Untitled document (10)

pdf

School

Indiana University, Purdue University, Indianapolis *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

200

Subject

Electrical Engineering

Date

Jan 9, 2024

Type

pdf

Pages

5

Uploaded by DoctorBook19016

Report
Electric Field Simulations Anvi Kute Abstract: In this laboratory experiment, we utilized simulations on the Phet Interactive Simulations website to assess the strength of an electric field at different distances. The data obtained from these simulations was then utilized to determine the Coulomb constant "k" through two distinct calculation methods. These calculated values were subsequently compared with the established known value of "k". For activity two, we arrived at an average Coulomb constant of 8.82 * 10^9 Nm^2/C. Additionally, we conducted simulations to measure the relationship between electric field strength and distance, and evaluated the resulting diagram for accuracy based on information from our textbook. Introduction: The purpose of this lab was to create a simulation that would give us values for the strength of an electric field from a positive charge and a dipole, using a sensor at different radii. We got comfortable with the app for activity one, and for activity two the goal was to measure the Coulomb constant “k.” For activity three, we observed the electrical field of a dipole. Throughout the experiment, we identified sources of noise and attempted to minimize them. We also found errors in our experiments and addressed probable causes. Activity 1: We decided to use the link given in our lab sheet, and got comfortable with adding charges and sensors. We also got used to turning on and off different parts of the display, and measuring distances with the tape measure and grid lines.We started navigating different functions of the PHET simulation. Activity 2: In this experiment, we conducted measurements of the electric field strength at different distances from a positive point charge using software that provided grid lines for accurate placement of the charge and sensors. We placed 10 sensors at varying distances ranging from 0.25 meters to 5.0 meters and then analyzed the data using formula 1 from the theoretical background section, as part of method 1, and compared the results with the known value of "k" for Coulomb's constant. Additionally, we utilized Excel to create a graph of electric field strength plotted against 1/r^2 as part of method 2, and also graphed the electric field strength vs. distance for further analysis.
Activity 3: We added a negative point charge in addition to the positive point charge to create a dipole. We also added the electric field lines and compared this to the diagram from our textbook and found it to be similar. We then measured the electric field strength at distances ranging from 0.1 meters to 2.0 meters. Then we graphed the electric field vs. distance.
Data Analysis Activity 2: In this activity, we measured the strength of an electric field at different distances as shown in figure. We were then able to calculate the values of k using formula 1 from the theoretical background section. We found an average k of 9.06*10^9. The percentage error was around 1.9%. We also plotted the electric field strength and . 1/ 𝑟 ^2 We then fit a trendline and used the slope to calculate k.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Activity 3: In activity three, we set up a dipole and measured the electric field strength at different distances. We found similar results to the singular charge field strength from activity two. We also noticed that the direction of the electric field changed due to the addition of the second charge as shown in Figures. Conclusion: By the end of this lab we are able to calculate correct values of k and also know how to observe the electric field lines and strength of a dipole shown by the Phet simulation. We were able to find the value of k using this simulation and also find the percentage error which was 1.9%. Also our theory that the electric field would decrease when distance from the charge is increased. If we had more accurate data we will get closer to the accurate answer.