Hist 1421 Unit 1 DF, WA and LJ
pdf
keyboard_arrow_up
School
University of the People *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
1421
Subject
History
Date
Nov 24, 2024
Type
Pages
6
Uploaded by MinisterDiscovery5291
Unit 1 Hist 1421
Discussion forum
Discuss the role of the polis in Archaic and Classical-era Greece, supporting your
response with examples and detail from your reading.
The polis, or city-state, played a central role in the political, social, and cultural life of
Archaic and Classical-era Greece. These city-states were unique political entities, each with
its own government, laws, and traditions. Here, I'll discuss the role of the polis during these
periods, supported by examples and details from historical readings.
Archaic Era (c. 800–500 BCE):
1. Political Organization:
During the Archaic era, the polis emerged as the primary political unit. Examples include
Athens, Sparta, Corinth, and Thebes.
Each polis had its own form of government, ranging from oligarchies (rule by the few) to
early experiments in democracy.
2. Economic Structure:
The economy of the polis was often based on agriculture, and land ownership played a
crucial role in social and political standing.
Notable examples include the rivalry between Athens and Megara over control of the fertile
Megarid region.
3. Military Importance:
The military aspect of the polis was essential for defense and expansion.
The Battle of Marathon in 490 BCE, where Athens successfully repelled the Persian
invasion, exemplifies the importance of the polis in mobilizing its citizens for collective
defense.
Classical Era (c. 500–323 BCE):
1. Democratic Innovations:
In Athens, the Classical era witnessed the development of democracy. Cleisthenes' reforms
around 507 BCE expanded political participation to a broader segment of the population.
The establishment of the Boule (Council of 500) and the Ekklesia (Assembly) marked
significant democratic institutions.
2. Peloponnesian War (431–404 BCE):
The Peloponnesian War between Athens and Sparta highlighted the competition and
conflicts among different poleis.
The conflict showcased the diversity of political systems and the struggles for hegemony
among powerful city-states.
3. Cultural Centers:
The polis served as a cultural center, fostering intellectual and artistic achievements.
Athens, during the Golden Age under Pericles, became a cultural hub, with advancements in
philosophy (Socrates, Plato), drama (Aeschylus, Sophocles), and architecture (Parthenon).
4. League of Corinth:
The League of Corinth, led by Sparta after the Peloponnesian War, sought to maintain Greek
unity against external threats, such as the Persian Empire.
However, this league ultimately couldn't prevent conflicts among city-states, leading to
continued regional rivalries.
Overall Role:
Political Autonomy:
The polis represented a sense of political autonomy, with each city-state making its own
decisions and having its own identity.
Citizen Involvement:
Citizenship was closely tied to the polis, and citizen participation in governance was a
defining feature, particularly in democracies like Athens.
Regionalism and Rivalries:
The diversity of political systems and rivalries among poleis led to a complex and dynamic
political landscape.
Cultural and Intellectual Centers:
Poleis served as hubs for cultural and intellectual activities, contributing to the flourishing
of philosophy, art, and literature.
In conclusion, the polis was the cornerstone of political, social, and cultural life in Archaic
and Classical-era Greece. Its influence extended from the organization of political systems
to economic structures, military endeavors, and cultural achievements. The city-states were
both the building blocks and the dynamic forces that shaped the historical narrative of
ancient Greece during these periods.
***********************************************************************
Unit 1 Written assignment
How did people in Athens and Sparta obtain the right to participate in public life and
make decisions affecting the community? Who held public office? What rules
governed the selection of public office holders? How were the two city-states similar in
their governmental structures? How did they differ?
Athens:
1. Right to Participate:
Citizenship was a prerequisite for participation in public life. Athenian citizens, typically
free-born males, had the right to attend the Assembly (Ekklesia) and vote on important
matters.
2. Public Office:
Public offices were open to citizens. Key positions included archons, generals, and members
of the Council of 500 (Boule).
Some offices were elected, while others were filled through a lottery system known as
sortition.
3. Selection Rules:
Archons were initially elected, but later some were chosen by lot. The Boule was selected
by lot.
This random selection aimed to prevent the concentration of power and promote a broader
representation of citizens in governance.
Sparta:
1. Right to Participate:
Spartan citizenship was exclusive and limited to Spartiates, male descendants of original
Spartan warriors.
The majority of the population, including helots (serfs) and perioikoi (free non-citizens),
had limited or no political rights.
2. Public Office:
Sparta had a dual kingship, with two hereditary kings from separate royal families.
The Gerousia, a council of elders, played a significant role in decision-making. Members
were selected based on age and merit.
3. Selection Rules:
Kingship was hereditary, passed down within the two royal families.
Members of the Gerousia were selected based on age and merit, serving for life.
Similarities:
1. Citizenship Criteria:
Both Athens and Sparta limited political participation to a specific group of citizens,
excluding women, foreigners, and slaves.
2. Councils for Decision-Making:
Both city-states had councils that played a crucial role in decision-making. Athens had the
Boule, while Sparta had the Gerousia.
Differences:
1. Democracy vs. Oligarchy:
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Athens is known for its democratic principles, where citizens had direct participation.
Sparta, in contrast, had an oligarchic system with a limited group of citizens involved in
decision-making.
2. Citizenship Rights:
Athens had a more inclusive approach to citizenship compared to Sparta, where only a small
percentage of the population (Spartiates) enjoyed full political rights.
3. Leadership Structure:
Athens had a more varied leadership structure, with elected officials and a rotation of
citizens in offices. Sparta had a hereditary kingship.
4. Military Focus:
While both city-states had strong military traditions, Sparta placed a greater emphasis on
military training and the role of the warrior class.
5. Role of Women:
Athenian women had limited political rights, mainly confined to the household. Spartan
women had more freedom and a higher status, as the responsibilities of Spartan men often
required women to manage the household and property.
In summary, Athens and Sparta differed significantly in their governmental structures.
Athens is celebrated for its democratic experiment and more inclusive citizenship, while
Sparta is known for its oligarchic system, hereditary kingship, and focus on a highly
disciplined warrior society. Both, however, shared the characteristic of being city-states with
distinct political systems and citizen participation.
***********************************************************************
Unit 1 Learning Journal
Address the question of how Greek democracy ended.
Greek democracy, particularly in Athens, faced several challenges and ultimately came to an
end during a complex historical process. The decline of Greek democracy was a gradual and
multifaceted phenomenon, marked by internal strife, external conflicts, and shifts in
political dynamics. Here are some key factors contributing to the end of Greek democracy:
1. Peloponnesian War (431–404 BCE):
The Peloponnesian War between Athens and Sparta had a profound impact on Greek
democracy. The prolonged conflict strained resources, led to economic decline, and fostered
internal dissent.
Athens suffered a devastating defeat, and its dominance in the Delian League declined. The
war weakened the democratic spirit, as the hardships and losses fueled discontent.
2. Internal Strife and Oligarchic Coups:
After the Peloponnesian War, Athens experienced internal strife and power struggles
between democratic factions and those favoring oligarchy.
Oligarchic coups, such as the Four Hundred (411 BCE) and the Thirty Tyrants (404–403
BCE), briefly replaced democratic governance in Athens, suppressing democratic
institutions and persecuting political opponents.
3. Spartan Hegemony:
Sparta, after its victory in the Peloponnesian War, attempted to establish hegemony over
Greece. The Spartan imposition of oligarchic governments in some city-states further
eroded democratic principles.
4. Corruption and Mismanagement:
Instances of corruption and mismanagement in democratic governance contributed to a loss
of faith in the system. Critics argued that the democratic process allowed demagogues to
manipulate public opinion for personal gain.
5. Macedonian Conquest:
The rise of Philip II of Macedon and his son, Alexander the Great, had a significant impact
on Greek politics. Philip II defeated Greek city-states and imposed Macedonian control.
The Battle of Chaeronea in 338 BCE marked a turning point, solidifying Macedonian
dominance and effectively ending the era of independent Greek city-states.
6. Hellenistic Period:
The Hellenistic period that followed Alexander's conquest saw the establishment of
monarchies and the decline of traditional Greek city-state autonomy.
The political landscape shifted from city-states to larger kingdoms, diminishing the
influence and relevance of democratic institutions.
7. Roman Conquest:
By the 2nd century BCE, the Roman Republic expanded its influence over the Greek world.
The Roman conquest further marginalized the remnants of Greek democracy.
8. Cultural Shifts:
Cultural and intellectual shifts, such as the rise of Stoicism and other philosophical schools,
also contributed to changing perspectives on governance and civic life.
In summary, Greek democracy gradually declined due to a combination of external
pressures, internal conflicts, and shifts in political dynamics. The Peloponnesian War,
oligarchic coups, the rise of Macedon, and subsequent Hellenistic and Roman conquests all
played crucial roles in the transformation of Greek political institutions. While the ideals of
democracy persisted in subsequent philosophical and political discussions, the direct
practice of Greek democracy in its classical form came to an end during this historical
process.
************************************************************************
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help