Lab 7_Excavation Stage III (2)

pdf

School

Texas A&M University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

207

Subject

Geology

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

pdf

Pages

5

Uploaded by GrandProton748

Report
DINOSAUR EXCAVATION STAGE III Part I: Excavation Stage III - Vertebral Column Below is “site map” image of the excavation site(s). These images, and others you will need to complete this assignment, are available at https://sites.google.com/tamu.edu/geol-207-dinosaur-world-ex-3/home . An arrow is labeled in the top right corner of your image indicating the direction of North. On your site map image, each bone has been numerically labeled. 1) Identify and Catalog the Bones use Table 3 on the next page to catalog the bones recovered during the excavation. For each numbered bone, you should identify the type of bone and the region of the body the bone is from (for this lab, appropriate regions are “cervical”, “dorsal”, “sacral”). Under notes, provide any features present that are important sharded derived characters that could help you in your identification. You should also provide an approximate measurement for each bone marked with a * using the scale bars on the zoom-in photos available at https://sites.google.com/tamu.edu/geol-207-dinosaur-world-ex3/home .
Table 3. Bone catalog for Excavation Stage 3. (5 pts) Bone Number Bone Identification Skeletal Region Measurements Other Notes Length (cm) Width (cm) 76* Sacrum Sacral 60 30 77* D13 Dorsal 30 10 78 D12 Dorsal -- -- 79 D11 Dorsal -- -- 80 D10 Dorsal -- -- 81 D9 Dorsal -- -- 82 D8 Dorsal -- -- 83 D7 Dorsal -- -- 84 D6 Dorsal -- -- 85 D5 Dorsal -- -- 86 D4 Dorsal -- -- 87 D3 Dorsal -- -- 88 D2 Dorsal -- -- 89* D1 Dorsal 20 7 90* C9 Cervical 15 7 91 C8 Cervical -- -- 92 C7 Cervical -- -- 93 C6 Cervical -- -- 94 C5 Cervical -- -- 95 C4 Cervical -- -- 96* C3 Cervical 14 6 97 Cervical -- -- 98 Cervical Ribs -- -- 99 Cervical Ribs -- -- 100 Cervical Ribs -- -- 101 Cervical Ribs -- -- 102 Dorsal Ribs -- -- 103 Dorsal Ribs -- -- 104 Dorsal Ribs -- -- 105 Dorsal Ribs -- --
2) Interpret the Skeleton: (10 pts) a) How many cervical vertebrae does the specimen have? How many Dorsal vertebrae? How many sacral vertebrae are fused in the sacrum? (2 pts) Cervical: 11 Dorsal: 13 Sacral (fused): 5 b) Based on the number of vertebrae in each vertebral region, what can you infer about the morphology of the organism? (1 pts) It most likely is not a sauropod because of the number of vertebrae. c) What is the approximate total length of the vertebral column? Be sure to use the scale. (1 pt) It is approximately 400 centimeters long. d) Describe how the shape of the vertebrae change from anterior to posterior of the spine? Hint: compare the size/shape of the centrum, neural spine, etc. (2pts) Going from the anterior to the posterior of the spine the vertebrae become larger and larger along with the centrum. e) What is the functional reason for fusing the bones of the sacrum? What does this indicate about the organism’s mobility? (2pts) The functional reason for fusing bones of the sacrum is to support the pelvis and might indicate that the organism is bipedal. f) Examine the neural spines of the dorsal vertebrae. Do you see evidence that supports or refutes the interpretation that this organism had a buffalo-back or sail-back hypotheses? State you claim, give your evidence, and explain your reasoning. (2pts) There is no evidence to support either hypothesis because the neural spines aren’t thick enough for the buffalo back hypothesis or long enough for the sail back hypothesis. 3) Evaluate your evidence to reach a preliminary identification (10 pts) a) Given your observations of the spinal region, which major group(s) could this specimen belong to? State your claim (the clades), list your evidence, and explain your reasoning. (5 pts) This specimen likely belongs to the clade of theropod dinosaurs. Presence of cervical, dorsal, and sacral vertebrae, consistent with the vertebral morphology of theropods. Lack of sauropod-like features such as an extremely long neck. The vertebral characteristics and overall morphology are most consistent with those of theropod dinosaurs, a diverse group that includes bipedal predators like Tyrannosaurus rex and Velociraptor. b) Are there any dinosaur groups that your evidence can rule out? State you claim (“This could not be the Clade X ”), list your evidence, and explain your reasoning. (5 pts) This could not be a sauropod dinosaur. The total length of the vertebral column (134 cm) is relatively short for a sauropod. The observed characteristics, particularly the number of cervical vertebrae, are inconsistent with the typical morphology of sauropods, ruling out this group as a potential identification.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
4) Taphonomic considerations (3 pts) a) Bones #98-105 are ribs that articulate from the spinal column. How many ribs would you expect to be present if the skeleton was complete? How does the completeness of the ribs compare with the completeness of the spinal column? Provide a well-reasoned explanation for the differences you observe. (3 pts) If the spine was complete I would expect there to be 26 ribs. The difference is most likely because ribs are more fragile and prone to breakage as compated to the spinal column. Some ribs may have accidentally not been collected during the excavation on accident. 5) Use the Stratigraphic Column to Interpret the Age of the Dinosaur. (7 pts) Fossils can be used to create stratigraphic ranges that allow scientists to track the species duration, or longevity of groups, from their origination to their extinction in an area. The oldest fossil of a species is its first appearance datum (FAD) and the youngest fossil of a species is the last appearance datum (LAD). It may be helpful to think of FADs as the origination date of the group whereas you could think of LADs as the group’s extinction date . Examine the stratigraphic column on the next page before answering the questions below. The species below were found in this stratigraphic record. Using the information from their FADs and LADs (First Appearance Datum and Last Appearance Datum, respectively) to constrain the age of the excavation site, denoted as a bone icon on the stratigraphic chart. Organism FAD Age (Ma) LAD Age (Ma) Aquilapollenites 81 65 Baculites asperformis 80 75 Crassostrea subtrigonalis 77 66 Wodehouseia spinata 69 66 Momopites 66 62 Caryapollenites 62 57 1. What is the potential age range, in millions on years (Ma) of the excavation site? (1 pt) The potential age range could be from 77 million years ago to 69 million years ago. 2. What geologic age is excavation site? List the Geologic Period and Geologic Age after consulting the international stratigraphic chart. (1 pt) This is the Cenozoic Era, specifically the Paleogene Period and within the Paleocene Epoch.
Knowing the age of the excavation site should help you constrain the identity of the dinosaur. 3. Describe the changes in the environment of deposition starting from the oldest interval. For each stratigraphic interval, make a claim about the type of environment, state your evidence, and explain your reasoning. Be as specific as your evidence will allow. (5 pts) a. Lowermost stratigraphic interval (Oldest interval) This is a marine environment, my evidence being the presence of Aquilapollenites and Crassostrea subtrigonalis. Aquilapollenites is an extinct pollen grain genus and Crassostrea subtrigonalis is an oyster species which both indicate a marine environment. b. Dinosaur-bearing Interval The environment is terrestrial, with dinosaur fossil/remains suggesting a mixed habitat consisting of marshes, grasslands, and forests, where dinosaurs once roamed, shown by the "Dinosaur-bearing Interval" concept, although specific details are not provided. c. Uppermost stratigraphic interval (Youngest interval) The environment is terrestrial as seen by the presence of Wodehouseia spinata and Caryapollenites, which are pollen grains from marine sediments moving to terrestrial habitats, and the fossil plant species Wodehouseia spinata, suggesting a shift from marine to terrestrial ecosystems.