company scored in the second quartile for all five key use cases, with its highest score in orchestration of multiple employee-facing bots, followed by customer service, where it supports many integrations and complex end-to-end workflows. The scoring reflects the flexibility and versatility of the Avaamo platform. boost.ai The boost.ai conversational AI platform supports all common channels, has prebuilt industry modules, and offers a no-code option for many common functions. It has an intent architecture that enables it to scale to 10,000 intents while maintaining strong resolution rates. The solution supports integrations with leading CRM and contact center solutions and has a flexible live agent chat integration. Much of boost.ai’s innovation and differentiation lies in its ability to orchestrate multiple chat applications in large-scale distributed organizations. It is there where its unique virtual agent network (VAN) capability can be leveraged. This is accompanied with an approach for scaling to large numbers of intents. The boost.ai solution scored highest in the IT service desk and human resources use cases, where it was ranked in the second quartile. It is in these multiple departmental-type deployments where boost.ai is strongest. In customer service, it scored in the third quartile. Support for voice and telephony is a relatively new capability, and boost.ai scored in the fourth quartile for voice bot in call center use case. Cognigy Cognigy.AI is Cognigy’s complete conversational AI platform that comes integrated with Cognigy Voice Gateway and Cognigy Insights for additional synergetic features. Cognigy.AI has a very flexible and modern architecture that makes it easy to deploy in a variety of different environments, especially suited for complex architectures with a variety of services and components. This research note is restricted to the personal use of p.bruza@qut.edu.au.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Gartner, Inc. | G00748700 Page 13 of 28 Cognigy is an especially good choice in large enterprises that need to cover many different use cases with ownership of the maintenance and evolution of the platform outside of IT, in the business units themselves. The platform manages to balance this no- code ability for lines of business with deep customizability for IT architects who need robust integrations and support for a modern application life cycle. The versatility extends into the core capabilities, with the solution scoring high in almost all capabilities. Cognigy scores high on all use cases, but its voice capabilities are slightly below the rest of its offering. This causes Cognigy to just be nudged to the second quartile in customer service, and in voice bot in call center — while it is in the first quartile on all other use cases. Google The Google Conversational AI product suite is a SaaS solution leveraging a number of existing Google components including Contact Center AI (CCAI), Dialogflow CX, Dialogflow ES, Agent Assist AI, Insights AI, Speech-to-Text and Text-to-Speech. Contact Center AI (CCAI) uses a partner-driven go-to-market model to bring its Conversational AI capabilities to contact centers. For complex contact center deployments, working directly with Google as the implementation partner can provide customers with access to prerelease features. Implementation partners often provide their own complementary third-party components as well. Clients should consider the difference between using an implementation partner or working directly with Google when evaluating CCAI. The company is focused on customer service and scores highest for the customer service and voice bot in call center use cases. For these, it provides a broad set of IVR integrations, wide language coverage and a variety of text-to-speech voices, with special emphasis on U.S. English dialects. Google scored lower for the IT service desk use case; it has fewer off-the-shelf intents and integrations for this use case. It also scored low on bot orchestration, which relies on switching flows, not agents; Google’s approach does not appear to support third-party bots easily. IBM IBM Watson Assistant leverages the broader IBM language portfolio, including speech, language translation, and AI search to satisfy enterprise use cases. The platform includes AI capabilities to handle topic changes, suggest alternative options or detect when a human agent is needed. Channel and back-end integrations with contact center platforms are supported through native connectors or through standard API integration. This research note is restricted to the personal use of p.bruza@qut.edu.au.
Gartner, Inc. | G00748700 Page 14 of 28 Watson Assistant integrates with Watson Discovery and Watson Knowledge Studio, which allows data scientists, developers and analysts to build, run and manage AI models, and optimize decisions that enhance the conversational experience. A differentiator for IBM is the robust reuse of language assets outside of conversational AI use cases. Its FAQ- extraction feature is a good implementation of tooling to rapidly create FAQ chatbots from websites or documents. IBM scored in the second quartile for three of the use cases: customer service, human resources and voice bot in call center. This reflects, in part, IBM’s strength in voice services and its broad overall strengths. It scored in the third quartile in the IT service desk and the orchestration of multiple employee-facing bots use cases. Kore.ai Kore.ai Experience Optimization (XO) platform is a no-code platform for conversational AI that has a broad scope, and some capabilities cross over into adjacent markets. Specifically, its no-code interface building not only supports the traditional micro app as part of a conversation, but also supports small-scale application design. Also, its process builder overlaps with the RPA market. Kore.ai focuses on no-code and targets nondevelopers and non-data scientists, enabling them to do everything within the platform from the tooling. This allows for scale and operationalization within business units. Kore.ai has the greatest synergy with its integrated components. Kore.ai offers a large number of accelerators for different industries, domains and tasks that might greatly reduce implementation time. Kore.ai scores in the top quartile for all use cases. This reflects the strength of the product offering and flexibility of what it’s able to solve. The main element that reduces the scoring slightly is the inflexibility to incorporate third-party services to replace services that Kore.ai already offers. Omilia Omilia has significant experience working with contact centers and bringing digital engagement to customer service operations. Its solution draws from this background. Distinguishing functionalities of the Omilia Cloud Platform (OCP) are its miniApps approach, its experience with telephony integrations and its integrated passive voice biometrics. Additional functionality includes an extensive set of out-of-the-box prebuilt tasks, and a solution can be deployed in the cloud or on-premises. This research note is restricted to the personal use of p.bruza@qut.edu.au.
Gartner, Inc. | G00748700 Page 15 of 28 The OCP miniApps architecture makes it possible to modularize tasks and skills. Based on this capability, Omilia offers an extensive set of prebuilt modules, intents and entity types for a broad range of industries. An additional differentiator for OCP is a strong set of voice capabilities. Omilia scored in the first quartile for the customer service, IT service desk, voice bot in call center and orchestration of multiple employee-facing bots use cases. This is in part due to OCP’s approach and experience, which fit well in those use cases, and to its modular miniApps approach. OCP lacks experience in the HR use case and was rated in the third quartile, which reflects its lack of experience with enterprise business application enablement. OneReach.ai OneReach.ai’s Communication Studio G2 is a voice-first conversational AI platform with impressive capabilities in an impressive packaging. It has a very flexible microservices architecture that eases integration with third-party components, and back-end systems that will be available inside of its no-code environment. OneReach.ai prioritizes the user experience associated with conversations built on the platform. It has a vision for what constitutes good conversational design that is expressed through its offering and training materials to help users craft high-quality experiences. This care for implementation quality extends into the partner ecosystem. Additionally, OneReach.ai has very strong voice capabilities that come from a voice-first approach. OneReach.ai scores in the first quartile in all use cases and more impressively scored highest in all but one use case. This is due to the consistency of its capabilities, and its focus being well-aligned with Gartner’s definition of the enterprise conversational AI platform market. While other vendors have higher scores in individual capabilities, OneReach.ai has the highest average. With the addition of voice capabilities that stand out, it pushes OneReach.ai ahead of the competition. Openstream.ai Openstream.ai’s Eva is a multimodal enterprise conversational AI platform that addresses complex B2B, B2C and B2E use cases. Complementary solutions include Openstream.ai’s Agent Desktop with Agent Assist, which provides an alternative option to incumbent agent dashboards, and its prepackaged Eva smart assistant for employees. This research note is restricted to the personal use of p.bruza@qut.edu.au.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Gartner, Inc. | G00748700 Page 16 of 28 Eva employs advanced AI technologies such as a goal-based dialogue engine driven by belief networks and knowledge graphs autogenerated from structured and unstructured data. Eva excels at multimodal input, where language in the form of text or speech is combined with gestures, touch or pictures. In addition to multimodal interactions, Eva allows for flexible deployment where parts of the assistant can run offline on device and sync up to cloud-based implementation when needed or available. The company scored highest for its HR use cases where they do well in supporting complex requests requiring access to several applications to execute and coordinate workflows. Openstream.ai’s second highest score was in the area of voice bot in the contact center, where it can differentiate with a multimodal dialogue approach. However, the quality of text-to-speech services needs improvement. Oracle Oracle Digital Assistant (ODA) is a conversational AI platform that offers a full set of functionalities that can be used independently from other Oracle software. ODA creates skills with minimal data and coding, as it is trained to know enterprise constructs such as SQL, documents and APIs. ODA comes with an advanced approach to prebuilt skills for multiple industries and enterprise domains. Industries include retail, utilities, hospitality and the public sector. Enterprise domains include human capital management (HCM), supply chain management (SCM), sales, service and marketing. These skills can be searched, customized and adapted as needed. And when adapted, the adapted versions still take advantage of any advances and changes to the base model. Oracle scored in the second quartile for the IT service desk and the human resources use cases. This reflects its ability to define prebuilt skills for enterprise functions. It also scored in the second quartile for the orchestration of multiple employee-facing bots use case. ODA scored in the third quartile for customer service and voice bot in call center use cases. This, in part, reflects its lack of exposure to those use cases. Rasa Rasa offers Rasa Enterprise, a full conversational platform that is built on top of the well- known Rasa Open Source. The distinction between the two is that Rasa Open Source has all the machine learning components and is a developer-focused toolkit, while Rasa Enterprise adds enterprise features and no-code tooling. This research note is restricted to the personal use of p.bruza@qut.edu.au.
Gartner, Inc. | G00748700 Page 17 of 28 Rasa Open Source is a very popular toolkit among both developers and researchers. Contributions from the community and active governance from Rasa have often given the platform access to innovations in conversational AI earlier than most vendors. This foundation gives users a high level of control and the ability to deeply customize. The flip side is that the Enterprise tooling, consisting of the no-code and a configuration-based platform, has to keep pace and still offer an easier way for nondevelopers and non-data scientists to build conversational experiences. Rasa is in the third quartile for HR, voice bot in call center and orchestration of multiple employee-facing bots use cases, while it is in the fourth for customer service and IT service desk. This comes down to the availability and ease of use of the capabilities. Rasa, due to the availability of source code, can in theory be made to do anything, but the capability scoring for this report weighs capabilities easily available and configurable inside of the tooling much higher than code. Senseforth Senseforth’s A.ware platform is an enterprise conversational AI supporting a wide array of industries and use cases with large and complex implementations. Senseforth has two complementary products: its Hybrid Chat solution, which provides a set of human-in-the- loop capabilities to enable agents to collaborate with chatbots, and Smart Search, which is its on-site semantic and contextual search for supporting buyers on-site. A.ware has a combination of an extensive botstore, industry templates and easy-to-use no-code tools, which makes standing up a bot straightforward. The vertical most deeply supported is finance, which makes up around 60% of Senseforth’s customer base. A.ware also uses generative approaches to speed up workflow of voice applications. Senseforth uses its own proprietary AI technology extensively in the platform, and differentiates itself in its unique approaches, so clients should take extra care to evaluate if the differences will save them time and effort. The company scored highest for its customer support use cases. Its second highest score was in voice use cases. Senseforth scored second-lowest for HR use cases; while it has large implementations here, it scored lower due to the breadth and depth of use cases in this space. This research note is restricted to the personal use of p.bruza@qut.edu.au.
Gartner, Inc. | G00748700 Page 18 of 28 Sinch Sinch’s Chatlayer conversational platform is offered in its broad communications platform as a service (CPaaS) and includes an integrated agent dashboard. Related SaaS applications include a rich messaging campaign solution (Campaigns), an omnichannel cloud contact center solution (Contact Pro) and an AI knowledge base search tool. Chatlayer offers prebuilt intents for common industries and domains; however, these are not yet incorporated into a marketplace for Sinch’s broad set of global partners. The Chatlayer dialogue management allows application development, but is less suitable for orchestrator bot concepts and doesn’t allow integration of third-party NLP engines. Chatlayer offers advanced chatbot analytics and testing via integration with Botium Box. This strengthens its built-in analytic capabilities with a complementary and unique third- party solution. Sinch’s main strength is the synergies enabled when using it together with its larger SaaS and CPaaS portfolio. Sinch scored better in the IT service desk and human resources use cases, where it was in the third quartile. It scored in the fourth quartile in the other three use cases. This was largely the result of its limited breadth of references for these use cases. SmarTek21 SmarTek21 offers SmartBotHub, which offers full enterprise conversational AI capabilities. It has synergies with the Enterprise Cloud Connect product. The combination offers a strong ability to integrate across many back-end systems. The SmartBotHub platform also offers many preconfigured integrations. SmartBotHub is a solution that has all the requisite capabilities, but aside from the integration capabilities, little stands out as exceptional compared to the overall market. Although the company focuses primarily on customer service, the capabilities are usable for all use cases. An interesting addition is the Digital Meeting Assistant, which has the potential to be a differentiator in the future. SmartBotHub is quite flexible in its customization capabilities; and its strength is deployments inside very complex and custom IT architectures. SmarTek21 is in the third quartile for all use cases except HR, where it’s in the fourth. Its platform is consistent in the scoring and checks all the boxes for what an enterprise conversational AI platform has to support. This research note is restricted to the personal use of p.bruza@qut.edu.au.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Gartner, Inc. | G00748700 Page 19 of 28 Verint Verint offers conversational AI and voice automation services as part of the Verint Customer Engagement Platform. Related offerings integrating with its conversational AI include Verint Messaging (Conversocial), Verint Knowledge Management, Verint Community, Verint Workforce Engagement, Verint Automated Quality Management, Verint Case Management, Verint Speech Analytics and Verint Experience Management. With its extensive product portfolio, Verint offers a very broad approach to call center automation and agent empowerment. Although Verint Customer Engagement Platform is offered as a stand-alone platform, the synergies between Verint’s broader product offerings is their main advantage. Verint also has a large library of prebuilt components and integrations. Verint scored highest for the customer service use case, where its experience in customer engagement and analytics is evident. It scored in the bottom quartile for the other use cases. The HR use case was its lowest score, and while it has good experience in supporting employees, it is less known for back office. Yellow.ai Yellow.ai offers a broad and fully functioning conversational suite. It encompasses customer engagement, customer support, conversational commerce, HR automation and ITSM automation. It supports a broad set of channels, multiple back-office system integrations, integrated multilingual support and an advanced approach to natural language understanding intent maintenance. Yellow.ai offers a broad set of prebuilt functions for multiple industries as well as a marketplace for third parties. This promising approach allows third-party journeys, intents, and integrations to be reviewed and purchased and may enable enterprises to expand their chatbot functionality more rapidly. The no-code tooling of Yellow.ai is very polished, giving a good user experience to end users. Yellow.ai has a strong overall portfolio in all the use cases. It scored in the first quartile for the human resources use case, a use case where many others did not offer strong functionality. And the platform scored in the second quartile in the other four use cases, reflecting its consistently above-average capabilities. This research note is restricted to the personal use of p.bruza@qut.edu.au.
Gartner, Inc. | G00748700 Page 20 of 28 Context Enterprise conversational AI platforms are choices for enterprises that are finished with the initial phase of trialing chatbots and are looking for scalable and easy-to- operationalize platforms that deliver significant conversational automation. Different platforms have evolved from different places in the market, be it developer toolkits, complex IVR systems or enterprise messaging. All are used across many use cases and offer a comprehensive toolset for large-scale deployments. Enterprise conversational AI platforms are not stand-alone products working in isolation. They require deployment into already complex architectures that may mix both cloud and on-premises systems. It’s common for an architecture to have telephony systems, IVRs, multiple messaging channels, websites and mobile apps, speaker assistants, ticketing systems, email systems, agent dashboards, CRM, ERP, login systems, performance monitoring and analytics solutions. In addition, it’s common for these platforms to be deployed for multiple use cases with a different mix of said systems — with complex inheritance of intent, entity, dialogue management and user access across the use cases. Most clients will need to evaluate more than one use case to meet future requirements. A “single use case, single vendor” approach will have additional competitors that need to be evaluated. We encourage readers to make their own weightings comprising their required use cases, using our data as guidance, and arrive at their own shortlist. Product/Service Class Definition Gartner defines enterprise conversational AI platforms as software applications used to build, orchestrate and support the development and operationalization of multiple use cases of conversational automation. These platforms target multiple roles within the enterprise to enable conversational automation as a strategic enterprise capability. Critical Capabilities Definition Channel Integration Channel integration is the ability to connect to a variety of different channels, use specific rich features of different channels and operate multiple channels with the same implementation. Channels may include messaging platforms, website chat, telephony, voice speakers and others. This research note is restricted to the personal use of p.bruza@qut.edu.au.
Gartner, Inc. | G00748700 Page 21 of 28 Natural Language Understanding NLU is the ability to understand natural language used by the user, which includes intent recognition as well as entity recognition, and the ease of customizing and training the language model for non-data scientists. Voice Capabilities Voice capabilities are the ability to understand and implement sophisticated voice experiences on either dedicated devices or using telephony. Dialogue Management Dialogue management handles complex and sophisticated dialogue that may span different types, like question and answer, query, transactional, negotiation, and review; it also includes capabilities to handle disambiguation and a mix of many different dialogue- handling strategies at the same time. Back-End Integration Back-end integration is the ability to not only easily integrate with back-end systems, but easily leverage information and design dialogue for conducting transactions with common back-end systems. This capability includes handling of privacy and security. Agent Escalation Agent escalation refers to the ability to easily hand over conversations to agents on different trigger conditions, and includes the more advanced functionalities of agent dashboard integration and handing conversations back to the bot again. Continuous Improvement Continuous improvement is the ability of an implementation to easily improve over time as more data is collected. This includes unsupervised and supervised learning loops. Analytics and Testing Analytics and testing refers to the ability to collect performance data, and analyze it for meaningful and actionable insight for reporting, oversight and improvement purposes. This includes the ability to test and roll back if performance is not satisfactory, and point to potential solutions to problems in training data. This research note is restricted to the personal use of p.bruza@qut.edu.au.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Gartner, Inc. | G00748700 Page 22 of 28 Bot Orchestration Bot orchestration is the ability to orchestrate multiple bots, either inside the same use case or among bots targeting multiple use cases. This includes different collaboration patterns, like bots escalating to bots, or bots routing to bots. It also includes the orchestration of language assets and dialogue assets between several bot implementations. Life Cycle Management Life cycle management is the ability to exist in an existing architecture and development environment with dependencies, and to update, deploy and roll back with ease. This capability includes the ease of maintenance for an IT organization. Enterprise Administration Enterprise administration is the ability to administer users, roles, access and enterprise compliance and security aspects in the solution with ease and control. Customer Service This functionality is specific to the customer service use case; we focus on the number, scope of and size of prebuilt libraries for customer service in different industries, and their ease of customization. This capability also includes integration to other technologies specific to customer service, and the focus and packaging of customer-service-specific tooling. ITSM This functionality is specific to the ITSM use case; we focus on the scope and size of prebuilt libraries for ITSM, and the ease of customization of those libraries. Includes integration to ITSM-specific technologies and the focus and packaging of ITSM-specific tooling. HR/HCM This functionality is specific to the HR/HCM use case; we focus on the scope and size of prebuilt libraries for HR/HCM, and the ease of customization of those libraries. Includes integration to HR/HCM-specific technologies and the focus and packaging of HR/HCM- specific tooling. This research note is restricted to the personal use of p.bruza@qut.edu.au.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Gartner, Inc. | G00748700 Page 23 of 28 Use Cases Customer Service Customer service needs to support a wide variety of channels, both text- and voice-based, and typically targets a diverse audience. This use case requires tooling for the customer service organization and mechanisms to escalate to and involve human agents in operationalization. IT Service Desk IT service desk focuses on diagnostic conversations leading to preferrably automated resolution of a user’s problem. This use case requires leveraging of back-end ticketing systems and knowledge bases. Human Resources HR focuses on automation of a wide array of employee-focused informational and transactional conversations. Voice Bot in Call Center This use case is specifically automating voice phone calls in a call center with existing IVR and telephony systems in place. Orchestration of Multiple Employee-Facing Bots This use case is orchestration of many employee-facing bots for a variety of tasks. Each bot might be owned by different parts of the business, thus the orchestration is not only in how employees interact, but also in how they are maintained and operationalized. Vendors Added and Dropped As this Critical Capabilities is new research, no vendors have been added or dropped. This research note is restricted to the personal use of p.bruza@qut.edu.au.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Gartner, Inc. | G00748700 Page 24 of 28 Inclusion Criteria Table 1: Weighting for Critical Capabilities in Use Cases (Enlarged table in Appendix) This methodology requires analysts to identify the critical capabilities for a class of products/services. Each capability is then weighted in terms of its relative importance for specific product/service use cases. This research note is restricted to the personal use of p.bruza@qut.edu.au.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Gartner, Inc. | G00748700 Page 25 of 28 Each of the products/services that meet our inclusion criteria has been evaluated on the critical capabilities on a scale from 1.0 to 5.0. Critical Capabilities Rating Table 2: Product/Service Rating on Critical Capabilities (Enlarged table in Appendix) Table 3 shows the product/service scores for each use case. The scores, which are generated by multiplying the use-case weightings by the product/service ratings, summarize how well the critical capabilities are met for each use case. This research note is restricted to the personal use of p.bruza@qut.edu.au.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Gartner, Inc. | G00748700 Page 26 of 28 Table 3: Product Score in Use Cases (Enlarged table in Appendix) To determine an overall score for each product/service in the use cases, multiply the ratings in Table 2 by the weightings shown in Table 1. Critical Capabilities Methodology This methodology requires analysts to identify the critical capabilities for a class of products or services. Each capability is then weighted in terms of its relative importance for specific product or service use cases. Next, products/services are rated in terms of how well they achieve each of the critical capabilities. A score that summarizes how well they meet the critical capabilities for each use case is then calculated for each product/service. "Critical capabilities" are attributes that differentiate products/services in a class in terms of their quality and performance. Gartner recommends that users consider the set of critical capabilities as some of the most important criteria for acquisition decisions. This research note is restricted to the personal use of p.bruza@qut.edu.au.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Gartner, Inc. | G00748700 Page 27 of 28 In defining the product/service category for evaluation, the analyst first identifies the leading uses for the products/services in this market. What needs are end-users looking to fulfill, when considering products/services in this market? Use cases should match common client deployment scenarios. These distinct client scenarios define the Use Cases. The analyst then identifies the critical capabilities. These capabilities are generalized groups of features commonly required by this class of products/services. Each capability is assigned a level of importance in fulfilling that particular need; some sets of features are more important than others, depending on the use case being evaluated. Each vendor’s product or service is evaluated in terms of how well it delivers each capability, on a five-point scale. These ratings are displayed side-by-side for all vendors, allowing easy comparisons between the different sets of features. Ratings and summary scores range from 1.0 to 5.0: 1 = Poor or Absent: most or all defined requirements for a capability are not achieved 2 = Fair: some requirements are not achieved 3 = Good: meets requirements 4 = Excellent: meets or exceeds some requirements 5 = Outstanding: significantly exceeds requirements To determine an overall score for each product in the use cases, the product ratings are multiplied by the weightings to come up with the product score in use cases. The critical capabilities Gartner has selected do not represent all capabilities for any product; therefore, may not represent those most important for a specific use situation or business objective. Clients should use a critical capabilities analysis as one of several sources of input about a product before making a product/service decision. Recommended by the Authors Some documents may not be available as part of your current Gartner subscription. How Products and Services Are Evaluated in Gartner Critical Capabilities This research note is restricted to the personal use of p.bruza@qut.edu.au.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Gartner, Inc. | G00748700 Page 28 of 28 Magic Quadrant for Enterprise Conversational AI Platforms Solution Criteria for Enterprise Conversational AI Platforms Roles and Responsibilities for Scaling Chatbot Initiatives Enabling Conversation Interfaces Via Chatbots © 2022 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. This publication may not be reproduced or distributed in any form without Gartner's prior written permission. It consists of the opinions of Gartner's research organization, which should not be construed as statements of fact. While the information contained in this publication has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, Gartner disclaims all warranties as to the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of such information. Although Gartner research may address legal and financial issues, Gartner does not provide legal or investment advice and its research should not be construed or used as such. Your access and use of this publication are governed by Gartner’s Usage Policy . Gartner prides itself on its reputation for independence and objectivity. Its research is produced independently by its research organization without input or influence from any third party. For further information, see " Guiding Principles on Independence and Objectivity ." This research note is restricted to the personal use of p.bruza@qut.edu.au.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Gartner, Inc. | G00748700 Page 1A of 6A Table 1: Weighting for Critical Capabilities in Use Cases Channel Integration 10% 5% 5% 4% 7% Natural Language Understanding 5% 8% 10% 5% 9% Voice Capabilities 10% 3% 3% 25% 3% Dialogue Management 10% 9% 10% 10% 5% Back-End Integration 4% 15% 10% 3% 10% Agent Escalation 10% 10% 5% 10% 5% Continuous Improvement 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% Analytics and Testing 7% 5% 5% 7% 5% Bot Orchestration 3% 4% 9% 4% 40% Life Cycle Management 7% 4% 4% 4% 7% Enterprise Administration 4% 7% 4% 3% 4% Critical Capabilities Customer Service IT Service Desk Human Resources Voice Bot in Call Center Orchestration of Multiple Employee-Facing Bots This research note is restricted to the personal use of p.bruza@qut.edu.au.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Gartner, Inc. | G00748700 Page 2A of 6A Source: Gartner (March 2022) Customer Service 25% 0% 0% 20% 0% ITSM 0% 25% 0% 0% 0% HR/HCM 0% 0% 30% 0% 0% As of January 2021 Critical Capabilities Customer Service IT Service Desk Human Resources Voice Bot in Call Center Orchestration of Multiple Employee-Facing Bots This research note is restricted to the personal use of p.bruza@qut.edu.au.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Gartner, Inc. | G00748700 Page 3A of 6A Table 2: Product/Service Rating on Critical Capabilities Channel Integration 3.0 3.0 3.5 3.0 3.5 3.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 2.5 3.0 2.5 2.5 3.0 3.5 3.0 3.5 Natural Language Understandin g 3.0 3.5 2.0 3.0 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 3.3 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.5 2.5 3.5 Voice Capabilities 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.5 4.0 3.0 2.5 3.0 4.5 4.0 3.0 4.5 4.5 3.5 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.5 2.5 3.0 Dialogue Management 3.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.5 3.0 2.5 3.5 2.8 2.8 3.0 3.0 Back-End Integration 3.5 3.0 2.5 3.0 3.8 3.5 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 4.0 3.5 2.5 2.5 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.5 Critical Capabilities [24]7.ai Aisera Aivo Amazon Web Services Amelia Avaamo boost.ai Cognigy Google IBM Kore.ai Omilia OneReach.ai Openstream.ai Oracle Rasa Senseforth Sinch SmarTek21 Verint Yellow.ai This research note is restricted to the personal use of p.bruza@qut.edu.au.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Gartner, Inc. | G00748700 Page 4A of 6A Source: Gartner (March 2022) Agent Escalation 4.0 3.0 2.5 2.5 4.3 3.5 3.5 3.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Continuous Improvement 3.5 2.5 2.5 3.0 4.3 4.0 2.5 3.0 2.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.3 3.5 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.5 3.5 Analytics and Testing 4.0 3.5 2.5 3.0 3.8 3.3 3.5 3.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.0 3.5 3.0 3.3 3.5 2.5 3.5 3.0 3.0 3.5 Bot Orchestration 3.5 3.5 2.0 3.0 3.5 3.8 3.5 4.0 2.5 2.5 4.0 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 3.3 2.5 2.5 3.0 3.0 4.0 Life Cycle Management 4.0 3.0 2.5 3.0 3.0 3.5 3.0 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.0 3.0 3.5 4.0 3.0 2.8 3.0 3.0 3.0 Enterprise Administratio n 3.0 3.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.0 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.0 3.3 3.5 3.0 2.5 3.0 2.5 3.0 Customer Service 4.0 2.5 3.0 2.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 4.0 3.5 3.3 3.0 4.0 2.5 3.0 4.0 3.5 ITSM 1.5 4.0 2.5 2.5 4.5 3.0 3.5 3.5 2.5 3.0 3.5 3.0 3.5 3.0 3.5 2.5 3.0 3.5 3.5 3.0 3.5 HR/HCM 1.5 3.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 3.5 3.5 2.5 3.0 3.5 1.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 2.5 1.0 3.5 2.0 2.5 3.5 As of January 2021 This research note is restricted to the personal use of p.bruza@qut.edu.au.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Gartner, Inc. | G00748700 Page 5A of 6A Table 3: Product Score in Use Cases Customer Service 3.60 2.98 2.74 2.73 3.82 3.42 3.12 3.54 3.42 3.35 3.71 3.82 3.99 3.43 3.21 3.09 3.23 2.84 3.11 3.18 3.31 IT Service Desk 2.95 3.36 2.54 2.77 3.97 3.36 3.30 3.61 2.91 3.16 3.69 3.49 3.83 3.41 3.32 2.95 2.98 3.07 3.19 2.94 3.36 Human Resources 2.83 3.15 2.36 2.61 3.52 3.35 3.33 3.65 2.89 3.13 3.73 3.03 3.79 3.54 3.34 2.96 2.41 3.08 2.77 2.79 3.42 Voice Bot in Call Center 3.60 3.01 2.65 2.68 3.88 3.38 3.05 3.42 3.57 3.45 3.60 3.91 4.07 3.51 3.18 3.09 3.21 2.87 3.15 3.06 3.26 Orchestration of Multiple Employee- Facing Bots 3.46 3.27 2.35 2.94 3.65 3.59 3.30 3.80 2.87 2.98 3.86 3.61 3.95 3.45 3.35 3.24 2.81 2.78 3.09 2.95 3.58 As of January 2021 Use Cases [24]7.ai Aisera Aivo Amazon Web Services Amelia Avaamo boost.ai Cognigy Google IBM Kore.ai Omilia OneReach.ai Openstream.ai Oracle Rasa Senseforth Sinch SmarTek21 Verint Yellow.ai This research note is restricted to the personal use of p.bruza@qut.edu.au.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Gartner, Inc. | G00748700 Page 6A of 6A Source: Gartner (March 2022) This research note is restricted to the personal use of p.bruza@qut.edu.au.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help