Eddy and Kollena response
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Minnesota State University, Mankato *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
STRATEGIC
Subject
Health Science
Date
Nov 24, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
2
Uploaded by alexgkarasinga
1
Eddy Kerzuah response
The GRIT Leveraged Freedom Chair (LFC)'s purpose and relevance in addressing
mobility issues experienced by people with physical disabilities in resource-constrained
situations are successfully conveyed by the description you have provided about it. The gadget's
ruggedness, durability, and repairability were noted, which are important in low-resource
environments where maintenance and spare parts could be hard to come by. You claim that the
LFC provides a workable and cheap alternative for people with disabilities in places with poor
infrastructure. This highlights its importance in areas where traditional wheelchairs struggle to
negotiate difficult terrain. This restriction frequently restricts individuals' movement and
independence; hence the LFC is a useful alternative. You say technology promotes healthcare
access for people with impairments by making healthcare facilities more accessible. You say that
people can more easily access healthcare services and rehabilitation programs thanks to the LFC,
making getting the necessary medical interventions easier. People with disabilities must have
equal access to healthcare, as you emphasize in your article. In situations with limited resources,
the description conveys the benefits and goals of the GRIT Leveraged Freedom Chair (Hyeyoung
Hah et al., 2019). You note the device's potential to increase accessibility to healthcare and
emphasize the significance of fostering equity in healthcare for people with impairments.
References
Hyeyoung Hah et al. (2019, August 29).
The association between willingness of frontline care
providers' to adaptively use Telehealth technology and virtual service performance in
provider-to-provider communication: Quantitative study
. Journal of Medical Internet
Research.
https://www.jmir.org/2019/8/e15087/
2
Kollena Adair response
You described how the Embrace infant warmer provides a broad overview of its function
and purpose. You correctly explain that the system is intended to keep infants born prematurely
or with low birth weight warm so they may live. The more generous's portability, reusability, and
ability to run without dependable electricity are all highlighted as benefits. Your brief and
straightforward explanation of how the warmer operates is appreciated. You mention that the
device is warmed, melting a wax-like substance and maintaining a temperature of 98 degrees
Fahrenheit.
Additionally, the device's effectiveness lasts up to eight hours. You must note how the
device affects other nations, especially in environments with limited resources. You claim that
the Embrace infant warmer has saved more than 475,000 lives by providing an alternative to
large and expensive medical equipment. This technique is significant and promising, as seen by
the ambitious objective of rescuing 1 million infants by 2025 (Deborah & Howard Goldstein,
2022). You gave a thorough explanation that communicates the Embrace infant warmer's
function, advantages, and benefits while emphasizing its benefits and long-term objectives.
References
Deborah & Howard Goldstein. (2022). Evolution of Telehealth Technology, Evaluations, and
Therapy: Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Pediatric Speech-Language Pathology
Services.
https://pubs.asha.org/doi/full/10.1044/2021_AJSLP-21-00069
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help