Assi1
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Johns Hopkins University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
650
Subject
Industrial Engineering
Date
Dec 6, 2023
Type
docx
Pages
3
Uploaded by CommodoreBoulder10819
Mya Reid
Foundations of Human Systems Engineering
8/28/23
In my role as a 77X Model Based Systems Engineer, I took on the pivotal responsibility of leading
a groundbreaking project that aimed to seamlessly integrate an avant-garde wingtip design into a well-established commercial aircraft model. By leveraging my adept proficiency in cutting-
edge tools such as Cameo Systems Modeler and IBM Rational DOORS, I orchestrated an intricate
and cohesive workflow encompassing a spectrum of intricate tasks.
Beginning with the meticulous gathering of requirements, I orchestrated a systematic process that involved gathering specifications and aligning them with the overarching vision of the project. This initial step set the stage for what followed—a meticulous and comprehensive system architecture modeling phase that considered every intricate detail. We meticulously molded the innovative wingtip through iterative design refinements to align with the aircraft's existing structure and functional dynamics.
A crucial aspect of this endeavor was ensuring traceability throughout the entire process. In this
regard, I oversaw the establishment and management of a traceability matrix, meticulously tracking how each requirement was addressed in the design and verification phases. Rigorous verification testing became a cornerstone of our efforts. Employing advanced simulation techniques, we subjected the integrated design to a battery of tests that spanned a spectrum of real-world scenarios, ensuring its resilience and compatibility.
One of the most remarkable aspects of this project was the emphasis on cross-disciplinary collaboration. By bringing together experts from various domains—ranging from aeronautical engineers to human factors specialists—we fostered an environment of collective intelligence. This approach was precious when dealing with complex challenges transcending traditional boundaries.
The technical group from the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (HFES): "Aerospace Systems Technical Group." specializes in human factors research and design within aerospace systems, focusing on cockpit design, pilot interfaces, decision-making processes, and crew
Mya Reid
Foundations of Human Systems Engineering
8/28/23
resource management. This distinguished group, focused on human factors research and design
within aerospace systems, brought to the table a wealth of insights. Focusing on cockpit design, pilot interfaces, decision-making processes, and crew resource management, their expertise was instrumental in understanding the intricacies of human-system interactions.
Aerospace Systems Technical Group brings expertise in understanding human interactions and complex aerospace systems. Their knowledge includes cockpit design principles, pilot workload assessment, and crew coordination dynamics. Their insights can provide valuable guidance on ensuring that the new wingtip design integrates seamlessly with the overall aircraft system, considering pilot workload and interactions.
The proposed change is to consider the impact of the new wingtip design on pilot visibility and workload. This would involve conducting simulations and human-in-the-loop testing to assess how the modified wingtip affects the pilot's field of view, especially during critical flight phases such as takeoff, landing, and maneuvering. The impact of this change would be twofold: first, it would ensure that the new wingtip does not compromise pilot visibility, and second, it would provide insights into potential workload implications.
The benefits of considering pilot visibility and workload in the wingtip design include enhanced flight safety by maintaining adequate pilot situational awareness, reduced workload due to minimized adjustments needed, and improved pilot comfort during different phases of flight. However, there could be drawbacks related to increased design complexity and potential conflicts between aerodynamic optimization and human factors considerations. If the proposed change is not implemented, the new wingtip design might be optimized solely based on aerodynamic considerations, potentially leading to unexpected negative impacts on pilot visibility and workload. This could compromise flight safety, increase pilot workload, and lead to
potential conflicts between the aerodynamics team and the flight operations team.
Considering pilot visibility and workload within the wingtip design process could trigger a cultural shift within the aircraft design team. Initially, there might be resistance to adding
Mya Reid
Foundations of Human Systems Engineering
8/28/23
complexity to the design process and concerns about potential delays. However, as the benefits of improved pilot visibility and reduced workload become evident through simulations and testing, the cultural shift may lean towards a more integrated and human-centered design approach. Members of the group might respond with initial skepticism but would appreciate the importance of aligning with human factors principles to enhance overall flight safety and pilot performance.
References:
Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. (n.d.). HFES | Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
. Aerospace Systems Technical Group. https://www.hfes.org/Portals/0/Documents/ASTG_1.pdf?ver=2023-02-21-152148-837 Casinader, T. C. (2023, July 9). What’s the Point of The Folding Wingtips on The Boeing 777X?
Simple Flying. https://simpleflying.com/boeing-777x-folding-wingtips-why/
Boeing: VIDEO: 777X Folding Wingtip
. (n.d.). Boeing 777X Reveal. https://www.boeing.com/777x/reveal/video-777x-Folding-Wingtip/
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help