CS 3
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
SSAT Degree College *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
1
Subject
Geography
Date
Nov 24, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
1
Uploaded by CaptainFalconPerson690
1. The U.S. government should consider promoting and subsidizing the construction
of both pipeline and rail infrastructure to accommodate the increasing oil production.
Domestic oil production plays a significant role in the U.S. economy, reducing
dependence on foreign oil and creating jobs. It is crucial to have efficient
transportation infrastructure in place to ensure that this oil can reach markets and
refineries.
2. Advantages of increasing capacity to move oil by pipeline:
- Efficiency: Pipelines are the most efficient mode of transportation for large volumes
of oil, with continuous flow and minimal interruptions.
- Environmental impact: Pipelines have a lower carbon footprint compared to rail
transportation, as they emit fewer greenhouse gases per unit of oil transported.
- Safety: Pipelines have a lower risk of accidents compared to rail transportation, as
they are not subject to derailments or accidents during transit.
Disadvantages of increasing capacity to move oil by pipeline:
- Cost and time: Building pipelines can be expensive and time-consuming, requiring
significant investment and regulatory approvals.
- Environmental concerns: Pipeline leaks and spills can have severe environmental
impacts, potentially contaminating water sources and causing ecological damage.
Advantages of increasing capacity to move oil by rail:
- Flexibility: Rail transportation provides more flexibility in terms of routes and
destinations, allowing oil to reach markets not served by pipelines.
- Faster implementation: Rail infrastructure can be established relatively quickly
compared to pipelines, allowing for faster response to increased production.
- Economic benefits: Increased rail movements can create jobs and economic
opportunities in regions where pipeline infrastructure may not be feasible or cost-
effective.
Disadvantages of increasing capacity to move oil by rail:
- Safety concerns: Rail transportation of volatile oil can pose safety hazards, as seen
in the derailments and accidents that have occurred in the Bakken Region. This can
lead to environmental damage and risks to communities along rail routes.
- Environmental impact: Rail transportation emits more greenhouse gases compared
to pipelines, contributing to climate change.
- Limited capacity: Rail transportation has limitations in terms of the volume of oil
that can be moved compared to pipelines, which may not be sufficient to keep up
with rapidly increasing production.
3. As a U.S. government official, the mode of transportation chosen would depend on
a comprehensive evaluation of various factors such as cost-effectiveness,
environmental impacts, safety considerations, and regional requirements. In this
case, considering the volatile nature of the oil being produced in the Bakken Region
and the safety concerns associated with rail transportation, prioritizing the
construction of pipeline infrastructure would be a prudent choice. Pipelines offer
greater efficiency, lower environmental impact, and higher safety standards
compared to rail transportation. However, it is important to ensure that rigorous
safety measures and regulations are in place to minimize the risks associated with
pipeline transportation.
Discover more documents: Sign up today!
Unlock a world of knowledge! Explore tailored content for a richer learning experience. Here's what you'll get:
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help