maternal peer review feedback worksheet
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Chamberlain University College of Nursing *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
NR 327
Subject
Health Science
Date
Feb 20, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
2
Uploaded by AmbassadorStraw13374
i-Human Patients
®
Assignment
Peer Review Feedback Worksheet
©2023 Chamberlain University LLC. All rights reserved.
Chamberlain University | National Management Offices | 500 W. Monroe St., Suite 1300 | Chicago, IL 60661
Peer Review Feedback Rubric
Students are expected to utilize the Peer Review Rubric when evaluating the CJMM worksheet of another peer. Assignment Section and Required Criteria
(Points possible/% of total points available)
High
Level Of Performance
Satisfactory Level of Performance
Unsatisfactory Level of Performance
Section not
present in paper
For each of the 6 sections of the CJMM worksheet, evaluate your
peer’s responses by providing 2-3 sentences of relevant feedback
on strengths and weaknesses.
Meets All 3 Criteria
Meets 2 Criteria
Meets 1 Criteria
Did Not Complete
Recognize Cues
Is the information in this section accurate and relevant to
the patient?
Is there any missing information?
How could your peer have improved their responses?
Provides focused, accurate,
thorough, and relevant responses. Provides accurate and relevant responses. Some information may be missing.
Provides unclear, inaccurate, and/or irrelevant responses. Significant information missing.
Section not completed.
Insert your feedback here: Student did extremely well in this section and mentioned relevant cues relating to the issue. The student included the patients past medical history and their current symptoms that both relate to the patient’s potential problem. Analyze Cues
Is the information in this section accurate and relevant to
the patient?
Is there any missing information?
How could your peer have improved their responses?
Provides focused, accurate,
thorough, and relevant responses.
Provides accurate and relevant responses. Some information may be missing.
Provides unclear, inaccurate, and/or irrelevant responses. Significant information missing.
Section not completed.
Insert your feedback here: The information in this section is accurate and relevant to the patient with no missing information. This student was able to correctly interpret the data cues and come up with potential problems that are correctly related to the patient. They were able to focus on more than just the physical signs and symptoms, and also focused on the psychosocial problems. Prioritize Hypothesis
Is the information in this section accurate and relevant to
the patient?
Is there any missing information?
How could your peer have improved their responses?
Provides focused, accurate,
thorough, and relevant responses.
Provides accurate and relevant responses. Some information may be missing.
Provides unclear, inaccurate, and/or irrelevant responses. Significant information missing.
Section not completed.
Insert your feedback here: The student provided an accurate description of preeclampsia which is the most serious issue the patient may be experiencing. They provided an answer to the question at hand while also digging a little deeper and providing evidence to their response. Generate Solutions
Is the information in this section accurate and relevant to
the patient?
Is there any missing information?
How could your peer have improved their responses?
Provides focused, accurate,
thorough, and relevant responses.
Provides accurate and relevant responses. Some information may be missing.
Provides unclear, inaccurate, and/or irrelevant responses. Significant information missing.
Section not completed.
i-Human Patients
®
Assignment
Peer Review Feedback Worksheet
©2023 Chamberlain University LLC. All rights reserved.
Chamberlain University | National Management Offices | 500 W. Monroe St., Suite 1300 | Chicago, IL 60661
Insert your feedback here: There was no missing information in this section with accurate solutions to the potential problems listed above. I enjoyed reading how this peers solutions differed from mine however they were still correct. There isn’t anything I would suggest to improve their response. Take Action
Is the information in this section accurate and relevant to
the patient?
Is there any missing information?
How could your peer have improved their responses?
Provides focused, accurate,
thorough, and relevant responses.
Provides accurate and relevant responses. Some information may be missing.
Provides unclear, inaccurate, and/or irrelevant responses. Significant information missing.
Section not completed.
Insert your feedback here: The peer was able to take relevant data cues and form a plan of care that relates to the patient. The student accurately came up with environmental and individual factors that could negatively impact the patients care. Evaluate Outcomes
Is the information in this section accurate and relevant to
the patient?
Is there any missing information?
How could your peer have improved their responses?
Provides focused, accurate,
thorough, and relevant responses.
Provides accurate and relevant responses. Some information may be missing.
Provides unclear, inaccurate, and/or irrelevant responses. Significant information missing.
Section not completed.
Insert your feedback here: The student was great aware of environmental and individual factors that can be overlooked such as the patient having reliable transportation. The observed outcomes also matched the expected outcomes which indicated an improvement in the patients condition.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help