Milestone 1

docx

School

Kenyatta University School of Economics *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

121

Subject

English

Date

Nov 24, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

Uploaded by Experttwritter

Student’s Name Professor Matthews English 121 10/25/23 Research According to Academic Discipline The Three Academic Disciplines Introduction Stricter gun control measures are essential for enhancing public safety and reducing the alarming rate of gun-related violence in our society. Gun control has been a topic of intense debate and discussion in modern society, prompting this paper to examine into the complex perspectives of this contentious issue. In this paper, we will explore the concept of gun control through the lens of three distinct academic disciplines: Humanities, Philosophy, and Social Sciences. Gun Control Through the Lens of Humanities The study of Humanities is an exploration of what it means to be human, encompassing a wide range of subjects such as literature, history, philosophy, language, and art. When examining the issue of gun control through this lens, we gain insights into the cultural and historical dimensions of firearms and their regulation. The history of gun ownership and control is a story that stretches back centuries. Firearms have played pivotal roles in various historical contexts, from the American Revolution to the Wild West era (Campbell 88). By looking into the historical record, the paper helps in tracing the development of gun culture and its entwined relationship with American society.

Understanding this historical context is essential when discussing gun control, as it sheds light on the roots of the fervent debate surrounding this issue. Guns have held a unique place in American culture. They are symbols of frontier spirit, personal freedom, and even rebellion (Campbell 90). The portrayal of firearms in literature, art, and media has contributed to the enduring mystique surrounding guns. The Humanities perspective allows us to analyze how cultural representations of firearms have influenced public perception and attitudes towards gun control. It prompts questions about the role of these cultural depictions in shaping individual and societal perspectives on the Second Amendment and gun rights. One of the core tenets of Humanities is the interconnectedness of humanity across time and space. Gun control debates are not confined to a single era or a single nation. They extend across borders and generations (Campbell 86). By examining the historical records, literary works, and artistic expressions from different cultures, we can identify common themes and patterns in the discourse on firearms and their regulation. Gun Control Through the Lens of Philosophy Philosophy, often described as the "love of wisdom," is a discipline that delves into fundamental questions about the nature of reality, existence, knowledge, ethics, and the human mind. Philosophy prompts us to explore the ethical dimensions of gun control. The question of whether individuals should have unrestricted access to firearms raises ethical dilemmas (Austin 61). Philosophers analyze the consequences of such access in terms of individual rights, public safety, and the common good. They question whether personal freedoms should be weighed against the potential harm that can result from gun violence.

The philosophy of rights and responsibilities plays a pivotal role in the discussion of gun control. Philosophers examine the balance between an individual's right to bear arms and society's responsibility to protect its members. This balance necessitates considering not only individual liberties but also the duty of governments to maintain public safety and well-being (Austin 60). Philosophical theories like the social contract are often invoked in discussions of gun control. Thinkers like John Locke and Thomas Hobbes have proposed that individuals agree to live within a society under certain conditions, including the relinquishment of some personal freedoms for the sake of common security (Austin 55). Applying these theories to gun control, we explore the extent to which individuals should voluntarily limit their rights to firearms to uphold the social contract. Philosophical ethical frameworks such as consequentialism and deontology provide analytical tools for assessing gun control policies. Consequentialism evaluates policies based on their outcomes, considering whether stricter gun control measures lead to a safer society. Deontology, on the other hand, emphasizes moral duties and principles, raising questions about the inherent moral obligations related to gun ownership and usage (Austin 51). Philosophers have grappled with the ethics of self-defense, a relevant aspect of the gun control debate. Exploring this dimension, we consider whether an individual's right to self- defense justifies unrestricted access to firearms. Philosophical analysis can help distinguish between self-defense as a legitimate use of force and the potential for misuse. Gun Control Through the Lens of Social Sciences

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

Social Sciences represent a body of knowledge dedicated to unraveling the intricate fabric of human society, encompassing subjects like sociology, psychology, economics, political science, and anthropology. Social Sciences utilize behavioral analysis to study how gun ownership and gun control policies impact human behavior (Joslyn 23). This includes exploring trends in gun-related crimes, violence, and accidents. Researchers in this field investigate the psychological factors that influence an individual's decision to own a firearm and how these choices affect society. Quantitative research methods, such as surveys and statistical analyses, play a pivotal role in uncovering patterns and relationships within society (Joslyn 23). Social scientists employ these tools to examine the effects of various gun control measures on crime rates, public safety, and other aspects of society. By utilizing empirical data, researchers can draw evidence-based conclusions about the impact of different policies. The field of Public Health, a sub-discipline of Social Sciences, examines the health and safety implications of gun control. This discipline investigates the relationship between gun ownership and public health, exploring topics like gun-related injuries, suicides, and domestic violence incidents (Joslyn 24). This approach sheds light on the public health dimensions of firearms regulation. Scholarly Sources Grobman and Ramsey's book, 'Major Decisions: College Career and the Case for the Humanities,' explores the significance of the humanities in college education and career choices (Grobman and Ramsey 43). Through an accessible narrative, the authors make a compelling case for the enduring value of studying subjects such as literature, philosophy, and history, arguing

that these disciplines contribute essential skills and perspectives to a well-rounded education. They emphasize the practical benefits of a humanities education in a world driven by technological advancements. Leezenberg and De Vries’ ‘History and Philosophy of the Humanities’ offers an insightful exploration of the origins, development, and theoretical underpinnings of the humanities (Leezenberg and De Vries 74). The book looks into the historical evolution of humanistic disciplines and their interconnectedness, shedding light on how different worldviews and intellectual traditions have shaped the humanities over time. Through a simple academic approach, the authors guide readers in understanding the philosophical foundations that underpin the study of subjects like literature, art, and ethics. Fumerton's 'What Is Philosophy? A First-Person Perspective' offers a fresh introduction to the field of philosophy, inviting readers to explore fundamental philosophical questions from a first-person viewpoint (Fumerton 65). The book encourages self-reflection and engages with core concepts in philosophy, such as ethics, epistemology, and metaphysic. With a focus on engaging the reader in a thoughtful and interactive manner, Fumerton's work serves as an excellent entry point for those new to the discipline, as it encourages readers to explore their own philosophical perspectives. Ethics by Espejo is a comprehensive resource that explores the foundations and applications of ethical principles (Espejo 70). This book provides introduction to ethical theories and the moral dilemmas individuals and societies encounter. The book discusses topics such as utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue ethics, making it a valuable tool for those seeking to understand and engage with ethical questions. It is an excellent starting point for students and readers interested in learning ethics.

Leahey’s ‘Quantitative Methods in Sociological Research’ provides valuable insights into the role of sociology in social research (Leahey 45). This book discusses the significance of quantitative methods in sociological inquiry. Leahey's approach simplifies complex sociological concepts, making them accessible for students and researchers. The chapter is a useful resource for those seeking to understand the application of quantitative methods in sociology, offering a foundation for empirical social research (Leahey 45). ‘Global Trends and Transformations in Culture, Business, and Technology’ by Yeganeh offers a comprehensive analysis of the dynamic interplay between culture, business, and technology in the modern global landscape (Yeganeh 78). This book explores the ever-evolving trends and transformations that shape our world. The book tries to explain the impact of cultural shifts on business practices and technological advancements. It provides valuable insights for students and professionals seeking a deeper understanding of the complex interrelationships between these disciplines. Differences Between the Disciplines 1.What are the similarities and differences between how each discipline structures the presentation of information? The presentation of information in Humanities often follows a narrative style, focusing on interpretation and context, weaving a compelling narrative around a central theme or work of art (Shu, 79). Social Sciences, on the other hand, predominantly utilize quantitative data and statistical analyses to structure information, allowing for systematic exploration of societal phenomena. Philosophy, distinguished by its emphasis on rigorous argumentation, structures information through logical reasoning and critical discourse, aiming to unravel complex

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

philosophical questions. While Humanities and Philosophy lean towards narrative and argumentation, Social Sciences favor data-driven analysis, reflecting the diverse approaches these disciplines employ in presenting information. 2.What are the similarities and differences between the conventions, analytical approaches, and discourse patterns of each discipline? The conventions, analytical approaches, and discourse patterns in these disciplines display notable similarities and differences. Humanities and Philosophy both embrace a qualitative and interpretive approach, emphasizing in-depth analysis and the critical interpretation of texts, artworks, and ideas (Baltar and Mateus 26). These disciplines engage in philosophical discourse and argumentation, promoting rigorous critical thinking. Social Sciences, on the other hand, predominantly adopt a quantitative approach, relying on empirical data, statistical analysis, and systematic methods (Shu 103). The discourse pattern in Social Sciences often revolves around research methodologies, findings, and statistical evidence, emphasizing objectivity and the formulation of hypotheses. 3.Are there differences in how evidence is identified and knowledge created in each discipline? In Humanities, evidence is often drawn from textual and artistic sources, subject to interpretation, and knowledge is created through critical analysis and synthesis. In Social Sciences, empirical evidence collected through research methods forms the basis for knowledge creation, focusing on systematic data analysis (Morris 98). Philosophy, on the other hand, relies on conceptual and logical reasoning as evidence, with knowledge derived from sound philosophical arguments and counterarguments. These disciplines differ in their approaches to

evidence identification and knowledge creation, reflecting the diverse methodologies they employ. 4.What kinds of information are prioritized? Is there an implied difference in "value" between each discipline? In Humanities, information that is often prioritized includes literary and artistic interpretations, historical narratives, and cultural context. Here, the value is placed on diverse perspectives, narratives, and subjective interpretations that contribute to a deeper understanding of human experiences and cultural expressions. In Social Sciences, the prioritization leans towards empirical data, statistical evidence, and research findings. The value in this discipline is often associated with the objectivity of data and the ability to draw generalizable conclusions based on systematic research (Morris 98). Philosophy prioritizes philosophical arguments and conceptual reasoning. The value in Philosophy lies in the clarity, coherence, and logical soundness of arguments, which are central to the pursuit of truth and philosophical exploration. 5.How is expertise or validity established in each discipline?  How does each discipline uniquely speak to or address a topic of global or personal significance that you may wish to explore in later assignments? Establishing Expertise and Validity in Each Discipline Expertise and validity are established differently in each of these disciplines. In Humanities, expertise is cultivated through a deep understanding of cultural and artistic contexts, often demonstrated through academic credentials and publications. Validity, in this context, relies on the credibility of interpretations and the ability to support claims with contextual evidence. In Social Sciences, expertise is recognized through academic qualifications, research experience,

and the publication of peer-reviewed research. The validity of research is established by adhering to rigorous methodologies, achieving statistically significant results, and undergoing the scrutiny of peer review. Philosophy, on the other hand, establishes expertise through advanced degrees, contributions to philosophical discourse, and the development of logical and rigorous arguments (Morris 98). Validity in Philosophy is achieved by constructing arguments that are logically sound and withstand critical scrutiny. These diverse approaches reflect the distinctive nature of each discipline and its criteria for expertise and validity. Addressing Global or Personal Significance: Each discipline uniquely speaks to topics of global or personal significance. Humanities provides insights into the cultural, social, and historical dimensions of global issues, shedding light on the impact of art, literature, and culture on contemporary society. Social Sciences, with its empirical research and data-driven approach, offers practical solutions to global challenges, including understanding and addressing public health crises, socioeconomic disparities, and policy implications. Philosophy, with its focus on critical thinking and conceptual analysis, provides a framework to explore the fundamental questions and ethical dilemmas of personal and global significance (Morris 98). It enables a deep examination of values, ethics, and the foundations of knowledge, offering valuable insights into the complexities of human existence.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

Work Cited Austin MW. God and Guns in America . Grand Rapids Michigan: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company; 2020. Pp 50- 72 https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx? direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=2471446. Accessed November 6 2023. Baltar R Mateus E. Humanities . São Paulo: Editora Edgard Blücher; 2017. pp. 28 – 41 Campbell DJ. America's Gun Wars : A Cultural History of Gun Control in the United States . Santa Barbara California: Praeger An Imprint of ABC-CLIO LLC; 2019. Pp 80-95 https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx? direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=2087862. Accessed November 6 2023. Espejo R. Ethics . Farmington Hills. MI: Greenhaven Press; 2010. Fumerton RA. What Is Philosophy? : A First-Person Perspective . New York NY: Routledge; 2023. doi:10.4324/9781003223566 Grobman L Ramsey EM. Major Decisions : College Career and the Case for the Humanities . 1st ed. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 2020. http://public.eblib.com/choice/PublicFullRecord.aspx?p=6168032. Accessed October 25 2023. https://public.ebookcentral.proquest.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=5809578.

Joslyn MR. The Gun Gap : The Influence of Gun Ownership on Political Behavior and Attitudes . New York NY: Oxford University Press; 2020. Pp. 22- 45 http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx? direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=2440736. Leahey E. Sociology. In: Quantitative Methods in Sociological Research . Oxford University Press; 2011:07. doi:10.1093/obo/9780199756384-0044 Leezenberg M De Vries G. History and Philosophy of the Humanities : An Iintroduction . Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press; 2019. https://doi.org/10.1515/9789048551682. Accessed October 25 2023 . Morris TV. Philosophy . 2nd ed. Hoboken NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2022. Pp. 90-103 Shu X. Knowledge Discovery in the Social Sciences : A Data Mining Approach . Oakland California: University of California Press; 2020. pp. 76- 85 https://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9780520965874 . Yeganeh H. Global Trends and Transformations in Culture Business and Technology . First ed. New York New York (222 East 46th Street New York NY 10017): Business Expert Press; 2022. Accessed October 25 2023.

Milestone 1

Related Documents