12.edited
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
University of Nairobi *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
499
Subject
Communications
Date
Nov 24, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
6
Uploaded by ChancellorBoulder9878
1
Relationship Interview
Student’s Name
Instructor’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Course
Date
2
1.
My interviewee had a two-year relationship with a former girlfriend that terminated a
few years ago. After college, they started working in various places, drifting apart and breaking
up. They were friends after the breakup, although not as close.
2.
Their relationship seemed unique and irreplaceable. They believed they had something
special and distinctive in each other, unlike everyone else. However, interdependence and
disclosure needed to be improved. They were independent and did not share their deepest
thoughts or feelings. Company, affection, and shared experiences were intrinsic joys of the
partnership. They spent less time together as their work and other activities got busier, reducing
their inherent joys. Lack of interdependence, disclosure, and interdependence ended the
partnership.
3.
My interviewee assessed the relationship partner's self-esteem as high. Their self-
confidence and security helped ignite their attraction and maintain their connection. Insecurity,
envy, and reliance were less likely when both parties had healthy self-images. Harmony helped
them respect and support each other's differences, fostering trust and communication. They were
not dependent on one other for affirmation or self-esteem. Therefore, their relationship was equal
and partnership-like. Their confidence helped them grow together while maintaining
independence, creating a strong and resilient friendship.
3
4.
I interviewed someone who knew little about their partner's family. They rarely addressed
their family, which didn't affect their relationship. However, my respondent noted that their
partner's troubled relationship with their parents caused conflict. The partner's parents' ideals and
expectations conflicted with the relationship, generating problems.
5.
My interviewee and their partner had a strong foundation of similar beliefs, contributing
to their initial attraction and long-term connection. Truthfulness, loyalty, and family were
important to both, forming an emotional bond. They disagreed about work and life objectives,
like any couple. These differences occasionally caused tension and arguments, yet they were
possibilities for progress. Their relationship strengthened as they learned to communicate,
compromise, and support each other's goals. Sharing beliefs and having different goals shows
how adaptable and resilient a loving, committed partnership can be.
6.
Positive and negative gender differences altered the relationship. My interviewee was
more reserved and kept their emotions to themselves, while their companion was more emotional
and opened up. This made communicating and understanding each other's needs challenging.
Their partnership was balanced and harmonious since their differences complemented one
another.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
4
7.
My interviewee's partner was culturally and spiritually different, which generated
relationship issues. Knowing each other helped them recognize and respect one another's
differences. This strengthened their bond and helped them transcend cultural and spiritual
barriers.
8.
My interviewee's experience demonstrated the six fundamental elements for sound love
relationship judgments. First, they prioritized friendship, letting their relationship grow gradually
and establishing a solid emotional foundation. Second, they worked hard to build trust and open
communication, which is essential to a strong partnership. Their attention to each other's needs
showed their dedication to happiness and satisfaction. Seeking counsel from others showed a
willingness to learn to understand the connection better. They correctly took time for
introspection to make educated judgments and examine the relationship's future. Your
interviewee's success shows that love partnerships require careful, balanced, and supportive
approaches.
9.
Both sides ended the relationship because they realized they were no longer compatible.
However, it was still challenging and emotional for them. My interviewee handled the breakup
by focusing on work and other elements of their life while grieving and healing. After seeking
help from friends and family, they were able to move on and remain friends with their ex-partner.
5
Overall, the interviewee's former relationship was unique, irreplaceable, and shared
values. It needed interdependence and disclosure, which doomed the partnership.
Communication and mutual respect helped them overcome gender, cultural, and spiritual
obstacles. She also made good decisions and coped well after the breakup, which allowed her to
move on and stay friends with her ex. I learned from this interview the value of communication,
trust, understanding, self-reflection, and support during difficult times in relationships.
6
References
Adler, R. B., & Proctor II, R. F. (2022).
Looking out, looking in
. Cengage Learning.
Parrott, L. (2002).
Relationships: how to make bad relationships better and good relationships
great
. Zondervan.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help