Activity 2 Economics

docx

School

University of Texas, Arlington *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

11

Subject

Economics

Date

Feb 20, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

5

Uploaded by CorporalStrawSwan37

Report
PROFITABILITY ANALYSIS 1 Profitability Analysis Iddisah Sulemana September 9, 2023
PROFITABILITY ANALYSIS 2 Profitability Analysis Question 1- Break even point Break-even Price Calculation Break even Price = ¿ Costs + ( Marginal Cost Quantity of Units Sold ) Quantity of Units Sold Break even Price = 50000 +( 5 10000 ) 10000 =$10.00 per copier This indicates that, to cover all costs without accruing a profit or a loss, the selling price should be set at this amount. After 70% increase, Break even Price = 50000 +( 5 17000 ) 17000 = $7.94 per copier This indicates a decrease in the unit price necessary to break even, confirming the principle of economies of scale, where an increase in production tends to decrease the unit cost. Question 2- Profitability Analysis To ascertain the profitability of the investment, we utilize the Net Present Value (NPV) NPV = t = 1 4 20000 ( 1 + 0.15 ) t 70000 ¿ $ 12,900.43
PROFITABILITY ANALYSIS 3 The computed NPV stands at approximately -$12,900.43, signifying an unprofitable investment. At a 15% discount rate, this implies a wealth decrease of about $12,900, emphasizing the critical consideration of the time value of money in making informed financial decisions. It's essential to scrutinize potential returns comprehensively, factoring in opportunity costs and risk assessments, before proceeding with an investment. Question 3- Scenario 1 Short-term Decision In the immediate term, the company faces a net deficit of $2 million, stemming from the difference between the $5.5 million revenue and $7.5 million total costs. Variable costs, at $4.5 million, are lower than revenue, signifying coverage of these costs and contributing partly to fixed costs. Therefore, in the near future, it's advisable for the company to sustain operations. Halting operations would solely reduce variable costs, with fixed costs persisting, thereby increasing the net loss. Long-term Decision In the long term, the sustainability of the firm's operations is risky, given the persistent net losses. The management should adopt a rigorous examination of the operational structure to identify potential areas for cost reduction, especially fixed costs, and strategies to enhance revenue (Tey & Brindal, 2015). Scenario 2 In this scenario, where the revenue reduces to $5.0 million, the firm incurs a net loss of $2.5 million. Under these circumstances, the firm's revenue is barely surpassing the variable costs, which stand at $4.5 million. This signifies a dangerous financial position, as the firm is
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
PROFITABILITY ANALYSIS 4 scarcely covering its variable costs, leaving a meager portion to offset the fixed costs. This course is unsustainable, and thus, the firm needs to contemplate serious modifications to its operational strategy (Mathews, 2006). In the short term, it's crucial to examine avenues to cut both variable and fixed costs and seek ways to augment revenue. If these measures don't yield better financial prospects, the company may need to contemplate downsizing or temporarily pausing operations to prevent additional financial setbacks.
PROFITABILITY ANALYSIS 5 References Tey, Y. S., & Brindal, M. (2015). Factors influencing farm profitability.  Sustainable Agriculture Reviews - Volume 15 , 235-255. Mathews, J. A. (2006).  Strategizing, disequilibrium, and profit . Stanford University Press.