HSA4140_MOD2_Guilefuss

TRANSFER FROM FEE-FOR-SERVICE TO VALUE- BASED SYSTEM 3 care, the effectiveness of the medical staff, patient experience and safety of the Medicare patients. Accountable Care Organizations (ACO) This service is provided by clinicians, hospitals and other health care professionals that come together under their own discretion to give coordinated high-quality care to a group of patients ( Accountable Care Organizations | AHA , n.d.). Accountable care organizations are both private and public, but they are also contracted with Medicare. This service would be great to implement in the transition, because the ACO’s are very focused on providing and optimizing the quality of care to patients. The accountable care organization uses data and EBP (evidence-based practice) which helps reduce duplicate care, coordinates services of care, helps close the gaps in patient care these all help reduce the costs of healthcare dollars (HealthPayerIntelligence, 2017). This service would help all healthcare organizations reduce costs by rewarding them with value instead of volume. Bundled Payment/Episode-of-Care Model This model is designed for providers to be paid for “per episode” basis Lockner (2018). This means that it will include all necessary services including inpatient and outpatient, and all required services necessary to treat the patient Lockner (2018). This will cover the time of diagnosis to recovery. It’s one single cost, and the payment is based on the average cost of the “episode”, which will then make the providers profit by keeping it below the bundled rate Lockner (2018). Putting this into the plan for transition into value-based system would be a big change but provide the quality of care, and make the patients feel more valued with care. For the

TRANSFER FROM FEE-FOR-SERVICE TO VALUE- BASED SYSTEM 6 Health Services Administration Assignment Grading Rubric Component: Content Unacceptable Marginally Meets Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Maximum Points Points Earned Demonstrates accurate understanding and synthesis of assignment concepts by:  Meeting content standards  Identifying relevant points and main ideas that are organized and complete  Providing accurate and relevant information highlighting an understanding of material  Demonstrating original thought and personal reflection in relation to the concepts  Providing evidence to support thoughts, comments and opinions (e.g., source citations)  Content does not meet assignment standards  Information provided was inaccurate  Information presented in disorganized manner  Information presented in an incomplete manner  Demonstrates limited understanding of the material  No supportive evidence provided  Provides insufficient peer-reviewed resources (citations and references)  Demonstrates limited or no original thought and/or reflection  Content marginally meets assignment standards  Information presented was generally accurate  Information presented is minimally developed  Content presented in a disorganized manner  Information presented demonstrates only partial understanding of the material  Information is insufficiently supported with up-to- date, peer-reviewed resources  Demonstrates some original thought and/or reflection  Content sufficiently meets all assignment standards  Information presented is accurate  Information presented is adequately developed  Content presented is organized  Information presented demonstrates an adequate understanding of the material  Information is adequately supported with up- to-date, peer reviewed resources  Demonstrates original thought and reflection  Content exceeds all assignment standards  Information presented exceeds expectations of upper division course work  Information presented is well developed  Content presented is exceptionally well organized and comprehensive  Information presented demonstrates thorough understanding and application of the material  Information is thoroughly supported with up-to-date, peer reviewed resources  Demonstrates original thought and insightful connections 14 Component: Professionalism Unacceptable Marginally Meets Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Maximum Points Points Earned Demonstrates a commitment to academic integrity and professional standards by:  Meeting all assignment requirements completely  Maintaining academic integrity  Applying instructor feedback, when appropriate  Submitting work that is accurate and reflective of upper level scholarly expectations  Using professional language and terminology  Submitting work on time  Assignment requirements were not met  Did not adhere to principles of academic integrity  Work does not reflect correction of errors previously noted by instructor  Excessive errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, and/or APA  Excessive use of unprofessional language, terminology or abbreviations (i.e. texting)  Key requirements of the assignment were missing  Adhered to principles of academic integrity  Works reflects only minimal correction of errors previously noted by instructor  Numerous errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, and/or APA  Some use of unprofessional language, terminology or abbreviations (i.e. texting)  Key requirements of the assignment were met  Adhered to principles of academic integrity  Works reflects correction of the majority of errors previously noted by instructor  Minimal errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, and/or APA  Language and terminology is professional and appropriate  Key requirements of the assignment were met  Adhered to principles of academic integrity  Works reflects correction of all errors previously noted by instructor  Accuracy with grammar, spelling, punctuation, and/or APA  Exceptional use of professional language and terminology 6 Total Points 20 Instructor Feedback Special Disclaimers:  1 point deduction for failure to use standard HSA file naming convention: course_assignment_lastname (i.e. HSA3104_timeline_smith)  1 point deduction for failure to include the assignment rubric. Abbreviated Late HSA Policy, please see your course syllabus for the full late policy:  Assignments submitted within 24 hours of due date – 50% deduction (graded score – 50%).  Assignments submitted after 24 hours are not accepted for credit. Academic Integrity: All academic work submitted to satisfy course requirements is expected to be the student’s OWN work.  All instances of plagiarism will be forwarded to the Dean for review and possible academic discipline.