HPF209_Assessment 1 Brief_Essay_Module 3.1_SM_HC_DK_HC_SM_HC_28042019

HPF209_Assessment_1_Brief_Essay_Module Due3.1 Page 1 of 6 Task Summary Write an essay that examines the current debate in Australia surrounding the use of homeopathy as a way of treating health conditions. Assess the evidence for the efficacy of Homoeopathic treatment and critically evaluate the arguments on both sides of the debate. From your research, make an assertion about the value of homeopathy in clinical practice that is supported by the evidence. Please refer to the Task Instructions for details on how to complete this task. Context Homoeopathy is a modality commonly used within naturopathic practice. In this task students will consider the scientific evidence base of homoeopathy to evaluate the criticisms of the modality that are made in a recent Australian National Health & Medical Research Council (NHMRC) report on Homeopathy. This task will prepare you to engage in academic debate regarding the scientific basis of homoeopathy. You will develop skills to counter the typical assertions and criticisms of this modality. This will be of benefit in clinical practice to explain to patients and other health professionals about the evidence in relation to the efficacy and safety of homeopathy. Task Instructions Identify the criticisms and controversies of homeopathy as outlined in the introduction to the NHMRC Report on Homeopathy. Critically appraise the information in the NHMRC Report and make an assertion regarding the evidence base of homoeopathy. ASSESSMENT 1 BRIEF Subject Code and Title HPF209 Homoeopathic Foundations Assessment Essay regarding Homoeopathy as it relates to an evidenced based paradigm Individual/Group Individual Length 1000 words (+/- 10%) Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below are listed after the rubric. Submission Due by 11:55pm AEST Sunday end of Module 3.1 (Week 5) Weighting 30% Total Marks 100 marks

HPF209_Assessment_1_Brief_Essay_Module Due3.1 Page 2 of 6 Your essay should cover the following points:  Briefly examine the basic principles of homeopathy.  Identify different treatment approaches used by homeopaths that are described in the literature.  Identify common criticisms of homoeopathy that are typically made by the scientific community.  Identify some reasons why clinical trials and systematic reviews may not always support homoeopathy.  Critically evaluate the information and make an assertion regarding the evidence base of homoeopathy. Format Details:  Essay Format (see LASU for more information on how to structure an essay). You may, however, use headings.  11 - 12 point font  1.5 or double spacing in the assignment  Word count is 1000 words +/- 10% How will you be assessed in this assessment?  Review the marking rubric for a detailed marking guideline. To prepare for this assignment 1. Complete the learning concepts and activities from Modules 1 and 2 2. Read the NHMRC report: National Health and Medical Research Council. (2015). NHMRC Information Paper: Evidence on the effectiveness of homeopathy for treating health conditions. Canberra: National Health and Medical Research Council. Retrieved from https://nhmrc.gov.au/sites/default/files/images/nhmrc-information-paper-effectiveness-of- homeopathy.pdf 3. Read the criticisms of the NHMRC report on the Australian Homoeopathic Association (AHA) and Homeopathy Research Institute (HRI) websites: https://www.homeopathyoz.org/professional-members-news/295-why-is-there-an- ombudsman-against-the-nhmrc https://www.hri-research.org/2015/03/nhmrc-publishes-flawed-report-despite-concerns- raised-during-public-consultation/ 4. Read supporting articles such as: Mathie, R.T, Lloyd, S.M., Legg, L.A., Clausen J., Moss, S., Davidson, J.R.T., Ford, I., (2014). Randomised placebo-controlled trials of individualised homoeopathic treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis. Systematic Reviews , 3:142, 2-16. Retrieved from https://systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/2046-4053-3-142

HPF209_Assessment_1_Brief_Essay_Module Due3.1 Page 4 of 6 Assessment Rubric Assessment Attributes Fail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49% Pass (Functional) 50-64% Credit (Proficient) 65-74% Distinction (Advanced) 75-84% High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100% Knowledge and understanding of the philosophy and the principles of practice of homoeopathy & homoeopathic treatment approaches related to clinical practice Percentage for this criterion = 30% Demonstrates a partially developed understanding of principles and approaches.  Errors in describing the development and philosophy and the principles of practice of homoeopathy.  Misidentification of homoeopathic treatment approaches. Demonstrates a functional knowledge of principles and approaches by:  Providing accurate descriptions of the philosophy and principles of practice of homeopathy.  Providing a basic discussion of different treatment approaches. Demonstrates proficient knowledge of principles and approaches by:  Providing accurate examination of the philosophy and principles of practice of homeopathy  Adequately discussing different Homoeopathic prescribing approaches. Demonstrates advanced knowledge of principles and approaches by:  Providing accurate and thorough examination of the philosophy and principles of practice of homeopathy.  Comprehensively discussing different Homoeopathic prescribing approaches. Demonstrates exceptional knowledge of principles and criticisms by:  Providing accurate and comprehensive examination of the philosophy and principles of practice of homeopathy.  Comprehensively discussing different Homoeopathic prescribing approaches.  Comparing and assessing a number of academic sources. Critique the evidence base for homoeopathy by reviewing the evidence surrounding the use of homoeopathy in clinical practice and common criticisms typically made by the scientific community. Provides a limited understanding and evaluation of the evidence base for the use of homeopathy in clinical practice. Does not make an assertion based upon the evidence. Provides a basic appraisal of the evidence for the use of homeopathy and makes an assertion based upon the evidence. Identifies common criticisms of homeopathy and reasons that clinical trials may not Provides a detailed appraisal of the evidence for the use of homeopathy and makes an assertion based upon sound evidence. Identifies common criticisms of homeopathy based upon the evidence and reasons that clinical Provides a thorough appraisal of the evidence about the use of homeopathy substantiated by robust evidence from the research and makes an assertion based upon sound evidence. Thoroughly identifies common criticisms of Provides a comprehensive appraisal of the evidence about the use of homeopathy substantiated by robust evidence from the research and makes an assertion based upon sound evidence. Comprehensively identifies common criticisms of

HPF209_Assessment_1_Brief_Essay_Module Due3.1 Page 5 of 6 Percentage for this criterion = 50% Does not identify common criticisms of homeopathy and reasons that clinical trials may not always support its use in clinical practice. always support its use in clinical practice. trials may not always support its use in clinical practice. homeopathy based upon sound evidence and reasons that clinical trials may not always support its use in clinical practice. homeopathy based upon sound evidence and reasons that clinical trials may not always support its use in clinical practice. Effective Communication (Written) Percentage for this criterion = 10% Meaning is repeatedly obscured by errors in the communication of ideas, including errors in structure, sequence, spelling, grammar, punctuation, and/or the acknowledgment of sources. Meaning is sometimes difficult to follow. Information, arguments, and evidence are structured and sequenced in a way that is not always clear and logical. Meaning is easy to follow. Information, arguments, and evidence are structured and sequenced in a way that is clear and logical. Information, arguments, and evidence are structured and sequenced in a way that is clear and persuasive. Information, arguments, and evidence are insightful, persuasive, and academically presented. Correct citation of key resources and evidence Percentage for this criterion = 10% Demonstrates inconsistent use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas. Referencing is omitted or does not resemble APA. Assertions are minimally supported with primary journals or government reports and organisational sites to develop arguments. Required academic sources not used. Demonstrates use of some credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas. Referencing resembles APA, with frequent or repeated errors. Assertions are mostly supported with primary journal articles, government reports, and organisational sites to develop arguments and/or position statements. Required academic sources are used. Demonstrates use of credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas. Referencing resembles APA, with occasional errors. Assertions are supported with primary journal articles, government reports, and organisational sites to develop arguments and position statements. Required academic sources are used. Demonstrates use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and statements. APA referencing is free from major errors. Assertions are well supported with good quality primary journal articles, government reports, and organisational sites to develop arguments and position statements. Demonstrates use of high quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and position statements. APA referencing is free from errors. Assertions are strongly supported with high quality primary and secondary journal articles, government reports and credible organisational sites to develop arguments and position statements.