COMM 321 Unit 1 Introduction
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
University of Waterloo *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
321
Subject
Communications
Date
Apr 3, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
58
Uploaded by BrigadierAntelopePerson2879
COMM 321
Unit 1: Introduction (Chapters 1 & 2)
The Canadian Financial Reporting Environment
Before studying the various accounting rules and statements, it’s necessary to understand why there is a need for accounting standards, how they are set, and signs that the preparers of financial information may not be following them.
By law, any corporation, big or small, must produce a set of financial statements (F/S) for its shareholders as well as the government. For large corporations, the users of F/S
can also include banks, equity analysts, credit rating agencies, customers, suppliers, managers, unions, regulators, potential shareholders, tax authorities, etc. All users are relying on the F/S in order to make decisions about the subject corporation.
Lenders and investors, whether existing or potential, need to make decisions as to whether they will extend their
financial resources (money) to the corporation. Suppliers and customers need to decide whether they will commit their resources to the corporation on an ongoing basis. All are looking to assess how management is performing. This leads to the objective of financial reporting.
The objective of financial reporting is to communicate useful information about an entity to key decision makers that allows them to make resource allocation decisions and assess management stewardship.
The reality of large corporations is the people or entities with funds at risk (investors and creditors) are not managing the corporation and further, they have investment alternatives. They need to be able to compare
the income prospects and economic resources of all alternatives they are evaluating, and to assess the relative risks and returns of each. This creates a need for accounting standards – companies must prepare their F/S using the same
principles and rules, thereby allowing users to easily understand their economic situation and compare
it to others.
Accounting Standards in Canada
Standards in Canada must be set by CPA Canada (the organization for Chartered Professional Accountants). This is mandated by the Canadian Business Corporations Act and by the various securities commissions in Canada – both require F/S to be prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) as set by CPA Canada. All standards can be found in the CPA Canada Handbook, available online (UW students can access it through the library for free). There are two sets of accounting rules or standards that have been mandated by CPA Canada. They are known by the acronyms IFRS and ASPE.
Publicly accountable enterprises and government business enterprises must follow IFRS: International Financial Reporting Standards
Private Companies, pension plans and non-profit enterprises can follow either IFRS or ASPE: Accounting Standards for Private Enterprises
1
Therefore, if a company’s shares are traded publicly (e.g. on the Toronto Stock Exchange), they must follow IFRS. If they are a private company, they can choose either IFRS or ASPE. Both IFRS and ASPE are principles
based (vs. strict rules based), allowing for flexibility and the use of professional judgement by the accountant. The IFRS are set by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), based in London, England. The ASPE are set by the Accounting Standards Board (AcSB) of CPA Canada, based in Toronto, ON. The U.S. currently follows their own GAAP as set by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), supported by FASB (the U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board). The SEC has stated it desires to adopt IFRS for US companies but the timetable is unclear – many in the U.S. believe their GAAP is rules based whereas IFRS is principles based. IFRS has been adopted by most countries worldwide – the other major holdouts are China, which has stated it will adopt IFRS but has not set a date, and Japan where IFRS are optional but not required.
The process for setting standards is as follows: 1.
A need for a standard is identified and put on the agenda
of the standard setting body by interested parties; the need is usually created by a new type of business transaction; for example, when the first interest rate swap was entered into by a bank and its customer – a swap is an agreement to exchange one
set of cash flows for another – there was no accounting standard in place; as such, neither the bank nor its customer were entirely sure how they should account for the swap.
2.
The board conducts its own research and analysis, then publishes an exposure draft for comment.
3.
The exposure draft
is sent to all interested parties for comments (this will include all major accounting firms as well as the corporations that are currently entering into these new types of transactions).
4.
The board receives and evaluates
the comments, incorporates them into the standard, possibly issuing a re-exposure draft if necessary.
5.
The final standard
is issued.
6.
Standards are revised
if and when necessary using the same approach (the IASB has a mandated 2-year post-implementation review of each standard).
When a company enters into a business transaction, the accountants (and auditors) must decide how to account for the transaction in terms of how it should be presented on the F/S. In resolving accounting issues, there is a hierarchy
that is followed. In order, it is:
The CPA Canada Handbook (Parts 1-4; Part 1 is IFRS, Part 2 is PE, Part 3 is Non-Profits, Part 4 is pension plans); if the transaction is covered by the CPA Canada Handbook, it must
be accounted for in the prescribed manner
AcSB/IASB background information and basis for conclusions; this is an explanation for how the board reached its conclusions; this might provide guidance on how the transaction should be treated
AcSB/IASB implementation guidance
Pronouncements of standard setting bodies in other jurisdictions; for example if there is no Canadian standard but the U.S. has issued a standard, the U.S. standard will most likely be followed
Approved drafts of new standards
Exposure drafts or research studies
Accounting textbooks, journals, studies (many are referenced in CPA Canada Handbook)
Industry practice
2
Management Bias Any user of financial statements knows that the F/S have been prepared by management of the issuing corporation. It must be acknowledged that management are not neutral parties. In other words, users need to be aware of management bias.
Preparers of the financial information are not neutral and may be presenting it in a manner that may overemphasize the positive and/or underemphasize the negative. Management compensation may be based on net income or by the value of the company’s shares. Further, there exists pressure on management to meet analyst expectations. There may also be a need to comply with certain contracts (most loan
agreements have minimum financial ratios that must be met or the debt is in default) or with certain regulatory minimums if the company operates in a regulated environment (if the company fails to meet the minimums the regulator can replace management). Hence management may be distorting the F/S.
Warning signs
that the F/S might be misstated or that fraud could be present include any of the following:
Worsening economy
making it harder for the company to maintain growth and profitability targets
Worsening industry results – in many frauds, the entire industry was suffering but the company committing fraud continued to report increased profits
Worsening company results (although this is difficult to assess outside of the company)
Unrealistic budgets or the forecasts released to the public appear aggressive; managers missing budgets are often fired
Management compensation tied to financial statistics, such as operating income, net income, etc. thus creating a real incentive to inflate these statistics
Management compensation linked to stock price
, or the compensation from stock options dwarfs all other compensation, thus creating an incentive to continually report results the market will view as favourable
Existence of analyst targets (for EPS), particularly when the company is followed by several analysts; missing targets usually causes stock price to drop significantly, creating pressure on management
Existence of contractual financial ratios
in loan agreements, particularly if the company appears close to missing the required ratio; e.g. must maintain interest coverage ratio of 4:1 or higher and the company reports its coverage ratio at 4.1:1; since missing the ratio means the loan is in default (which in
turn could lead to bankruptcy), the true ratio could be less than 4:1
Existence of regulatory
minimum financial hurdles or a requirement to pass stress tests; typically the regulator has the power to take over the company if these are missed
The Role of Auditors
To offset the risk associated with management bias, the F/S of all public companies must be audited. Further, most banks dealing with private companies require their F/S to be audited too. An audit is an examination of a company’s books and records by an independent body, to ensure the F/S present fairly the underlying transactions. An external audit is conducted by an independent accounting firm – the 4 largest are Deloitte, Ernst & Young, KPMG and PricewaterhouseCoopers – who sign and attach their audit report to the company’s F/S. The report expresses their opinion as to whether the F/S are presented fairly and in accordance with GAAP (i.e. IFRS for public companies). An auditing firm that fails to uncover material fraud or misstatements in the 3
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
F/S can, and has been
, successfully sued for damages suffered by investors and creditors who relied on those F/S and the auditor’s report.
Agency problem
When it comes to the operation of businesses, an odd phenomenon occurs as the organization grows – the entities with the money at risk (bankers, bondholders, investors) are not the entities running the business day to day. All big corporations utilize agents
– these are people who act for the entities with the money at risk. Examples include management, auditors, credit analysts, equity analysts, consultants, etc. The agency problem is the fact that sometimes agents will act in their own
best interest rather than in the best interests of the shareholders or lenders. Examples of agent abuses that have occurred historically include:
Management concealing poor performance by altering financial statements
CEOs and CFOs intimidating junior staff to produce higher income numbers even when not warranted, through accounting misstatements
CEOs selecting close personal friends to sit on their board of directors
Senior executives giving themselves incentive compensation in life-changing dollar amounts (i.e. 8 and 9 figures) and tied to stock prices
Senior executives buying or selling their own company’s stock prior to good or bad news releases
Credit analysts rating companies higher than warranted in order to maintain fee revenues
Auditors approving financial statements they knew were wrong in order to maintain fee revenue, or in some cases, to maintain consulting revenue that dwarfed audit fees
Security analysts maintaining “buy” or “strong buy” ratings in order to win lucrative investment banking
business
In 2001/02, several large American multinationals went bankrupt, generating huge investor losses as well as job
and pension losses. In many of these cases, F/S had been distorted to fraudulently conceal the underlying problems in the business. (Some of these frauds are topics for the COMM 321 group project.) Auditors, equity analysts and credit rating analysts had all failed to warn of any problems, even in as little as 3 weeks prior to the
company going bankrupt. In response, the U.S. government passed the Sarbanes Oxley Act (2002).
This act significantly changed the accounting, auditing and securities industries in the U.S, and was copied by many international jurisdictions, including Canada. The changes included:
Stronger independence rules
for auditors, audit committees and securities analysts; for example, auditors could no longer accept consulting engagements from their audit customers
F/S must be signed and certified
by CEO and CFO; prior to the act, only the auditors signed the F/S
Stronger jail sentences
for executives who knowingly commit fraud and/or misrepresent their F/S; jail sentences handed out under the Act have been as high as 25 years
Protection for whistle blowers
– these are people who spot illegal activity and report it
SEC given power
over accounting and auditing industries through the Public Company Oversight Board
(including power over accounting and auditing standards); previously this had been the sole domain of the U.S. accounting profession
Stronger reporting requirements for senior executive stock transactions
; executives now required to publicly report any stock purchases or sales 4
Management and auditors must report on internal controls
; internal controls are the controls a company puts in place to ensure fraudulent transactions do not take place; the most common control is ensuring that an employee who has access to an asset does not have access to the accounting records that report on movement of that asset (e.g. the accounts receivable clerk would not have access to customer cheques
arriving; warehouse staff would not have access to inventory records, etc.)
The changes appear to be working. The number and size of frauds committed since the passage of the bill have declined. Further, before the act, it was relatively common for a University of Waterloo CPA co-op student to encounter fraud on several, if not every, work term. Today, many co-op students graduate without ever encountering fraud.
Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting
In order to ensure accounting standards remain useful and consistent, standards setters use a conceptual framework to provide a guide for all standards and for the use of professional judgment by all accountants.
The framework is presented pictorially in the textbook on page 2-31. The starting point is the users’ needs. This leads to the objective of financial reporting which as mentioned, is to provide useful information about the entity to existing and potential investors, creditors and other stakeholders to assist in making their resource allocation decisions and to assess the effectiveness of management stewardship. Other elements to the framework are: the qualitative characteristics of useful information, the elements of financial statements and the foundational principles of accounting.
Qualitative Characteristics of useful financial information:
1.
Fundamental Characteristics: a.
Relevance - capable of making a difference; has predictive or confirmatory value b.
Faithful Representation - complete, neutral and free from error
2.
Enhancing Characteristics: a.
Comparability - allows users to identify similarities and differences between entities; includes consistency
b.
Verifiability - different observers will reach same value c.
Timeliness - to make their decisions d.
Understandability – clear and concise to users; note that the standard for users is those who have reasonable business knowledge
3.
Constraints: a.
Materiality (if omitting it could influence decisions, it’s material); calculations indicative of materiality include 5% of pre-tax income, 1% or 2% of sales, 5% of assets b.
Cost (cost of obtaining information must not be greater than benefit of providing it)
Elements of Financial Statements:
1.
Assets – owned by the company with the potential to provide future economic benefits
2.
Liabilities – owed by the company, representing an obligation to transfer economic resources
3.
Equity – the residual interest, representing assets less liabilities
4.
Revenues – increases in economic resources resulting from an entity’s ordinary activities
5
5.
Expenses – decreases in resources resulting from an entity’s revenue generating activities
6.
Gains and Losses – increases or decreases in equity from peripheral or incidental transactions
Foundational Principles of Accounting: These are the principles that determine how most transactions are to be measured, recorded and presented in the
F/S. They include the following.
1.
Economic entity – it’s possible to identify an economic entity with distinct activities; present most meaningful entity (usually the consolidated group rather than the legal entity)
2.
Control – F/S should include all legal entities under common control
3.
Revenue recognition
– record revenues when earned (regardless of when cash is received)
*
4.
Matching
– record expenses in same period as the related revenue
*
5.
Periodicity – financial information must be reported periodically so it is assumed that an entity’s economic activities can be divided into artificial time periods
6.
Monetary unit – money is the common denominator of economic activity and is appropriate for accounting measurement (ignore CPI)
7.
Going concern – the reporting entity will continue to operate for the foreseeable future (note that liquidation values are usually drastically
different from F/S values)
8.
Historical cost – transactions initially recorded at historical cost (since this is readily measurable at a point in time, represents an arms-length exchange with an independent 3
rd
party)
9.
Fair value – may be more useful than historical cost for certain assets and liabilities in certain industries;
where used, the F/S should present the fair value as the value it can be sold at on the reporting date
10. Full disclosure – anything that is relevant should be disclosed in the financial statements
*
Note that Revenue Recognition and Matching govern when Income Statement transactions are to be recorded.
Public Company Annual Report
Every public company issues an annual report, usually a few months after its year-end. Note however that the financial results are usually released to the press 3-4 weeks
after year-end. Although there is no standard requirement, the typical annual report for a Canadian public company often exceeds 100 pages comprised as follows:
Financial highlights for the year combined with a statement from the CEO (2-3 pages)
MD&A (Management Discussion and Analysis) – management’s detailed explanation for the financial results and ratios (40-50 pages)
Management and Auditor Reports – standard wording is the norm (4-6 pages)
Financial Statements (4 pages)
Notes to the Financial Statements – provides more detail on each line in the F/S (40-50 pages)
Info on Management and Directors (2-4 pages)
If you’re curious, there is an example of a set of F/S at the back of your text (Volume 1). Alternatively, the F/S for Apple Inc. are readily available online and fairly easy for a student to read. The auditors report (and their audit) covers only the financial statements and accompanying notes
. However, CPA Canada has provided guidance for the MD&A in which they suggest preparers view the company through 6
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
the eyes of management, be written in plain language, focus on management strategy and amongst other things, mention the company’s vision, strategy and key performance drivers.
COMM 321
Unit 2: The Income Statement (Chapter 4)
Management Decision Making
Management decisions in any corporation can be separated into:
Operating
decisions – using the company’s resources to earn a profit
Investing
decisions – using the company’s financial resources to invest in/dispose of assets
Financing
decisions – obtaining the necessary funds to run the business (debt, equity, retaining profits)
The results of all these decisions affect a company’s income. However, in assessing management stewardship, it
makes sense to report financial performance in a way that showcases the results of these decisions separately, i.e. the results of operating decisions vs. financing decisions vs. investment decisions.
The financial statement that reports a company’s financial performance is known as the Income Statement
under ASPE and as the Statement of Comprehensive Income
under IFRS (may also be split into a statement of profit or loss and statement of comprehensive income).
The user’s objective
is to evaluate past financial performance and be able to predict future financial performance and cash flows. It is therefore important to be able to assess which items are most likely recurring
(will therefore impact next year) and which are not necessarily recurring. A clear distinction is between continuing operations and discontinued operations (any businesses which have been sold or shut down). Continuing operations are obviously the most important and are presented first.
Within continuing operations, there will be an operating section
and a non-operating section. Again, the intent is to allow the user to see the results of operating decisions, distinctly from investing and financing decisions, as
well as to assess recurring income vs. income that is not necessarily recurring. Operating income should be the starting point in assessing recurring income.
Key Accounts and Subtotals
Within the Operating section: Sales – Cost of Goods Sold
= Gross Profit – Selling General & Administrative Expenses (SG&A) = Operating Income
Sales indicate whether the company is growing or shrinking. The gross profit
is the profit the company generates from its products or services before deducting the costs of operating its business. For a distributor, the
cost of goods sold is the actual cost of buying the inventory that has been sold. For a manufacturer, the cost of goods sold is the cost of manufacturing the goods that have been sold. Note that the cost includes all costs 7
associated with its factory – direct materials, direct labour and overhead
. Hence depreciation of all factory equipment, all supervisor salaries, etc. are included in Cost of Goods Sold.
SG&A is
the cost of running the business and will include the costs of the sales, marketing, accounting, finance and human resource departments as well as all executives, all office equipment, office rent, etc. Operating income
is therefore the profit before the impact of any financing or investment decisions. Analysts consider this to be one of the most if not the most important
items on the income statement. It represents the profitability of the company’s main line of business. A healthy operating profit margin (i.e. operating income divided by sales) is a vital indicator of an attractive business. The next section is the Non-operating section which contains: Other Income and Gains
(Investment Income, Interest Revenue, Rental Revenue, Asset Sales, Unusual Items)
- Other Expenses & Losses
(Investment Losses, Interest Expense, Asset Sales, Unusual Items)
= Earnings from Continuing Operations before Tax
- Income Tax Expense (on Income from Continuing Operations only)
= Earnings from Continuing Operations
Other Income is important since it will contain not just realized investment income but also unrealized investment income on investments held for trading purposes
(realized means the investment has been sold; unrealized means the value of the investment has changed during the period but it has not yet been sold). Other Expenses for many companies will be where interest expense (the cost of financing using debt) resides. It is also important to recognize that the Income Tax Expense line will represent the tax expense associated with
continuing operations only
. This is to help the user in predicting next year’s Net Income.
To arrive at Net Income, we must add or deduct any income or loss from discontinued operations. The discontinued operations are less important since they only impact the past. As such, the information will be summarized for the user and contain only the following:
Income (Loss) from operations
for the part of the year the business was owned and operated (this will be reported net of tax)
Gain (Loss) on disposal
(again, net of tax)
Additional details will be presented in the notes to the financial statements. Note that discontinued operations should include those disposed of during the year and those held for sale at year-end.
Earnings Per Share (EPS) Disclosures The income statement or Statement of Comprehensive Income also contains EPS information for the fiscal year.
EPS must be segregated as follows:
Income from Continuing Operations
Income from Discontinued Operations
Net Income
8
Since EPS is intended to represent the Earning per share available to common shareholders only, Basic EPS is
calculated as: (Net Income – Preferred dividends)/Weighted Average # C/S O/S
Note that preferred dividends are deducted from Income from Continuing Operations and Net Income only. There is a distinction between cumulative preferred dividends and non-cumulative preferred dividends. Although there is no legal obligation for a corporation to pay either form of dividend until the board of directors
declares one, cumulative preferred dividends rank ahead of any payment to common shareholders. Even if the corporation is liquidated, cumulative preferred dividends must be paid before common shareholders receive anything. Non-cumulative preferred dividends on the other hand, are lost forever if the board of directors elects not to pay them. As such, in calculating EPS for any year, cumulative
preferred dividends are deducted regardless
of whether they have been declared. However, non-cumulative
preferred dividends are deducted only
if they have been declared during the year. If the common shares are subject to dilution (i.e. there exits outstanding options, warrants, convertible debt, convertible preferred shares), then the company must disclose Basic EPS
and Fully Diluted EPS
. We will be calculating Fully Diluted EPS later in the course.
Accounting Changes:
As large corporations engage in many different types of transactions, there are often changes that must be accounted for. An analyst needs to understand how each are accounted for. The three most common are:
Change in accounting estimates
Change in accounting policy
Errors in prior years
Changes in accounting estimates
are not disclosed separately in the F/S but instead, are referenced in the notes. Prior years are not
adjusted, rather the change is reflected in the current year and going forward, referred to as prospective treatment
. Examples are a change in an asset’s estimated useful life or salvage value, change in bad debts’ percentage of sales, etc.
Changes in Accounting Policy
occur either as a result of management decisions or due to new standards being prescribed by IFRS or ASPE. Opening R/E is adjusted
(shown on the Statement of Retained Earnings, net of tax), all comparative figures are re-stated
and the error is explained
in the notes; examples include change from ASPE to IFRS, change in depreciation method, adoption of new IFRS standard, etc.
Errors in Prior Years
arise most often in inventory but can arise in literally any account, for any reason from honest mistakes to intentional fraud. Similar to a change in accounting policy, opening R/E is adjusted (shown on Statement of Retained Earnings, net of tax), all comparative figures are re-stated
and the error is explained
in the notes.
You might recall extraordinary items from past accounting courses. These are no longer allowed in IFRS and are no longer addressed in ASPE.
9
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Comprehensive Income (IFRS only):
Comprehensive Income comprises both
Net Income as calculated above plus
Other Comprehensive Income.
Other Comprehensive Income
(OCI) is simply a list of items that the IASB believes should be included in comprehensive income, but not net income. All items are non-cash, but are felt to be relevant to the user. The individual items are presented as separate line items, net of tax,
after Net Income. The list includes:
Adjustments on revaluation of Property Plant & Equipment – this represents the difference between book value and fair value of certain property, plant and equipment; since real estate values may have changed considerably since land and buildings were purchased (e.g. businesses that have been operating for more than 25 years), there could be significant value tied up in the company’s land and buildings; although the company may not intend to sell the assets, it is still felt to be relevant to the user
Unrealized gains/losses on FX translation of foreign subsidiaries – many companies have subsidiaries in countries with highly volatile currencies (e.g. Argentina); the gain or loss in the value of the subsidiary due to currency volatility is felt to be relevant to the user
Actuarial gains/losses on defined benefit pension plans; these are plans in which the pensioner is paid a certain amount every year based on their final salary, i.e. an annuity; the company’s pension liability is the present value of this annuity; as interest rates change, the liability changes;
Changes in the fair value of a financial instrument used as a cash flow hedge; companies will often hedge future cash flows using derivative contracts, e.g. a liability to pay US$5 million in 5 years might be hedged using a 5-year US/CAD foreign exchange contract; as the US/CAD exchange rates change, the value of this contract goes up or down; although the company is unlikely to sell the contract as long as their liability remains intact, any gains or losses were felt to be relevant to the user
Unrealized gains/losses on investments measured using the Fair Value through OCI method (FV-OCI) – we’ll expand on this in Unit 9 but there are 3 methods of measuring investments when a company does not control or exert significant influence over the investee; the most popular methods are the other two: the cost/amortized cost model and the Fair Value through Net Income (FV-NI) model; however, for any unrealized gains/losses on FV-OCI investments, representing the change in value of these securities during the period, they must be included as OCI
Just as Net Income is closed out every year to Retained Earnings, Other Comprehensive Income must also be closed out every year. The offset to OCI is an equity account called Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
which is reported in Shareholders’ Equity, after R/E. Hence for public companies, their Shareholders’ Equity contains Preferred Shares, Common Shares, Contributed Surplus (if applicable), Retained Earnings and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.
Other Issues:
Assets Held for Sale (i.e. Discontinued Operations)
As mentioned, discontinued operations should include both those operations that were sold or closed during the year, plus any operations currently being sold. From an accounting perspective, assets being held for sale means:
There is an authorized plan to sell in place
10
The asset is available for immediate sale
There is an active program to find a buyer in process
The sale is probable within a year
The asset is reasonably priced
Any changes to the plan are unlikely
If all the above conditions are met, then the accounting treatment is as follows:
Income (Loss) for the period appears in the discontinued operations section of the Income Statement
No further depreciation is recorded on any asset
Asset is written down to the lower of its carrying value or its fair value less selling costs
Asset is presented separately on the Balance Sheet: IFRS – classify as current asset; ASPE – retain original classification of asset (either current or L-T)
ASPE: Statement of Retained Earnings:
Under ASPE, the Net Income is carried to the Statement of Retained Earnings. The Statement of Retained Earnings is a brief statement, normally in the following format:
Balance, January 1 as reported
Adjustment for prior period error or change in accounting policy if applicable
Balance, January 1 as restated
Add: Net Income
Less: Cash Dividends
Stock Dividends
Balance, December 31
IFRS: Statement of Shareholders’ Equity:
Under IFRS, Net Income and Comprehensive Income are carried to the Statemen of Shareholders’ Equity. We will discuss this statement later in the course, but it is presented more like a table than an actual statement, as shown below.
Preferred
Shares
Common
Shares
Contributed
Surplus
Retained
Earnings
Accumulated
OCI
Total
Opening Balance
$
$
$
$
$
$$$
Any Restatement
Opening Restated
$
$
$
$
$
$$$
Issuance of Shares
$
$
$
Repurchase of Shares
($)
($)
($)
Possible
$
Net Income
$
$
OCI
$
$
Comprehensive Income
$
$
$
Dividends
($)
$
Ending Balance
$
$
$
$
$
$$$
* Negative numbers usually appear in brackets
11
COMM 321
Unit 3: The Balance Sheet/Statement of Financial Position (Chapter 5)
The statement that provides a snapshot of everything a company owns
, everything it owes
and the residual position left to the owners
at a specific point in time, is known as The Balance Sheet under ASPE (as well as U.S. GAAP) and as The Statement of Financial Position under IFRS. It provides information about the company’s resources, obligations and structure of its ownership interests.
Users of this statement are assessing liquidity
(how quickly assets can be converted to cash), solvency
(ability to meet its financial obligations), financial flexibility
(ability to respond to unexpected needs or opportunities –
does it have the capacity to issue more debt) and ultimately, book value
(the amount accruing to the owners). Users perform extensive ratio analysis
to explore the relationships between the various components of the statement, in order to compare these ratios to prior years, to competitors and to other industries. Examples include the current ratio, debt to equity ratio, quick ratio, etc. In terms of disclosures, a company must disclose its current and non-current assets, current and non-current liabilities, but the company can choose which order they appear in. Alternatively, a liquidity presentation can be
used where it is judged to be more relevant. Under a liquidity presentation, both assets and liabilities are presented from most liquid to least liquid, regardless of whether being held for the short term or long term. Typically in North America, the format is as follows:
Assets
Liabilities
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
L-T Investments
Long-Term Liabilities
Property, Plant & Equipment
Total Liabilities
Intangible Assets
Shareholders’ Equity
Goodwill
Share Capital, Contributed Surplus
Other Assets
Retained Earnings
Accumulated OCI (IFRS only)
Total Shareholders’ Equity
Total Assets
Total Liabilities plus Shareholders’ Equity
However in Europe, most balance sheets are flipped with the long term assets coming first on the asset side, and
equity appearing at the top of the liabilities and equity side. Both formats are acceptable under IFRS.
Line items to be disclosed per IFRS (* denotes ASPE too) include the following, but it is acceptable to disclose the line item in the notes to the financial statements (which in fact most public companies do).
P. P. & E.*
Investment property*
Intangible assets (goodwill must be disclosed separately)*
Financial assets*
Financial liabilities*
Investments accounted for using the equity method*
Biological assets (livestock, grains)
12
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Inventories*
Trade and other receivables*
Cash and cash equivalents*
Total of assets held for sale*
Total of liabilities in assets held for sale*
Trade and other payables*
Provisions
Current tax assets and liabilities*
Deferred tax assets and liabilities*
Non-controlling interests
Issued capital and reserves attributable to owners
Practice:
A practice balance sheet and solution has been posted in Learn. Download the practice question in Excel – it’s in the format of a trial balance (also appears below) – and try to complete the balance sheet on your own in the typical North American format. Compare your answer to the solution. 13
Zeitz Corporation
Trial Balance
December 31, 2011
Debit
Credit
Accounts Payable
545,000
Accounts Receivable
515,000
Accrued Liabilities
96,000
Accumulated Depreciation - buildings
152,000
Accumulated Depreciation - equipment
60,000
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
80,000
Administrative Expenses
900,000
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
25,000
Bonds Payable
1,000,000
Buildings
1,040,000
Cash
205,000
Common Shares
809,000
Correction of prior year's error (affects income)
140,000
Cost of Goods Sold
4,800,000
Equipment
600,000
Franchise
160,000
Interest Expense 211,000
Inventory
687,000
Investment Gains
63,000
Investment in Bonds (hold to maturity)
299,000
Land 260,000
Long Term Notes Payable
900,000
L-T Investment in Shares (FV through OCI
277,000
- market value = 345,000)
Patent
195,000
Retained Earnings
218,000
Sales
7,960,000
Selling Expenses
1,860,000
S-T Notes Payable
98,000
Trading Securities
153,000
Unusal Gain
160,000
Wages Payable
136,000
12,302,000
12,302,000
1. What was Zeitz's income for the year?
2. Is the above Retained Earnings the opening or closing balance?
3. Prepare a Statement of Financial Position, ignoring income taxes
14
COMM 321 Unit 4: The Statement of Cash Flows (Chapter 5)
A key part of any business is managing its cash
. A company can incur accounting losses and remain in business. It can even use up all of its retained earnings, run huge deficits and still remain in business – many high-tech companies do, particularly in their early years. But a company that runs out of cash is… bankrupt!
The statement of cash flows
presents the sources and uses of a corporation’s cash over a specific period (month, quarter, year). Corporations can generate cash in several ways: through their operations, by selling assets, by borrowing, by issuing shares, etc. Similarly, they can use cash in several ways: in their operations, buying assets, repaying debt, paying dividends on their shares, etc. It is not enough to know whether cash increased or decreased in a period. Investors need to know how the corporation generated its cash and how it used its cash. Consider the following 2 companies that both start the year with $500,000 in cash.
Company A
Company B
Cash, January 1
$500,000
$500,000
Cash, December 31
$1,200,000
$100,000
Cash Flow for the Year
+ $700,000
- $400,000
On the surface, one would say Company A is better at managing its cash. Consider the following further information.
Company A
Company B
Sales
- 200%
+ 300%
Operating Expenses
+ 50%
+ 10%
Assets
Selling
Buying
Debt
In default
Repaying
Equity
Selling
Unchanged
Clearly, to understand a business, a F/S user must know what is happening to cash from different perspectives –
operating, investing and financing. Accountants must therefore r
eport cash flows by operating, investing and financing activities
.
What is Cash?
Cash includes all company bank accounts
right around the globe; foreign accounts are translated at the year-
end foreign exchange rate. If an account is in overdraft (i.e. negative balance), it may be included if it is nettable
against other positive balances; otherwise it must be included in current liabilities (most companies sign an agreement with their bank whereby the bank is able to net positive and negative accounts together; however, a negative account in one bank is never nettable against a positive account in a different bank). If the company is investing in short term investments that are readily convertible to known, fixed amounts of cash, those too may be included. However, they must have maturities of 3 months or less
. If the company is managing a short-term investment portfolio for return rather than liquidity, it is usually excluded from cash and referred to on the balance sheet as marketable securities. 15
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Note that cash subject to restrictions (e.g. sinking funds, or balances that must be maintained pursuant to a loan agreement) must be excluded. Cash received from (or used in) Operating Activities:
This will be the cash flow related to the business’ primary revenue producing activities and other activities that are not investing or financing activities. Since it tells the user how much cash the main business is generating, many analysts regard this as the most important line
in the entire set of financial statements. It includes receipts from customers, payments to suppliers, employees, tax authorities, insurers, etc.
Operating cash flows are generally related to the changes in the working capital accounts
, i.e. Current Assets and Current Liabilities.
Cash received from (or used in) Investing Activities:
This will be the cash flow related to the acquisition and disposal of long-term assets and investments
. It tells the user whether the company is spending money on revenue generating assets or not. It includes purchases of land, buildings or equipment, purchases of investments, as well as the proceeds from the disposition of any assets.
Investing cash flows are generally related to the cash change in the long-term asset accounts (Long-Term Investments, Property, Plant & Equipment).
Cash received from (or used in) Financing Activities:
This will be the cash flow related to changes in the company’s capital base – long term debt and equity
. It tells
the user how the company’s capital base is changing. It includes the proceeds from the issuance of debt or equity securities, the cost of repaying or redeeming debt, the amount spent on repurchasing the company’s own capital stock, as well as the payment of dividends.
Financing cash flows are generally related to the cash change in the Long-Term Liability and Equity accounts.
** Note that significant non-cash transactions are excluded from the Statement of Cash Flows, although they would be disclosed elsewhere. These are transactions such as the acquisition of assets by assuming liabilities, the acquisition of another company by issuing shares, or the conversion of debt to equity. When a transaction is conducted partially using cash and partially non-cash, only the cash part affects the Statement of Cash Flows. For example, if a $60,000 asset is acquired for $50,000 cash plus 200 common shares, the acquisition of the asset would show up in the Cash Flow from Investing Activities as a purchase for $50,000. The remaining $10,000 (and the increase in common shares from the issuance of the 200 shares) would be disclosed in the notes. IFRS vs. ASPE
A significant difference between ASPE and IFRS is the treatment of interest and dividends, both paid and received. Under ASPE interest or dividends paid or received that is included in Net Income must be presented under operating activities
and interest or dividends paid that is deducted from retained earnings must be 16
presented under financing activities
. Therefore, virtually all private companies show interest received and paid,
as well as dividends received under operating activities and dividends paid under financing activities.
IFRS allows the payment of interest or dividends to be treated as either
operating or financing activities, and the receipt of dividends to be treated as either operating or investing activities.
Direct vs. Indirect Method
There are two methods of presenting the cash flow from operating activities: the direct method and the indirect
method. Both IFRS and ASPE allow for the use of either method and the total cash flow from operating activities will be the same under either method
. The U.S. requires companies using the direct method to also include the indirect method. As a result, virtually all North American companies use the indirect method only. Note that the decision only
impacts the appearance of Cash Flow from Operating Activities
. Cash Flow from Investing Activities and Cash Flow from Financing Activities will be the same
under both methods.
The direct method looks like a cash income statement. Instead of Sales
, the top line is Cash Receipts from Customers
. Instead of Cost of Goods Sold
, it discloses Cash paid to Suppliers
. Instead of Wages Expense
, it
discloses Cash paid to Employees
. And so on.
The indirect method on the other hand begins with Net Income
and then adjusts for non-cash items. So depreciation
and any gains or losses on disposal
of assets are both backed out straight away. (Recall that a gain or loss on asset disposal is calculated as the Proceeds Received less the Net Book Value (NBV)
of the asset; the proceeds are usually the cash item, but the NBV is the asset’s cost less the asset’s accumulated depreciation, which is non-cash.) After these two items, the changes in the working capital accounts are either added or subtracted.
Direct Method The direct method uses data from both the income statement and balance sheet to arrive at the individual line items. It is a key takeaway from COMM 321 to be able to calculate the line items for the direct method once you have been given an income statement and a balance sheet.
Keep in mind that you are calculating the impact on cash for the current year
. In the following sections, assume a December 31 year-end.
Cash Receipts from Customers: On the income statement, customers impact Net Sales; on the balance sheet, customers impact Accounts Receivable and Unearned Revenue. To arrive at the cash receipts from customers, the starting point is Sales. The January 1 balance in Accounts Receivable will have been collected by year-end
but those receivables are not included in this year’s Sales. The December 31 Accounts Receivables were included in this year’s Sales but will not have been collected yet. So the cash received from most customers this
year will be Net Sales + Opening Accounts Receivable – Ending Accounts Receivable.
Unearned Revenues represent cash that a company has collected from customers before the company provides
goods or services. As such they are a current liability – the company owes its customer goods or services. The journal entries are typically as follows.
When the money is collected:
DR Cash
$$$
CR Unearned Revenue
$$$
17
When the goods or services are delivered to the customer (and therefore earned):
DR Unearned Revenue
$$$
CR Sales
$$$
The January 1 balance in Unearned Revenue was collected last year
but the amount is included in this year’s Sales. The December 31 balance was collected this year
but is not included in this year’s Sales. Hence the total Cash Receipts from Customers for this year will be as follows:
Cash Receipts from Customers
= Net Sales + Opening Accounts Receivable – Ending Accounts Receivable +
Ending Unearned Revenue – Opening Unearned Revenue
Cash Payments to Suppliers: In calculating payments to suppliers, the starting point is to recognize that payments to suppliers run through the Purchases
account. Recall the Cost of Goods Sold formula. If CGS is Cost of Goods Sold, OI is Opening Inventory, P is Purchases and EI is Ending Inventory, then the formula is:
CGS = OI + P – EI, or P = CGS – OI + EI
Purchases also impact Accounts Payable
. For this exercise assume all Accounts Payable relate to Purchases. The opening Accounts Payable have been paid
but are not reflected in this year’s Purchases. The ending Accounts Payable are reflected in this year’s Purchases but have not yet been paid
. Hence the Cash Paid to Suppliers for the current year will be as follows:
Cash Paid to Suppliers
= Cost of Goods Sold – Opening Inventory + Ending Inventory + Opening Accounts Payable – Ending Accounts Payable
Cash Payments to Employees: On the income statement, payments to employees will run through the Wages or Salaries Expense
account. On the balance sheet, payments to employees will run through the Wages or Salaries Payable
account. Similar to the above analysis, the Opening Wages (Salaries) Payable have been paid to employees but are not included in Wages (Salaries) Expense. The Ending Wages (Salaries) Payable are included in Wages (Salaries) Expense but have not yet been paid. So this year’s Cash Paid to Employees is:
Cash Paid to Employees = Wages (Salaries) Expense + Opening Wages (Salaries) Payable – Ending Wages (Salaries) Payable
Other Cash Payments: Most other cash payments will be calculated in the exact same way. So Cash Payments to Lenders
will be Interest Expense + Opening Interest Payable – Ending Interest Payable. Cash Payments to Governments will be Tax Expense + Opening Tax Payable – Ending Tax Payable.
The exceptions will be any expenses that must be prepaid
, such as insurance or rent. An example will illustrate how to make these calculations.
Example:
ABC Corporation prepays its insurance on April 1 of every year. In 2018, they prepaid $12,000 (i.e. $1,000 per month) and in 2019, they prepaid $18,000 (i.e. $1,500 per month). Hence on the December 31, 2018 balance sheet, their Prepaid Insurance account was at $3,000 and on December 31, 2019 it was $4,500. On the December 31, 2019 income statement, insurance expense was shown as $16,500. What was their cash paid to insurers for 2019? 18
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
The 2018 Prepaid Insurance is part of 2019 Insurance Expense but was not paid
in 2019. The 2019 Prepaid Insurance was paid
in 2019 but is not part of 2019 Insurance Expense. The cash paid to insurers in 2019 is:
Cash Paid to Insurers
= Insurance Expense – Opening Prepaid Insurance + Ending Prepaid Insurance
= $16,500 – $3,000 + $4,500 = $18,000
Once all the calculations are complete, the operating activities section of the Statement of Cash Flows will look something like the following when the direct method is used.
Cash receipts from customers
Less:
Cash paid to suppliers
Cash paid to employees
Cash paid to Lenders
Cash paid to governments
Cash paid to insurers/landlords
Cash paid for Other Expenses
= Cash provided by operating activities
Indirect Method
As mentioned, the indirect method begins with Net Income and then adjusts for non-cash items, starting with Depreciation and any gains/losses from asset disposals. However, changes in the company’s working capital accounts will impact cash flow from operating activities. How?
Recall the accounting equation: Assets = Liabilities + Equity or A = L + E A company’s cash flow for the year is the change in its cash balance from January 1 to December 31 of that year, assuming a December 31 year-end. So in terms of an equation, we have:
Cash Flow = Δ Cash for the year (C = Cash)
A = L + SE
Δ
A = Δ
L + Δ
SE
Δ (C + Non-Cash A) = Δ
L + Δ
SE Δ C = Δ
L + Δ
SE – Δ Non-Cash A
Hence if non-cash assets increase
, cash will decrease
; if non-cash assets decrease
, cash will increase.
If liabilities or equity increase
, cash will increase
; if liabilities and equity decrease
, cash will decrease
. So for the indirect method, any increases
in Accounts Receivable or Inventory are deducted from Net Income whereas any decreases are added. Any increases
in Accounts Payable, Wages Payable or Taxes Payable would be added
to Net Income whereas any decreases would be deducted.
19
So under the indirect method the operating activities section of the Statement of Cash Flows will look something like the following:
Net Income
+ Depreciation
- Gain (Loss) on Asset Disposal
- Increases (Decreases) in C/A balances (other than Cash!)
+ Increases (Decreases) in C/L balances
= Cash Flow from Operating Activities
Comparing the Direct Method to the Indirect Method:
Direct:
Indirect:
Favoured by standards setters
Most popular in North America by far
Favoured by lenders
Reconciles to other statements (I/S, B/S)
Quasi cash income statement
Line items are not cash items
More meaningful, relevant to those who want cash flow info since the line items are real activities
Shows management of working capital and its effect on cash (e.g. reducing inventory, extending payables
Considered easier to read
Required by US even when direct method is used
Cash Flow Statement – Example of Indirect and Direct Methods from Balance Sheet and Income Statement
The following is a simple example of a Statement of Cash Flows. Note that we are given the Income statement and Balance Sheet, but all line items on the cash flow statement must be calculated. Be sure to note that the difference in account balances tells the reader what must have happened. For example, we see that equipment has increased from $49,500 to $135,000. Hence the company must have purchased equipment which will appear in the investing activities section. Similarly, we see the company’s Common Shares have increased – hence they must have issued common shares during the year (financing activities).
Although we are not told that the company paid dividends, we can see they must have. The retained earnings started the year at $76,500 and the company earned $225,000. If we add the two together, we get $301,500. But the ending retained earnings balance is $216,000. Retained earnings are only impacted by net income and dividends. Hence the company must have paid out dividends of $85,500 – this will appear in the financing activities section.
20
ABC Company
Income Statement
For the year ended December 31, 2005
Sales
$ 495,000
Cost of goods sold
166,500
Gross margin
328,500
Operating expenses:
Selling and Admin.
67,500
Depreciation
36,000
Total operating expenses 103,500
Net Income $225,000
ABC Company
Balance Sheet
As at December 31, 2005
Assets
Current Assets
Dec. 31, 2005
Dec. 31, 2004
Cash
$135,000
$ 58,500
Accounts receivable 202,500
225,000
Inventory
274,500
171,000
Total current assets
612,000
454,500
Capital Assets
Equipment 135,000
49,500
Less: depreciation (amortization)
(36,000
)
0
Net equipment
99,000
49,500
Total Assets
$711,000
$504,000
Current Liabilities Accounts payable
$36,000
$ 40,500
Salaries payable
54,000
27,000
Total Liabilities
$90,000
$ 67,500
Shareholders’ Equity
Common shares
405,000 360,000
Retained earnings
216,000
76,500
Total Liabilities & Shareholder Equity $711,000
$504,000
Other Information:
Assume there were no non-cash transactions during the year.
Required:
Prepare
a Statement of Cash Flows using both the indirect and direct methods.
21
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Cash Flow Statement
For the Year Ended December 31, 2005
Cash Flow from Operating Activities – Indirect Method
Net Income
$225,000
Add Depreciation
36,000
(Increase) Decrease in A/R
22,500
(Increase) Decrease in Inventory
(103,500)
Increase (Decrease) in Accounts Payable
(4,500)
Increase (Decrease) in Salaries Payable
27,000
Net Cash from Operating Activities
$202,500 (A)
Cash Flow from Operating Activities – Direct Method
Cash Received from Customers
$517,500
(495,000+225,000–202,500)
Cash Paid to Suppliers
274,500
(166,500+274,500-171,000+40,500-36,000)
Cash Paid re Selling and Admin
40,50
0
(67,500+27,000-54,000)
Net Cash from Operating Activities
$202,500 (A)
Cash Flow from Investing Activities:
Purchase of Equipment
($85,500)
(135,000-49,500)
Net Cash from Investing Activities
($85,500) (B)
Cash Flow from Financing Activities:
Common Shares Issuance
$45,000
(405,000-360,000)
Cash Dividends Paid
85,500
(76,500+225,000-216,000)
Net Cash from Financing Activities
($40,500)
(C)
Net Increase in Cash
$76,500
(A) + (B) + (C)
Cash, beginning of year
$58,500
(agrees to Balance Sheet)
Cash, end of year
$135,000
(agrees to Balance Sheet)
Practice:
A practice statement of cash flows and solution has been posted in Learn. It is slightly more difficult than the above but incorporates the material presented in this unit. Download the practice question in Excel –
you have been given the income statement and balance sheet, as well as necessary additional information. Try to complete the Statement of Cash Flows on your own using both the direct and indirect method. Compare your answer to the solution. 22
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
COMM 321
Unit 5: Revenue Recognition (Chapter 6)
Revenue is an important part of any business. For accountants, the issue is when to recognize it. When goods are sold in a market for cash, it is obvious when to recognize the revenue. However, most business revenues are more complex. Goods and services may be bundled, warranties may be offered, payment terms may be overly generous and there may be return options that extend months into the future.
Historically, the earnings approach
was the standard around the globe – revenue is recognized when it is earned
. To assess whether it has been earned, accountants looked at whether the risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred
, whether the earnings process is substantially complete, whether or not the price is measurable and whether or not collectability is reasonably assured. ASPE
uses the earnings approach for revenue recognition.
However, effective for years beginning after January 1, 2018, IFRS
adopted a contract-based approach
to revenue recognition. There are 5 steps involved in this approach, which will be expanded upon below.
Identify the contract with the customer
Identify the performance obligations in the contract
Determine the contract price
Allocate the price to the performance obligations
Recognize revenue as each performance obligation is satisfied
Goods vs. Services
For goods
, a key distinction is FOB shipping vs. FOB destination
– these are terms usually specified on the invoice to indicate where title passes and therefore when revenue should be recognized. FOB shipping means title passes to the customer when it leaves the point of shipping, i.e. the seller’s premises; FOB destination means title passes when it reaches the destination, i.e. the customer’s premises.
An interesting legal case involved the Canadian drug maker Biovail. They missed an earnings target one quarter
by $5 million and claimed it was because a truck had crashed on route to a customer in the Southern U.S. The truck did actually crash; it made headlines at the time since the entire load was lost. Analysts quickly tried to calculate whether $5 million worth of drugs could fit into one transport truck and confirmed that it was possible.
However, when the SEC learned that the truck had left Biovail a day before quarter-end and the trip would typically take 2 days, they fined the company $10 million for misleading investors. The SEC figured out that if Biovail sold its products FOB shipping, then the truckload would have been included in earnings. On the other hand, if Biovail sold its products FOB destination, the truckload was never going to be part of the quarter’s earnings since it wasn’t going to arrive until the day after quarter-end. So regardless, the crash had no impact on
the quarter’s earnings. The company paid the fine without admitting it did anything wrong.
For services
, it’s important to distinguish between those that have a discrete earnings
process vs. those that have a continuous earnings
process. 23
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Services that have a discrete earnings process
(e.g. a car tune-up, tax return preparation) are services where the
seller earns revenue upon providing a discrete service. The seller should only recognize revenue when they are finished providing the service. This is called the completed contract method
– revenues and gross profit are only recognized when the contract is complete.
Services that have a continuous earnings process
(e.g. a construction project, a lengthy consulting engagement) are services where the seller is required to perform many ongoing acts and can measure the performance on an ongoing basis. In this case, revenue should be recognized in accordance with work performed. This is referred to as the percentage-of-completion method
.
At any point in time, the percentage complete = the costs incurred to date/(costs incurred to date + estimated costs to complete)
As such, the revenue to be recognized will = total revenue * % complete – revenue recognized in prior periods
Gross Profit to be recognized = Current year revenue – current year costs
Note that these sorts of sales are usually managed by a project manager who keeps track of the work performed and is constantly re-estimating the costs to complete. Hence calculating the percentage complete is straightforward.
Example:
A company bids on and wins a contract to build a parking garage for a city. It will take 3 years to build. At the beginning, the estimated total costs
are $8,000,000. The price the city has agreed to pay is fixed at
$11,000,000 (FP)
. The company can bill the city pre-determined amounts based on milestones specified in the contract. For example, when the city approves the drawing for the garage, the company can bill them $250,000. This is referred to as a progress billing. A project manager is responsible for estimating the total costs, managing the workers, keeping track of the work performed and sending out the billings throughout the 3-year period. A summary of each year’s activity appears below.
2010
2011
2012
Costs incurred to date
$3,060,000
$6,435,000
$9,300,000
Estimated costs to complete
$4,595,000
$2,656,000
0
Progress billings in total
$4,000,000
$6,300,000
$11,000,000
Cash collected in total
$3,500,000
$5,000,000
$11,000,000
Solution: Percentage Completion Method
2010
2011
2012
Costs incurred to date (CI)
$3,060,000
$6,435,000
$9,300,000
Estimated costs to complete
$4,595,000
$2,656,000
0
Estimated total costs (ETC)
$7,655,000
$9,091,000
$9,300,000
% complete = CI/ETC
39.9739%
70.7843%
100%
Revenue to recognize = % * FP
$4,397,126
$7,786,272
$11,000,000
Less prior years
0
$4,397,126
$7,786,272
Current year revenue
$4,397,126
$3,389,146
$3,213,728
Current year costs
$3,060,000
$3,375,000
$2,865,000
Gross Profit
$1,337,126
$14,146
$348,728
24
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
25
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Entries: (Percentage Completion)
2010
2011
2012
DR Contract Asset
$3,060,000
$3,375,000
$2,865,000
CR RM, A/P, Cash, etc.
$3,060,000
$3,375,000
$2,865,000
To record costs of construction
DR Accounts Receivable
$4,000,000
$2,300,000
$4,700,000
CR Contract Asset
$4,000,000
$2,300,000
$4,700,000
To record billings
DR Cash
$3,500,000
$1,500,000
$6,000,000
CR Accounts Receivable
$3,500,000
$1,500,000
$6,000,000
To record collections
DR Contract Asset
$4,397,126
$3,389,146
$3,213,728
CR Revenue
$4,397,126
$3,389,146
$3,213,728
To record construction revenues
DR Construction Expenses
$3,060,000
$3,375,000
$2,865,000
CR Contract Asset
$3,060,000
$3,375,000
$2,865,000
To record construction expenses
Note that the Contract Asset appears as either a Current Asset or Current Liability at the end of the year depending on whether it is in a debit or credit position. The net amount will be a liability if billings exceed revenue recognized. In the above example, the net position would appear as an asset for $397,126 in 2010 and for $1,486,272 in 2011. Obviously, the Balance Sheet is clear of all amounts by the time the contract is finished in 2012.
ASPE allows for the use of the completed contract method for these types of sales although in practice it is almost never used. There would be no income or expenses recorded until 2012 when the revenues would be $11,000,000 and the expenses would be $9,300,000.
26
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Other Situations:
Bundled goods and/or services.
This is when products are bundled together and sold for a discounted price, e.g. sell A for $50 and B for $75 but agree to sell a package of the two together for $100. In this case the revenues are allocated based on relative fair value. So A’s revenue = 50/125*100 = $40 and B’s revenue = $60. It is also possible to use a method referred to as the residual value method when some products do not have standalone prices. In this method we use the standalone prices for the units that have them and the residual value for the unit that doesn’t. So if we assume in the above example that A, B and C were bundled for $150 say, we would use $50 for A, $75 for B and the residual value or $25 for C. Sales on Consignment.
This is an arrangement common in big ticket items, especially if they are sold through a
network of dealers. The manufacturer ships the goods to the dealer “on consignment”. This means that title to the goods remains with the manufacturer
until the goods are sold by the dealer. The Consignor is the manufacturer and the Consignee is the dealer. The Consignee doesn’t send any cash for the goods until they are sold. Normally the Consignee is paid a selling commission. If the goods are never sold, they’re returned to the Consignor. Note that the Consignor maintains an Inventory on Consignment
account in addition to the normal
inventory accounts. Often the Consignor is also responsible for freight and marketing costs.
Example:
A consignor ships $150,000 worth of goods to a consignee. The consignor then receives a bill for the
freight out of $1,000. The Consignee pays for $500 of marketing costs and then sells the goods for $225,000. The Consignee thus earns a 10% commission. The accounting entries would be as follows.
Consignor
Consignee
Consignor ships $150,000 worth of goods to Consignee.
DR Inventory on Consignment $150,000
No entry.
CR Finished Goods Inventory $150,000
Consignor pays freight out - $1,000
DR Inventory on Consignment $1,000
No entry.
CR Cash
$1,000
Consignee pays $500 marketing costs
No entry.
DR Receivable from Consignor $500
CR Cash
$500
Sale of goods for $225,000 cash
No entry
DR Cash $225,000
CR Payable to Consignor $225,000
Notification and remittance to Consignor
DR Cash
$202,000
DR Payable to Consignor
$225,000
DR Marketing Expense
$ 500
CR Receivable – Consignor
$ 500
DR Commission Expense
$ 22,500
CR Commission Revenue
$ 22,500
CR Revenue
$225,000
CR Cash
$202,000
DR Cost of Goods Sold
$151,000
27
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
CR Inventory on Consignment $151,000
(includes freight costs)
Abnormal business terms.
These are things such as extended payment terms (well beyond normal), billing a customer but not shipping goods until much later or vice versa. A practice that used to be common by salesmen seeking to increase their commissions around Christmas would be to “sell” a large amount of goods to a favourite customer, telling their contact they can return them in January. In all cases the accountant must use their professional judgment to determine if a sale has actually occurred using tests outlined above (i.e. risks and rewards of ownership having transferred, earnings process complete, collectability assured, price determinable).
Contract Based Approach to Revenue Recognition (IFRS 15)
The earnings approach to revenue recognition can be subject to abuse (there can be different views on what the earnings process is and when complete) and difficult to apply. The contract based approach was developed to be
less subjective. It focuses on the rights and obligations present in actual contracts and recognizes revenue when the rights/obligations change.
Step 1: Identify the contract
with a customer. This means the contract has been approved by both parties and they are committed to carrying it out, the rights to goods and services and the payment terms can be identified, the transaction has commercial substance and collection is probable. Note that if each party has the right to terminate the contract without paying further compensation, then the contract does not exist.
Step 2: Identify the separate performance obligations
in contract and whether they are distinct or bundled (distinct if could be sold separately or customer benefits separately); if distinct, treat separately.
Step 3: Determine the transaction price
including any variable components and financing components if the contract is for greater than a year and/or payments are more than a year away. Any non-cash consideration is included at fair value. Credit risk is usually considered separately.
Step 4: Allocate the purchase price to the separate performance obligations
using stand-alone selling prices as a guide. In cases where there are no stand-alone selling prices, the accountant can use market prices for similar items as a guide, or can use the residual value method referred to above.
Step 5: Recognize revenue when (or as) the performance obligations are satisfied, based on whether the performance obligation is satisfied over time or at a specific point in time
. If the obligation is satisfied over time, the revenue should be recognized over time too, using the percentage-of-completion method. If the obligation is satisfied at a point of time, then the revenue can only be recognized when the obligation is satisfied. Indicators that the obligation has been satisfied include physical possession of goods, legal title, risks and rewards of ownership, the customer’s acceptance and/or the seller’s right to payment.
Applying the Contract Based Approach
Bell Computers sells its computers with a 90-day warranty. Historically, Bell incurs $50 in costs for providing this service. Bell also offers a 2-year extended warranty which customers can purchase for an additional cost 28
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
equating to 30% of the computer’s selling price. Occasionally Bell will sell the computer on extended payment terms.
29
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Situation 1:
Bell sells a computer for $1,000 cash and the customer declines the extended warranty.
The sale of hardware with a 90-day warranty is considered one performance obligation since the warranty is an assurance warranty
– it assures
the customer the product is free of defects when it is sold (all Bell products are
sold with this warranty). In this case the entire $1,000 is allocated to sales when the product is delivered and the
$50 estimate for the warranty liability must also be recorded. The journal entry is:
DR Cash
$1,000
DR Warranty Expense
$ 50
CR Sales
$1,000
CR Warranty Liability
$ 50
Situation 2:
Same situation but the customer accepts the extended warranty for a price of $300 and pays cash. The extended warranty
is a separate performance obligation and must be recognized over the length of the warranty period, usually on a straight-line basis (i.e. in this case $300/24 or $12.50 in revenue would be recognized every month). The costs of this warranty would be expensed as incurred. The journal entry is:
DR Cash
$1,300
DR Warranty Expense
$ 50
CR Sales
$1,000
CR Unearned Revenue
$ 300
CR Warranty Liability
$ 50
Situation 3:
Same situation – customer buys the computer with the extended warranty – but instead of cash upfront, Bell is to receive $300 cash upfront, $650 a year from now and a second $650 two years from now.
The payments do not match the delivery of goods to the customer (i.e. receives the goods immediately but pays over time) – the company is providing financing
to the customer. The financing is a separate source of revenue and must be accounted for separately. To calculate the interest being charged we must determine the interest rate being charged. To do this, we equate the cash option with the present value of the deferred payment option
and use the Excel RATE function (or a financial calculator) to get the interest rate.
Solve $1,300 = $300 + $650*(1+i)^-1 + $650*(1+i)^-2 to get i= 19.427% (Using Excel RATE function)
Payment
Principal
Interest
Balance
1,000.00
650.00
455.73
194.27
544.27
650.00
544.27
105.73
0
The journal entry is: DR Cash
$ 300
DR Note Receivable
$1,000
DR Warranty Expense
$ 50
CR Sales
$1,000
CR Unearned Revenue
$ 300
30
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
CR Warranty Liability
$ 50
When Bell receives its first payment, the entry will be:
DR Cash
$650.00
CR Note Receivable
$455.73
CR Interest Revenue (1000*19.427%)
$194.27
When Bell receives its second payment, the entry will be:
DR Cash
$650.00
CR Note Receivable
$544.27
CR Interest Revenue (544.27*19.427%)
$105.73
31
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
COMM 321
Unit 6: Accounts Receivable (Chapter 7)
Trade Receivables:
A corporation can have amounts receivable from customers, employees and others. These amounts can be classified as trade or non-trade
(i.e. related to the normal course of business or not) and as current (less than 1
year) or non-current
. The company may also have notes receivable or even loans receivable. A note receivable
is evidenced by a promissory note and usually bears interest. Trade receivables are usually only evidenced by a sales invoice and shipping document, and typically do not bear interest, at least for the first 30 or 60 or 90 days.
Every company would prefer to sell for
cash only
, but the business reality is, in most industries, companies can only sell on account – customers are typically given 30 days to pay for the goods or services received. Since the revenue has been earned, both the sale and the account receivable must be recorded. To understand the accounting, it is helpful to understand the business reality
behind corporations extending credit to customers.
Corporations typically have a credit manager
or credit department that approves customers for credit, before the first sale is finalized. Approval is generally based on a review of the customer’s financial statements and/or a credit check. Credit bureaus keep information about companies and their credit history, providing it to corporations for a fee. At the time of sale, the credit manager is fully expecting all customers will be able to pay
the amount they owe.
Unfortunately, the business reality is some customers won’t pay. In terms of how it unfolds, the credit manager keeps an aged accounts receivable trial balance
. This is a listing of all accounts receivable, showing which ones are less than 30 days old, which are 31-60 days old, 61-90 days old and so on. The credit manager is usually not too worried about amounts that are less than 60 days old. At 60 days old though, the manager will likely phone the customer or send a letter off reminding them payment is due. If payment still does not occur, the actions will get more aggressive – letters threatening legal action or the use of a collection agent. Unfortunately, the cost of legal action makes it impractical for amounts that are less than say $10,000. Every corporation has different policies on when they give up chasing the customer, but at somewhere between 180 days and a year after the sale was initially made, the account is written off.
From an accounting standpoint, the matching principle
requires that expenses be recorded in the same period as the related revenue. The bad debt is considered the cost of selling on account
, and the revenue is recorded long before the corporation knows the account will be written off. As such, every company must estimate
how much of their sales will eventually prove to be uncollectible and record the expense in the period of sale. There are two ways to estimate the amount of bad debts:
Estimate as a % of Sales
, e.g. 1%, 1.5%, etc.
Estimate as a % of aged accounts receivables
, e.g. ½% of amounts under 30 days, 1% of amounts 31-
60 days old, etc. Estimates are made based on historical experience
and most companies use both methods
. When sales are made, the accountant automatically adds the percentage amount to bad debts expense. So if a company’s experience has been that despite all its best efforts, 1.2% of all sales eventually go bad, a sale for $750 would 32
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
result in the sale being recorded (DR Accounts Receivable, CR Sales) plus a second entry to record the bad debt
(1.2% of $750). The bad debts expense entry would be:
DR Bad Debts Expense
$9.00
CR Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
$9.00
Note that the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts is netted against the Accounts Receivable balance on any reporting date (which is why it is referred to as a Contra-Asset account). As a result, Accounts Receivable are always reported at their net realizable value
. The companies typically use the % of aged accounts receivable method at quarter-end or at year-end to see if the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts balance is reasonable. They will then adjust the allowance to the amount they believe is appropriate. So if a company determined that the balance should be $125,000 say (the Allowance
should be a credit balance), but the actual balance showing was $140,000 (CR), they would make the following entry to bring the allowance to the correct amount.
DR Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
$15,000
CR Bad Debts Expense
$15,000
The allowance is always brought to the correct amount with the other side of the entry being bad debts expense.
Writing Off Individual Accounts Receivable:
When an account does eventually go bad, it must be written off. This only occurs after a corporation has done everything it can to recover the money (friendly reminders, phone calls, nasty letters, collection agents, etc.). Note that there is no income statement affect at that time
because the expense has already been recorded in the month of sale. However, the balance sheet accounts must be tidied up – the account must be removed from both the accounts receivable balance and from the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts balance. Therefore, the entry is:
DR Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
$$$
CR Accounts Receivable
$$$
Recovery of Accounts Previously Written Off:
Occasionally an account is written off but a few months later, the amount is recovered. This can occur when the customer’s financial situation improves or if they happen to receive additional financing and can pay back their suppliers. From a business standpoint if they hope to resume dealing with past suppliers, they will first have to pay off their existing debts
. From an accounting perspective, the write-off must therefore be reversed, and the collection of cash must be recorded (i.e. 2 entries). The entries are therefore:
DR Accounts Receivable
$$$
CR Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
$$$
DR Cash
$$$
CR Accounts Receivable
$$$
33
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
34
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Example:
ABC Corporation estimates its Bad Debts Expense in two ways. Throughout the year, they write off 1/2% of sales as bad debts expense. Then at year-end, they analyse their aged A/R trial balance and estimate bad debts to
be the following:
Aging Category
Estimated % that will be Delinquent
2010 YE Balance
< 30 days
0.5%
$2,400,000
31-60 days
1.25%
$1,150,000
61-90 days
2.5%
$ 400,000
> 90 days
7.5%
$ 150,000
$4,100,000
In 2010, ABC recorded total credit sales of $12,600,000 and cash sales of $250,000. Write-offs of A/R that were judged to be uncollectible totalled $24,500. There was also a recovery of a previously written off account, amounting to $400. The opening balance in the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts was $12,000 (usual sign). Required: Prepare summary journal entries to record bad debts for 2010. Illustrate the year-end Balance Sheet presentation for Accounts Receivable.
Throughout the year bad debts expense is increased by ½% of sales. Note that this applies to credit sales only
.
DR Bad Debts Expense (1/2% of $12,600,000)
$63,000
CR Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
$63,000
The write-offs would result in the following entry:
DR Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
$24,500
CR Accounts Receivable
$24,500
The recovery of the amount written off would be treated as follows:
DR Accounts Receivable $400
CR Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
$400
DR Cash
$400
CR Accounts Receivable
$400
The Allowance for Doubtful Accounts would be adjusted to the amount produced using the % of aged accounts receivable method. The balance in the account should be (based on the percentages above):
(2,400,000*.005 + 1,150,000*.0125 + 400,000*.025 + 150,000*.075) = $47,625CR
The account pre-adjustment is: $12,000CR + 63,000CR + 400CR - 24,500DR = $50,900CR
Therefore the adjusting entry is:
DR Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
$3,275
CR Bad Debts Expense
$3,275
The year-end Balance Sheet presentation would show both the gross Accounts Receivable and net, as follows:
Accounts Receivable
$4,100,000
35
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Less: Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
($47,625)
$4,052,375
Discounts, Credit Cards and Returns
Sales Discounts if customer pays early:
To entice customers to pay early, corporations will often offer sales discounts
. Assume ABC Corporation offers 2/10, n/30 payment terms. This means customers can deduct 2% off their sales amount if they pay in 10 days. The entire amount is due in 30 days regardless. This is a good transaction for both
seller and buyer. From the buyer’s standpoint, the 2% discount translates to an annual interest rate over 30%, so even if they have to borrow to take advantage, it’s worth it. From the seller’s standpoint they get paid early which means they can buy more goods to sell and earn their gross margin on additional purchases (gross margins are often in excess of
40%). From an accounting standpoint, the discount is recorded only when it’s taken. Assume on Feb 1, ABC sells $1,500 of goods to DEF Corporation. The entry is:
DR Accounts Receivable $1,500
CR Sales
$1,500
DEF decides to pay on Feb 11 (10 days later) and takes the discount. ABC’s entry to record the payment is:
DR
Cash
$1,470
DR
Sales Discounts
$30
CR
Accounts Receivable
$1,500
Sales Discounts can be either a contra-revenue account that goes with Sales on the Income Statement in arriving at Net Sales or it can be recorded as an expense and recorded with other Selling Expenses as part of SG&A Expenses.
Credit Card Sales
Companies sell via credit cards since it increases sales, they don’t have to take customer credit (instead they take Visa, MasterCard or American Express credit), they get their cash quickly and administration is easier. Assume ABC Corporation sells $1,000 via credit card and the credit card company charges a 3% fee. The entry for the sale is:
DR Accounts Receivable (Credit card supplier)
$970
DR Credit Card Charges
$30
CR Sales
$1,000
Credit Card Charges also can be either
a contra-revenue account that goes with Sales on the Income Statement in arriving at Net Sales or it can be recorded as an expense and recorded with other Selling Expenses.
Note that Sales Returns are always
recorded as a contra revenue account
in arriving at Net Sales on the Income Statement (i.e. deducted from Gross Sales).
36
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
37
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Buying Long-Term Notes Receivable
Companies may sometimes buy long term notes receivable at a price equal to the present value of the cash flows
. If interest rates are the same as the rate the note was written at, the note can be purchased at face value. Otherwise, it will be bought at either a premium or discount (i.e. either over or under face value respectively). Example:
A four-year note receivable for $50,000, paying 8% compounded annually with bullet repayment is purchased at face value. The entry would be:
DR Notes Receivable
$50,000
CR Cash
$50,000
If, however, the note was purchased to yield 10% compounded annually, the value of the note would be the present value of the interest and principal at 10% compounded annually. The PV of the principal is: $50,000*(1.1)^-4 = $34,150.67
The PV of the interest is: 4000 * (1-1.1^-4)/.1 = $12,679.46
The purchase price of the note is therefore $46,830.13
The entry to record the purchase is the same as above except the amount would be $46,830.13.
To record interest, the Effective Interest Method is used which mirrors the business reality: the note was purchased to yield 10% interest, so the 10% interest is recorded every year
. An amortization table will illustrate:
Year
Cash Payment
Interest Income
Carrying Value
0
$46,830.13
1
$4,000
$4,683.01
$47,513.14
2
$4,000
$4,751.31
$48,264.45
3
$4,000
$4,826.45
$49,090.90
4
$4,000
$4,909.10
$50,000.00
So the entry to record the first payment will be: DR Cash
$4,000.00
DR Notes Receivable
$ 683.01
(46830.13*10% - 4000)
CR Interest Revenue
$4,683.01
Other Transactions
Assigning Accounts Receivable as security for a loan
This is very common in Canada, especially amongst private companies. The accounts receivable are assigned to
a bank as security for an operating line of credit. There is no accounting impact but the fact they have been assigned as security for a loan must be disclosed in the notes to the financial statements.
Factoring or Selling Accounts Receivable – conditions for sale treatment
38
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Some companies factor or sell their accounts receivable as a way to generate liquidity. Often they use the proceeds to pay down debt. As such, it is important that the sale be recorded and the accounts receivable are removed from the balance sheet. Accountants have arrived at the following conditions which must all be present
in order for the transaction to be recorded as a bona fide sale:
1.
The transferred assets must be identifiable and isolated from seller
2.
The Seller must have the right to pledge or sell the assets
3.
The Seller must not maintain control through a repurchase agreement
Companies sell receivables with or without recourse
. Recourse is the right of a buyer to go back to the seller and get reimbursed if the collectability of the Accounts Receivable is much worse than expected. If a company sells without recourse, they will receive less than the face value of the receivables but will have no further obligation if collections fall short. So a company selling $900,000 worth of accounts receivable for $880,000 without recourse would record the following entry:
DR Cash
$880,000
DR Loss on Sale of Receivables
$20,000
CR Accounts Receivable
$900,000
If a company sells its receivables with recourse, they must estimate the future liability
related to the recourse obligations. In the above example, assume the A/R were sold for $880,000 but the seller agrees to reimburse the
buyer for any accounts over $5,000 that go delinquent. They estimate they will eventually have to pay a further $10,000 to satisfy this obligation. The entry would then be:
DR Cash
$880,000
DR Loss on Sale of Receivables
$ 30,000
CR Accounts Receivable
$900,000
CR Recourse Liability
$ 10,000
Accounts Receivable Disclosure Requirements
Receivables must be segregated between trade receivables, amounts due from related parties, any prepayments, or other significant amounts.
There must be separate reporting of current and non-current receivables, including the maturity dates for
non-current receivables
The amount of any allowance for doubtful accounts must be disclosed. Further, under IFRS, the changes
in the allowance account over the past year must be disclosed in the notes.
The amount of any interest income related to receivables as well as any impairment losses (bad debt expense) must also be disclosed.
Any sales of receivables must be disclosed, describing the typical transaction, the accounts affected, how the amounts determined (e.g. transfer at PV of future expected cash flows), and any future obligations related to the sales.
If the accounts receivable have been assigned as security for a loan, the amount pledged as well as details of the loan must be disclosed in the notes to the F/S.
39
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
COMM 321
Unit 7: Inventory (Chapter 8)
Inventory is an asset that is either being held for sale or being held for use in production. The corporations that hold inventory are retailers, wholesalers and manufacturers. In all cases, inventory is included in Current Assets, and in North America, appears after Accounts Receivable. It is presented at the lower of cost and net realizable value.
Retailers and Wholesalers typically have one inventory account where cost includes all costs incurred to bring
the goods to a saleable condition and/or location
. This may include freight, non-refundable sales taxes, purchase discounts, import duties, preparation costs if applicable, storage, etc. Interest costs are also eligible if the loan is specifically related to inventory.
Manufacturers on the other hand have three inventory accounts: Raw Materials (RM), Work-in-Process (WIP) and Finished Goods (FG). The factory is typically divided into separate spaces for each, in some cases separated by a fence. The RM arrive from suppliers – these are the basic materials needed to make the product –
and are released into WIP where direct labour and manufacturing overhead are added. Once complete, the goods go to FG where they remain until sold to a customer. Manufacturing overhead is all the costs incurred in the factory other than direct labour and direct materials, e.g. rent, depreciation, supervisory salaries, maintenance costs, insurance, etc. Again, interest costs can be included if the loan is specifically related to inventory.
It is useful for students to picture
a manufacturer’s building as follows.
Factory
Raw Materials
incl.
material cost only
Factory
Work-in-Process
incl.
direct labour, direct materials,
manufacturing overhead
Factory
Finished Goods
incl.
direct labour, direct materials,
manufacturing overhead
Office
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
It is very important for a student to recognize that all costs incurred in the factory
go first into inventory, which is a Balance Sheet
account. In contrast, all costs incurred in the office
are SG&A expenses which appears on the Income Statement
. Factory costs don’t impact the Income Statement until the goods are sold
.
Cost of Goods Sold is the
cost of inventory that has been sold and relates directly to sales. It can be calculated by compiling the actual costs or by using the Cost of Goods Sold equation. This depends on whether the company uses a perpetual inventory system or a periodic inventory system (see below).
The cost of goods sold equation is:
CGS = OI + P – EI
where:
CGS = Cost of Goods Sold
OI = Beginning Inventory
P = Purchases
EI = Ending Inventory
40
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
**Note that OI + P = Goods Available for Sale
The equation is best illustrated by a market example. A vendor goes to a market with 5 handbags in a box for sale. On the way to the market he buys 100 more. Throughout the day, they are selling so fast the vendor loses track of how many have been sold. But at the end of the day there are 10 handbags left in the box. The CGS equation confirms how many were sold. The OI was 5, P were 100 and the EI was 10. Therefore, the CGS is 95.
(If you’re thinking someone could have stolen some handbags, note that theft is considered part of CGS.)
Perpetual vs. Periodic Inventory System
Corporations use different methods to control their inventory. Duties are typically segregated
between those responsible for the inventory records and those with access to the physical inventory. In that way, an individual who steals inventory cannot adjust the inventory records to conceal the theft. Further, inventory is stored in secure locations with restricted access
– even in a manufacturer, the people with access to the raw materials will be different from the people with access to finished goods or work-in-process. Finally, companies maintain ongoing records
of inventory, referred to as a perpetual inventory system, or periodically count inventory
to determine the Balance Sheet value, referred to as a periodic inventory system.
The periodic system was used almost exclusively prior to the advent of computers. December 31 is the most common year-end and prior to 1980, many factories and warehouses throughout the country closed on New Years’ Eve for the sole purpose of counting inventory. Today, both systems are used in similar proportions.
The key features of a perpetual
inventory system are:
There is a detailed ongoing record
of each inventory item which totals to the balance sheet value
Records are updated
when goods are sold and when purchased
Purchase discounts and returns are recorded in the inventory account
Cost of goods sold is recorded when the sale is made
Test counts throughout the year are used to verify the accuracy of the ongoing balance
The key features of a periodic
inventory system are:
Inventory is physically counted
once per period to determine the balance sheet value
Purchases, purchase returns and purchase discounts are recorded in separate accounts
There is no entry
to record cost of goods sold when the sale is made
Cost of goods sold is calculated at end of period based on CGS equation
41
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Accounting Entries: Perpetual vs. Periodic
Perpetual System
Periodic System
1. Purchase Inventory
1. Purchase Inventory
DR Inventory
$$
DR Purchases
$$
CR Accounts Payable
$$
CR Accounts Payable
$$
2. Purchase Returns
2. Purchase Returns
DR Accounts Payable
$
DR Accounts Payable
$
CR Inventory
$
CR Purchase Returns
$
3. Purchase Discounts
3. Purchase Discounts
DR Accounts Payable
$
DR Accounts Payable
$
CR Inventory
$
CR Purchase Discounts
$
4. Sales
4. Sales
DR Accounts Receivable
$$$
DR Accounts Receivable
$$$
CR Sales
$$$
CR Sales
$$$
DR Cost of Goods Sold
$$
(no entry)
CR Inventory
$$
Inventory Costing Methods:
Because it is practically difficult to determine which actual items were taken from which physical inventory locations, companies employ different assumptions to arrive at inventory cost. The three alternatives are:
Specific Identification
Weighted Average
First-in, First-out (FIFO)
GAAP allows corporations to choose any of these alternatives but the method chosen should be rational and should provide the best matching
of revenues and expenses.
Specific identification
obviously provides the best matching but is usually not practical. It can only be used when the company is able to specifically identify the exact item that was sold and its cost. Hence this method is typically used only for big ticket sales like cars, trucks, expensive jewellery, etc. It is used almost exclusively with perpetual inventory system.
The weighted average method
assumes the cost of goods sold is the average of all inventory purchases during the period. Under a periodic inventory system, the average is calculated at the end of the year. When using a perpetual inventory system however, the average cost is calculated every time a purchase is made.
The FIFO method
assumes the oldest goods are sold first. Under a periodic inventory system, ending inventory
is valued using the most recent purchases, and the cost of goods sold is calculated based on the opening balance 42
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
and the remainder of purchases (i.e. the CGS equation). Under a perpetual inventory system, the cost of goods sold is calculated when goods are sold, based on the oldest purchase. In an inflationary environment
, FIFO will produce the lowest CGS
and therefore the highest Net Income
.
Illustration:
Assume ABC Corporation has the following inventory transactions for the month of January:
Number of Units
Cost per Unit
Jan 1 Opening Balance
400
$1.10
Jan 4 Purchase
300
$1.20
Jan 5 Purchase
250
$1.25
Jan 6 Sale
200
Jan 9 Purchase
150
$1.30
Jan 10 Sale
300
Jan 16 Purchase
100
$1.35
Jan 25 Sale
150
Jan 29 Sale
150
Calculate the balance in Inventory at the end of January and the Cost of Goods Sold for January under both FIFO and Weighted Average using both the perpetual and periodic inventory systems.
1. Perpetual Inventory System:
FIFO:
Jan 6 sale from opening balance; cost = 200*1.1 = 220
Jan 10 sale from opening balance (200) and Jan 4 purchase (100); cost = 200*1.1+100*1.20 = $340
Jan 25 sale from Jan 4 purchase; cost = 150*1.2 = 180
Jan 29 sale from Jan 4 purchase (50) and Jan 5 purchase (100); cost = 50*1.2+100*1.25 =
$185
Ending inventory = 400 units; cost = 150 from Jan 5 purchase + Jan 9 and 16 purchases = 150*1.25+150*1.3+100*1.35 = $517.50
Jan Cost of Goods Sold = 220+340+180+185 = $925
Weighted Average:
Jan 4 weighted avg. = (400*1.1+300*1.2)/700 = 1.142857
Jan 5 weighted avg. = (700*1.142857+250*1.25)/950 = 1.171053
Jan 6 cost of goods sold = 200*1.171053 = $234.21
Jan 9 weighted avg. = (750*1.171053+150*1.3)/900 = 1.192544
Jan 10 cost of goods sold = 300*1.192544 = $357.76
Jan 16 weighted avg. = (600*1.192544+100*1.35)/700 = 1.215038
Jan 25 cost of goods sold = 150*1.215038 = $182.26
Jan 29 cost of goods sold = 150*1.215038 = $182.26
Ending inventory = 400*1.215038 = $486.02
Jan Cost of Goods Sold = $956.48
Note:
517.50 + 925 = $1,442.50
486.02 + 956.48 = $1,442.50
43
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
44
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
2. Periodic Inventory System:
FIFO:
Ending Inventory = 400 units = 100 from Jan 16 purchase + 150 from Jan 9 purchase + 150 from Jan 5 purchase = $517.50
Cost of Goods Sold = 400*1.1+300*1.2+250*1.25+150*1.3+100*1.35 – 517.50 = $925
Wtd Avg:
Avg Cost for period = (400*1.1+300*1.2+250*1.25+150*1.3+100*1.35)/1200=1.202083
Cost of Goods Sold = 800*1.202083 = $961.67
Ending Inventory = 400*1.202083 = $480.83
Note:
961.67 + 480.83 = $1,442.50
Effect on Income of different choices in Costing Method:
In the above example Cost of Goods Sold varied from low of $925.00 to high of $961.67 – a difference of $36.67 or 4%
. This difference goes directly to the bottom line. Therefore the choice of inventory costing method has a direct impact on income
. It also affects the amount of income tax paid since income tax expense is usually a % of income. Periodic Inventory Adjusting Entry
At the end of the period, in a periodic system, there needs to be an adjusting entry to record the correct ending inventory and the correct Cost of Goods Sold for the period. Recall that for the entire period, the entries have only recorded Purchases, Purchase Discounts and Purchase Returns (and the balance in the inventory account pre-adjustment is the opening inventory value for the period). All of the purchase accounts will be brought to zero, as these amounts will now be allocated to Cost of Goods Sold and Ending Inventory, along with the opening inventory value. The entry will be the following.
DR Inventory
Ending Inventory Value (per physical count)
DR Cost of Goods Sold
Calculated using costing method
DR Purchase Returns
to bring balance to zero
DR Purchase Discounts
to bring balance to zero
CR Purchases
to bring balance to zero
CR Inventory
Opening Inventory Value
Note that the entry does reflect the Cost of Goods Sold formula. The adjusting entry for the January data shown in the FIFO example above, assuming that the ending inventory was counted, would be:
DR Inventory
$517.50
DR Cost of Goods Sold
$925.00
CR Purchases
$1,002.50
CR Inventory
$440.00
45
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Inventory Errors
Because the ending inventory of one period is the opening inventory in the next period, an error in one period affects the next one
too. However, the effect on income in each period is opposite
. Recall the CGS formula.
CGS = OI + P – EI
If the ending inventory in Period 1 is overstated by $1,000 (i.e. too high), CGS will be understated by $1,000 (too low) since the deduction was too high
. If CGS is understated, income is overstated by the same $1,000 (too high). However, in Period 2, opening inventory is again overstated by $1,000 but this time, due to the CGS equation, CGS will be over
stated by $1,000 (i.e. too high) since the addition is too high
. Income will be under
stated by $1,000 (too low). In summary, the error has produced income that is too high in Period 1
and too low in Period 2
. However, assuming Period 2 ending inventory is correct, there is no further affect
on subsequent periods. Retained Earnings is impacted by Net Income (and dividends) so in the above example, Retained Earnings will be overstated in Period 1
since Net Income was overstated. However, by the end of Period 2
, Retained Earnings will be correct
(assuming no other errors).
Practice Question:
A company discovers the following errors in its accounting records. (A positive number indicates the item was overstated.)
2012
2013
Opening Inventory
($12,000)
$5,000
Salary Expense
$8,000
($14,000)
Determine the impact on the company’s income and retained earnings for both 2012 and 2013, ignoring taxes and assuming no other errors.
In 2012, income will be overstated by $9,000 but retained earnings will be understated by $3,000. In 2013, income will be overstated by $9,000 again and retained earnings will be overstated by $6,000. (Hint: don’t forget the opening inventory of one year is the ending inventory of the previous
year.) Other Issues and Disclosures
Lower of Cost and Net Realizable Value
Inventory is held for resale. The readers of F/S assume it will be sold for more than its Balance Sheet value. When the realizable value of the inventory (i.e. the amount the company expects to sell it for) is less than its cost, the inventory should be written down to the lower value. It is misleading to present inventory at a value in excess of what the inventory can be sold for. The write-down will reduce income in the period the write-down occurs in, usually through Cost of Goods Sold. Typically, this sort of adjustment affects high tech companies where the value of inventories can shift rapidly as technology changes. However, the rule is applied to all companies, regardless of industry. 46
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Inventory and the Cash Flow Statement
Inventory effects the cash flow statement in the Operating Activities section, through both Cost of Goods Sold (reflected in Net Income) and in the adjustment to cash flow for increases or decreases in inventory balances. However, the choice of costing method will not impact the cash flow from operating activities (why?).
Inventory Exceptions
There are some exceptions to valuing inventory at the lower of cost or NRV. Financial instruments, construction
contract work-in-process, agricultural inventories, mining and forestry inventories and inventories of commodity-brokers are all generally presented at their fair value less costs to sell. It is felt that the market value is more relevant for these sorts of inventories.
Estimating Inventory Value
Assuming the opening inventory value, the total sales and purchases for the year, as well as the typical gross margin percentage are all known, ending inventory can be estimated using the gross margin to calculate the Cost of Goods Sold, and then the CGS equation to calculate EI.
Example:
Arsonists Inc. lost all its inventory in a fire. They file a claim with their insurance company for $1,000,000 representing their estimated ending inventory value. Assuming their opening inventory was $100,000, their sales for the year was $600,000, their purchases for the year were $350,000 and their normal gross margin is 35%, does their estimate sound reasonable?
Using their normal gross margin, Cost of Goods Sold is estimated as (100-35%) * $600,000 = $390,000
Since CGS = OI + P - EI
Ending Inventory = OI + P – CGS = $100000+350000 – 390000 = $60,000
Therefore, it does NOT seem reasonable that Arsonists had $1,000,000 worth of ending inventory!
F/S Disclosures
The disclosures for Inventory include how cost is calculated, whether any inventories have been pledged as security for debt (common for Canadian companies, particularly if private – usually pledged to support an operating line of credit), the carrying value by inventory type, the amounts charged to expense in the period, the
amount of any inventory write-downs and any amounts carried at NRV or fair value.
If commitments to purchase inventory are significant at the balance sheet date, that should be disclosed in a note
to the F/S, and any anticipated loss on such commitments must be taken in the current period. This is sometimes
done when competition for a particular supply is intense, e.g. the supply of silicon was constrained in 2008-
2010 so some users committed to purchasing several years supply in advance.
47
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
COMM 321
Unit 8: Property Plant & Equipment (Chapters 10 & 11)
Property Plant & Equipment (PP&E) consists of tangible assets that will provide future economic benefits, will last for greater than 1 year, are held for use in
production, administration or for rental purposes
, and are not for sale in the ordinary course of business. The components of PP&E are disclosed separately based on whether they are tangibly different, have different useful lives, or have different patterns of use. Examples include land, buildings, equipment, vehicles, etc. Investment property
is property (land or a building — or part of a building — or both) held (by the owner or by the lessee as a right-of-use asset) to earn rentals or for capital appreciation or both, rather than for:
(a) use in the production or supply of goods or services or for administrative purposes; or
(b) sale in the ordinary course of business.
Investment property must be disclosed separately from Property Plant & Equipment. Typically, land held for future expansion is considered investment property until such time it is being used in the business
or it is being
developed for use in the business. Similarly, rental buildings owned by a manufacturer or service provider, would also be disclosed separately.
PP&E are initially recorded at cost. As to what constitutes cost, any reasonable expense that is incurred to bring an asset to its intended use gets included in the cost of that capital asset.
Examples of costs
that would be included in the cost of a capital asset (in addition to its invoice cost) are: delivery charges, insurance during transportation, installation expenses, non-refundable sales taxes (note that for
many businesses GST is refundable), raw material and labour costs during the period required to get machinery up and running to production speed (note that this does NOT include costs incurred because the machine is not operating at capacity for other reasons, e.g. product demand not yet built up), any special wiring or electrical work required for the new machinery and any special renovations required to accommodate the new asset (special floor, special room, sound proofing, etc.). When buying land or buildings, realtor and legal fees can be added to the cost. When constructing a new building
, surveying costs as well as the interest costs during the construction period on a loan taken out specifically to finance the construction can also be capitalized (note that once the building is complete, interest costs are treated as an expense of the period in which they occur). Under IFRS, the estimated costs to restore the
site when the asset is disposed of (whether legally or constructively obligated to do so) must be included as part of the cost. Under ASPE, this is done only when the company is legally obligated to do so. Finally, note that grading, landscaping, or draining the land are all considered to be part of the land cost. If a company buys land with a building on it that must be torn down
, the demolition costs are considered to be the cost of the land since they are incurred to get the land ready for its intended use. In fact, all costs incurred
up to the excavation of the new building are considered to be costs of the land. This is significant since land is not depreciated so its costs never impact the income statement. On the other hand, if the company is tearing 48
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
down its own building that it previously used, the demolition costs are considered to be costs of disposing the old building and would increase the loss on disposal.
An example of a cost that would not be included is damage during installation
. This is not considered to be a normal or reasonable expense associated with the asset but rather is considered to be a cost of the period in which the damage occurred. Also, any storage costs caused by delay in building construction are expensed.
When a company constructs it own assets,
all Direct Materials, Direct Labour and Variable Overhead may be included in the cost of the asset (Fixed Overhead may not). If the company borrows specifically for the construction project, the interest costs on the loan should be capitalized under IFRS (i.e. added to the cost of the
asset), though ASPE allows the costs to be either expensed or capitalized. Incidental revenues
and expenses incurred prior to the asset being ready for use are capitalized under ASPE, but are treated as income under IFRS. For example, if the land was used as a parking lot prior to building a warehouse on it, the revenues would be treated as income under IFRS, but would reduce the cost of the land under ASPE.
Additions to assets are capitalized and amortized over their useful life. In deciding if an expenditure should be expensed or capitalized, the key criteria is whether it extends the useful life and thus provides future economic benefits. For example, a car tune-up or oil change does not extend the car’s life so would be expensed in the period incurred. However, replacing the transmission does extend the car’s life and so that cost would be capitalized.
Leasehold improvements
are capital expenditures made to a property that is being leased. For example, many firms create offices and otherwise renovate the space they are renting. These expenditures are capitalized, segregated and reported as leasehold improvements and amortized over the lesser of the remaining useful life or
the term of the lease.
Special Situations
Deferred Payments
A situation that can arise (common when purchasing raw land) is deferred payment terms
. For example, land is sold for $1,000,000 whereby the purchaser pays $200,000 at the beginning of each year for 5 years. Under IFRS, the asset must be recorded at its present value
, using market interest rates.
In this case, assuming an interest rate of 5% compounded annually, the asset would be recorded as costing $909,190.10. The reasoning is the balance should be recorded as interest costs. The amortization table would look like the following.
Payment #
Payment Interest Expense
Carrying Value
1
$200,000.00
$709,190.10
2
$200,000.00
$35,459.51
$544,649.61
3
$200,000.00
$27,232.48
$371,882.09
4
$200,000.00
$18,594.10
$190,476.19
49
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
5
$200,000.00
$9,523.81
0.00
When purchased, the buyer would make the following journal entry.
DR Land
$909,190.10
CR Cash
$200,000.00
CR Note Payable
$709,190.10
When the second payment is made, the entry would be:
DR Note Payable
$164,540.49
DR Interest Expense ($709,190.10*5%)
$ 35,459.51
CR Cash
$200,000.00
Recording the asset this way reflects the fact that part of the cash payments are really payments on account of interest. In business, there is always a time value of money and it should be reflected in the accounts.
Bundled Asset Purchases
Another special situation is paying one price for a basket of assets
. Clearly land and buildings are often purchased together, and sometimes even with additional equipment. The assets will depreciate over different lengths of time. The solution is to assign values to each asset based on their relative fair values. Example:
Land, buildings and equipment are purchased for $2,500,000. An appraiser values the land at $750,000, the building at $1,200,000 and the equipment at $1,050,000. The accountant would assign values to each asset class based on their relative fair values
, as follows.
Fair Value
% of Total
Assigned Value = % * Price Paid
Land
750,000
25%
$625,000
Building
1,200,000
40%
$1,000,000
Equipment
1,050,000
35%
$875,000
Total
$3,000,000
100%
$2,500,000
Non-cash transactions
Assets are often acquired in exchange for other assets, rather than cash. For example, businesses are purchased for shares, assets are traded in on new assets, etc. In these cases, the acquired asset is 50
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
valued by first looking at the fair value of the assets given up
. This is consistent with cash transactions whereby assets are valued based on the amount of cash given up. In cases where the fair value of the assets given up is not reliable, then the fair value of the asset purchased is used. As might be expected, in cases where one value is more reliable than the other, the more reliable value is always used
. So for example, if a used car is given up in exchange for 500 Royal Bank shares, the value of the Royal Bank shares is clearly more reliable and would be used as the value of the transaction. Asset donations
If an asset is donated by a shareholder, it is recorded at its fair value
and the credit goes to contributed surplus
, which is part of shareholders’ equity. There is no income affect. If an asset is donated by a government
, then the donation must be reflected in income
over the period the asset benefits the company. This is typically done by reducing the cost of the asset by the amount of the donation. For example, a grant of $25,000 toward acquisition of an asset would be credited to the cost of the asset, thus reducing the depreciation charge over the useful life. Alternatively, the grant can be set up as a deferred revenue and then the revenue is recognized over the life of the asset, or over the term of any conditions attached to the grant. So a condition whereby a plant must be built 5 years, the revenue would be recognized over the 5 years; if the condition is the company must employ 50 people for 10 years, then the revenue would be recognized over 10 years.
Other:
For transactions lacking commercial substance (e.g. transactions with family members), or in transactions where the fair values cannot be reliably determined, then the carrying value
of the asset given up is used.
Investment Property
– Fair Value Option
Property, plant and equipment includes property being held for investment, in the form of rental real estate
. IFRS recognizes that in some cases it might be more appropriate to value the asset at its fair value rather than its
historical cost. Since rental buildings generally are bought and sold based on their rental income (a good guideline for a building’s value is its rental income divided by a long-term interest rate), the value of rental real estate usually goes up rather than down
, even for older buildings (rent can be raised every year so revenues go up, as does the value of the building). Under IFRS, owners of rental buildings have the fair value option. Every year the building is written up or down to its fair value. No depreciation
is recorded. The changes in fair value affect Net Income – they are recorded in the Other Income
section of the income statement. Once a company choose to use the fair value option, it can never revert to the historical cost method. Also, a company using the fair value option must use it for all of its investment property. Note too that under IFRS, if a company is using the cost method, the fair value of any investment property must be disclosed in the notes to the F/S. An example of the fair value option is provided at the end of this unit. Revaluation Option for Property, Plant & Equipment Given that for some assets, the fair value might be more relevant than the cost (a good example is a factory or warehouse that was purchased more than 20+ years ago), IFRS gives companies the option to revalue any category of PP&E to its fair value at any revaluation date
. Like the fair value option, once this option is chosen it must be followed from then on. Assets can be revalued annually or every 3-5 years
. Any increase in value is recorded as OCI through a Revaluation Surplus account (Accumulated Depreciation is eliminated at the time of revaluation to the Asset Cost account, then the Asset Cost is adjusted to its fair value with the offset going to Revaluation Surplus). In the event the asset later drops in value, any decrease is used first to reduce the
51
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Revaluation Surplus account to zero, then to reduce income. Again, an example of the Revaluation Option appears below.
Depreciation
The objective behind depreciation (or amortization – the terms are synonymous) is to allocate an asset’s cost
to
the accounting periods that benefit from its use, as per the matching principle (costs must be recorded in the same period as the related revenues). If an asset is going to provide economic benefits over a period of 5 years say, then its cost must be allocated over those 5 years. There are 4 methods to be aware of.
1. Straight-Line
2. Activity method or Units of Production
3. Declining Balance
4. Double Declining Balance
The company must choose the method that best reflects the pattern in which the asset’s benefits are used up. Some methods require estimates (e.g. useful life, salvage value). Any estimate must be re-visited at least annually.
Example for all methods:
Assume an asset costing $10,000 has an expected useful life of 6 years (based on expected usage, wear and tear, technological obsolescence, any legal restrictions), an estimated salvage value of
$1,000, and an expected lifetime productivity of 30,000 units. The company has a December 31 year-end and acquires the asset on April 1, 2010. Production in 2010 was 3,800 units and in 2011 was 5,400. The applicable declining balance rate is 20%.
Straight-line Method
This method is used by approximately 90% of companies in Canada. It’s considered appropriate for assets where time is a good indicator of usage
Annual charge = (Cost – salvage value)/Useful life
= (10000-1000)/6 = 1,500
2010 charge = $1,500 * 9/12 = $1,125 (most companies pro rate depreciation expense based on the # of months when the asset is used for only part of the year)
2011 charge = $1,500
2010 Entry:
DR Depreciation Expense
$1,125
CR Accumulated Depreciation
$1,125
The depreciation expense is recorded on the Income Statement in Cost of Goods Sold if it’s an asset used in production for a manufacturer, or in Selling, General and Administrative Expenses if it’s an asset used in the office.
The Balance Sheet Treatment would be as follows, within the Property Plant & Equipment section.
2010
2011 2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
52
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Asset (at cost)
$10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000
Less: Accumulated Depreciation
($1,125)
($2,625)
($4,125)
($5,625)
($7,125)
($8,625)
($9,000)
Net Book Value
$8,875 $7,375 $5,875 $4,375 $2,875 $1,375
$1,000
Note that the Net Book Value is $1,000 at the end of the six years (March 31, 2016) which is the asset’s estimated salvage value. The company would normally sell the asset for $1,000, which means the total cost of the asset, which is really $9,000 (i.e. the $10,000 cost less the $1,000 salvage value), has been amortized equally against revenues over the six-year useful life.
Activity Method
This method is used by approximately 70% of corporate Canada. It’s appropriate for assets where production or activity is a good indicator of usage. For example, depreciating vehicles based on mileage driven usually makes more sense than depreciating them based on years. Many custom pieces of equipment have a built-in counter to count the number of uses. Per Unit charge = (cost – salvage value)/Expected lifetime production
= (10000-1000)/30000 = $0.30/unit
2010 charge = 3800*.3 = $1,140 (no need to pro rate since usage reflects shorter time owned)
2011 charge = 5400*.3 = $1,620
2010 Entry:
DR Depreciation Expense
$1,140
CR Accumulated Depreciation
$1,140
Declining Balance
This is the method imposed by the Canada Revenue Agency
and must be used by all Canadian corporations on their tax returns. In the year of acquisition, the rules have recently been changed to encourage companies to buy more capital assets. Companies get an extra ½ year’s charge in the year they acquire an asset
, referred to as the Accelerated Investment Incentive rule. Note that for Canadian tax, depreciation is referred to as Capital Cost Allowance (CCA). Annual charge = Undepreciated capital cost (or opening NBV) * applicable rate
2010 charge = 10000*20%*1.5 = $3,000
2011 charge = (10000-3000)*20% = $1,400
2010 Entry:
DR Depreciation Expense
$3,000
CR Accumulated Depreciation
$3,000
Double Declining Balance
This method is rarely used by corporate Canada. However, it has been used in the U.S. as a tax incentive
and is part of the CFA curriculum. It is identical to the declining balance method except the rate is based on the estimated useful life of the asset.
Rate to be used = 2/useful life in years = 2/6 = 33.3%
53
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Annual charge = Undepreciated capital cost (or opening NBV) * applicable rate
2010 charge = 10000*33.3%*9/12 = $2,500 (pro rate based on months used)
2011 charge = (10000-2500)*33.3% = $2,500
2010 Entry:
DR Depreciation Expense
$2,500
CR Accumulated Depreciation
$2,500
Changing Estimates
In the last decade or so, it has been reasonably common to have to change the estimates related to depreciation. For example, the useful lives of both cars and computers have changed fairly drastically as technology and quality control has improved. Further, the salvage values have also been turning out better than originally expected. Recall from Unit 2 that a change in accounting estimate does NOT require any adjustment to prior periods, but rather only changes the estimate used for future periods
.
Example:
A corporation was depreciating a computer based on an estimated useful life of 4 years. At the start of the third year, they realized the computer would likely be used for another 4 years. The computer cost $2,400
and was expected to have no salvage value, which is still the case.
For the first 2 years, the depreciation charge would have been $2,400/48 or $50 per month. Hence at the start of the third year, the net book value of the computer would be $2,400 – 24*50 or $1,200. It is now expected to last
4 more years with no salvage value so the charge for the next 4 years will be $1,200/48 or $25 per month
.
Asset Disposals
The gain or loss on disposal of an asset is the proceeds less the net book value (NBV)
. Once an asset has been put up for sale, it is re-classified in the F/S as an Asset Held For Sale. It is carried at the lower of NBV and Net Realizable Value (NRV), which is an estimate. No further depreciation is recorded while the asset is held for sale. Under ASPE, the asset is usually left in the Property Plant & Equipment section of the Balance Sheet, or in
another non-current section if they are not being used. Under IFRS, the asset can be classified as current if the sale is highly probable and the asset is available for immediate sale.
Example:
An asset with cost of $10,000 and accumulated depreciation of $8,000 is put up for sale. The expected selling price is $3,000.
Entry:
DR Asset held for Sale
$2,000
DR Accumulated Depreciation
$8,000
CR Asset
$10,000
Note that if the expected selling price were only $500 say, a loss of $1,500 would be recorded immediately. The
loss will appear in the Other Expenses or Losses section of the Income Statement, most likely labelled as Provision for Loss on Asset Disposal. In the above entry, the Asset held for Sale would only be debited for $500.
54
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
If the asset subsequently sells for more (less) than the recorded value, the appropriate gain (loss) is recorded at that time. For example, if the asset from the above entry were sold for $3,000, the entry to record the sale would
be:
DR Cash
$3,000
CR Assets held for Sale
$2,000
CR Gain on Sale
$1,000
The Gain on Sale is recorded in the Other Income section of the Income Statement.
Asset Trade-ins An asset trade-in is considered to be two transactions: the sale of the old asset and the purchase of the new asset
. Just as in a disposal for cash, the cost and accumulated depreciation of the old asset must be removed from the accounts. Generally speaking, the cost of the new asset is recorded at the fair value of the assets given up
.
However, if the fair value of the asset being acquired is more reliable, then that value would be used.
Example:
Assume a company acquires a new asset with a list price of $18,000. They trade in an asset with cost of $10,000, accumulated depreciation of $8,000 and a fair value of $2,500. The seller says they will give the company a trade-in allowance of $3,000 for the asset. The buyer then pays $15,000 in cash. In this case, the fair value of the assets given up (old asset + cash) would be used to record the cost of the new asset, being $17,500. The entry to record
the transaction would be:
DR
New Asset
$17,500
DR
Accumulated Depreciation
$ 8,000
CR
Cash
$15,000
CR
Old Asset
$10,000
CR
Gain on disposal
$ 500
Even though the list price of the new asset is $18,000, it is recorded as $17,500 since this better reflects the cost of the asset, i.e. we gave up cash of $15,000 plus an asset worth $2,500. In business, it is common for list prices to be discounted in order to complete a sale
. Hence list price is considered to be less reliable than the cash plus old asset. The gain on disposal of the old asset is the difference between the asset’s fair value ($2,500)
and its net book value ($2,000).
Similarly, if the fair value of the asset given up was less than its book value, a loss on disposal would occur. In the same example, assume the fair value of the asset given up was only $200 and the buyer still paid $15,000 in cash. The list price remains at $18,000 but the buyer is only paying $15,200. The entry becomes:
DR
New Asset
$15,200
55
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
DR
Accumulated Depreciation
$ 8,000
DR
Loss on Disposal
$ 1,800
CR
Cash
$15,000
CR
Old Asset
$10,000
Revaluation Option – Property Plant & Equipment (IFRS)
For some assets, IFRS believes that disclosing its fair value on the balance sheet might be more appropriate. Hence they give companies the option to revalue their PP&E to its fair value
. There are companies that have occupied the same land and buildings for 50+ years. In some cases, the building has been fully depreciated and the land which is currently worth millions of dollars is on the balance sheet at its historical cost, being only a small fraction of that. It’s important to recognize that any gain or loss is recorded as OCI
.
If a company chooses to use the Revaluation Option, it must do so for an entire class of assets
, rather than just a select few. Typical classes include, land, buil0dings, machinery, vehicles, etc. Also, it must continue to revalue the asset class on a regular basis. The frequency of valuation depends on the asset. If the values fluctuate frequently, annual valuations
would be in order. If values are not so volatile, revaluation need only be carried out every 3-5 years
. To date, most Canadian companies have elected NOT to use the Revaluation Model. Example:
Assume the asset used in the depreciation example, was being depreciated using the straight-line method (i.e. cost $10,000, salvage value $1,000, useful life 6 years, purchased April 1, 2010). At the end of 2012, the asset has a fair value of $7,000 and the owner elects to use the revaluation option. At that time, the NBV of the asset is $5,875 ($10,000 cost less $4,125 in accumulated depreciation). The process is to reduce the accumulated depreciation to zero and value the asset cost to its fair value - $7,000. The entries are: DR Accumulated Depreciation
$4,125
CR Asset
$4,125
DR Asset (7000-5875)
$1,125
CR Revaluation Surplus (OCI)
$1,125
The depreciation expense will change based on the new value
. Assuming the asset’s useful life remains unchanged – there are 39 months left to go – and the salvage value is still estimated to be $1,000, the depreciation expense in 2013 will be ((7000-1000)/39)*12 = $1,846.
Note that if the asset subsequently declines in value below the new NBV, the loss is first applied to the Revaluation Surplus account to reduce it to zero and any remainder is taken against income.
Once the revaluation option is chosen, it must be maintained for the life of the company
insofar as that asset class is concerned..
56
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Fair Value Option – Investment Property
This option is only available for investment property (e.g. rental real estate). The fair value of the property is assessed every year
and a gain or loss is recognized in current year income. It is recorded in the Other Income/Expense
section of the Income Statement. Once the fair value option is chosen it too must be maintained until the asset is sold, or it becomes owner-occupied. No depreciation is recorded.
Example:
A corporation acquires a rental building for $1,800,000 on January 1, 2014 and elects to use the fair value option. The building’s fair value on the dates below are:
December 31, 2014
$1,750,000 December 31, 2015
$1,600,000
December 31, 2016
$1,850,000
The entries on each date would be as follows:
December 31, 2014
DR Loss in value of Rental building
$50,000
CR Rental Building
$50,000
December 31, 2015
DR Loss in value of Rental building
$150,000
CR Rental Building
$150,000
December 31, 2016
DR Rental building
$250,000
CR Gain in Value of Rental Building
$250,000
Note that the Gain/Loss in Value affects Net Income and Earnings per Share
. It is NOT reported as OCI. Hence the revaluation option affects OCI whereas the fair value option affects Net Income
.
Property Plant & Equipment: ASPE vs. IFRS
There are a number of differences between ASPE and IFRS when it comes to Property, Plant & Equipment. These are the significant ones.
ASPE
IFRS
Recognition at cost Revaluation Option for PP&E
Fair Value Option for Investment Property
Must disclose fair value of investment property recorded at cost
Incidental start-up revenues/expenses
Incidental start-up revenues/expenses recorded on income applied to cost
statement
No reconciliation required
Must reconcile opening to closing NBVs for each asset class
57
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Interest costs on construction borrowing
Interest costs on construction borrowing are capitalized
may be expensed or capitalized
No mention of biological assets
Separate standard for biological assets
Test of impairment when events indicate
Test of impairment at least annually (using discounted cash flows)
appropriate (use undiscounted cash flows)
Assets held for sale are current only if sold
Assets held for sale may be current if meet certain tests
before the F/S are issued
58
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help