1.
6 points
In November 2021, President Biden signed the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act.
The bill
funds government spending on infrastructure (roads, bridges, etc.).
A case can be made that
public infrastructure is an input to production.
To make this explicit, let
G
in
be government
spending on infrastructure.
Therefore, we can write the production function as
zF K N G
( , ,
in
).
Assume, as seems reasonable, that the marginal products of labor and capital increase with an
increase in
G
in
.
a.
Explain why an increase in
G
in
causes an increase in the current-period output supply
curve.
An increase in government spending on infrastructure, represented by Gin, can lead to an
increase in the current-period output supply curve due to the concept of crowding-in. When the
government invests in infrastructure, it enhances the productivity of both labor and capital.
Improved roads, bridges, and other infrastructure elements reduce transportation costs and
increase the efficiency of production processes. As a result, the marginal products of labor and
capital increase, leading to higher overall productivity. This increase in productivity causes the
output supply curve to shift outward, reflecting higher levels of output at each price level.
b.
Within the context of the real intertemporal model, consider, then, an increase in
G
due to
an increase in
G
in
.
Determine the equilibrium effects of the increase in
G
in
in the labor
market and in the goods market.
To make matters concrete, assume that the impact of the
increase on
Y
d
is greater than the impact of the increase on
Y
s
.
In the real intertemporal model, an increase in government spending on infrastructure, denoted by
Gin, has equilibrium effects in both the labor market and the goods market. The increase in Gin
raises the marginal products of labor and capital, leading to higher wages and returns on capital.
In the labor market, this stimulates an increase in employment and potentially a reduction in
unemployment. In the goods market, the higher productivity translates into an increase in output.
c.
In terms of its conclusions, how does this example differ from the example in Chapter 11
that considers the equilibrium effects of an increase in
G
?
This example differs from the Chapter 11 example that considers the equilibrium effects of an
increase in government spending (G) by specifically focusing on infrastructure investment. The
emphasis on infrastructure spending acknowledges the potential for productivity-enhancing
effects, which can have a more direct impact on the production function and, consequently, on the
equilibrium in both the labor and goods markets. The consideration of the marginal products of
labor and capital explicitly connects the increase in government spending on infrastructure to
changes in productivity and economic output. This highlights the importance of the type of
government spending and its specific impact on the production process in understanding
equilibrium effects.
2.
4 points
The government decides that the use of credit cards is bad, and introduces a tax on credit card
balances. That is, if a consumer or firm holds a credit card balance of X (in real terms), he or she
is taxed tX, where t is the tax rate. Determine the effects on the equilibrium price and quantity of
credit card balances, the demand for money, and the price level, and explain your results