Rebuttal Essay Topics
pdf
keyboard_arrow_up
School
University of North Alabama *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
101
Subject
Communications
Date
Nov 24, 2024
Type
Pages
40
Uploaded by DeaconFlamingo4100
Article Rebuttal: Minimum Wage Essay
Article Rebuttal: Minimum Wage
Over the years there has been much debate about raising the federal minimum wage. Some states
have taken it upon themselves to set higher minimum wages than the federal minimum wage,
because of the lack of action by congress. The supporters of the raising of the federal minimum
wage have been more vocal lately. This is especially true since studies have shown, that the gap has
grown between the wealthier population, and the middle class.
Recently President Obama, because of the lack of effort and action by congress, has used executive
action to implement the raising of the federal minimum wage to $10.10 an hour for new federal
contracts, effective 2015. This, naturally, has brought out commentary, studies
...show more content...
The Council of Economic Advisers (CEA) said, "Zero is a perfectly reasonable estimate of the
impact of the minimum wage on employment". They further argued, that consideration was taken
that rising wages boost productivity and reduce employee migration. It is important to note that the
CEA members are appointed by the President, to advise him. Also, worth noting, the Democrats are
making the minimum wage an issue they are highlighting in the 2014 elections. Public support for
this initiative receives support across all facets of society through various polls, but Republicans
oppose raising the minimum wage almost unanimously. (Davis, S.)
The findings in the CBO report have parts highlighted by both sides of the argument, where the data
is skewed, or parts are overlooked to provide support of each view. There are two sides to this issue.
On the surface things appear simple and the question is how does it affect each of us as individuals?
Arguments could be made, and most likely will be made, that branch out and take the focus off of
the true issues. I can see arguments for not raising the wage turn into this seen as an attack on
Americans freedom, too much government control, this will impede innovation, make the U.S. less
competitive and even this being seen as an attack on capitalism. In support of the rising wage, I can
see the comparison to big oil, steel and the railroad monopolies of the late 1800 and early 1900's.
Even the necessity of government stepping in
Get more content on StudyHub.Vip
Socrates Rebuttal Against Meletus
305166
Word count
Apology, Crito
Book and chapter numbers
Apology, 18a–24b
Exegesis 1
Socrates rebuttal against Meletus
In the Apology, due to Socrates activities against the politicians, poets, and craftsmen resulted in
being prosecuted. That activity was the quest to find an individual who is wiser than himself to
understand what the Delphic Oracle told Socrates
. This led to Socrates questioning and insulting
their wisdom. Meletus, who represents the poets, is the main accuser of Socrates and convicts him
for "investigating the things beneath the earth and in the heavens and making the weaker argument
stronger and teaching others these same things" (19b–c). The point I will try to express in this
exegesis is to show Socrates defense against
Get more content on StudyHub.Vip
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Essay about Article Rebuttal
APA Format:
Article Rebuttal
Lori M. Slack
BCOM/275
February 17, 2014
Rod Klein
Article Rebuttal
Marriage is not about a piece of paper, a ring, or sexual preference. It has never been about any of
these matters, and should not be considered so. Marriage is the commitment between two people
who love each other unconditionally. According to Psychology Today, "marriage is the process by
which two people who love each other make their relationship public, official, and permanent"
(Psychology Today, 2002) . Anyone can get married, but it takes dedication and work to make a
marriage last and be successful. This paper will specifically discuss an article written by Jan LaRue,
Why Homosexual "Marriage" Is Wrong and what
...show more content...
In saying this she is being selective to support her argument, and in doing so is being confirmation
biased. Who is to say that homosexuality is more unholy, or wrong, than divorce, adultery, and
lying? Logical Fallacies
The fallacy that was used in this article is false attribution because of the biased attributes in the
argument. For example, saying that marriage has to be limited to only a man and a woman is not
discriminating, yet it clearly is because of the biased feelings of homosexual relationships. Another
type of fallacy that was used is the fallacy of ambiguity; when an abstract belief is treated as if it
were concrete evidence. Religion is not based on scientific concrete evidence, but merely a belief in
something. The Bible has been written and rewritten by man, and has lack of evidence supporting
that there is a God.
Conclusion
Many base their idea of right and wrong on biased conclusions and/or religion. This makes the issue
hard to decipher between who is right and wrong. Biased conclusions do not make the idea correct.
The idea that only a man and a woman can fall in love with each other, and not a man and a man or
a woman and a woman, is based on favoritisms in how someone feels about the issue. Articles, such
as the one above, have the intentions of sharing their beliefs in the hope of others adopting that
particular belief. The question that should be presented is,
Get more content on StudyHub.Vip
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Pro Abortion (Anti Abortion Rebuttal) Essay
Pro Abortion
Abortion is defined as the expulsion of a fetus by a pregnant female before the normal end of a
pregnancy. Many times and in most cases, specifically in the article titled "ABORTION" by
Jimmyissmart on oppapers.com, abortion is seen as an act of violence and inhumane murder. It is
mainly for this reason why people who are anti– abortion support their point of view. However, to
murder the victim must first be alive, but what is the meaning of life? According to dictionary.com
life is defined as the sum of the distinguishing phenomena of organisms, esp. metabolism, growth,
reproduction and adaptation to environment. Hence, a fetus can not be alive because it lacks the
ability to adapt to its environment, a fetus does not have
...show more content...
In some cases women who abort pregnancies do it because at that specific moment in their life they
are just not ready for a baby but look forward to having one at a later date in their life. Surgery for
one is costly and secondly and most importantly once a sterilization of a female is complete it is
highly unlikely for this process to be reversed. In the case that a responsible female takes the proper
precautions by using a condom or taking a pill and still ends up with an unwanted pregnancy should
she drop out of school get a job at McDonalds work for minimum wage and raise a baby in poverty
or should she post pone her getting a baby get an education first then, when she is more capable to
raise and manage a happy and healthy baby do so?
Thirdly, "Rape is a big excuse for people who are for abortion." Women who become pregnant
through rape and even incest rape suffer the most severe form of emotional tragedy. Should they still
go through with having that child even though they may be at a time in their life where a child may
completely destroy their life and also the fact that, that child will be the embodiment of that one
moment in their life that they try to forget? One of the underlying themes in Jimmyissmart's paper is
humanity. However, how ironic is
Get more content on StudyHub.Vip
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Article Rebuttal
Article Rebuttal BCOM/275 March 19, 2012 Tania Say Article Rebuttal Does the Use of Cell
Phones Cause Brain Cancer? The Opponent's Argument In this paper valid points will be presented
to refute the statement made by Dr. Ronald Herberman, Director of the University of Pittsburgh
Cancer Institute, to his faculty and staff on July 21, 2008. "Limit cell phone use because of the
potential risk of cancer" (Reyes, 2009). Herberman based his claim on unpublished data and stated
"it takes too long to get answers from science and I think people should take action now" (Reyes,
2009). Herberman quoted one study that was published in a paper by the Royal Society in London,
which found that "pre–teen and teenagers who
...show more content...
The cell phone industry, of course, says that there is products are safe. "The significant weight of the
evidence demonstrates that radiofrequency energy in mobile phones poses no credible health risks,"
says Motorola spokeswoman Paula Thornton Greer. "Although there have been reports of negative
health effects from low levels of radio frequency energy, these reports have not been replicated or
confirmed" (Childs, 2009). However, "research and anecdotes have suggested a number of other
means by which cell phones may adversely affect health – and possibly not in the way we might
think" (Childs, 2009). These health issues can be bacteria caused by not cleaning their cell phones
that can be treated with antibiotics. It was also found that cell phone showed a significant
deterioration in the quality of driving a vehicle. When walking and talking on a cell phone their
attention to traffic is lowered and they stand the chance of getting hit by a car. Another health issue
is to the thumb from texting, causing sores and blisters. Those users with allergies to certain metal
can have additional side–effect in the form of contact dermatitis. The noise–related side effect to the
ear from using an earpiece with a high volume, this is easily remedied by just by turning down the
volume. Conclusion Almost in every case, the beliefs that cell phone usage can lead to or cause a
higher risk of brain cancer have been proven to be false by
Get more content on StudyHub.Vip
Article Rebuttal
Article Rebuttal Maybelline Torres University of Phoenix BCOM/275 April 17, 2012 Prof. Lourdes
Lebrón Bayrón Article Rebuttal In this article rebuttal an analysis will take place on the authors,
reliability, credibility, and validity on the account of Noah's flood. The rebuttal will give emphasis
on the claims young earth creationist have on the earth's existence period. Additionally, address old
earth and young earth theories. Finally identify any fallacies in the argument. For centuries creation
theorists have given emphasis to Noah's flood as enough evidence to a universal deluge.
Nevertheless, it is understood the ark presented in the Bible had a higher credibility to a local flood.
According
...show more content...
The following claim states that it can give evidence that all animals and humans originated from
occupants of the ark. The people could have descended from the ark inhabitants, but scientist lack
evidence on the animals descending from the ark. Finding the ark does not give evidence of the
ancestry of all creatures. One way to refute this is consider the Koala in Australia. How did this
earthly animal travel to Australia once the ark settled? Traveling this distance would be impossible
nevertheless because the flood was local Koalas did not need to be on the ark. Furthermore, the
author asserts that locating ark remains forces paleontologists to re–decipher fossils as an effect of
the flood, not of many years buildup. Old–earth creationists relates fully with the geological proof of
the arks old age existence. There are no findings of the ark, although several informants alleged to
have seen it. In reality the ark will never be located, most likely it no longer exists. Noah maybe
used the ark wood for rebuilding the society. God declared to Noah never again would He destroy
the world with water. Noah was clear he had no use for the ark maybe he dismantled it for
constructing material. Moreover, creation theorists Baumgardner, and Barnett claim after the flood
the land would have resembled a lifeless wilderness deprived of trees and plants. If the plant and
tree seeds floated after the flood it would still take many years
Get more content on StudyHub.Vip
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
That being said, I argue that we should understand Nietzsche's partial rebuttal of The Birth of
Tragedy as a development of his former positions about Metaphysics. For sure his idiosyncracies
with the term have grown over the years: at this stage, metaphysics simply tends to be employed just
in a negative way, often describing what falls into the cauldron of Platonic–Christian Ressentiment.
Nonetheless, we should not let a shift in terms of vocabulary mislead us. Once more, the problem
for Nietzsche is not metaphysics as such, but 'just' the values embodied by a particular metaphysics .
This finds evidence in that, while he rejects the metaphysics of the duality of Apollo and Dionysus,
in the late Nietzsche art still enjoys a crucial role.
Get more content on StudyHub.Vip
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Affirmative Rebuttal
I was part of the rebuttal for the Negative Team. My part of the argument was to rebut the
Affirmative Team's point that the First Amendment rendered the school rule unconstitutional.
However, I argued that the school rule was not unconstitutional, as it had not broken any part of the
First Amendment by only asking the students to be quiet while the anthem played. Additionally, I
turned the argument on them during the rebuttal, by proving why Philip was being a disturbance,
and the First Amendment's freedom of speech could not protect him, as freedom of speech is defined
as the legal right to express one's opinion freely. The three main points introduced by the other team
included that Narwin was unjust and biased, Philip has the right to freedom
...show more content...
I projected by voice to be louder, and I believe that I spoke at a fairly moderate pace and emphasized
when necessary. In my rebuttal, I also used the book and also used a dictionary to help support the
arguments that I made. I also used a real–world example in our classroom, when I discussed how
Ms. Breault was not violating our rights to the First Amendment when she tells us to quiet down.
However, I could have improved on certain aspects of my argument. I feel like my argument did not
completely address their argument, and there were still aspects of their argument that were left
unrebutted. The Supreme Court case was a point I did not specifically address, but it was still a very
powerful part of that argument. Additionally, I believe that I could have used some more analysis in
my rebuttal. I was very brief about commentary on why the rule did not violate the First
Amendment, and I could have directed the rebuttal more on Philip and blamed him even more,
making our case stronger and their case weaker. Overall, I felt that this debate was quite interesting,
as the Affirmative Team still put up a fight and introduced some very excellent points and evidence I
would have never thought of, although I am certain most, if not all, of us agreed with the Negative
side before this debate started. By this debate, I learned several aspects of a debate and how a debate
is structured overall. I also learned what makes a strong argument in a debate: powerful evidence,
convincing evidence, and no holes. I had a great experience doing this debate, and I find it
unfortunate we will not have time to do another one this school
Get more content on StudyHub.Vip
Doomsday: The Rebuttal Essay
The world has to end because it began. How the world will end has been the center of heated
discussions. The topic of Doomsday has produced conferences, meetings, movies and books
attempting to prophesy the end of age. With the emergence of Doomsday prophets have also
emerged fallacies that preach propaganda to audiences of those seeking immunity from one sole
apocalyptic day. One author in particular is Ronald Bailey. According to Forbes.com, Ronald Bailey
has been a science writer for Forbes magazine and wrote an essay called Seven Doomsday Myths
About The Environment. Bailey wrote this essay in response to fallacies concerning Doomsday. In
his essay he attempts to identify fallacies that are present in seven of the most common
...show more
content...
Bailey does this by, illustrating the Ad Hominem fallacy tactic. The Ad Hominem fallacy is
committed when the "arguer ignores the merits of his/her opponent's argument, and rather makes
some reference to the arguer himself/herself, and assumes that this somehow discredits the
argument" (qtd. in Hurley 119) this is a way to discredit the opponent. Bailey debunks Doomsday
Myths by repeatedly ignoring the merits of his opponent. For illustration Bailey stated, "the gloomy
prognostications by the likes of Paul Ehrlich, Lester Brown, Al Gore, Stephen Schneider, and Carl
Sagan
. There is no scientific evidence to support the often heard claim that there is a global
ecological crisis threatening humanity and life on the entire Planet Earth." (Bailey). He then follows
up with more discredit by stating repeatedly in his rebuttal to his opponents claims by stating "False
Doomsday Prediction" and "what really happened" (Bailey), as part of his oppositional statement.
This tactic debunks the data that was presented by the Doomsday claimant as false, incorrect, and
unfounded. Statements such as this are an attempt to insinuate to the reader that the claims that were
made by the Doomsdayer's are false and Bailey's claims are true. In addition, Bailey himself circums
to the use of Appeal to Unqualified Authority fallacy in his arguments to Doomsday fallacies.
According to The Appeal To Unqualified Authority
Get more content on StudyHub.Vip
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Destiny Review Rebuttal
Jacob Gornall GS 1001 Dr. Ferrell 01/12/2016 Destiny Review Rebuttal Destiny was one of the
most anticipated games of 2014 and it was hyped up to be Bungie's next masterpiece. This was
Bungie's take on borderlands, which I mean let's be real, Borderlands 2 was a knock out, especially
compared to Destiny. "Graphically, Destiny is truly a beautiful and diverse looking game, especially
when you explore the planets opposed to the downtrodden atmosphere of Earth. Whether it's the
lush forests of Venus or the red deserts of Mars"(Impulse Gamer Admin, 2014). The graphics are
amazing and the worlds are beautiful, but you are really given little reason to explore at all once you
get the 5 chests on each planet you're done, there's really no reason
Get more content on StudyHub.Vip
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Argumentative Essay Quotes
Cabute, Jeanette Anne H.
BSIE–HE 4A
Quotation:
1. "Nobody can go back and start a new beginning, but anyone can start today and make a new
ending." –Maria Robinson
Explanation: Our lives are full of ups and downs. Often we get so caught up with the downs in our
lives that we fall into depression. We feel that everything in life is falling apart. You regret the
choices you've made in the past and feel that you have failed in life. Understand that you cannot go
back in time and undo choices you've made but that you can stop yourself from repeating the past by
making smarter decisions so that you can have a better future.
Reaction: Yes, our life is full of up and downs. We also cannot change the past, but we can make
better things or choices
...show more content...
If we try new things we're going to make a few mistakes but we are learning from that mistake. If
you don't make any mistakes, you're in a rut and not trying anything new. Mistakes are part of our
lives, we cannot change it, and we just have to take the risk. Nothing is impossible if we try new
things and nothing will lose if you try right.
4. "The heart has its reasons which reason knows not." –Blaise Pascal
Explanation: The heart, the organ capable of storing love can also reason. Its reasoning makes all the
sense in the world to the heart and to the heart's owner when the owner first hears it. It's the
reasoning that makes you fall in love at first sight. It's the reasoning that somehow makes it so hard
to let somebody go even though you have no logical reason to want that person to stay.
Reaction: The quote means that you have to listen to your heart. Just like in love, you just only knew
that you love that person but you don't know why. We fall in love in a mutual weirdness and called it
love.
5. "When love is not madness it is not love." –
Pedro Calderón de la Barca
Explanation: The actual quote is when love is not madness, it is not love, and it is by Pedro
Calderon. Love in its self is madness. Love brings to life so many different emotions that it is like a
chaos in your
Get more content on StudyHub.Vip
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Brian Rohn
English comp. 2 Amodio
Rebuttal paper ±A proposal I never thought I 'd consider '
Sabaa Saleem is a Pakistani woman who is about to graduate college and is torn between the
modern day American culture she 's grown up in and her cultural background. Sabaa moved to the
U.S. after only living in Pakistan her first year of life. Ever since she came to America she has
known that one day she 's going to have to live with a person for the rest of her life of her parents
choosing. Sabaa has come to terms with this and thinks that although she lives in America and she
can do whatever she wants after she is eighteen she feels that respecting her parents wishes is what
she has to do. Most of this reasoning is because her dad has had
...show more content...
Sabaa is now a semester away from a degree and dreading the fact that she 's going to have to meet
the man she will marry in the spring of the up coming year. She has even taken a final class of little
importance so that she can have another semester of college but will be forced to graduate after this
final writing class.
To be able to date and meet someone of your own liking is one of the reasons America is so great
and we have the freedoms we do. If her family doesn 't accept these freedoms then why did they
leave pakistan in the first place? She has obeyed her parents up until this point and has faced the
hardships of saving herself for marriage and is committed to that. With how she talks about her
parents and how understanding they are I don 't think that if she was to date a guy and they got to
meet him they would be too upset if they knew she was going to marry someone they find as an
acceptable guy if she actually loved him. Watching the movies and reading the books that are so
readily available since Americans are very young which mostly have to do with love or meeting the
person of your dreams is something that I think no matter what background you have you want to
accept to be your future path. We don 't notice it but these values are instilled in us from when we
are children. If Sabaa never saw snow whiter or basically any Disney movie when she was a child I
could understand her
Get more content on StudyHub.Vip
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
This poem by Ralph Waldo Emerson is an exceptional work of his. Entirely characteristic of his
poetic approach, it captures the full meaning behind the appreciation of nature, and it does so in a
simple yet effective style. The poem is also, in my opinion, an effective rebuttal to the Puritan
critique of the Emersonian lifestyle. Of course, this subject matter is the most apparent quality of the
work. Puritanism as an ethical code is quick to condemn what it sees as sinful, and even quicker to
condemn laziness. But, as Emerson so successfully puts it, his activities are not laziness. He is not
sitting idly, but instead embracing nature, because nature holds dually divinity and knowledge. In
the first three opening stanzas, he opens defensively, emphasizing the thought that he is both putting
into and getting out of his life. A clever bit of personification tells that his flowers come loaded
home with his thoughts, and a metrically superb fourth stanza reveals the value that Emerson finds
in nature – a secret history, told by the birds. He ends with a powerful metaphor, showing both the
source and value of his art (the first, nature, the second, the fruits of nature) at once. It is further
testament to his skill, I think, to write so persuasively while still writing simply, though others may
be critical of this straightforwardness. Perhaps the greatest feature of this work is not content, or
style, however, but instead the overarching motif of dichotomy. Throughout the
Get more content on StudyHub.Vip
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Essay on Objections and Rebuttals
Objections and Rebuttals Whenever a customer has an objection to the offer or price, the problem is
not that offer or the price it is actually that we as advocates have failed to build enough value in the
product to justify the price. So in actuality the reason for the objection more often than not is that the
customer is telling us that they are not willing to pay $19.95/$24.99 at this moment. The best way to
combat this is to use an intelligent and informed rebuttal, do this by keeping the conversation going
don't get flustered or aggravated Listen Think & Respond. Show empathy with the customer let
them know you are here to solve their problem, remember we have to make the customers
objections seem miniscule and offer a reasonable
...show more content...
It's a win win situation you can't loose with this offer." If the customer still says they don't have a
card we have to give them every option available such as "Is there someone there that understands
what your going through that could let you use their card and you could give them the cash?" or "Is
there someone that you can call to help you out with this I don't mind holding while we figure this
out?" This particular objection can seem tough at first again DONT GET FRUSTRATED display
your dedication in finding a solution for the customer. Objection: "I'm going to think about it" this
particular objection should make our blood boil. What's to think about after talking to a
knowledgeable advocate such as yourself, Right? Rebuttal: " I totally understand but don't you agree
that the best way to think about this product is to actually use it in your home and get real time
results, because that is exactly what this Risk–Free promotion is about" or "I totally understand but
let's be honest with ourselves are you really going to go home and think about having clear skin? We
all know life is hectic and putting this off will only make that clear and healthy skin be further out of
your reach we are halfway there its time to take control" remember some of these customers are
very indecisive we need to be the deciding factor in the phone call and we do this by displaying
confidence in our rebuttals. Objection: "I need to talk to" this is usually just the
Get more content on StudyHub.Vip
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Rebuttal Mearsheimer's Core Assumptions
Core Assumptions
Realist presumptions are based on an anarchic system vested in the interest of the individual states
through their own national interest. The state is expressed as rational and unitary actors; the main
actor making rational decisions as a whole on behalf of the state. Power is hailed above all else and
morals are irrelevant when the security of the state is at risk.
On the other hand, liberalists prefer cooperation and collaboration where war is a last resort. They
consider human nature to be good in itself and that social progress can be made through moral and
material improvements. They believe in a hierarchic system where power is not commutable. State
and non–state actors are needed in the world of politics, wealth is also viewed as important when
it
...show more content...
His thesis centers on the overbearing pressure the West has placed on expanding NATO and how it
is slowing trying to take more control. Mearsheimer explains that Russia's action were to be
expected given the ongoing encroachment. He finds Russia taking part of Ukraine justified given
their continued fears of their boarders being compromised. Throughout the article he emphasis the
danger of NATO expanding and how it has given reason for Russia to be on guard.
Sestanovich and Mcfaul rebuttal Mearsheimer's thesis with their own by explaining that other
contributing factors that have surrounded the crisis. They state many flaws in his writing and pose
what they attribute to be the more likely possibilities. They point out the numerous interactions and
cooperation that were present before the incident, such as signing the New Start treaty, supporting
the UN Security Council sanctions against Iran, and other events. They identify Russia's aggression
has grown from within, due to their own internal political dynamics and not from NATO
enlargement.
Authors'
Get more content on StudyHub.Vip
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Rebuttal For Refugees Essay
Rebuttal While offering help to refugees is necessary, caution should be taken on the
appropriateness of the immigrants. Individuals proposing that employees should be accepted in any
country fail to present reliable evidence to justify their claims. In fact, issues arise when the aspect
of peace raises questions among the locals. Fundamentally, accepting immigrants from war–torn
areas into the U.S. is a way of fulfilling the moral obligation (Hansel 15). Besides, it saves
individuals from brutal death and the disastrous outcomes of battle. Equally, it would be shameful
for a well–developed country with many resources such as America to just sit back and watch as
people suffer in front of their eyes knowing that they can offer assistance.
...show more content...
is subject to debate. Firstly, the availability of cheap labor reduces the wages which high schools of
Native American dropout get (Tichenor 11). Most refugees perform the difficult tasks that the well–
educated citizens cannot undertake since they readily accept low wages. Since the labor intensive
tasks do not require sophisticated skills, school dropouts find them as the best opportunities for them
to acquire a salary. However, due to the benefits offered to the refugees already working there, the
Americans have no option but accept the low wages. Even though the U.S. fulfills its humanitarian
responsibility by giving homage to refugees, it would be unethical to do so at the cost of the natives.
The danger imposed by the acceptance of immigrants from regions which face terrorism is a critical
issue subject to questions. Although the U.S. government screens its refugees, it does not warrant
the innocence of the foreigners (Hansel 18). It is possible for terrorists to invade the borders of
America in the name of seeking refuge from wars in their countries. Similarly, if allowing
immigrants into the nation triggers anxiety among the locals, it is not
Get more content on StudyHub.Vip
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Rebuttal: End of Men
"Be sure to check your sources to make sure they are reliable resources" as my High School English
teach would constantly remind me. I believe that is important regardless of what level one may be in
their writing acumen. In the article, The End of Men, I see that Hanna Rosin have many out dated
facts and fails to realize the ever changing world has changing opinions. Rosin should have checked
her sources and be more specific with her details, but that would have been to the detriment of her
argument. Hanna Rosin makes a claim that the reign of men is over and is no longer dominant in the
postindustrial era. Rosin argues the point that women are dominating the workforce and presents
statements such as "Men dominate just two of the 15 job
...show more content...
The creation of this agency is centered on one goal, to promote gender equality around the world.
The key in the mission is the promotion of gender equality, this is not only in the U.S., but all over
the world; this can best explain why so many may be confused.
If there is gender equality, evidently there would be an increase in women's wages, scholarships for
women, women sports, etc. "Ms. Bachelet brings to this critical position a history of dynamic global
leadership, highly honed political skills and uncommon ability to create consensus and focus among
U.N. agencies and many partners in both the public and private sector," says U.N. Secretary–
General Ban Ki–moon to reporters, according to an unofficial U.N. transcript. "
United Nations
Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women" is the official name of the
organization.
Rosin argues that women exceeded men as a part of the U.S. labor force in 2009, but according to
Bureau of Labor Statistics, men have regained the jobs lost during the recession at a much faster
pace than women.
All in all, there is more being done to aid women in their struggles they have are still facing today.
With this aid by organization such as the "United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the
Empowerment of Women", there are many benefits that comes with this promotion; however, it is
not an excuse to make false
Get more content on StudyHub.Vip
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Rebuttal Outline Essay
REBUTTAL FORM OF PERSUASION The purpose of this paper is to argue against those
perpetrators who are committing human rights violations against an oppressed group of people who
are unable to defend themselves against the abuses. To defend the victims, you must know why and
how the perpetrators are oppressing the group of victims and why these abuses are wrong. Your
paper will be organized according to the rebuttal format for persuasion. This paper is organized the
same way your persuasive paper last year was organized. Make sure you follow the form below for
this paper. This format is required; it is not an option. Even though there are many forms of
persuasion, we are learning the rebuttal format. I. Introduction a. Tell
...show more content...
They support your position. This is where you make your strongest case. i. Present an argument in
support of your position. Prove it by using 1. facts to show proof by induction 2. syllogisms for
deduction 3. examples 4. reasons 5. quotes ii. Present an argument in support of your position. Prove
it by using the above. iii. Present an argument in support of your position. Prove it by using the
above. III. Conclusion a. Restate your position on the issue. b. Conclude with an emotional appeal
for your position. What will happen if we don't listen to your suggestions? Predict the future for
your victims. c. AND/OR give your readers a call to action. What should they be doing to resolve
this issue? IV. Works cited a. Evidence should be cited in your text. See the MLA Stylebook for
help. b. Follow MLA style for creating your works cited page. c. Don't forget to cite all Internet
sources. V. Essay Parameters a. Essay Length: 1200–1600 words (not including work cited) b.
Number of arguments: At least three rebuttal arguments and one defense. c. Number of CITED
sources: At least three different kinds of credible sources (Example: a website, a magazine, a
newspaper) d. Due Dates: See Angel Reminders Use the vocabulary of your topic. Choose words
that have emotional connotation to help your cause. Create an interesting and original introduction
and conclusion. Try to use rhetorical
Get more content on StudyHub.Vip
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Examples Of Rebuttal On Mr Geraci
Rebuttal on Conference Documentation with Mr. Geraci and Mrs. Davis on 8/21/17
When Mr. Richard was unload his bus on 8/16/17 with his stop signs out at PVM to go get another
load of students another bus drove around him, while he was unloading. After he left all the buses
started unload their students and the same bus driver started back up her bus with students all around
her bus. That evening I asked Mr. Geraci what can we do about the safety issues with that bus driver
and he told me in front of 4 other bus driver. That she is going to have a hit a student before
anything will get done. I told Mr. Geraci that was wrong and he told me to call Mr. Yates. So, I call
Mr. Yates. Me and him had words and he got very ugly with me so I told
Get more content on StudyHub.Vip
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Rebuttal Essay on "Needed: A License to Drink"
"Needed: A License to Drink" is an essay written by Mike Brake. In this essay, Brake explains why
he thinks people need a license to drink. He has had family members die from alcohol related events
and believes they might still be alive if a license was required to drink. Alcohol is related to many
deaths and alcoholism is a disease that affects many people. "It causes more than 19,000 auto
fatalities each year, it is responsible for more than a third of deaths from drowning and fire"
(Brake135). Brake mentions that doctors have to report certain sexually transmitted diseases
. He
think they should have to report alcoholism as well. Also, licenses for hunting, guns, and
...show
more content...
If people lose their license, that does not mean they will not be able to get alcohol. If people want
alcohol, they will get it. "Iowa's 21–year–old legal–drinking age applies to everyone – patrons,
agents, employees and the licensee's family members
" (State of Iowa Alcoholic Beverages
Division). This cite is credible because it contain all the information about the drinking laws in
Iowa. I do not drink much and my parents would never buy me alcohol while I am still younger than
21, but I have never had any problem getting alcohol if I want it. Generally, my friends just get it for
me. They do not seem to be too concerned about the law either, because many of them have just
recently turned 21. I can not think of any one who has had trouble getting alcohol if he or she wants
it. I do not see a major problem with that unless driving or some other very potentially dangerous
event comes into play.
Another problem would be the fact that this has been attempted before, in a different manner.
Alcohol Prohibition in the 1920's had an unexpected outcome.
The lessons of Prohibition remain important today. They apply not only to the
debate over the war on drugs but also to the mounting efforts to drastically
reduce access to alcohol and tobacco and to such issues as censorship and bans
on insider trading, abortion, and gambling. Although consumption of alcohol
fell at the beginning of Prohibition, it subsequently increased
Get more content on StudyHub.Vip
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help