PHIL1404_DF_Unit1-A - Copy (24)
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
University of the People *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
1404
Subject
Health Science
Date
Nov 24, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
2
Uploaded by ziadtsoubra
The Ethical Dilemma of Leather and Fur Consumption
After engaging with Chapter 12 of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Global
Economy textbook, I've found myself deeply contemplating the ethical implications of using
leather and fur products. Initially, I might have viewed these materials as mere fashion
statements or necessities, but the chapter shed light on the broader environmental and
ethical consequences. While it's clear that these industries can have a significant negative
impact on animal welfare and the environment, I also recognize that they are deeply
ingrained in many cultural and economic structures. For me, it's not about abruptly ceasing
the use of these products, but rather understanding the importance of ethical sourcing and
sustainable practices. I believe that if these industries can evolve to minimize harm, utilizing
leather and fur can still be a part of our lives without the associated guilt.
Considering a Vegetarian Lifestyle
The chapter also brought to the forefront the debate surrounding meat consumption. It's
compelling to consider the environmental footprint of the meat industry, especially its
contribution to greenhouse gas emissions and resource depletion. I've always understood
vegetarianism as a personal dietary choice, but now I see it as a potential response to these
larger global issues. While I'm not ready to completely embrace vegetarianism, the
arguments presented have certainly nudged me towards reconsidering my dietary choices.
It's a complex decision, influenced not just by ethical considerations, but also by nutritional,
cultural, and personal preferences. I think it's essential for each individual to weigh these
factors and make an informed decision that aligns with their values and lifestyle.
Naturalness of Animal Product Consumption
This topic particularly resonates with me. The consumption of meat and use of animal
products like leather and fur are often justified as 'natural' human practices. However, I
believe that the concept of what is 'natural' should be fluid, evolving with our growing
understanding of ethics and sustainability. While historically these practices were perhaps
necessary for survival, today we are in a position to reassess and redefine our relationship
with nature and animals. This doesn't imply an outright rejection of these practices but calls
for a more humane and environmentally conscious approach.
Corporate Ethical Responsibility Towards Animals
Finally, the chapter led me to consider whether ethical duties extend beyond humans to
animals. My perspective is that ethical companies should indeed recognize their
responsibility towards animals. This responsibility might manifest in different forms – from
ensuring humane treatment of animals involved in their supply chains to actively engaging
in environmental conservation efforts. Such an approach not only aligns with a broader
definition of corporate social responsibility but also resonates with a growing consumer
base that values ethical practices.
In conclusion, Chapter 12 has been instrumental in broadening my perspective on these
critical issues. It has encouraged me to think more deeply about the consequences of my
choices as a consumer and the role of corporations in shaping a more ethical and
sustainable world.
Reference:
Jimenez, G. C., & Pulos, E. (2016). Good Corporation, Bad Corporation: Corporate
Social Responsibility in the Global Economy. Open SUNY Textbooks. Retrieved
from:
https://milnepublishing.geneseo.edu/good-corporation-bad-corporation/
.
515 words
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help